Vaccinations in patients with hematological malignancies

Parent caregivers' preferences and satisfaction with currently provided childhood cancer survivorship care

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the level of satisfaction of parent caregivers of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) with currently provided survivorship care and their preferences for survivorship care provider.

METHODS

Study subjects were parent caregivers recruited at three hospitals in Korea. Study data were collected from self-administered questionnaires and medical records. We assessed parent caregivers' levels of satisfaction with specific survivorship care contents and preferred types of survivorship care provider among oncologists, primary care physicians (PCPs), and institutional general physicians (IGPs). Factors associated with parent caregivers' preferences for survivorship care provider were evaluated by multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

680 parent caregivers (mother 62.1% and father 37.9%) of 487 CCSs (mean age at diagnosis: 6.9 ± 5.1 years; mean time since treatment completion 5.4 ± 4.4 years) were included. Parent caregivers' dissatisfaction was the highest with screening for second primary cancer, followed by psychosocial problem management. Higher educational level of parent caregiver, parent caregiver's higher level of dissatisfaction with currently provided care, higher age of CCSs at cancer diagnosis, history of receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and longer time lapse after cancer treatment were significantly associated with parent caregivers' higher preference for PCPs or IGPs than oncologists. Parent caregiver's multiple comorbidities and higher fear of cancer recurrence were associated with parent caregivers' higher preference for oncologists than PCPs or IGPs. Around 80% of parent caregivers recognized that a shared care system was helpful for promoting the health of CCSs.

CONCLUSION

Parent caregivers were substantially dissatisfied with currently provided care, especially regarding the health issues not directly associated with the primary cancer. Parent caregivers' preferences for survivorship care provider is influenced by multiple factors, including age and survival time of CCSs, characteristics of parent caregivers, satisfaction level with care, and specific survivorship care contents.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

The findings of our study suggest that shared survivorship care for CCSs with consideration of specific care contents can complement the current oncologist-led survivorship care system.

Spike-Specific Memory B Cell Response in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients following Multiple mRNA-1273 Vaccinations: A Longitudinal Observational Study

Preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection is of utmost importance in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation patients (allo-HCT), given their heightened susceptibility to adverse outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, limited data are available regarding the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines in these subjects, particularly concerning the generation and persistence of spike-specific memory response. Here, we analyzed the spike-specific memory B cells in a cohort of allo-HCT recipients vaccinated with multiple doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine and monitored the spike-specific antibody response from baseline up to one month after the fourth dose. After the primary vaccine series, the frequency of spike-specific B cells, detected within the pool of Ig-switched CD19+ cells, significantly increased. The booster dose further induced a significant expansion, reaching up to 0.28% of spike-specific B cells. The kinetics of this expansion were slower in the allo-HCT recipients compared to healthy controls. Spike-specific IgG and ACE2/RBD binding inhibition activity were observed in 80% of the allo-HCT recipients after the first two doses, with a significant increase after the third and fourth booster doses, including in the subjects who did not respond to the primary vaccine series. Additionally, 87% of the allo-HCT recipients exhibited positive cross-inhibition activity against the BA.1 variant. Our findings provide evidence that allo-HCT recipients need repeated doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine to induceSARS-CoV-2 specific immune response similar to that observed in healthy individuals. This is particularly crucial for vulnerable individuals who may exhibit a limited response to the primary series of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Pathogenesis and management of immune dysfunction secondary to B cell haematological malignancies

Malignancies of the B-lymphocyte lineage are among the most diagnosed haematological malignancies in clinical practice. In our community, multiple myeloma (MM) and its precursor condition monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance are the commonest, accounting for ~12% of diagnoses, followed by chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and its precursor condition monoclonal B lymphocytosis, ~9%. Along with diffuse large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma, these conditions comprise around a third of all haematological malignancies diagnosed. Infection remains an important cause of mortality and morbidity in the management of patients with these conditions. This is in part treatment-related but also reflective of disease-related immune dysfunction. Infectious complications account for up to 50% of early mortality in patients with myeloma and up to 50% of all mortality in patients with CLL. A variety of strategies are available to decrease the morbidity and mortality of infectious complications; however, practices vary between countries and often between treating physicians. Treatment options have evolved significantly over the last decade, with the introduction of monoclonal antibodies, small molecule inhibitors, second- and third-generation immunomodulatory agents and CAR-T cell therapy. Much of the data that inform clinical practice in infection management predates current therapeutic approaches. This is in part because of the rapid development of new therapies but also reflective of the long natural history of many of these diseases and the need for prolonged periods of observation. In this article, we review the aspects of disease and treatment that contribute to immune dysfunction in MM, CLL and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and review the current strategies used to manage immune dysfunction and infection.

