Local heat preconditioning in skin sparing mastectomy: a pilot study

Preconditioning Strategies for Improving the Outcome of Fat Grafting

Autologous fat grafting is a common procedure in plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery. However, it is frequently associated with an unpredictable resorption rate of the graft depending on the engraftment kinetics. This, in turn, is determined by the interaction of the grafted adipose tissue with the tissue at the recipient site. Accordingly, preconditioning strategies have been developed following the principle of exposing these tissues in the pretransplantation phase to stimuli inducing endogenous protective and regenerative cellular adaptations, such as the upregulation of stress-response genes or the release of cytokines and growth factors. As summarized in the present review, these stimuli include hypoxia, dietary restriction, local mechanical stress, heat, and exposure to fractional carbon dioxide laser. Preclinical studies show that they promote cell viability, adipogenesis, and angiogenesis, while reducing inflammation, fibrosis, and cyst formation, resulting in a higher survival rate and quality of fat grafts in different experimental settings. Hence, preconditioning represents a promising approach to improve the outcome of fat grafting in future clinical practice. For this purpose, it is necessary to establish standardized preconditioning protocols for specific clinical applications that are efficient, safe, and easy to implement into routine procedures.

Thermal preconditioning can reduce the incidence of intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries

Intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries (IAPIs) occur frequently among patients who undergo surgical procedures that last longer than 3 h. Several studies indicated that heat shock proteins (HSPs) play an important role in the protection of stress-induced damages in skin tissues. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the potential preventive effect of thermal preconditioning (TPC) on IAPIs in surgical patients and rats and to identify the differentially expressed HSP genes in response to the above treatment. TPC was performed on one group of hairless rats before the model of pressure injuries was established. Subsequently, the size of skin lesions was measured and the expression levels of mRNA and protein of HSPs of the pressured skin were detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), western blot, and immunohistochemical staining. For human studies, 118 surgical patients were randomly divided into the TPC group (n = 59) and the control group (n = 59), respectively. The temperature and pressure of sacral skin, as well as the incidence of pressure injury (PI) were detected and compared. In animal studies, TPC significantly reduced both the size and incidence of PI in rats on the second, third and fourth days post treatment. In addition, the expression levels of both mRNA and protein of HSP27 were increased in the TPC group, compared with the control group. Immunohistochemical staining showed that HSP27 was distributed in various types of dermal cells and increased in basal cells. In human studies, a significant reduction (75%) of IAPIs was observed among the patients in the TPC group. TPC can reduce the incidence of PI in rats and humans, and the upregulation of HSP27 may play an important role in this biological progress. Further studies are warranted to explore the molecular mechanism of the preventive effect in PI mediated by HSP27.

Non-operative adjuncts for the prevention of mastectomy skin flap necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Native skin flap necrosis is a potentially devastating complication following skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy with a reported incidence of as high as 30%. Treatment depends on the depth and extent of tissue necrosis and can range from dressings to surgical debridement and further reconstruction. This can have implications on patient physical and psychological wellbeing as well as cost of treatment. This study aims to identify and appraise cost-effective non-surgical adjuncts for the prevention of native skin flap necrosis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and structured around existing recommended guidelines. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed with the medical subject headings 'mastectomy' and 'flap necrosis'. After exclusion, 12 articles were selected for review and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 8439 mastectomies were performed on 7895 patients. Preventative non-surgical adjuncts that demonstrated statistically significant reduction in mastectomy flap necrosis included topical nitroglycerin ointment (P = 0.000), closed-Incision negative pressure wound therapy (P = 0.000), topical dimethylsulfoxide ointment (P = 0.03), oral cilostazol (P = 0.032), and local heat pre-conditioning (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies multiple adjuncts that may aid in preventing mastectomy skin flap necrosis, especially in high-risk patients. Further studies could aim to define standardized protocols and compare the various adjuncts in different circumstances.

