Outcome in body-contouring surgery after massive weight loss: A prospective matched single-blind study

The Impact of Body Contouring Following Bariatric Surgery: A Prospective Examination of Psychosocial and Medical Impairment

INTRODUCTION

Body contouring surgery (BCS) to remove loose skin is often desired following bariatric surgery. This study prospectively examined psychosocial and medical functioning based on BCS status after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

N=56 adults who sought a BCS consultation following bariatric surgery completed measures of impairment, depression, and medical (e.g., rashes, infections) and psychosocial concerns due to loose skin. Assessments were repeated at 1- and 3-month follow-ups.

RESULTS

Most did not undergo BCS due to insurance coverage denial/finances; n = 24 (42.9%) underwent BCS. The groups with and without BCS did not differ significantly in BMI, weight loss, impairment, or depression at any assessment; however, a significantly greater proportion of non-BCS patients reported several medical and psychosocial concerns due to loose skin relative to BCS patients at follow-up assessments. Greater loose skin concerns were associated significantly with greater impairment and depression at all assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Over half who sought BCS did not undergo BCS, mostly due to insurance/financial reasons. The BCS group had significantly fewer medical and psychosocial concerns related to loose skin at follow-ups. Greater loose skin concerns were associated with heightened levels of broad psychosocial impairments suggesting that loose skin and psychological concerns warrant greater clinical attention after bariatric surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Ethical Considerations and Outcomes in Body Contouring Surgeries Among Adolescents: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Body contouring surgery (BCS) in adolescents, particularly following bariatric surgery, involves a complex array of ethical, psychological, and medical factors. This review focuses on adolescents who have experienced significant weight loss, often due to bariatric surgery, and subsequently require body contouring to address excess skin and soft tissue.

METHODS

A literature narrative review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Relevant articles were screened and selected based on their discussion of post-bariatric and massive weight loss body contouring surgeries in adolescents, focusing on prevalence, outcomes, and ethical considerations.

RESULTS

The prevalence of BCS among adolescents is rising, influenced by social media and societal perceptions of beauty. However, the percentage of adolescents receiving BCS after bariatric surgery remains low. Adolescents undergoing BCS experience improvements in physical functioning, body image, and psychological well-being. Complications, although common, are mostly minor. Ethical considerations include ensuring informed consent, assessing emotional maturity, managing patient expectations, and involving adolescents in decision-making. Comparative analysis reveals similar outcomes in adults and adolescents, but adolescents face unique ethical challenges related to autonomy, long-term effects, and ongoing physical and emotional development.

CONCLUSION

BCS in adolescents following bariatric surgery can lead to improved physical and psychological outcomes. However, the decision to undergo BCS must be carefully considered, taking into account the adolescent's maturity, expectations, and long-term well-being. Ethical considerations are paramount, emphasizing the need for informed consent, realistic expectations, and a multidisciplinary approach. Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and the specific ethical implications of BCS in adolescents compared to adults.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

A Systematic Review of Questionnaires Assessing Patient Satisfaction in Plastic Surgery: Tools, Topics, and Surgical Types

Background

Patient satisfaction is crucial for evaluating healthcare services, including plastic surgery. This systematic review aims to analyze questionnaires assessing patient satisfaction in plastic surgery, identifying their strengths and weaknesses to improve outcomes and enhance the quality of care.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases. Studies were included if they were original research articles, written in English, and focused on patient satisfaction questionnaires in plastic surgery. Data extraction and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.

Results

A total of 105 studies were included. General/overall satisfaction was the most common topic addressed (99.04%). Cosmetic outcomes were the most frequently assessed category (34.3%). Breast reconstruction was the most common procedure (33.3%). Most studies used a combination of generic and procedure-specific questionnaires (45.71%). The most frequently used measurement tools were BREAST-Q and self-developed questionnaires, each accounting for 28.57% and 27.61%.

Conclusions

This review provides a comprehensive analysis of patient satisfaction questionnaires in plastic surgery, emphasizing the importance of a holistic approach and well-established, validated tools. The findings contribute to improving plastic surgery outcomes and enhancing the quality of care. Future research should refine assessment tools to address patients' needs and promote patient-centered outcomes in plastic surgery.

A Prospective, Matched Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life in Bariatric Patients following Truncal Body Contouring

BACKGROUND

Massive weight loss after bariatric surgery can lead to excess skin associated with functional and aesthetic sequelae. Access to the benefit provided by body contouring procedures may be limited by insurance approval, which does not consider health-related quality of life. The aim of this study was to quantify the benefit in health-related quality of life for patients who undergo body contouring procedures after massive weight loss.

