The anatomic basis of the internal mammary artery perforator flap: a cadaver study

Treatment of trunk defects using perforator flaps: A case series introducing suprascapular artery perforator flap

This case series explores the efficacy of freestyle perforator flaps, including the newly introduced suprascapular artery perforator flap (SSAP), in reconstructing trunk defects. Over a five-year period, 24 perforator flap procedures were performed on 19 patients, primarily for defect reconstruction after skin tumor and ulcer resections. Flap design was customized using preoperative doppler ultrasound and they were then transferred to defects in a V-Y or propeller fashion. The most frequently utilized flaps were the dorsal intercostal artery perforator (DICAP) flap and the lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap. Notably, SSAP flaps were successfully employed for shoulder defects resulting from squamous cell carcinoma resections. Complications occurred in 29 % of cases, including seroma evacuation, hematoma, and wound dehiscence, with one patient experiencing severe liver failure post-surgery. The versatility of perforator-based reconstruction was demonstrated through the combination of DICAP and LAP flaps for large trunk defects. Additionally, internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) and lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flaps were utilized for parasternal and infraclavicular defects, respectively. The introduction of the SSAP flap expands the options for dorsal shoulder area reconstruction, offering faster healing and superior cosmetic results compared to traditional methods like secondary intention healing or skin grafting. Although this study showcases promising outcomes, further research is warranted to validate the effectiveness of SSAP flaps and to explore their applications in a broader patient population.

Internal mammary artery perforator-based plug flap

INTRODUCTION

Various oncoplastic techniques have emerged over the years to preserve breast cosmesis and symmetry without compromising the principles of tumor excision. One of the newer techniques for breast volume replacement to achieve symmetry and cosmesis is the use of fascio-cutaneous pedicled chest wall perforator flaps or local perforator flaps (CWPF).

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of reconstruction with internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP)-based plug flap to fill the infero-medial defect caused by a tumor close to skin, with visible retraction.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

A 52 years old woman, with an extensive palpable mass (3 cm) in the lower medial quadrant of the right breast, the tumor was close to skin, with visible retraction. The patient has small and round breasts, without ptosis.

CONCLUSION

In this situation and when there is skin that needs to be removed, reconstruction can be done with a pedicle flap skin paddle; the IMAP flap is an ideal donor site in these cases. It is a safe flap with good vascularization and offers a great cosmetic result.

A breast sharing technique using the pedicled IMAP flap for delayed breast reconstruction and contralateral symmetrising mammaplasty: A case series and evolution of the surgical technique in selected patients

INTRODUCTION

The 'breast-sharing' procedure uses the disposable tissue as a flap to reconstruct the post-mastectomy defect. This enables simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral symmetrisation without additional donor site morbidity. However, controversies related to the oncological safety of this procedure have prevented its widespread uptake. We aim to present this technique based on a pedicled internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap and discuss its technical feasibility and oncological safety.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 2013 and May 2022, a series of 10 consecutive patients underwent a breast-sharing procedure using the pedicled IMAP flap for breast reconstruction. Clinical and surgical aspects of the breast-sharing procedure were analysed.

RESULTS

In all the cases, the breast-sharing technique allowed for simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral breast symmetrisation. Immediate complications included two total venous congestions and one hematoma. Three flaps had distal flap congestion. One flap required debridement and local flap reconstruction. All flaps required fat grafting during the secondary procedures to improve breast symmetry. With an average follow-up of 5.6 years, there was no evidence of recurrent disease. All patients were satisfied to very satisfied with the aesthetic outcome of this reconstructive option.

CONCLUSIONS

The breast-sharing technique based on the IMAP flap combines breast reconstruction and contralateral symmetrisation with good aesthetic outcomes in selected patients. The flap has a high complication rate related to venous drainage. Flap design modification and using indocyanine green imaging may reduce venous congestion. A secondary venous micro-anastomosis at the axilla is highly recommended for persistent flap congestion. The reported incidence of contralateral breast cancer is low, and thus, the residual tissue obtained from the contralateral breast mammaplasty can be safely used for breast reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Use of Free Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flap Harvested With Minimally Invasive Approach for Facial Reconstruction: Report of Two Cases

The internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap has been widely used for chest wall and neck reconstruction. The color of its skin paddle closely resembles that of facial skin, making it attractive for facial reconstruction. However, there has been insufficient investigations reporting the use of free IMAP flap. Furthermore, even in such studies, somewhat invasive procedures, including rib cartilage resection, were employed to ensure sufficient pedicle length, potentially increasing donor morbidity. Our report presents two cases of successful facial defect reconstruction using a free IMAP flap harvested with minimal donor site damage, showing its feasibility. In the first case, a 48-year-old male underwent wide excision for a malignant melanoma on his right cheek, resulting in a 4 × 4.5 cm full-thickness defect. A free IMAP flap with a 2.5 cm pedicle, was harvested without rib cartilage resection, preserving IMA main trunk, and transferred with anastomosed to the angular vessels within the defect. The second patient presented with a 4.5 × 3.5 cm basal cell carcinoma on the left cheek, necessitating wide excision and leaving a 6 × 5 cm defect. A free IMAP flap was harvested with the same approach and successfully reconstructed the defect with connected to the superficial temporal vessels using vascular bridge. Both patients were discharged complication-free, with no recurrence during 24 and 15 months of follow-up, respectively. They were highly satisfied with the final skin color and texture outcomes. Harvesting a free IMAP flap while minimizing donor morbidity may offer an attractive option for facial reconstruction.

Reconstruction of the anterior chest wall using the internal mammary artery perforator flap (IMAP): About a series of 23 cases

BACKGROUND

The advent of propeller flaps has permitted new and less invasive coverage solutions for thoracic defects compared to conventional flaps. Through a retrospective analysis of our cases, we would like to show the advantages of the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap for anterior chest wall reconstruction.