Importance of Postoperative Use of External Warming Devices in Flap Reconstructive Surgery

Flap failure, partial or complete, can have great negative impact on the patient and the reconstructive outcome. The effect of thermal regulation on flap survival is well recognized. This article focuses on the importance of external warming devices as a standard on postoperative flap care to avoid any temperature-related vascular compromise. PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE search had been performed. More than 60 papers have been reviewed. Out of them, that 29 references have been included in this review. The authors emphasize on the importance of strict postoperative flap temperature control with active warming devices as a standard of practice to minimize any related microcirculatory changes.

[The Value of Synthetic and Biologic Meshes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction]

Implant based breast reconstruction (IBBR) keeps evolving and has been influenced heavily by the use of synthetic and biologic meshes in the last years. In both, subpectoral as well as prepectoral approaches the use of synthetic and biologic meshes has made it possible to place implants precisely according to the breast's footprint and strengthen soft-tissue coverage, particularly in the lower pole of the breast with lower complication rates and better cosmesis. Various mesh options that differ in material, processing, size and cost are currently in clinical use. This review aims to define the role of biologic and synthetic meshes in IBBR regarding the advantages and disadvantages of their use.

Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy, from the Subpectoral to the Prepectoral Approach: An Evidence-Based Change of Mind?

Over the last years, prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction has undergone a renaissance due to several technical advancements regarding mastectomy techniques and surgical approaches for the placement and soft tissue coverage of silicone implants. Initially abandoned due to the high incidence of complications, such as capsular contraction, implant extrusion, and poor aesthetic outcome, the effective prevention of these types of complications led to the prepectoral technique coming back in style for the ease of implant placement and the conservation of the pectoralis muscle function. Additional advantages such as a decrease of postoperative pain, animation deformity, and operative time contribute to the steady gain in popularity. This review aims to summarize the factors influencing the trend towards prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction and to discuss the challenges and prospects related to this operative approach.

Defining Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature and a Call for Standardization

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis following breast reconstruction may lead to wound dehiscence, infection, implant exposure, and reconstructive failure. The absence of a standardized definition for it has led to variation in estimated incidence, from as low as 2 percent to greater than 40 percent. The authors systematically reviewed the literature on mastectomy skin flap necrosis to characterize existing definitions and provide a framework for future classification.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed and Cochrane databases identified studies reporting a discrete definition of mastectomy skin flap necrosis and corresponding outcomes in breast reconstruction. Provided definitions were extracted, categorized, and comparatively analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, with a combined total of 14,368 patients and 18,920 breasts. Thirty-four studies (57.6 percent) reported mastectomy skin flap necrosis solely as a function of total breasts, and 11 (18.6 percent) reported mastectomy skin flap necrosis solely as a function of total patients. Only 14 studies (23.7 percent) provided two separate rates. The overall rate of mastectomy skin flap necrosis was 10.4 percent (range, 2.3 to 41.2 percent) and 15.3 percent (range, 4.7 to 39.0 percent), when reported per breast or per patient, respectively. Studies were categorized by mastectomy skin flap necrosis definition, including intervention (n = 33), depth (n = 20), area (n = 4), and timing (n = 2). Mastectomy skin flap necrosis rates were highest in studies defining necrosis by depth (15.1 percent), followed by intervention (9.6 percent), timing (6.4 percent), and area (6.3 percent). Necrosis rates among studies defining mastectomy skin flap necrosis by intervention, depth, and area were found to be statistically different (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Reported mastectomy skin flap necrosis definitions and outcomes vary significantly in the existing literature. For accurate characterization and quantification, a clear, simplified, consensus definition must be adopted.

Preconditioning with Foam-mediated External Suction on Flap Microvasculature and Perfusion in a Rodent Model

Foam-mediated external suction (FMES) has previously shown to improve tissue microcirculation. We hypothesized that preconditioning fasciocutaneous perforator flaps with FMES would augment perfusion and demonstrate greater capillary recruitment.

