The early response of plastic and reconstructive surgery services to the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Articles Published in the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Journal (1976-2023)

BACKGROUND

Despite the important role of the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (APS) journal in the field of aesthetic plastic surgery, there is a notable absence of literature that focuses exclusively on the bibliometric analysis of this journal. In recognition of APS's 48 years of publishing, this study aims to perform a bibliometric analysis of the articles published in the APS (1976-2023).

METHODS

Articles published in the APS were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database. VOSviewer was employed to perform bibliometric analyses. Microsoft Excel was utilized to analyse the publication and citation trends.

RESULTS

From 1976 to 2023, 5134 articles were published in the APS. These articles were contributed by 12,963 researchers from 3354 institutions across 91 countries. The USA and China were the leading contributors. The most prolific author is Luan Jie from China. The co-citation networks highlighted the influence of the journal Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. We categorized the articles into four groups, and the results show that articles with the highest publications and citations in the APS are related to facial cosmetic surgery. In terms of specific surgical procedures, breast augmentation surgery has garnered consistent attention from researchers over the past 48 years, ranking first in both the number of publications and citations.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study indicate that the APS is a significant scientific journal, is widely utilized by global researchers in the field of aesthetic plastic surgery, and spans diverse knowledge domains.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Surgical Wait Times for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in Ontario

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on surgical wait times for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) in Ontario, Canada. Methods: Ontario's wait time data has fourteen reporting categories for PRS. For each category, the mean wait time for consultation and for surgery were reported. Each category was given a priority ranging from 1 to 4. Two periods, three-month and six-month, were selected and compared to the same calendar months of the previous year. Wait times, surgical volume and percent change to the provincial wait time target were reported and compared to the baseline data. Results: This study reviewed 9563 consults and 15,000 operative cases. There was a 50% reduction in the volume of surgical consults during the study period compared to the baseline period (P = 0.004). The reduction ranged from 46% to 75% based on the reporting category. The volume of surgical cases decreased by 43% during the study period compared to the baseline period (P = 0.005). A statistically significant increase in the mean wait times for surgery was observed, involving priorities 2 to 4 (overall mean = 32 days, P ≤ 0.01). There was a 15% decrease in the percentage of surgeries meeting the provincial target times (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: COVID-19 has caused a significant reduction in the volume of cases performed in the majority of PRS categories with an overall increase in the wait times for consultation and for surgery. Recovery following COVID-19 will require strategies to address the growing volume of cases and wait times for surgery across all PRS categories.

Trend of Academic Productivity in Plastic Surgery and the Impact of COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis

BACKGROUND

Plastic surgery has grown rapidly over the past decade, with increasing scientific output. The emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a considerable impact on plastic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To identify trends in published literature in plastic surgery from 2011 to 2021. To explore the impact of COVID-19 on scientific research output through bibliometric analysis methods.

METHODS

Web of Science was searched by authors on December 23, 2021. Published papers about plastic surgery over the last decade were analyzed. The search output was imported into VOSviewer for science mapping.

RESULTS

The actual number of papers related to plastic surgery during the COVID-19 period was higher than expected one. For scientific outputs in plastic surgery, keywords about surgical practice had a high frequency. "Reconstruction," "effect," "flap," "tissue," "defect," "model" maintained a high level of heat before and after COVID-19. The heat of "risk," "complication," "review," "infection," "cohort," and "meta-analysis" increased after the outbreak of COVID-19. The international collaboration showed an upward trend despite the impact of COVID-19. From the perspective of the volume of plastic surgery publications, some journals had a more positive performance compared to the pre-epidemic period. The proportion of original articles decreased after the spread of COVID-19 from 70.26% to 63.84%.

CONCLUSION

Although the COVID-19 has a profound impact on the healthcare industry, the bibliographic data reveals an increasing scientific output in the field of plastic surgery over time. For plastic surgery, high-frequency terms, research hotspots, popular journals, article types, and international collaboration have changed under the influence of COVID-19.