METHODS

Patients evaluated for postbariatric body contouring procedures were systematically identified and prospectively surveyed using the BODY-Q. Health-related quality-of-life change for each functional scale was compared between those who underwent body contouring procedures (operative group, preoperatively versus postoperatively) and those who did not (nonoperative group, preoperatively versus resurvey) using t tests. Propensity score matching allowed the authors to balance baseline demographics, comorbidities, physical symptoms, and risk factors between cohorts.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven matched patients were analyzed (34 operative versus 23 nonoperative). No significant difference in age, body mass index, time between surveys, or preoperative BODY-Q scores existed between cohorts. The surgical group demonstrated a significant improvement in 10 out of 11 BODY-Q functional scales. The nonoperative group realized no improvements and, in the interim, had a significant deterioration in four BODY-Q scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Postbariatric body contouring procedures represent a critical and final step in the surgical weight loss journey for patients and are associated with significant improvements in health-related quality of life. Further deterioration in psychosocial and sexual health-related quality of life occurs in patients who do not undergo body contouring procedures following bariatric surgery. This study provides prospective comparative data that validate the field's standard intervention and justification for insurance approval.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

The Age Factor in Postbariatric Body Contouring Surgery Outcome

BACKGROUND

Increasing life expectancy will likely lead greater numbers of older patients to seek postbariatric body contouring plastic surgery. The impact of age on body contouring plastic surgery outcome is undetermined.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 317 postbariatric body contouring plastic surgery cases was performed. Patient demographics and operative and postoperative data were collected. Patients were categorized into three age groups, and univariate analysis examined group differences. Multivariate logistic regression analysis assessed independent associations between age and surgical outcome measures.

RESULTS

Patients 60 years and older had a higher mean preoperative body mass index (30.8 ± 3.6 kg/m2, p < 0.001) and higher rates of hypertension (48.9 percent, p < 0.001), dyslipidemia (38.3 percent, p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (17 percent, p = 0.012) compared to the younger age groups. They also sustained significantly higher complication rates (any minor complications, p = 0.004; minor surgical site infections, p = 0.005; minor hematomas, p = 0.007; any major complications, p < 0.001; major surgical-site infections, p < 0.001; and major dehiscence, p < 0.001). Increasing age was a significant risk factor for any major complications (p = 0.005), reoperation (p = 0.02), and readmission (p = 0.001). Age greater than or equal to 60 years was a significant risk factor solely for readmission (OR, 3.32; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing age was a risk factor for adverse postoperative outcome in postbariatric body contouring plastic surgery patients; however, age greater than or equal to 60 years in and of itself was an independent risk factor for readmission only. These findings may aid plastic surgeons in patient consultation and in decision making regarding suitable candidates for these procedures.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Physical measurements and patients’ perception of excess skin on arms and thighs before and after bariatric surgery

Background

Bariatric surgery is an effective weight loss method for patients with obesity. One side effect of bariatric surgery is uncomfortable excess skin. Much remains to be learned about physical measurements and patients’ subjective perceptions of it. Here, we investigated the pre- to post-bariatric changes in patients’ perception and physical measurements of the skin on the arms and thighs, in order to find possible subgroups especially affected by post-operative excess skin and to identify predicting factors.

Methods

One hundred forty-seven patients eligible for bariatric surgery completed the Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire (SESQ) and underwent measurements of their skin before and 18 months after the procedure.

Results

Although most physical measurements decreased post-operatively, many patients reported increased discomfort. We identified one subgroup particularly prone to report excess skin on the arms post-operatively: women with high discomfort from excess skin on the arms and high body mass index (BMI), pre-operatively. Ptosis of the excess skin seems to be a feasible measurement for predicting post-operative discomfort. For every centimetre of ptosis pre-operatively, patients had 1.37- and 1.31-fold higher odds of achieving a score for post-operative discomfort from excess skin on the upper arms and thighs, respectively, of ≥ 6 (on a 0–10 scale).

Conclusions

We identified a subgroup especially affected by discomforting excess skin on arms and thighs after weight loss. Furthermore, we suggest a pre-operative pro-operative ptosis measuring to predict post-operative discomfort level. The result of this study further increases the knowledge of excess skin and should be useful in further improving patient education.

Level of Evidence: Level III, risk / prognostic study.