Vaccinations in children with hematologic malignancies and those receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants or cellular therapies

Children who are immune compromised are uniquely threatened by a higher risk of infections, including vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). Children who undergo chemotherapy or cellular therapies may not have preexisting immunity to VPDs at the time of their treatment including not yet receiving their primary vaccine series, and additionally they have higher risk of exposures (e.g., due to family structures, daycare and school setting) with decreased capacity to protect themselves using nonpharmaceutic measures (e.g., masking). In the past, efforts to revaccinate these children have often been delayed or incomplete. Treatment with chemotherapy, stem cell transplants, and/or cellular therapies impair the ability of the immune system to mount a robust vaccine response. Ideally, protection would be provided as soon as both safe and effective, which will vary by vaccine type (e.g., replicating versus nonreplicating; conjugated versus polysaccharide). While a single approach revaccination schedule following these therapies would be convenient for providers, it would not account for patient specific factors that influence the timing of immune reconstitution (IR). Evidence suggests that many of these children would mount a meaningful vaccine response as early as 3 months following completion of treatment. Here within, we provide updated guidance on how to approach vaccination both during and following completion of these therapies.

Catch-up antibody responses and hybrid immunity in mRNA vaccinated patients at risk of severe COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The immunogenicity of repeated vaccination and hybrid immunity in vulnerable patients remains unclear.

METHODS

We studied the impact of iterative Covid-19 mRNA vaccination and hybrid immunity on antibody levels in immunosuppressed subjects. Patients with liver cirrhosis (n = 38), survivors of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (n = 36) and patients with autoimmune liver disease (n = 14) along with healthy controls (n = 20) were monitored for SARS-CoV-2-S1 IgG after their 1st-3rd vaccine doses, 31 of whom became infected with the Omicron variant after the 2nd dose. Ten uninfected allo-HSCT recipients received an additional 4th vaccine dose.

RESULTS

Unexpectedly, immunosuppressed patients achieved antibody levels in parity with controls after the 3rd vaccine dose. In all study cohorts, hybrid immunity (effect of vaccination and natural infection) resulted in approximately 10-fold higher antibody levels than vaccine-induced immunity alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Three doses of the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine entailed high antibody concentrations even in immunocompromised individuals, and hybrid-immunity resulted further augmented levels than vaccination alone. Clinical trial registration: EudraCT 2021-000349-42.

Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. A multicentric experience

COVID-19 disease has a strong impact on hematological patients; those receiving autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) represent a particularly vulnerable group, in which the effectiveness of vaccination is very variable. Chiarucci et al. showed that patients affected by non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and treated with rituximab experienced a lower rate of immunization against SARS-CoV-2 (54%), as well as significantly lower IgG antibody titers. In our multicenter retrospective observational study, we included 82 patients who underwent aHSCT, divided into two groups: 58 patients vaccinated after aHSCT (group A) and 24 vaccinated before getting transplantation (group B). In group A, 39 (67%) patients had positive serology, and the rate of positivity increased with time after aHSCT. In the subgroup of patients with NHL, the administration of rituximab predicted negative serology, particularly when administered in the 6 months before vaccination (13% response rate). Patients affected by plasma cells had a higher rate of positivity (83% overall), independently of the time to aHSCT. In group B, no patient who initially showed positive serology became negative after transplantation, so the aHSCT did not affect the response to the vaccination. Our study confirmed the role of rituximab as a negative predictor of response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, whereas the conditioning and transplantation procedure itself seemed to be less important.