METHODS

We included patients who underwent anterior chest wall reconstruction with an IMAP propeller flap in the Toulouse University Hospital's plastic surgery department from January 2019 to December 2022. The data were collected on patient data, skin defects, and flap characteristics.

RESULTS

Twenty-three IMAP flaps were realized to cover locoregional defects. The skin paddle size of the IMAP flap averaged 15.6cm long (12-20)×6.7cm wide (4-10). The average arc of rotation of the flap was 113.5° (range 70-140°). In 3 cases, the IMAP flap was performed with a superior epigastric artery perforator flap (SEAP). In 3 cases out of 23, the flap partially necrotized, requiring surgical revision. In 1 case, the flap was fully necrotized and had to be removed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our series of 23 IMAP flaps on thoracic reconstruction is one of the largest published to date. Our series shows that the IMAP flap offers a simple and reliable solution with minor donor site morbidity for reconstructing small to medium-sized defects in the medial and paramedian regions of the chest wall.

The internal mammary artery perforator flap in pharyngoesophageal, cervical tracheal, and cutaneous neck reconstruction

The internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap is an evolution of the deltopectoral flap that is harvested based upon a single perforator from the internal mammary artery. Its favorable characteristics include pliability as a fasciocutaneous flap, ease of harvest, and minimal donor site morbidity. In this paper, we report our harvest technique and the versatility of the IMAP flap for pharyngoesophageal, cervical tracheal, and cutaneous neck defects. We seek to highlight the IMAP as a useful regional reconstructive option in both the primary and salvage reconstructive setting. As such, this flap is an important option in the head and neck reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium.

Local Flaps in Breast-Conserving Surgery in Early Breast Cancer Patients: Armamentarium for Breast Surgeon

To describe the technique and outcome of local perforator arteries advancement flap in breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) in patient of early breast cancer as our initial experience and review of literature on it. Patients who underwent (BCS) with local perforator artery flap reconstruction were reviewed in terms of their clinical, surgical, and post-operative follow-up details after taking written and informed consent. We have described 4 patients of early breast cancer out of which one patient was post-NACT while 3 were for upfront BCS. We have performed LICAP in 2 patients, AICAP in 1 patient, and IMAP in one patient, depending on the location of primary tumors. None of the patients had any major or minor surgical complications in the post-operative period and drains were removed on post-operative day 2. All patients received post-operative radiotherapy and tolerated well without any loco-regional complications. Patients are in routine follow-up with cosmetic satisfaction without any local recurrence over 1 year. The main advantages of pedicled perforator flaps are well-vascularized tissue, spares underlying muscle leading to lesser donor site morbidity like muscle function and seroma formation, easily reach the breast area with good match in terms of skin and subcutaneous tissue, faster recovery, and shorter learning curve in comparison to free flaps. Knowledge and skill about these flaps will help surgeon to give better surgical outcomes and satisfaction to patients.

Breast Vascularization and Its Implication in Breast Reduction and Mastopexy Surgery: Anatomical Study

(1) Background: Breast reduction is one of the most frequently performed plastic surgeries in women worldwide. The Wise pattern breast reduction is one of the most frequent skin designs for this surgery. One key point of the surgery is to preserve a well-vascularized NAC by using different surgical pedicles. This study aims to test and update the anatomical knowledge of breast vascularization, the topographic and anatomical basis of the different surgical vascular pedicles, and the differences between the right and left sides. (2) Methods: A descriptive observational anatomical study was carried out on 15 breasts from 10 cryopreserved body donors. A dissection was performed by quadrants to know the affected arteries' origin in the different patterns. (3) Results: The largest and most frequently dissected internal mammary perforator artery was in the second intercostal space. A total of 44.9% of the dissected perforators are located in the upper inner quadrant, compared to 53.5% in the lower quadrants. (4) Conclusions: The upper inner quadrant alone has the most arterial perforators. In contrast, the sum of the two lower quadrants represents the greatest vascularization of the breast, with a small difference between both.

Surgical Delay of Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flaps for Total Autologous Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

When abdomen-based free flap reconstruction is contraindicated, the muscle-sparing thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap may be considered for total autologous breast reconstruction. The TDAP flap is often limited by volume and is prone to distal flap necrosis. We aim to demonstrate our experience combining the delay phenomenon with TDAP flaps for total autologous breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients presenting for autologous breast reconstruction between April 2021 and August 2023 were recruited for surgically delayed TDAP flap reconstruction when abdominally based free flap reconstruction was contraindicated because of previous abdominal surgery or poor perforator anatomy. We dissected the TDAP flap except for a distal skin bridge and then reconstructed the breast 1 to 7 days later. Data included flap dimensions (in centimeters × centimeters), delay time (in days), predelay and postdelay perforator caliber (in millimeters) and flow (in centimeters per second), operative time (in minutes), hospital length of stay (in days), complications/revisions, and follow-up time (in days).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients and 16 flaps were included in this study. Mean age and body mass index of patients were 55.9 ± 9.6 years and 30.1 ± 4.3 kg/m2, respectively. Average flap skin island length and width were 32.1 ± 3.3 cm (n = 8 flaps) and 8.8 ± 0.7 cm (n = 5 flaps), respectively. Beveled flap width reached 16.0 ± 2.2 cm (n = 3 flaps). Average time between surgical delay and reconstruction was 2.9 days, ranging from 1 to 7 days (n = 18 flaps). Mean predelay and postdelay TDAP vessel caliber and flow measured by Doppler ultrasound increased from 1.4 ± 0.3 to 1.8 ± 0.3 mm (P = 0.03) and 13.3 ± 5.2 to 43.4 ± 18.8 cm/s (P = 0.03), respectively (n = 4 flaps). Complications included 1 donor site seroma and 1 mastectomy skin flap necrosis. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 476 days (n = 17 operations).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate surgically delayed TDAP flaps as a viable option for total autologous breast reconstruction. Our series of flaps demonstrated increased perforator caliber and flow and enlarged volume capabilities and had no incidences of flap necrosis.