Thermal Preconditioning for Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Optimising patients pre-operatively reduces the chance of complications. This may be achieved by preconditioning. Thermal preconditioning refers to the supraphysiological heating of organisms or specific organs prior to an environmental insult. This review explores the current application and efficacy of thermal preconditioning for surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of Medline (via PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane library was performed. Only articles evaluating the use of supraphysiological heating prior to a surgical intervention were included. Qualitative syntheses of data were undertaken due to the heterogeneity of the studies. The quality of each article was appraised using risk of bias tools (Cochrane and SYRCLE).

RESULTS

The primary literature search returned 3175 articles. After screening and reviewing reference lists, 28 papers met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were performed in animals, with only three clinical trials. Although there was broad coverage of different surgical techniques, flap transfer was the most commonly performed procedure. Most studies demonstrated a beneficial effect of thermal preconditioning, ranging from increased joint mobility to improved flap or organ transplant survival rates. The quality of evidence was variable, with experimental animal studies limited by a lack of methodological detail.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermal preconditioning for surgery has been primarily investigated using animal models. A beneficial effect has been demonstrated in most cases, across specialties ranging from plastic to general surgery. Future studies should aim to assess the clinical significance through large multicentre randomised controlled trials.

Changes in skin-physiology after local heat application using two different methods in individuals with complete paraplegia: a feasibility and safety trial

STUDY DESIGN

Interventional feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate safety and effects of local heat preconditioning on skin physiology using water-filtered infrared-A radiation (wIRA) or warm water therapy (wWT) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

Acute and rehabilitation center, specialized in SCI.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 15 individuals (3 women, 12 men) with complete paraplegia from thoracic levels ranging between T2 and T12 received local heat applications either with wIRA or wWT on the thigh (paralyzed area) and on the upper arm (non-paralyzed area). Local heat was applied during three 30-min cycles, each separated by 30 min rest; thus, the treatment lasted for 180 min. Temperature, blood perfusion, and skin redness were measured at baseline, before and after heat application and 24 h after the last application.

RESULTS

Heat applications with wIRA and wWT were well-tolerated. No burns or any other side effects were detected. Skin temperature (p ≤ 0.008) and blood perfusion (p ≤ 0.013) significantly increased after heat application. Local skin temperature (arm p = 0.004/leg p < 0.001) and blood perfusion (arm p = 0.011/leg p = 0.001) after the first and the second application cycle, respectively, were significantly higher during heat application with wIRA than with wWT. However, skin redness did not change significantly (p = 0.1). No significant differences were observed between the paralyzed and non-paralyzed areas for all parameters immediately, as well as 24 h after the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both heating methods have been confirmed as safe treatments in this study, further investigations with regard to their efficacy in the context of preconditioning are warranted.

SPONSORSHIP

The use of the instruments Hydrosun® 750 Irradiator (Hydrosun Medizintechnik, Germany) and Hilotherm-Calido 6 (Hilotherm GmbH, Germany) was sponsored by the Dr. med. h. c. Erwin Braun Foundation and by Hilotherm GmbH, respectively.

A randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate local heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: the preHEAT trial

Objective

preHEAT was a randomised controlled feasibility trial to determine how best to measure skin necrosis in breast reconstruction to inform the design of a larger multicentre trial.

Background

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) is a serious complication resulting in prolonged wound healing. Local heat preconditioning of the MSF before surgery has been shown to reduce skin necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction patients (IBR).

Method

preHEAT was a single-centre, randomised control two-arm single-blind parallel arm feasibility trial of local heat preconditioning in breast cancer patients undergoing SSM and NSM at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK. All patients undergoing IBR above the age of 18 were included. Intervention patients heated breast skin to 43 °C in three, 30-min cycles interrupted by spontaneous cooling using hot water bottles. The primary aim was to compare measurement of skin necrosis using binary ‘yes/no’ assessment, the SKIN score, and wound area.

Results

One hundred forty-one patients were randomised over a 2-year period (71 heated group, 70 controls). There was near perfect agreement between assessors using the “yes/no” measurement of necrosis. The proportion of patients experiencing necrosis in controls was 35% (n = 23/66) in the heated 26% (n = 18/68]). In the control group, 17% (n = 4/23) patients experiencing necrosis required surgical intervention for necrosis compared to 11% (n = 2/18) in the heated group.