Safety Profile and Outcomes of Early COVID-19 Treatments in Immunocompromised Patients: A Single-Centre Cohort Study

Background: Early treatment with remdesivir (RMD) or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) could be a valuable tool in patients at risk of severe COVID-19 with unsatisfactory responses to vaccination. We aim to assess the safety and clinical outcomes of these treatments among immunocompromised subjects. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all nonhospitalized patients who received an early treatment with RMD or mAbs for COVID-19, from 25 November 2021 to 25 January 2022, in a large tertiary hospital. Outcomes included frequency of adverse drug reaction (ADR), duration of symptoms and molecular swab positivity, emergency department access, hospital or intensive care unit admission, and mortality in the 14 days following treatment administration. Results: Early treatments were administered to 143 patients, 106/143 (74.1%) immunocompromised, including 41 solid organ and 6 hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Overall, 23/143 (16.1%) subjects reported ADRs. Median time from treatment start to SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab negativity and symptom resolution was 10 (IQR 6–16) and 2.5 days (IQR 1.0–6.0), respectively, without differences between immunocompromised and nonimmunocompromised patients. In the 14 days after treatment administration, 5/143 patients (3.5%) were hospitalized and one died as a result of causes related to COVID-19, all of them were immunocompromised. Conclusions: RMD and mAbs have minimal ADRs and favourable outcomes in immunocompromised patients.

Evaluation of serological response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in hematological patients

Introduction

In immunocompromised patients, SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine has been used in Italy from the beginning of the vaccination campaign, but several studies have shown that the serological response of onco-hematological patients was reduced compared to healthy subjects, due to the state of immunosuppression because of both underlying disease and administered therapy.

Methods

We evaluated the association of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG titers in 215 hematological patients with clinical and demographic variables to verify if it was possible to identify predictive parameters of serological response, as well as using a control group, consisting of healthy health workers of San Carlo Hospital in Potenza. Anti-SARS-CoV2 IgG titers were evaluated after 30–45 days post second dose vaccine using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay technology.

Results

Patients with hematological malignancies, compared with the control arm, had both a mean concentration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG significantly lower and a seroconversion rate numerically lower. All chronic lymphatic leukemia patients showed levels of antibody titer below the mean concentration, also in only clinical surveillance patients. Comparing serological response in hematological malignancies, only acute leukemia patients who were off therapy had the highest seroconversion rate among the patients’ cohorts and a mean antibody concentration greater than the control arm. Patients treated with steroids and rituximab showed a lower level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG. Differences in anti-spike IgG levels among chronic myeloid leukemia patients stratified according to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and molecular response were observed, and they could have interesting implications on the evaluation of the effects of these drugs on the immune system, but having not reached statistical significance at the moment. The cohort of patients who received a stem cell transplant was very heterogeneous because it included different hematological malignancies and different types of transplant; however, a mean concentration of anti-SARS-CoV2 IgG greater than the control arm was reported. Indeed, among patients who performed a transplant for over 6 months only one had a spike IgG concentration below the cutoff.

Conclusions

Our data confirm reduced serological response in hematological patients after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. However, we found a great diversity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response according to types of pathologies and therapies.

Association between PCV13 pneumococcal vaccination and risk of hospital admissions due to pneumonia or sepsis among patients with haematological malignancies: a single-centre retrospective cohort study in Israel

OBJECTIVES

Patients with haematological malignancies receiving immunosuppressive therapy are at highest risk of invasive pneumococcal disease. Our goal was to investigate whether vaccination of haematological patients with pneumococcal 13-valent conjugated vaccine (PCV13) prior to therapy initiation is associated with decreased hospital admissions due to pneumonia or sepsis within 12 months.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A longitudinal retrospective cohort study was conducted at the haematology unit of Carmel Medical Center, Israel.

PARTICIPANTS

Information on adult patients (>18 years) who were diagnosed between 1 January 2009 and 30 December 2019 with haematological malignancies and received immunosuppressive therapy was retrieved from the electronic health records. Patients with haematological malignancies who received the PCV13 vaccination during or after initiation of the immunosuppressive therapy were excluded from the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

A multivariate logistic regression model was performed to determine whether PCV13 vaccination is associated with fewer hospital admissions due to pneumonia or sepsis.

RESULTS

The cohort included 616 patients, of which 418 (67%) patients were not vaccinated and 198 (33%) were vaccinated. Within 12 months, 15.1% (n=63) of non-vaccinated patients compared with only 7.1% (n=14) of the vaccinated patients were hospitalised due to pneumonia or sepsis. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that receiving PCV13 vaccination is associated with 45% (OR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.246 to 0.839, p=0.012) reduced odds of being hospitalised due to pneumonia or sepsis in patients with haematological malignancies receiving immunosuppressive therapy.