Body Contouring Surgery Improves Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Our main objective is to evaluate the effect of body contouring surgery (BCS) on the magnitude and durability of weight loss after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus search were conducted from the time of their inception to June 2020. We included comparative studies that assessed weight progression, in terms of Body Mass Index change (∆BMI), Total Body Weight Loss (TBWL%), and Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) for the post-bariatric patient population and the effect of BCS on weight progression.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were included. The pooled sample size was 2307, of which 691 were cases who underwent BCS post-bariatric surgery, and 1616 were comparative controls. The mean follow-up time for cases and controls were 61.6 ± 23.8 months and 52.2 ± 23.8 months, respectively. Nine studies reported results of BMI changes, six provided %EWL, and five used %TBWL. Significant improvement in weight loss was observed in the BCS group when measured by either ∆BMI (3 kg/m2 points decrease, p 0.023), %TBWL (6% increase, P < 0.0001), or %EWL (14% increase, P < 0.0001). Sub-group analysis showed that increased follow-up time was associated with higher TBWL% (p 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The evidence provided in this review strongly supports the added long-term benefits of body contouring surgery for selected patients after massive weight loss following bariatric surgery. Having a multidisciplinary team that involves a bariatric and a plastic surgeon as well as nutritionists and psychologists for the management of patients with obesity going through the bariatric pathway is recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

A systematic review of body contouring surgery in post-bariatric patients to determine its prevalence, effects on quality of life, desire, and barriers

Many post-bariatric patients have impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to excess skin following weight loss; however, it is inconclusive whether body contouring surgery (BCS) improves this impairment. We aimed to comprehensively summarize existing evidence of the effect of BCS on the HRQoL (primary outcome) and determine the prevalence of, the desire for, and barriers to BCS (secondary outcomes). Randomized controlled trials, cohort, cross-sectional, case-control, and longitudinal studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central, and Web of Science. After screening 1923 potential records, 24 studies (representing 6867 participants) were deemed eligible. Only 18.5% of respondents from cross-sectional studies underwent BCS, with abdominal BCS as the most common procedure. Most participants desired BCS but listed "cost" and "lacking reimbursement" as the main barriers. Results suggest that most post-bariatric patients who underwent BCS experienced improvements in their HRQoL, which could be seen in almost every dimension evaluated, including body image and physical and psychosocial functions. Therefore, both bariatric and plastic surgeons should regard BCS not only as an aesthetic supplement but also as a vital part of functional recovery in the surgery-mediated weight loss journey and, thus, provide it to more post-bariatric patients.

The Edmonton Obesity Staging System as a predictor for postoperative complications after medial thigh lift in massive weight loss patients

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the correlation between the Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) and the occurrence of postoperative complications after medial thigh lift in formerly obese patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review of patients undergoing medial thigh lift between 2009 and 2019 after massive weight loss. Data on demography, comorbidities, surgery, and postoperative outcome were extracted from patients' charts. Patients were grouped into EOSS categories. Complications were classified into minor and major. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between risk factors and complications.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients were included in the study. Complications occurred in 76 (70%) of the patients, most of which were minor (60/108, 56%). Complications increased with increasing EOSS stage, and all EOSS 3 patients had complications. Classification as EOSS 2 or 3 significantly associated with occurrence of postoperative complications (OR 99.3, p<0.001) as well as minor and major complications individually (OR 3.1 and 6.5, p<0.05). This effect was independent of body mass index (BMI), maximum BMI loss, type of weight loss, volume of liposuction, weight of resected tissue, and type of surgery.

CONCLUSION

EOSS is a robust and independent predictor for postoperative complications in medial thigh lift surgery after massive weight loss.

Painful Complications After Cosmetic Surgery: Management of Peripheral Nerve Injury

BACKGROUND

Aesthetic procedures are among the most common surgeries performed by plastic surgeons. The prevalence of persistent pain remains unknown and underappreciated in the plastic surgery literature.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this article was to increase awareness of this problem while describing the diagnostic and management strategies for patients with postoperative pain after aesthetic plastic surgery.

METHODS

A literature review was performed utilizing the PubMed database to identify painful complications of brachioplasty, blepharoplasty, rhytidectomy, abdominoplasty, breast augmentation, mastopexy, and breast reduction. A treatment algorithm was described to guide plastic surgeons presented with patients reporting pain after aesthetic surgery.

RESULTS

Title and abstract review followed by application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 20 clinical studies for this review, including lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, iliohypogastric nerve, and intercostal nerves after abdominoplasty; median antebrachial cutaneous nerve after brachioplasty; supraorbital, supratrochlear, and infratrochlear nerves after blepharoplasty; greater auricular nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, and zygomaticofacial nerve after rhytidectomy; and intercostobrachial nerve after breast surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuromas can be the source of pain following aesthetic surgery. The same clinical and diagnostic approach used for upper and lower extremity neuroma pain can be employed in patients with persistent pain after aesthetic surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Complications after lower body contouring surgery due to massive weight loss unaffected by weight loss method

