The impact of time from injury to surgery on the risk of neuropathic pain after traumatic spinal cord injury

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating neurological disorder often accompanied by neuropathic pain (NeP), significantly affecting patients' quality of life. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of the time from injury to surgery on the development of NeP following traumatic SCI. Medical records of patients with traumatic SCI who underwent surgical intervention between January 2017 and January 2021 at two specialized centers were reviewed. Variables associated with NeP including demographics, injury profiles, medical history, surgical details, and pain assessments were investigated. Independent risk factors related to NeP were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A total of 320 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 245 (76.6%) being male and a mean age of 56.5 ± 13.2 years. NeP was identified in 48.4% of patients (155 of 320). The multivariate analysis identifies age at injury, Injury Severity Score, and the neurological level of injury as independent risk factors for the development of NeP in both AIS A and AIS B, C, and D subgroups. Additionally, a significant association between the time from injury to surgery and NeP was observed in AIS B, C, and D patients, while no such association was found in AIS A patients. This study highlights the benefits of early and ultra-early surgical intervention in preventing NeP in patients with incomplete traumatic SCI (AIS B, C, and D), underscoring the importance of optimizing surgical timing to improve patient outcomes. Prospective studies are warranted to establish evidence-based surgical guidelines for managing traumatic SCI and preventing NeP effectively.

Delaying ACL reconstruction is associated with increased rates of medial meniscal tear

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the time from injury to ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and the rate as well as repairability of meniscal tears. Secondary aims were to evaluate the relationship between meniscal injury and Tegner Activity Scale, age, BMI, and gender.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2022, 1,840 consecutive ACLRs were performed. A total of 1,317 ACLRs were included with a mean patient age of 31.2 years ± 10.5 [16-60]. Meniscal tear was assessed during arthroscopy using the ISAKOS classification. Time from injury to ACLR, Tegner Activity Scale, age, BMI and gender were analysed in uni- and then in multivariate analyses. Patients were divided into four groups according to the time from injury to surgery: < 3 months (427; 32%), 3-6 months (388; 29%), 6-12 months (248; 19%) and > 12 months (254; 19%).

RESULTS

Delaying ACLR > 12 months significantly increased the rate of medial meniscal (MM) injury (OR 1.14; p < 0.001). No correlation was found between a 3- or 6-month time from injury to surgery and MM tear. Performing ACLR > 3, 6, or 12 months after injury did not significantly increase the rate of lateral meniscal (LM) injury. Increasing Tegner activity scale was significantly associated with a lower rate of MM injury (OR 0.90; p = 0.020). An age > 30 years (OR 1.07; p = 0.025) and male gender (OR 1.13; p < 0.0001) was also associated with an increased rate of MM injury. Age > 30 years decreased the rate of MM repair (OR 0.85; p < 0.001). Male gender increased the rate of LM tear (OR 1.10; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Performing ACLR more than 12 months after injury was associated with increased rates of MM injury but not with lower rates of repairable lesions. An increased pre-injury Tegner activity score was associated with a decreased rate of MM tear. Age > 30 years was associated with an increased rate of MM tear with concomitant ACL injury and a decreased rate of repairability of MM tear. ACLR should be performed within 12 months from injury to prevent from the risk of MM injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Optimizing The Timing of Stereotactic Minimally Invasive Drainage for Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

Intracerebral hemorrhage is a high-risk pathological event that is associated with formidable morality rates. Here, our objective was to perform a retrospective study to determine the best timing for drainage using physiological data on patients who received drainage at different timings.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed 198 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage who underwent stereotactic drainage at the conventional timing (surgery within 12 h of admission; control group) and 216 patients who underwent stereotactic drainage at a customized surgical timing (elective group). Follow-ups were performed at 3 and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The clinical indicators, including prognosis, hematoma clearance, recurrent hemorrhage, intracerebral infection, pulmonary infection, deep venous thrombosis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, and matrix metallopeptidase 2 and 9 levels, were compared between the control and elective groups. Our data indicated that the elective group had significantly better prognosis compared to the control group (p = 0.021), with a higher rate of hematoma clearance (p = 0.004) and a lower rate of recurrent hemorrhage (p = 0.018). The total occurrence rate of post-surgery complications was also lower for the elective group (p = 0.026). NIHSS scores and serum MMP2/9 levels of the elective group were lower than those of the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Customized timing of stereotactic drainage may be superior to conventional fixed timing (within 12 h post-hemorrhage) in reducing post-surgery complications and promoting recovery, which supports the potential use of customized timing of stereotactic minimally invasive drainage as a new convention in clinics.

Protective and Risk Factors for Humerus Head Necrosis After Proximal Humerus Fracture Treated with Internal Locking Plate

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common and lead to post-traumatic humerus head necrosis (HHN) in 3-35% after ORIF with an internal locking plate. Few studies focus on this condition and risk factors remain a discussion topic. Hertel's criteria for initial head ischemia right after fracture (fracture complexity, medial hinge displacement and short metaphyseal head extension) have recently been correlated to HHN, but there is still a clear lack of evidence on the topic. Due to its anatomical similarities to the proximal femur, some authors argue that PHF may as well benefit from early surgery to avoid head necrosis.

METHODS

In this 10-year retrospective study, we assessed 305 patients from a single center. All cases were treated with a PHILOS plate through a deltopectoral approach. The mean follow-up time was 467 days. The primary endpoint was HHN.