CONCLUSION

This is the first observational study to demonstrate the association between PCV13 vaccination and hospital admissions in patients with haematological malignancies receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Patients receiving PCV13 vaccination before immunosuppressive therapy initiation had significantly reduced odds of hospitalisation due to pneumonia or sepsis compared with non-PCV13-vaccinated patients.

Secondary Immunodeficiency in Hematological Malignancies: Focus on Multiple Myeloma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Secondary immunodeficiency is reported in most patients with hematological malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma. The aim of our review was to evaluate the existing literature data on patients with hematological malignancies, with regard to the effect of immunodeficiency on the outcome, the clinical and therapeutic approach, and on the onset of noninfectious complications, including thrombosis, pleural effusion, and orofacial complications. Immunodeficiency in these patients has an intense impact on their risk of infection, in turn increasing morbidity and mortality even years after treatment completion. However, these patients with increased risk of severe infectious diseases could be treated with adequate vaccination coverage, but the vaccines' administration can be associated with a decreased immune response and an augmented risk of adverse reactions. Probably, immunogenicity of the inactivated is analogous to that of healthy subjects at the moment of vaccination, but it undertakes a gradual weakening over time. However, the dispensation of live attenuated viral vaccines is controversial because of the risk of the activation of vaccine viruses. A particular immunization schedule should be employed according to the clinical and immunological condition of each of these patients to guarantee a constant immune response without any risks to the patients' health.

Reduced humoral immune response after BNT162b2 coronavirus disease 2019 messenger RNA vaccination in cancer patients under antineoplastic treatment

Background

Cancer patients are at a higher risk of developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients undergoing treatment remain unclear.

Patients and methods

In this interventional prospective multicohort study, priming and booster doses of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine were administered 21 days apart to solid tumor patients receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted or hormonal therapy, and patients with a hematologic malignancy receiving rituximab or after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Vaccine safety and efficacy (until 3 months post-booster) were assessed. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody levels were followed over time (until 28 days after the booster) and in vitro SARS-CoV-2 50% neutralization titers (NT50) toward the wild-type Wuhan strain were analyzed 28 days after the booster.

Results

Local and systemic adverse events (AEs) were mostly mild to moderate (only 1%-3% of patients experienced severe AEs). Local, but not systemic, AEs occurred more frequently after the booster dose. Twenty-eight days after the booster vaccination of 197 cancer patients, RBD-binding antibody titers and NT50 were lower in the chemotherapy group {234.05 IU/ml [95% confidence interval (CI) 122.10-448.66] and 24.54 (95% CI 14.50-41.52), respectively} compared with healthy individuals [1844.93 IU/ml (95% CI 1383.57-2460.14) and 122.63 (95% CI 76.85-195.67), respectively], irrespective of timing of vaccination during chemotherapy cycles. Extremely low antibody responses were seen in hematology patients receiving rituximab; only two patients had RBD-binding antibody titers necessary for 50% protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (<200 IU/ml) and only one had NT50 above the limit of detection. During the study period, five cancer patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, including a case of severe COVID-19 in a patient receiving rituximab, resulting in a 2-week hospital admission.

Conclusion

The BNT162b2 vaccine is well-tolerated in cancer patients under active treatment. However, the antibody response of immunized cancer patients was delayed and diminished, mainly in patients receiving chemotherapy or rituximab, resulting in breakthrough infections.

•

The BNT162b2 vaccine is well-tolerated in cancer patients, including patients under immunotherapy.

•

Full BNT162b2 vaccination results in a blunted humoral immune response in cancer patients under active treatment.

•

The humoral immune response after BNT162b2 vaccination varies between different antineoplastic treatments.

•

Two doses of BNT162b2 vaccination may insufficiently protect patients receiving chemotherapy or rituximab against SARS-CoV-2.