The impact of COVID-19 on plastic and reconstructive surgery in China: A single-centre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the volume of plastic surgery operations in a large public hospital and figure out the changes in the related factors associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and identify the potential problems.

METHODS

We created a survey and collected clinical data from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2020. Information on procedure time, patient gender, patient age, and procedure type was collected from the database. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0.

RESULTS

A total of 10,827 patients were admitted to our department. The total number of patients decreased by 21.53% in 2020 (3057 cases) than the same period in 2019 (3896 cases). The total number of aesthetic procedures decreased by 34.17% in 2020 than that in 2019. However, restorative procedures in 2020 (2013 cases) only decreased by 12.86% than that in 2019 (2310 cases). The percentages of women amongst patients who underwent aesthetic procedures were 91.75%, 92.18%, and 90.71% in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively. Most of the patients in these three years were aged 20-29 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The plastic surgery industry is experiencing the effects of the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. COVID-19 was quickly brought under control, and the plastic surgery industry developed rapidly in China because of the active, timely, and accurate implementation of epidemic prevention strategies.

Impact of COVID-19 on the patient referral pattern and conversion rate in the university versus private facial plastic surgery centers

Purpose

To compare the number of referrals and conversion rate between the pandemic and pre-pandemic period.

Methods

The number of referrals and conversion rate between the 10-month pandemic (March–December 2020) and pre-pandemic (March–December 2019) were evaluated in the two university (mainly non-cosmetic) and private (mainly cosmetic) facial plastic surgery centers. Demographics and monthly number and type (cosmetic and non-cosmetic) of the referrals and surgeries were recorded from the both and cosmetic facial injections (botulinum toxin and filler) and the source of referrals (web- and non-web-based) from the private center. The conversion rate was a ratio of the number of the surgeries to the number of referrals.

Results

The number of referrals declined by 7.7% in the private center which was significantly higher for the non-cosmetic (26%) than the cosmetic (0.5%) referrals. It was 32% in the university center. The private center conversion rate significantly (P < 0.001) decreased for both the cosmetic (60%) and non-cosmetic (82%) procedures. It was not significantly different between the cosmetic (65%) and non-cosmetic (58%) procedures in the university center. However, the number of cosmetic facial injections (11%) and the web-based referral source (4%) increased. The recovery was better for the number of referrals (better in the private center) than the conversion rate.

Conclusion

The fall in the conversion rate was statistically significant in the private center. While the number of referrals recovered to almost the pre-pandemic level, the conversion rates, despite recovery, remained at a lower level at the end.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02469-1.

Breast Reconstruction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic posed unique challenges for breast reconstruction. Many professional organizations initially placed restrictions on breast reconstruction, leading surgeons to conceive innovative protocols for offering breast reconstruction. This study reviewed the current evidence on breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide guidance for surgeons facing future crises.

Methods

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for studies (1) describing implant and autologous breast reconstruction following mastectomy and (2) occurring during or pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

Of the 1347 studies identified, 26 were included. Studies discussed type of reconstruction (18, 69%), complications (11, 42%), timing of reconstruction (10, 38%), protocols (10, 38%), COVID-19 screening (7, 27%), and length of hospital stay (7, 27%). The type of reconstruction varied depending on the stage of the pandemic: early on, autologous breast reconstruction was halted to preserve resources, but was later resumed. Within implant-based reconstruction, direct-to-implant was favored over serial tissue expansion. Several protocols were developed, with many emphasizing multidisciplinary collaborations for patient selection, use of specialized measures to reduce risk of COVID-19 transmission, and optimization of same-day discharge. Complication rates following breast reconstruction were similar to pre-pandemic rates.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic has forever changed the landscape of breast reconstruction by raising important questions about delivery of care, cost, and resource utilization. The findings of this review may inform surgeons as they plan for similar future crises or strive for improved patient care and efficacy even during nonpandemic times.