Utilization of the internal mammary perforators as the recipient vessels for microsurgical breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

The selection of reliable recipient vessels is essential for successful free tissue transfer. The use of internal mammary intercostal perforators (IMAPs), instead of the internal mammary vessels as the recipient vessels, has been described in breast reconstruction. Debates exist regarding the reliability of these perforators as recipient vessels because of their variability in location and caliber. The aim of this paper was to conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to determine the reliability of the IMAPs as recipient vessels.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed on the "PubMed," "Medline," "Ovid," and "Cochrane library" databases for articles published from January 1990 to March 2021. Exclusion criteria were non-English studies, reports with case number less than 5, cadaveric or animal studies, and studies with incomplete postoperative outcomes. The reliability of using IMAPs for breast reconstruction was determined by assessing the reported rates of partial or complete flap failure and other complications (fat necrosis, skin necrosis, and requirement for revision surgery).

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixteen cases in 13 studies were included for further analysis with more than 85% of the IMAPs suitable for anastomosis being located in the second and third intercostal spaces. Partial or total flap failure was reported in three of 316 patients (0.95%). The rate of other complications such as fat necrosis, skin necrosis, and requirement for revision surgery were all less than 5%.

CONCLUSION

With deliberate preoperative planning, delicate perioperative manipulation, and meticulous microvascular anastomosis, the internal mammary perforators can be used as reliable recipient vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction.

Perforator-Based Cross-Midline Flaps of the Trunk: A Paradigm Shift in Flap Design

BACKGROUND

The traditional design for truncal perforator flaps is ipsilateral without midline decussation. The presumed rationale is to minimize the risk of distal flap necrosis. In this article, the authors present their experience and results with contralateral truncal perforator flaps designed and raised crossing the midline.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 43 patients (25 men and 18 women) who underwent reconstructive surgery from 1984 to 2021 using a contralateral flap design crossing the midline in the anterior trunk and upper back. Considerations included pathology, location, and the dimensions of the defect and flap. Arithmetic and weighted means with their 95% confidence intervals were estimated to compare ipsilateral and contralateral techniques.

RESULTS

Contralateral flaps used included the internal mammary perforator flap ( n = 28) superficial superior epigastric artery flap ( n = 8), superior epigastric perforator flap ( n = 2), and the second or ninth dorsal intercostal artery perforator flap ( n = 5). All of these flaps, excluding the superficial superior epigastric artery flap, demonstrated length and coverage surface averages that were significantly greater than those of traditional ipsilateral flaps. However, with the contralateral superficial superior epigastric artery, both measures were statistically similar to those of traditional ipsilateral flaps.

CONCLUSION

The anatomical variation design suggests that the trunk midline is not a barrier and that perforator flaps in these two regions may be raised on different longitudinal axes without compromising vitality.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Contralateral internal mammary artery perforator flap for large inner chest wall defect repair and immediate breast reconstruction after excision of large malignant inner breast tumors

OBJECTIVES

Large breast tumor resection can cause chest wall defects that are difficult to close. A combination of oncoplastic techniques is required to repair chest wall defects and immediately reconstruct the breast. In this report, we present the use of the contralateral internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap to repair large chest wall defects and perform breast reconstruction for a series of patients.

METHODS

Between July 2013 and June 2020, 10 patients and 4 patients underwent chest wall defect repair and breast reconstruction, respectively, with contralateral IMAP flaps. The average body mass index was 26.9 kg/m2 (range: 21.5-33.7 kg/m2 ). Tumor sizes varied from 2.5 × 1.5 × 0.8 to 9.5 × 6.0 × 4.0 cm3 . Defect sizes ranged from 16 × 10 to 8 × 4 cm2 . All patients underwent multiple imaging examinations to exclude abnormalities. Primary outcomes included complete tumor resection and flap survival. Secondary outcomes included the BREAST-Q results and bilateral breast symmetry measurements.

RESULTS

All flaps exhibited good postoperative survival and were between 20 × 12 and 10 × 5 cm2 . Two patients experienced minor complications that did not influence outcomes. No obvious donor site complications were observed. The BREAST-Q results indicated favorable reconstructive efficacy, with "satisfaction with breasts," "physical well-being (chest)," and "satisfaction with the outcome" scores of 77.8 (range: 58-87), 83.2 (range: 77-89), and 80.1 (range: 70-88), respectively. No signs of tumor recurrence were observed during a median follow-up period of 53.5 months (range: 6-83 months). However, poor postoperative bilateral breast symmetry was observed (vertical extent: 0.63 [range: 0.36-0.88]; horizontal extent: 0.64 [range: 0.41-0.80]).

CONCLUSIONS

IMAP flaps are reliable options for chest wall defect repair and breast reconstruction for selected patients with locally advanced breast cancer and inner breast tumors. Despite poor postoperative bilateral breast symmetry, most patients reported excellent outcomes.