Is it time to reconsider prophylactic antimicrobial use for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation? a narrative review of antimicrobials in stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) is a life-saving procedure for multiple types of hematological cancer, autoimmune diseases, and genetic-linked metabolic diseases in humans. Recipients of HSCT transplant are at high risk of microbial infections that significantly correlate with the presence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and the degree of immunosuppression. Infection in HSCT patients is a leading cause of life-threatening complications and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers issues pertinent to infection in the HSCT patient, including bacterial and viral infection; strategies to reduce GVHD; infection patterns; resistance and treatment options; adverse drug reactions to antimicrobials, problems of antimicrobial resistance; perturbation of the microbiome; the role of prebiotics, probiotics, and antimicrobial peptides. We highlight potential strategies to minimize the use of antimicrobials.

EXPERT OPINION

Measures to control infection and its transmission remain significant HSCT management policy and planning issues. Transplant centers need to consider carefully prophylactic use of antimicrobials for neutropenic patients. The judicious use of appropriate antimicrobials remains a crucial part of the treatment protocol. However, antimicrobials' adverse effects cause microbiome diversity and dysbiosis and have been shown to increase morbidity and mortality.

Mini Review Immunological Consequences of Immunization With COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Preliminary Results

Background: BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are the two recently approved mRNA-based vaccines against COVID-19 which has shown excellent safety and efficacy. Preliminary data about specific and neutralizing antibodies is available covering the first 100 days after vaccination. Methods: We reviewed all the publications regarding the immunologic consequences of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccination. A summary of specific antibodies concentration and neutralizing antibodies titers elicited by each vaccine is provided. Results: BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 displayed a reassuring safety and efficacy profile, with the latter above 94%. They can elicit specific antibodies titers and neutralizing antibodies concentrations that are far superior from those observed among COVID-19 human convalescent serum, across a wide span of age, for at least 100 days after vaccination. Moreover, the vaccine-induced T cellular response is oriented toward a TH1 response and no evidence of vaccine-enhanced disease have been reported. Discussion: BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 can elicit specific antibodies titers and neutralizing antibodies concentrations above those observed among COVID-19 human convalescent serum in the first 100 days after vaccination. Data about vaccine efficacy in those with previous COVID-19 or immunocompromised is still limited.

Clinical, social, and psycho-oncological needs of adolescents and young adults (AYA) versus older patients following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Purpose

To analyze demand for information and advice as well as medical, psychological, and social needs of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) and older patients (non-AYA) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Methods

A questionnaire was sent to 100 HSCT recipients comprising n = 50 AYAs (aged 19–39 years) and n = 50 non-AYAs (> 39 years). The questionnaire covered the categories: (a) patient characteristics; (b) need for advice, on medical, psychological, and social care topics; (c) medical, psychological, and social needs, and (d) preferred forms and channels of information.

Results

The return rate was 65%. 62.5% of patients indicated medical needs; 41.1% psychological needs, and 64.9% had needs concerning social issues. Among medical aspects, aftercare was important to both groups. Nutrition was of highest interest for AYA, while non-AYAs identified fatigue and vaccination as their most pressing concerns. Body shape/sexuality and relaxation techniques were the most common psychological issues for AYA, while coping strategies were important for both cohorts. Family, relationship and friends were of less interest in both groups. Rehabilitation and premature retirement were of highest interest for both cohorts. The preferred mode of communicating advice was one-to-one conversation in a quiet environment as opposed to informational sessions.

Conclusion

Despite well-established aftercare programs following HSCT, many patients describe unmet needs regarding medical, psychological, and social policy issues. AYA and non-AYA differ in informational needs after HSCT, and, therefore, age-appropriate informational materials are necessary. Particularly AYA may profit from information covering body-shape/sexuality and nutrition, while both cohorts require information covering coping strategies and aftercare.

Viral reactivations following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric patients - A single center 11-year analysis