Body contouring surgery following massive weight loss positively affects a patient's quality of life. However, the procedure is prone to complications. Herein, we stratified complications timewise. Furthermore, we examined whether the weight loss method - bariatric surgery or lifestyle changes - affected the frequency or severity of complications. In this single-centre retrospective analysis, we included 158 patients with massive weight loss undergoing body contouring surgery between 2009 and 2015. We recorded 96 complications in 80 patients, with an overall rate of 51%. Most complications (80.2%) were minor (Clavien-Dindo grades 1 and 2) and superficial wound infections. Immediate complications (0-24 hours post-operation) affected 8.3% of patients, with early complications (1-7 post-operative days) affecting 16.7% of them and late complications (8-30 post-operative days) affecting 58.3% of them. We found no statistical difference in complication rates when comparing bariatric and non-bariatric patients. Older age (p = 0.042) at operation is associated with an increased risk for immediate haematoma or bleeding requiring surgery. Among early complications, a high maximum weight (p = 0.035) and a high preoperative weight (p = 0.0053) significantly correlated with a haematoma or bleeding requiring surgery. For late complications, seroma correlated with older age (p = 0.0061). Complications are primarily minor and non-life threatening after body contouring surgery because of frequent massive weight loss. Here, no particular subgroup of massive weight loss patients appeared more prone to complications. Thus, for each patient, the risks associated with body contouring surgery following massive weight loss should be considered individually.

Impact of Abdominal Lipectomy on Post-Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery Weight Loss

BACKGROUND

Abdominal lipectomy after bariatric surgery is recommended because of residual excess skin resulting in difficulty with maintaining hygiene, recurrent infections, and functional impairment, interfering with daily activities. There is a dearth of literature examining weight loss outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal lipectomy post sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The purpose of this study was to examine whether post-SG patients who received abdominal lipectomy achieved greater percent excess weight loss (%EWL) than post-SG patients who did not receive abdominal lipectomy.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients who underwent minimally invasive SG at the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System from March 2008 to June 2015 was conducted. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: patients who underwent abdominal lipectomy after SG (PS-SG) and patients who underwent SG alone (SG). Demographics, comorbidities, and %EWL were examined.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were included in the PS-SG group versus 287 patients in the SG group. Significant differences were found in %EWL at 24 (P < 0.0001), 36 (P < 0.005), and more than 36 months (P < 0.005) follow-up between groups, with a greater %EWL in patients in the PS-SG group versus the SG group.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study revealed that patients in the PS-SG group achieved greater %EWL than patients with SG alone. Although larger studies are needed, this study supports using abdominal lipectomy as an adjunctive procedure to assist with long-term weight loss as part of the overall treatment of bariatric surgery patients.

Modified Fleur-de-lis Abdominoplasty for Massive Weight Loss Patients

INTRODUCTION

Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty is an effective procedure for correcting abdominal contour abnormalities in both the vertical and horizontal orientation. Tension on the approximated tissue edges and reduced microvascular perfusion is mainly responsible for wound dehiscence and delayed wound healing in the T-point area and seroma formation. To reduce these complications, we developed a modification of the fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty technique forming upper abdominal skin flaps with deepithelialized mediocaudal edges.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 76 consecutive patients underwent fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty over a 2-year period. Of these, 38 (50%) underwent standard fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty and 38 (50%) had modified fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty.

RESULTS

Full-thickness skin defects as major complications and nonoperative treated seroma formations were significantly reduced in modified fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty reduces the rate of full-thickness skin defects at T-junction and the development of seroma formation.

Prevalence and factors associated with persistent pain following body contouring surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Persistent postsurgical pain (PPP) has been reported by patients following various surgeries. Body contouring procedures are being performed more frequently, but no data are available regarding the effects of these procedures. Long-term disability occurring after performing "functional" procedures on healthy subjects is a particular concern. The aim of this study was to describe the risk factors, prevalence, characteristics, and effects of persistent pain after body contouring procedures.

METHODS

Patients who underwent body contouring surgery (e.g., abdominoplasty, lower body lift, medial thigh lift, brachioplasty, and abdominal liposuction) between January 1 2009 and December 31 2013 were included in this retrospective, monocentric cohort study. Pain evaluation was performed using a visual analog pain scale (VAS) and the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire. Major risk factors previously identified in the literature were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study included 199 patients. Pain was reported by 42 patients (21%). Seventy-one percent (n = 30) of these 42 patients presented with neuropathic pain. Risk factors that were significantly associated with PPP were acute postoperative pain (p = 0.0003), medical history of bariatric surgery (p = 0.002), longer period of hospitalization (p = 0.04), depressive status during the operative period (p = 0.03), substantial stress before surgery (p = 0.03), and major complications after surgery (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Persistent chronic pain is frequent after body contouring procedures. Preemptive approaches and early postoperative diagnosis are important measures that can be used to limit the effects of this complication on the patient's quality of life.