Robotics in Microsurgery and Supermicrosurgery

Microsurgery has changed the ability to perform highly precise and technical surgeries through the utilization of high-powered microscopes and specialized instruments to manipulate and repair anatomical structures as small as a few millimeters. Since the first human trials of robotic-assisted microsurgery in 2006, the expansion of microsurgery to supermicrosurgery (luminal diameter less than 1 mm) has enabled successful repair of previously inaccessible structures. Surgical robotic systems can offer two distinct operative advantages: (1) minimal access surgery-by entering body cavities through ports, flap harvest can be redesigned to affect a minimally invasive approach for flaps such as the rectus abdominis muscle, the latissimus flap, and the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap; and (2) precision-by eliminating physiologic tremor, improving ergonomics, increasing accessibility to difficult spaces, and providing motion scaling, precision is significantly enhanced. Robotic-assisted microsurgery is a promising application of robotics for the plastic surgeon and has played an important role in flap harvest, head and neck reconstruction, nerve reconstruction, gender-affirming surgery, and lymphatic reconstruction-all the while minimizing surgical morbidity. This article aims to review the history, technology, and application of microsurgery and supermicrosurgery in plastic surgery.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Internal Mammary Artery Perforators as Recipient Vessels

Recipient vessel selection is vital for successful autologous free-flap breast reconstruction. Internal mammary artery perforators have gained interest as a recipient vessel option. However, previous studies on their microsurgical safety and efficacy are limited and inconsistent. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of using internal mammary artery perforators as recipient vessels in breast reconstruction.

Methods

The protocol has been previously published in PROSPERO (CRD42020190020). The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PROSPERO databases were searched. Two independent reviewers evaluated the articles for inclusion in the study. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the MINORS instrument (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies).

Results

Of the 361 articles screened, 13 studies were included (313 patients with 318 flaps; 223 unilateral, 31 bilateral, mean average age 51.2 and mean BMI 27.8 ± 1.9). The mean overall success rate was 99.8%, the pooled surgical success rate was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 97%-100%], and the overall rate of complications was 11% (95% CI: 7%-18%). The most common complication was vascular-related to microanastomoses, with an incidence of 5% (95% CI: 2%-10%). The fat necrosis rate was 3% (95% CI: 2%-6%).

Conclusions

This study verified that internal mammary artery perforator vessels are reliable in breast reconstruction, with a high success rate and a relatively low complication rate. Moreover, in selected microsurgical breast reconstruction patients, internal mammary artery perforators may be the primary recipient vessel choice over the internal mammary artery or thoracodorsal vessels.

The shark flap: a modified internal mammary artery perforator flap for composite defects in head and neck reconstruction

This report describes a multi-vector variant of IMAP flap which allows to reconstruct composite head and neck defects. It was named the 'shark flap' because of its shape: a main body (the regular IMAP) and a superior 'fin' based on a randomic vascular pathway.

Regional pedicled flap salvage options for large head and neck defects: The old, the new, and the forgotten

Objectives

The objective of this article is to review options for regional pedicled reconstruction for large head and neck defects in a salvage setting.

Methods

Relevant regional pedicled flaps were identified and reviewed. Expert opinion and supporting literature were used to summarize and describe the available options.

Results

Specific regional pedicled flap options are presented including the pectoralis major flap, deltopectoral flap, supraclavicular flap, submental flap, latissimus flap, and trapezius flap.

Conclusions

Regional pedicled flaps are useful options in a salvage setting even for large defects and should be in the armamentarium of any reconstructive head and neck surgeon. Each flap option carries specific characteristics and considerations.

Vascular anatomy of the breast and its implications in the breast-sharing reconstruction technique

The most frequently described breast-sharing procedure consists in a pedicled technique where the transferred lower breast pole is based on the lower perforators of the internal mammary (IM) artery. The current article investigates the vascular supply of the breast and its surgical implications in breast-sharing reconstruction. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images of 55 patients (110 breasts) were retrospectively examined. A total of 473 branches of the IM, lateral thoracic (LT) and anterior intercostal (AI) arteries with a diameter greater than 0.5 mm were traced throughout their course in the breast. Distinct connections between the vessels were equally recorded. Although any vessel could vascularise any quadrant in the individual patient, blood supply to the lower quadrants came fundamentally from the AI arteries (76.2% of all the perforators). Lower IM branches (4th-5th) were seen to reach both lower quadrants in only 6.4% of the breasts, whereas LT branches did in 15.5%. In 86.4% of the breasts, at least a distinct AI perforator was seen to perfuse both lower quadrants. Well-defined connections between the IM and the LT arteries were observed in 41.8% of the breasts, always at or above the nipple-areola level. Other connections were far less common. Our study strongly indicates that the breast-sharing technique based on 4th-5th contralateral branches of the IM or LT arteries is unreliable in most patients. Given the unpredictable vascularization pattern in the lower breast pole, a preoperative imaging study is mandatory when the use of the contralateral breast is considered. Due to its accuracy, availability, and anatomical reliability, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance is the best technique in the preoperative evaluation of the breast-sharing reconstruction.

Modified Adipofascial Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flap for Secondary Esophagoplasty

Papillary thyroid carcinoma with esophageal invasion often requires simultaneous reconstruction after radical tumor resection. However, in a recurrent case, with the upper aerodigestive tract previously reconstructed by a free flap, the alternative option for secondary reconstruction still presents a great challenge for surgeons. Here, we describe a novel secondary cervical esophagoplasty technique using a modified adipofascial internal mammary artery perforator flap. The 2-month follow-up postoperatively showed satisfactory patency of the cervical esophagus. The modified adipofascial internal mammary artery perforator flap is a reliable and convenient technique, with better aesthetic results for secondary cervical esophageal reconstruction.

Matching the perforating branch of the internal thoracic artery and the deep inferior epigastric artery for breast reconstruction using multi-detector row computed tomography

PURPOSE

Matching the diameter of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and perforating branch (PB) of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) is important for arterial anastomosis during breast reconstruction using the DIEA flap. An anatomic investigation of these arteries was performed using multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Contrast-enhanced MDCT data of 50 women (aged 18-90 years) covering the neck to the groin were analyzed. The diameter of the PBs of the ITA at their origins from the first to the sixth intercostal space and of the DIEA 20 mm from the bifurcation of the external iliac artery were measured.