Viral reactivation occurs frequently in the context of immunodeficiency and immunosuppression after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and can cause severe complications. The aim of this single-center retrospective analysis was to characterize viral infections in the first year after HSCT, to investigate risk factors and to study the impact of viral infections on transplantation outcome. This will facilitate the identification of at-risk patients and the development of new preventive strategies. 107 pediatric allo-HSCT from January 2005 through December 2015 were analyzed for infections with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), adenovirus (ADV), herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella zoster virus (VZV). Viral infections were detected after 68.2% of transplantations. The viruses most commonly encountered were HHV-6 (36/107) and EBV (30/107). Severe viral disease was rare (7/107) and none of the patients died as result of viral reactivation. Important risk factors for viral infections were higher age at HSCT, donor type and occurrence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD). Especially for EBV, transplant from an unrelated donor and in-vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) had a significant effect on infection rates, whereas for CMV the strongest effect was seen by donor and recipient serostatus with recipient seropositivity most predictive for reactivation. The occurrence of severe aGvHD was associated with EBV and ADV infections. For HSV, the recipient serostatus was identified as prognostic factor for HSV infections, while we found higher age at time of HSCT as risk factor for VZV infections. The overall survival of patients with or without viral infections did not differ significantly. Interestingly, when looking at the 85 patients in our cohort who had received an HSCT for a malignant disease, a tendency towards lower relapse rates was seen in patients affected by viral infections (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.25 - 1.06, p = 0.072). Viral reactivations are common after pediatric allo-HSCT, though severe complications were rare in our collective. Determining risk factors for viral reactivations may help to identify patients in need of intensified monitoring and to individualize preventive strategies.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Antibody Titers Against Measles, Mumps, and Rubella in Recipients of Allogenic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Outbreaks of viral infections, such as measles, are regularly observed and pose a serious threat to recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The questions of how long cellular and humoral protective host immunity persists, and whether donor immunity can be transferred has not been clarified. Here we present a retrospective analysis of humoral immunity-serial antibody titers against measles, mumps, and rubella-in 331 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT at our single center between 2002 and 2015. Associations between the loss of protective antibody levels and clinical patient characteristics and transplantation parameters were examined. In general, antibody protection against measles persisted longer, with 72% of patients maintaining sufficient titers at 5 years post-HCT even without revaccination, while at that time only 65% and 50% of patients had protective immunity against rubella and mumps, respectively. The great majority of donors were seropositive for all 3 viruses; however, it appeared that donor humoral immunity could not be transferred and had no impact on post-HCT serostatus. Rather, the most relevant factor for persistent protective antibody titers against measles and rubella was whether patients were born before the introduction of the respective vaccine and thus were immunized by the wild-type disease-inducing virus instead of the vaccine. Moreover, the presence of moderate and severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was associated with more rapid loss of immune protection. In contrast, underlying disease, intensity of the conditioning regimen, use of antithymocyte globulin, age, and graft source had no influence on antibody titers. Overall, our findings suggest that the majority of antibodies against measles, mumps, and rubella originate from residual host cells, whereas donor immune status appears to have no influence on antibody protection post-HCT.

Prevalence of Hypogammaglobulinemia in Adult Invasive Pneumococcal Disease

Background

Patients with humoral immune deficiency are susceptible to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). This study estimates the prevalence of underlying hypogammaglobulinemia in admitted IPD cases and examines whether IPD cases had received preventative treatment.

Methods

All adult IPD cases (Streptococcus pneumoniae in blood or cerebrospinal fluid) admitted to The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) from January 2013 to December 2015 were identified through the Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory. Documented clinical demographics, S. pneumoniae serotype, serum immunoglobulins measured previously or in convalescence, and vaccination status of the cases were collected retrospectively for descriptive analyses.

Results

There were 134 IPD in 133 patients (47.4% male; mean age 63, standard deviation [SD] = 15.6 years) during a 3-year observation period. All-cause mortality rate was 22.6% over a mean follow-up time of 362, SD = 345 days. Fifty-seven patients (42.9%) had serum immunoglobulin levels measured. Eighteen were either found to have hypogammaglobulinemia in convalescence (8/18) or previously known to have hypogammaglobulinemia (10/18). None of the known hypogammaglobulinemic patients had received antibiotic prophylaxis and/or immunoglobulin replacement therapy within 4 months prior to IPD. The high and low estimates of prevalence of hypogammaglobulinemia were 31.6% (of all measured) and 13.5% (of all cases). Among 18 patients with hematological malignancies in our cohort, 13 had hypogammaglobulinemia. Many isolates were vaccine serotypes; however, only 8 had documented previous pneumococcal vaccination.

Conclusions

IPD has high mortality, and hypogammaglobulinemia was present in at least 13.5% of IPD cases. Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia is especially common in cases with hematological malignancy and IPD.

