Comparing airways clearance techniques in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis: positive expiratory pressure or temporary positive expiratory pressure? A retrospective study

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Application of T-PEP in the Therapeutic Management of COPD Patients

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, characterized by chronic mucus hypersecretion (CMH) that exacerbates airway obstruction and accelerates disease progression. Effective airway clearance techniques are essential to improve respiratory function and reduce exacerbations. Temporary Positive Expiratory Pressure (T-PEP) is a novel airway clearance device that has shown promise in managing COPD. Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of T-PEP in a standard pulmonary rehabilitation program. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in the MEDLINE and PEDro databases. Data from 162 subjects, including those with severe COPD and bronchiectasis, were analyzed. Key outcomes assessed were changes in lung function (FVC, FEV1, TLC), inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP, MEP), gas exchange (PaO2, PaCO2), exercise capacity (6MWT), symptom severity (mMRC, CAT, BCSS), and exacerbation rates. Results: T-PEP significantly improved FVC, FEV1, TLC, MIP, MEP, and DLCO compared to baseline, with heterogeneity noted across studies. Improvements in gas exchange and physical capacity were observed, with PaO2 increasing and PaCO2 decreasing. T-PEP also reduced symptoms of cough and dyspnea, improving quality-of-life scores. Additionally, a notable reduction in acute exacerbations of COPD was seen after one month and three months of treatment. Conclusions: T-PEP therapy shows substantial benefits in improving lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life while reducing exacerbation rates in COPD patients. Although promising, these findings require further confirmation through randomized clinical trials to establish the optimal application of T-PEP in various clinical settings and patient phenotypes.

Advancing the Battle against Cystic Fibrosis: Stem Cell and Gene Therapy Insights

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a hereditary disorder characterized by mutations in the CFTR gene, leading to impaired chloride ion transport and subsequent thickening of mucus in various organs, particularly the lungs. Despite significant progress in CF management, current treatments focus mainly on symptom relief and do not address the underlying genetic defects. Stem cell and gene therapies present promising avenues for tackling CF at its root cause. Stem cells, including embryonic, induced pluripotent, mesenchymal, hematopoietic, and lung progenitor cells, offer regenerative potential by differentiating into specialized cells and modulating immune responses. Similarly, gene therapy aims to correct CFTR gene mutations by delivering functional copies of the gene into affected cells. Various approaches, such as viral and nonviral vectors, gene editing with CRISPR-Cas9, small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapy, and mRNA therapy, are being explored to achieve gene correction. Despite their potential, challenges such as safety concerns, ethical considerations, delivery system optimization, and long-term efficacy remain. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of CF pathophysiology, the rationale for exploring stem cell and gene therapies, the types of therapies available, their mechanisms of action, and the challenges and future directions in the field. By addressing these challenges, stem cell and gene therapies hold promise for transforming CF management and improving the quality of life of affected individuals.

Effectiveness of a new "focused pulse" high-frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with moderate to severe COPD

BACKGROUND

Chest physiotherapy plays a crucial role in the treatment of COPD, although the optimal techniques for airway clearance have not been definitively established. Among the different techniques, high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) has gained attention for its potential to create a widespread lung percussion, facilitating the removal of secretions and potentially clearing the peripheral bronchial tree. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a novel "focused pulse" HFCWO in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

METHODS

Sixty patients were randomized to three groups: a group treated with the PEP technique, a group with "focused pulse "HFCWO" and a group with pharmacological therapy alone (control group). The primary outcomes were changes in respiratory function parameters, changes in dyspnea and quality of life scores as well as daily life activity and health status assessment. The secondary outcomes were the number of exacerbations and the number of practitioner or emergency department (ED) visits after 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Sixty patients concluded the study with 20 patients allocated to each group. The two devices improved respiratory function tests, quality of life and health scores and dyspnea compared to the control group. Maximal expiratory pressure and diffusing lung carbon oxide were significantly improved in the focused pulse HFCWO group compared to the PEP group. Only pulse-focused HFCWO showed a statistically significant lower number of exacerbations and visits to ED or practitioner compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The focused pulse HFCWO technique improves daily life activities and lung function in patients with stable COPD. The device demonstrated significantly greater effectiveness in lowering COPD exacerbations as well as visits to ED or practitioner.

Feasibility of subacute rehabilitation for mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 disease: a retrospective case series

In this case series study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a subacute rehabilitation program for mechanically ventilated patients with severe consequences of COVID-19 infection. Data were retrospectively collected from seven males (age 37-61 years) who were referred for inpatient rehabilitation following the stay in the ICU (14-22 days). On admission, six patients were still supported by mechanical ventilation. All patients were first placed in isolation in a special COVID unit for 6-22 days. Patients attended 11-24 treatment sessions for the duration of rehabilitation stay (13-27 days), including 6-20 sessions in the COVID unit. The treatment included pulmonary and physical rehabilitation. The initially nonventilated patient was discharged prematurely due to gallbladder problems, whereas all six mechanically ventilated patients were successfully weaned off before transfer to a COVID-free unit where they stayed for 7-19 days. At discharge, all patients increased limb muscle strength and thigh circumference, reduced activity-related dyspnea, regained functional independence and reported better quality of life. Rehabilitation plays a vital role in the recovery of seriously ill post-COVID-19 patients. Facilities should develop and implement plans for providing multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatments in various settings to recover functioning and prevent the development of long-term consequences of the COVID-19 disease.

Airway Clearance Techniques: The Right Choice for the Right Patient

The management of bronchial secretions is one of the main problems encountered in a wide spectrum of medical conditions ranging from respiratory disorders, neuromuscular disorders and patients undergoing either thoracic or abdominal surgery. The purpose of this review is illustrate to the reader the different ACTs currently available and the related evidence present in literature. Alongside methods with a strong background behind as postural drainage, manual techniques or PEP systems, the current orientation is increasingly aimed at devices that can mobilize and / or remove secretions. Cough Assist, Vacuum Techniques, systems that modulate airflow have more and more scientific evidence. Different principles combination is a new field of investigation that goes toward an increasing of clinical complexity that will facing us.

Measuring airway clearance outcomes in bronchiectasis: a review

While airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are recommended for individuals with bronchiectasis, many trials have demonstrated inconsistent benefits or failed to reach their primary outcome. This review determined the most common clinical and patient-reported outcome measures used to evaluate the efficacy of ACTs in bronchiectasis. A literature search of five databases using relevant keywords and filtering for studies published in English, up until the end of August 2019, was completed. Studies included randomised controlled trials, using crossover or any other trial design, and abstracts. Studies were included where the control was placebo, no intervention, standard care, usual care or an active comparator. Adults with bronchiectasis not related to cystic fibrosis were included. Extracted data comprised study authors, design, duration, intervention, outcome measures and results. The search identified 27 published studies and one abstract. The most common clinical outcome measures were sputum volume (n=23), lung function (n=17) and pulse oximetry (n=9). The most common patient-reported outcomes were health-related quality of life (measured with St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, n=4), cough-related quality of life (measured with Leicester Cough Questionnaire, n=4) and dyspnoea (measured with Borg/modified Borg scale, n=8). Sputum volume, lung function, dyspnoea and health- and cough-related quality of life appear to be the most common clinical and patient-reported measures of airway clearance treatment efficacy.