RESULTS

The mean diameters of the right and left DIEAs were 1.53 ± 0.263 mm and 1.53 ± 0.306 mm, respectively. The diameter of the PBs in the second and third intercoastal spaces was the same as the diameter of the DIEA, bilaterally.

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that anastomosis of the DIEA with PBs of the ITA in the second and third intercoastal spaces is optimal for DIEA flap grafting. Our results could contribute to making vascular anastomosis easier, thereby reducing the burden on both surgeons and patients.

Double-pedicle unaffected split-breast flap for unilateral breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

In some breast cancer patients with a contralateral unaffected hypertrophic and ptotic breast, autologous small-breast reconstruction with contralateral breast reduction is a good option. The current study is aimed to assess the efficacy of the double-pedicle unaffected split-breast (USB) flap harvested from the central half of the unaffected breast for unilateral breast reconstruction with contralateral transverse scar reduction mammoplasty.

METHODS

Between February 2003 and May 2020, 14 patients underwent breast reconstruction using the USB flap. The mean patient age was 59.1 (range: 48-76) years, and the mean body mass index was 24.2 (range: 19.5-33.3) kg/m² . This flap comprised half of the contralateral breast tissues with the 3rd or 4th internal mammary perforator (IMAP) and the lateral thoracic vessel (LTA/V). After USB flap elevation and LTA/V resection, flap perfusion from the IMAP was evaluated on indocyanine green (ICG) angiography. The medial pedicle USB flap was rotated 180° and was transferred to the affected site via the midline. The LTA/V was anastomosed to the recipient vessel to supercharge the distal part of the USB flap, which was then used for breast reconstruction. Then, the remaining contralateral upper and lower breast poles were used for transverse scar reduction mammoplasty.

RESULTS

The mean flap size was 13.3 × 26.9 (range: 9.5 × 22 to 16 × 29) cm. All flaps and reduced breasts survived without serious complications such as flap necrosis, although there was one patient with hematoma and one patient with hypertrophic scar. ICG revealed poor perfusion in the distal, lateral part of the flap, ranging from 22.0% to 48.5% of the overall flap area. Final aesthetic evaluation was high, with 11 cases (78.6%) being "good" or "excellent" and 3 cases (21.4%) that were either poor or fair. The mean follow-up period for the patients was 53.8 (range: 15-84) months, with none of the patients presenting second primary breast cancer or recurrence in both breasts.

CONCLUSION

USB flap breast reconstruction with contralateral reduction mammoplasty is a valuable option in breast cancer patients with a hypertrophic and ptotic breast.

Case Report: Revisiting the Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flap: Salvage Option for Circumferential Pharyngo-Esophageal Defects

Patients that present with pharyngeal strictures and pharyngocutaneous fistulas in the context of previous reconstruction and post-operative radiotherapy often report significant morbidity and reduction in quality of life. Reconstruction of such defects present a substantial clinical challenge requiring the importation of unirradiated vascularized tissue to facilitate healing in a friable, fibrotic, and vessel depleted tissue bed. The authors present a case report demonstrating an adaptation of the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap for reliable reconstruction of circumferential pharyngeal defects with primary tension free closure of the donor site. This technique avoids the use of free tissue transfer in a hostile, irradiated neck. The tubed IMAP flap is an excellent option, serving the purposes of reconstruction as well as addressing the patient's presenting issues of a chronic sinus and pharyngeal stricture inhibiting oral intake.

Autologous Unilateral Breast Reconstruction with Venous Supercharged IMAP-Flaps: A Step by Step Guide of the Split Breast Technique

Various techniques for breast reconstruction ranging from reconstruction with implants to free tissue transfer, with the disadvantage of either carrying a foreign body or dealing with donor site morbidity, have been described. In patients who had a unilateral mastectomy and offer a contralateral mamma hypertrophy a breast reconstruction can be performed with the excess tissue from the hypertrophic side using the split breast technique. Here a local internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap of the hypertrophic breast can be used for reconstruction avoiding the downsides of implants or a microsurgical reconstruction and simultaneously reducing the enlarged donor breast in order to achieve symmetry. Methods: Between April 2010 and February 2019 the split breast technique was performed in five patients after mastectomy due to breast cancer. Operating time, length of stay, complications and the need for secondary operations were analyzed and the surgical technique including flap supercharging were described in detail. Results: All five IMAP-flaps survived and an aesthetically pleasant result could be achieved using the split breast technique. An average of two secondary corrections to achieve better symmetry were necessary after each breast reconstruction. Complications included venous flap congestion, partial flap necrosis and asymmetry. No breast cancer recurrence was recorded. An overall approval of the surgical technique among patients was observed. Conclusions: The use of the contralateral breast for unilateral total breast reconstruction represents an additional highly useful technique for selected patients, is safe and reliable results can be achieved. Although this technique is carried out as a single-stage procedure, including breast reduction and reconstruction at the same time, secondary operations may be necessary to achieve superior symmetry and a satisfying aesthetic result. Survival of the IMAP-flaps can be improved by venous supercharging of the flaps onto the thoracoepigastric vein.

Reconstruction of a deep sternal wound with exposed pericardium using an IMAP propeller flap: A case report

The results of this case suggest that the IMAP propeller flap may be a viable and safe option for deep sternal wound reconstruction with minimal donor-site morbidity.