Conclusion

The binary outcome of MSFN “yes/no” is a suitable and reliable primary outcome measure of necrosis and was superior to the SKIN Score or necrosis area. The trial study design is feasible for a larger definitive trial.

Trial registration

ISRCTN15744669. Date of registration: 25/02/2018

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-019-0392-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Measuring skin necrosis in a randomised controlled feasibility trial of heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: study protocol and statistical analysis plan for the PREHEAT trial

Background

Essential strategies are needed to help reduce the number of post-operative complications and associated costs for breast cancer patients undergoing reconstructive breast surgery. Evidence suggests that local heat preconditioning could help improve the provision of this procedure by reducing skin necrosis. Before testing the effectiveness of heat preconditioning in a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT), we must first establish the best way to measure skin necrosis and estimate the event rate using this definition.

Methods

PREHEAT is a single-blind randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing local heat preconditioning, using a hot water bottle, against standard care on skin necrosis among breast cancer patients undergoing reconstructive breast surgery. The primary objective of this study is to determine the best way to measure skin necrosis and to estimate the event rate using this definition in each trial arm. Secondary feasibility objectives include estimating recruitment and 30 day follow-up retention rates, levels of compliance with the heating protocol, length of stay in hospital and the rates of surgical versus conservative management of skin necrosis. The information from these objectives will inform the design of a larger definitive effectiveness and cost-effectiveness RCT.

Discussion

This article describes the PREHEAT trial protocol and detailed statistical analysis plan, which includes the pre-specified criteria and process for establishing the best way to measure necrosis. This study will provide the evidence needed to establish the best way to measure skin necrosis, to use as the primary outcome in a future RCT to definitively test the effectiveness of local heat preconditioning. The pre-specified statistical analysis plan, developed prior to unblinded data extraction, sets out the analysis strategy and a comparative framework to support a committee evaluation of skin necrosis measurements. It will increase the transparency of the data analysis for the PREHEAT trial.

Trial registration

ISRCTN ISRCTN15744669. Registered 25 February 2015

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-017-0223-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Its surgical approach has become less and less mutilating in the last decades. However, the overall number of breast reconstructions has significantly increased lately. Nowadays, breast reconstruction should be individualized at its best, first of all taking into consideration not only the oncological aspects of the tumor, neo-/adjuvant treatment, and genetic predisposition, but also its timing (immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction), as well as the patient's condition and wish. This article gives an overview over the various possibilities of breast reconstruction, including implant- and expander-based reconstruction, flap-based reconstruction (vascularized autologous tissue), the combination of implant and flap, reconstruction using non-vascularized autologous fat, as well as refinement surgery after breast reconstruction.

Impact of active thermoregulation on the microcirculation of free flaps

BACKGROUND

While it is a known fact that warming increases blood flow in healthy tissue, little is known about the impact of active thermoregulation on the altered microcirculation of free flaps. The objective of the study was to identify the impact of postoperative active thermoregulation on free flap microcirculation.

METHODS

Tissue temperature was assessed in 25 free perforator flaps using an implanted probe. Active thermoregulation was achieved using a water circulation based system. Changes in microcirculation were evaluated at the day of surgery and throughout the first three postoperative days after passive cooling (room temperature), passive warming (wound dressing), active warming (38 °C) and active cooling (15 °C) using laser Doppler flowmetry and remission spectroscopy.

RESULTS

Active warming increased flap temperature by 7.7% to 36.4 °C ± 0.5 °C in comparison to the initial values of flaps without dressing (P < 0.001). As a result, the blood flow increased by 77.7% of the base value (P < 0.001). A significant correlation between all microcirculation parameters and tissue temperature was observed with a 5.52 AU blood flow increase per degree temperature increase (r = 0.7; P < 0.001). All microcirculation parameters showed a statistically significant increase after both passive and active warming, whereby active warming showed significantly higher values than passive warming.

CONCLUSIONS

Active thermoregulation using water-based circulation is an effective and safe procedure to improve microcirculation in free flaps and is superior to conventional passive warming strategies.