RESULTS

HHN was diagnosed in 12 patients (4%), 10 of which were diagnosed within the first year and one case 4 years after surgery. A positive correlation (p < 0.04) was found between HHN and fracture type (both in AO and Neer's classification), initial neck-shaft-angle (NSA) and metaphyseal head extension (MHE). Medial hinge displacement (MHD) occurred in all HHN cases. Achieving perfect reduction (< 2 mm dislocation) was relevant to avoiding HHN (p = 0.035). Although HHN developed in 32% of the high risk cases (four-part fractures with a short MHE), it was completely avoided (0%) when perfect reduction was achieved. Time until surgery after admission was neither a protective nor a risk factor for HHN.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that fracture complexity (four-part and C-fractures) as well as disruption of the medial hinge with a metaphyseal head extension smaller than 8 mm are relevant risk factors for humerus head necrosis. A combination of these criteria generated an high risk pattern with a 32% rate of HHN. Though often difficult to achieve, perfect reduction was a clear protective factor and reduced HHN to 0%. Perfect reduction may be key to inosculation and, therefore, salvage of the humerus head, especially in high risk cases. Surgery timing did not correlate with HHN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, retrospective cohort study.

[Surgical techniques for severe brain injury : With special emphasis on polytrauma]

CLINICAL ISSUE

In Austria approximately 2000 people suffer from severe brain injury per year. Brain trauma is the most common cause of death under the age of 45 years. In polytrauma patients the treatment and management of severe brain injury is particularly challenging because the life-threatening injuries of other organ systems significantly influence the timing of surgery and the outcome. The sequence of the necessary surgery is an interdisciplinary decision already made in the emergency room. The evacuation of space-occupying intracranial hemorrhage can be of secondary importance.

STANDARD TREATMENT

The standard approach for acute subdural hematoma is a craniotomy using a large question mark-shaped incision (trauma flap) and decompression. In acute epidural hematoma and impression fractures the localization of the lesion determines the surgical approach and evacuation. A variety of access procedures are available. Frontobasal injuries are extremely rarely an indication for an emergency operation for life-threatening injuries. Decompressive craniotomy is performed as for craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma by the standard trauma flap.

DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP

Emergency room computed tomography provides fast and accurate information about the localization and extent of brain injury.

PERFORMANCE

The mortality of acute subdural hematoma ranges between 50-90% despite an adequate evacuation. Outcome of epidural hematoma has a much better prognosis (10% mortality). The results of decompressive craniectomy versus conservative treatment for moderate disability and good recovery are quite similar according to the randomized evaluation of surgery with craniectomy for uncontrolled elevation of intracranial pressure (RESCUE-ICP) study.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATION

Interdisciplinary cooperation and communication and well-trained trauma surgeons with experience in brain trauma are key factors in the treatment of severe brain injury in polytrauma patients.

Early (≤48 Hours) versus Late (>48 Hours) Surgery in Spinal Cord Injury: Treatment Outcomes and Risk Factors for Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVES

Surgical management of spinal cord injury (SCI) is challenging. There is no standard guideline regarding the timing of surgery, although physicians have prioritized early surgery over the past decades. Although better outcomes have been observed from these studies, the definition of early surgery has been controversial, although mostly limited to 24-hours after injury. For some hospitals, this early surgery could be difficult to implement in practice. Hence, we re-evaluated the timing of early surgery as surgery within 48 hours and investigated the surgical outcomes of SCI depending on whether surgery was performed early (≤48 hours) or late (>48 hours). The primary outcomes were improvement in the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade in early and late surgery groups.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study in individuals aged 15-85 years, who underwent surgery for SCI between 2005 and 2016. The rate of AIS grade improvements was measured at 6 months after injury. Of the 86 enrolled patients, 31 (mean, 40.9 ± 12.64 hours) and 55 (mean, 168.25 ± 93.01 hours) patients were assigned to the early and late surgery groups, respectively.

RESULTS

AIS grade improvement was significantly greater in the early than in the late group (P = 0.039). In the early group, there was no significant difference in neurologic improvements among the AIS B, C, and D groups, but the AIS A group showed a significant improvement (P = 0.015). This finding was not observed in the late group (P = 0.060). AIS grade improvement was also significantly greater in the incomplete SCI group than in the complete SCI group, for all measurements (early, P = 0.007, late, P = 0.009). Other factors that significantly affected clinical outcomes were AIS grade on admission and the level of the injury.

Outcome following valve surgery in Australia: development of an enhanced database module

BACKGROUND

Valvular heart disease, including rheumatic heart disease (RHD), is an important cause of heart disease globally. Management of advanced disease can include surgery and other interventions to repair or replace affected valves. This article summarises the methodology of a study that will incorporate enhanced data collection systems to provide additional insights into treatment choice and outcome for advanced valvular disease including that due to RHD.

METHODS

An enhanced data collection system will be developed linking an existing Australian cardiac surgery registry to more detailed baseline co-morbidity, medication, echocardiographic and hospital separation data to identify predictors of morbidity and mortality outcome following valve surgery.

DISCUSSION

This project aims to collect and incorporate more detailed information regarding pre and postoperative factors and subsequent morbidity. We will use this to provide additional insights into treatment choice and outcome.