Clinical Application of the Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Adipofascial Flap

Background:

Skin ulcers on the anterior chest wall are caused mainly by radiation therapy for breast cancer and anterior mediastinitis after thoracotomy, and they are often refractory. Some muscle flaps are commonly used for anterior chest wall reconstruction, but muscle flaps accompany high invasion. We used the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) adipofascial flap and IMAP skin flap for the anterior chest wall reconstruction.

Methods:

We examined the IMAPs using a handheld Doppler device and contrast-enhanced computerized tomography preoperatively. Each flap was designed based on the location of the IMAP and the size of the flap was dependent on the coverage required by the size and location of the skin ulcer. The location of the IMAPs functioned as the pivot point of the flap and the flap was flipped or swung on the defect.

Results:

We used IMAP adipofascial flap for 2 cases and IMAP skin flap for 1 case. In those 3 cases, we could elevate the flap with no complications even after the internal mammary artery had been harvested. There was no recurrence of the skin ulcer or wound infection after the operation.

Conclusions:

In this study, we reported 3 cases of skin ulcer on the anterior chest wall reconstructed with the IMAP adipofascial and skin flap. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of the IMAP flap as an adipofascial flap. The IMAP adipofascial flap accompanies less invasion than muscle flaps and the surgical procedure is relatively easy. The IMAP adopofascial flap is considered as one of the effective means for anterior chest wall reconstruction.

Expanding the use of internal mammary artery perforators as a recipient vessel in free tissue transfer: An anatomical analysis by computed tomography angiography in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The internal mammary artery (IMA) perforator has assumed recent prominence as recipient vessels in free autologous breast reconstruction. However, anatomical understanding is unclear, due to limited cadaver and clinical studies. We evaluated the usability of these vessels by evaluating perforator size, dominance, laterality, interspace location, and relationship with breast volume.

METHODS

A retrospective review assessed 197 female patients with breast cancer who had undergone computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest wall. The average age and body mass index (BMI) of patients was 49.0 ± 6.5 years and 24.2 ± 5 .8 kg/m² , respectively. The average volume of breasts was 437 ± 190 mL. Our analysis focused on the anatomy of IMA perforator and its relationship to volume and BMI.

RESULTS

A total of 377 hemi-chest evaluations were performed. Most patients (95.5%) had sizeable perforating artery identified on CTA. Among all sizeable perforators identified, the mean diameter of the most dominant arterial perforator was 1.8 ± 0 .8 mm. The right hemi-chest had significantly larger perforators than the left (1.9 ± 0 .9 mm vs. 1.7 ± 0 .7 mm, p = 0.002). The first intercostal space (ICS) had a slightly greater of perforators than second ICS (34.6% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.172). However, second ICS had a greater number of most dominant perforators compared to first ICS (38.9% vs. 34.7%, p = 0.357). Perforators from first ICS emerge medial to the sternal edge and breast footprint. When dividing groups with 0-1 versus 2-3 reliable perforators, breast volume was significantly higher in the later (422.0 mL vs. 461.2 mL, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

These results are expected to encourage microsurgeons to use the IMA perforator by providing a clear anatomical roadmap.

Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

Thoracodorsal vessels (TDVs) and internal mammary vessels (IMVs) have both been widely employed as recipient vessels for use in free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps. However, whether TDVs or IMVs are preferable as recipient vessels for autologous breast reconstruction with a free MS-TRAM flap remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes when TDVs were used as recipient vessels to those obtained when IMVs were used as recipient vessels for autologous breast reconstruction with a free MS-TRAM flap.

METHODS

A retrospective matched-cohort study was performed. We retrospectively reviewed data collected from patients who underwent a free MS-TRAM flap for autologous breast reconstructions after mastectomy between March 2003 and June 2013. After a one-to-one matching using age, 100 autologous breast reconstructions were selected in this study. Of the 100 breast reconstructions, 50 flaps were anastomosed to TDVs and 50 to IMVs. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes including operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and aesthetic score were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in patient demographics and clinical outcomes, including the complication rates and aesthetic scores. There were no major complications such as total or partial flap loss in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study demonstrate that both TDVs and IMVs were safe and efficient as recipient vessels in terms of the complication rates and aesthetic outcomes.

Breast-sharing Technique in a Unilateral Mastectomy Patient

Breast reconstruction patients frequently desire consecutive or simultaneous contralateral breast reduction. When combining the requirements of both autologous breast reconstruction with symmetrizing breast reduction, a 2-staged contralateral pedicled breast sharing is a dignified alternative. We present a 60-year-old woman with a radical mastectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. On the contralateral side, she had a hypertrophic breast with a desire for reduction mammaplasty. A 2-stage procedure for breast sharing was planned. A preoperative computed tomography scan, to assess the status of the fourth intercostal mammary perforator (IMAP), was performed. After the first procedure, symmastia was evident. Water-assisted liposuction and quilting sutures to the sternal periosteum were applied in a second procedure to correct the symmastia. We preserved the fourth intercostal perforator to provide optimal vascularization. Water-assisted liposuction and quilting sutures were used to correct the remaining symmastia and contributed to the aesthetics of both breasts. A drawback of this procedure is the need for multiple stages. Furthermore, oncological safety should be considered and surgeons should be aware of the risk for venous congestion. Breast-sharing could be a feasible alternative reconstruction for women seeking unilateral breast reconstruction with contralateral breast hypertrophy. It reduces the need for free-flap surgery and subsequent donor-site morbidity. Considering the fact that the contralateral breast must be of significant size, the indication for this type of reconstruction is limited.

[Effectiveness of internal mammary artery perforator propeller flap repair combined with radiotherapy for chest keloid in female patients]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) propeller flap repair combined with radiotherapy for chest keloid in female patients.

Methods

Between January 2015 and December 2016, 15 female patients with chest keloids were treated, aged 28-75 years (mean, 45.2 years). The keloid disease duration was 1-28 years (median, 6 years). The causes of disease included secondary keloid caused by folliculitis in 7 cases, cardiac surgery in 4 cases, skin abrasion in 2 cases, mosquito bite in 1 case, and unknown etiology in 1 case. The size of keloid ranged from 5 cm×3 cm to 17 cm×6 cm. The IMAP propeller flaps were used to repair the defects after chest keloid excision. The size of flaps ranged from 7 cm×5 cm to 14 cm×8 cm. The donor sits were sutured directly. The routine radiotherapy was performed after operation.

Results

All IMAP propeller flaps survived well, and the donor site healed by first intention. All 15 patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 16 months). No telangiectasia or incision dehiscence occurred. No radiation-related carcinogenesis occurred during follow-up. The patients were satisfied with the breast shape and symmetry after operation. The symptoms of pain and itching were relieved at keloid area in 13 cases (86.7%), with no obvious recurrence of keloid at the donor site and the primary site. Only 2 cases (13.3%) recurred and were treated with continuously conservative treatment.

Conclusion

IMAP propeller flap is an ideal reconstruction method for repairing the wounds after chest keloid excision in female patients, which can preserve the good breast shape. The IMAP propeller flap repair combined with early postoperative radiotherapy can effectively reduce the recurrence rate, and the effectiveness is satisfactory.

Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneous Flap With a Midline Sternal Skin Paddle for Head and Neck Reconstruction: A New Design

PURPOSE

The pectoralis major musculocutaneous (PMMC) flap is a classic flap for head and neck reconstruction, relatively unpopular with the advancement of microsurgery and free flaps. The classic parasternal paddle design provided a thick flap with a small rotation arch leaving objectionable scarring. Our new symmetric midsternal design overcomes these problems.

METHODS

Chart review was done from the years 2000 to 2017. Flap skin paddle was placed symmetrically on both sides of the midsternal line. The pectoralis major (PM) muscle and aponeurosis were attached in the lateral half of the skin paddle. Most of PM muscle was elevated with the thoracoacromial vessel and dissected to the main trunk, where the PM muscle was cut and used for bulk. The flap was transferred to the neck and lower mandibular area. The flap was inset either supraclavicularly, covering the anterior neck, or subclavicularly, for intraoral/maxillary defects.

RESULTS

Eight patients underwent head and neck reconstruction using the new design of PMMC flap between the years 2000 and 2017. The etiologies of the defect were radiation necrosis in 3 patients, repair of cutaneous fistulas in 3, recurrent hypopharyngeal cancer in 1, and recurrent tongue cancer in 1 patient. There were no flap losses or major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

With the advancement of free-flap techniques, the classic flaps have become less popular. Our new design supplements the PMMC flap by providing a thin pliable flap with a long pedicle and rotation arc, allowing a combination of different types of flaps to cover composite head and neck defects, especially in cases that lack a reliable recipient vessel due to radiation.

Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flap for Immediate Volume Replacement Following Wide Local Excision of Breast Cancer

Background

Breast-conserving therapy is defined as a breast-conserving wide local excision (WLE) of a mammary tumour combined with postoperative radiotherapy. Immediate restoration of the mammary shape by use of breast reduction techniques (volume displacement) or tissue replacement techniques (volume replacement) is gaining popularity to prevent breast malformation.

Methods

To date, using the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap has been suggested for immediate volume replacement after WLE, but has never been evaluated in a published study.

Results

We applied this flap in 12 women (mean age, 56.1 years) after WLE (mean specimen weight, 46.5 g) of the medial aspect of the breast. Over a median follow-up of 35.3 months (standard deviation, 1.2 months), 4 women needed repeated surgery for dog-ear correction of the donor site.

Conclusions

In our experience, the use of an IMAP flap was a reliable technique with good cosmetic outcomes after oncoplastic reconstruction. In this series, donor site revision often proved necessary initially, but we showed that this may easily be prevented.

Computed tomography angiographic study of internal mammary perforators and their use as recipient vessels for free tissue transfer in breast reconstruction

CONTEXT

The internal mammary artery perforator vessels (IMPV) as a recipient in free flap breast reconstruction offer advantages over the more commonly used thoracodorsal vessels and the internal mammary vessels (IMV).

AIMS

This study was designed to assess the anatomical consistency of the IMPV and the suitability of these vessels for use as recipients in free flap breast reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from ten randomly selected female patients who did not have any chest wall or breast pathology but had undergone a computed tomography angiography (CTA) for unrelated diagnostic reasons from April 2013 to October 2013 were analysed. Retrospective data of seven patients who had undergone mastectomy for breast cancer and had been primarily reconstructed with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flap transfer using the IMPV as recipient vessels were studied.

RESULTS

The CTA findings showed that the internal mammary perforator was consistently present in all cases bilaterally. In all cases, the dominant perforator arose from the upper four intercostal spaces (ICS) with the majority (55%) arising from the 2^nd ICS. The mean distance of the perforators from the sternal border at the level of pectoralis muscle surface on the right side was 1.86 cm (range: 0.9-2.5 cm) with a mode value of 1.9 cm. On the left side, a mean of 1.77 cm (range: 1.5-2.1 cm) and a mode value of 1.7 cm were observed. Mean perforator artery diameters on the right and left sides were 2.2 mm and 2.4 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Though the internal mammary perforators are anatomically consistent, their use as recipients in free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction eventually rests on multiple variables.

The Deltopectoral Flap Revisited: The Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flap

Pharyngo-esophageal and tracheostomal defects pose a challenge in head and neck reconstruction whenever microanastomosis is extremely difficult in hostile neck that is previously dissected and irradiated. The deltopectoral (DP) flap was initially described as a pedicled flap for such reconstruction with acceptable postoperative results. A major drawback is still that the DP flap is based on 3 perforator vessels leading to a decreased arc of rotation. The DP flap also left contour deformities in the donor site. The internal mammary artery perforator flap was described as a refinement of the deltopectoral flap. It is a pedicled fasciocutaneous flap based on a single perforator, with comparable and reliable blood supply compared with the DP flap, giving it the benefit of having a wide arc of rotation. It is both thin and pliable, with good skin color match and texture. The donor site can be closed primarily with no esthetic deformity and minimal morbidity. The procedure is relatively simple and does not require microvascular expertise. In this report, the authors describe a patient in whom bilateral internal mammary artery perforator flaps were used for subtotal pharyngo-esophageal reconstruction and neck resurfacing. The flaps healed uneventfully bilaterally with no postoperative complications.

New Possible Surgical Approaches for the Submammary Adipofascial Flap Based on Its Arterial Supply

Introduction. Submammary adipofascial flap (SMAF) is a valuable option for replacement of the inferior portion of the breast. It is particularly useful for reconstruction of partial mastectomy defects. It is also used to cover breast implants. Most surgeons base this flap cranially on the submammary skin crease, reflecting it back onto the breast. The blood vessels supplying this flap are not well defined, and the harvest of the flap may be compromised due to its uncertain vascularity. The aim of the work was to identify perforator vessels supplying SMAF and define their origin, site, diameter, and length. Materials and Methods. The flap was designed and dissected on both sides in 10 female cadavers. SMAF outline was 10 cm in length and 7 cm in width. The flap was raised carefully from below upwards to identify the perforator vessels supplying it from all directions. These vessels were counted and the following measurements were taken using Vernier caliper: diameter, total length, length inside the flap, and distance below the submammary skin crease. Conclusions. The perforators at the lateral part of the flap took origin from the lateral thoracic, thoracodorsal, and intercostal vessels. They were significantly larger, longer, and of multiple origins than those on the medial part of the flap and this suggests that laterally based flaps will have better blood supply, better viability, and more promising prognosis. Both approaches, medially based and laterally based SMAF, carry a better prognosis and lesser chance for future fat necrosis than the classical cranially based flap.

Internal mammary artery perforator propeller flap for contralateral mastectomy defect: A case report

The internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap can be used as either loco-regional or free flap, and provides thin flexible coverage for defects of the chest wall and cervical regions. In this report, we present a bilateral mastectomy case in which the left mastectomy defect was closed with an IMAP propeller flap harvested from the right breast. Our patient with a history of left breast conservation therapy was diagnosed invasive ductal carcinoma in her left breast 14 years later. On physical examination, the patient's left breast displayed the stigmata of radiotherapy including dark discoloration and firmness to palpation, compared to contralateral pendulous breast. After bilateral mastectomy, an IMAP flap with a size of 26 cm × 11 cm was harvested from right chest and was transposed 180 degrees clockwise in a propeller fashion to the left mastectomy defect without any tension. The flap survived without any complication and the patient was free of recurrence or metastases during the follow-up of 18 months. The patient was satisfied with the outcome. IMAP propeller flap could be harvested safely to the anterior axillary fold in the subcutaneous fat plane. It may provide a large skin paddle especially in large breasted women. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:507-510, 2016.

Deltopectoral flap in the era of microsurgery

Background. Our study aimed to review the role of deltopectoral (DP) flap as a reconstructive option for defects in the head and neck region in the microvascular era. Methods. All patients who received DP flap reconstruction surgery at the Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, between 1999 and 2011 were recruited. Demographic data, indications for surgery, defect for reconstruction, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Results. Fifty-four patients were included. All but two patients were operated for reconstruction after tumour resection. The remaining two patients were operated for necrotizing fasciitis and osteoradionecrosis. The majority of DP flaps were used to cover neck skin defect (63.0%). Other reconstructed defects included posterior pharyngeal wall (22.2%), facial skin defect (11.1%), and tracheal wall (3.7%). All donor sites were covered with partial thickness skin graft. Two patients developed partial flap necrosis at the tip and were managed conservatively. The overall flap survival rate was 96.3%. Conclusions. Albeit the technical advancements in microvascular surgery, DP still possesses multiple advantages (technical simplicity, reliable axial blood supply, large size, thinness, and pliability) which allows it to remain as a useful, reliable, and versatile surgical option for head and neck reconstruction.

A clinical anatomic study of internal mammary perforators as recipient vessels for breast reconstruction

Background

Partially resecting ribs of the recipient site to facilitate easy anastomosis of the internal mammary vessels to free flaps during breast reconstruction can cause chest wall pain or deformities. To avoid this, the intercostal perforating branches of the internal mammary vessels can be used for anastomosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the location and size of the internal mammary perforator vessels based on clinical intraoperative findings and to determine their reliability as recipient vessels for breast reconstruction with microsurgical free tissue transfer.

Methods

Twelve patients were preoperatively screened for the presence of internal mammary perforators using Doppler tracing. After modified radical mastectomy was performed by a general surgeon, the location and size of the internal mammary perforator vessels were microscopically investigated. The external diameter was examined using a vessel-measuring gauge from a mechanical coupling device, and the distance from the mid-sternal line to the perforator was also measured.

Results

The largest arterial perforator averaged 1.5 mm, and the largest venous perforator averaged 2.2 mm. Perforators emerging from the second intercostal space had the largest average external diameter; the second intercostal space also had the largest number of perforators arising from it. The average distance from the mid-sternal line to the perforator was 20.2 mm.

Conclusions

Internal mammary perforators presented consistent and reliable anatomy in this study. Based on these results, the internal mammary perforators appear to have a suitable diameter for microvascular anastomosis and should be considered as an alternative recipient vessel to the internal mammary vessel.