Vaccine-preventable disease following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant in Western Australia

AIM

Infection is an important and frequent cause of mortality and morbidity following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This study was conducted to determine the epidemiology and clinical phenotype of vaccine-preventable disease in children who have undergone HSCT following the implementation of a standard revaccination programme.

METHODS

Children receiving first allogeneic HSCT in Western Australia between January 2005 and December 2014 were eligible for recruitment. Patients received standard antimicrobial prophylaxis and were vaccinated according to the West Australian post-HSCT immunisation schedule, commencing 6 months following HSCT. Children who developed any illness post-HSCT were reviewed, and investigations for infectious disease were undertaken as clinically indicated. Positive identification of vaccine-preventable disease was documented with the clinical course of the illness.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients were enrolled in the study. The overall incidence of vaccine-preventable disease following HSCT was 19.7%; influenza accounted for 50% of all cases, herpes zoster for 42.9%. All episodes occurred late, beyond day 100 post-HSCT. Overall survival for matched-sibling donor transplants was 83.3 and 75.0% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, and was 72.3 and 63.3% for alternative donor transplants. Mortality due to vaccine-preventable disease was low, with one death from disseminated herpes zoster.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high incidence of vaccine-preventable morbidity post-allogeneic HSCT in West Australian children. Viral aetiology constitutes the main burden, namely, influenza infection and varicella zoster virus reactivation. Further efforts are required to identify the most appropriate preventative strategies.

Varicella Zoster Virus Reactivation in Adult Survivors of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: How Do We Best Protect Our Patients?

Reactivation of varicella zoster virus (VZV) remains a significant public health burden for long-term survivors of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Delayed immune reconstitution after transplantation due to immunosuppression, post-transplant therapies, poor engraftment, and graft-versus-host disease leave a large number of patients at risk for herpes zoster (shingles) and its highly morbid complications. Although prophylaxis with acyclovir or valacyclovir has reduced the incidence of VZV reactivation as long as prophylaxis is continued, the incidence of disease in the late post-transplant period or after stopping prophylaxis is greater in the hematopoietic cell transplantation population than the general public. Therefore, additional interventions beyond long-term use of prophylactic antivirals are required to suppress VZV. Vaccines to elicit VZV-specific immunity represent one method to enhance prevention of VZV reactivation, but care must be taken with live vaccines. Inactivated vaccines have been developed and require well-designed studies to determine their safety and efficacy in this high-risk population. Here, we report the available evidence for established and newly developed vaccines for VZV and discuss our view on their role in protecting our transplant survivors against VZV reactivation.

iwCLL guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and supportive management of CLL

The previous edition of the consensus guidelines of the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL), published in 2008, has found broad acceptance by physicians and investigators caring for patients with CLL. Recent advances including the discovery of the genomic landscape of the disease, the development of genetic tests with prognostic relevance, and the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD), coupled with the increased availability of novel targeted agents with impressive efficacy, prompted an international panel to provide updated evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations. These recommendations include a revised version of the iwCLL response criteria, an update on the use of MRD status for clinical evaluation, and recommendations regarding the assessment and prophylaxis of viral diseases during management of CLL.

Infectious complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: current status and future perspectives in Korea

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a treatment for hematologic malignancies, immune deficiencies, or genetic diseases, ect. Recently, the number of HSCTs performed in Korea has increased and the outcomes have improved. However, infectious complications account for most of the morbidity and mortality after HSCT. Post-HSCT infectious complications are usually classified according to the time after HSCT: pre-engraftment, immediate post-engraftment, and late post-engraftment period. In addition, the types and risk factors of infectious complications differ according to the stem cell source, donor type, conditioning intensity, region, prophylaxis strategy, and comorbidities, such as graft-versushost disease and invasive fungal infection. In this review, we summarize infectious complications after HSCT, focusing on the Korean perspectives.

B-cell Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis: Entering an era

Monoclonal antibodies that target CD20 expressing B cells represent an important new treatment option for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). B-cell-depleting therapy is highly effective against relapsing forms of the disease and is also the first treatment approach proven to protect against disability worsening in primary progressive MS. Moreover, evolving clinical experience with B-cell therapy, combined with a more sophisticated understanding of humoral immunity in preclinical models and in patients with MS, has led to major progress in deciphering the immune pathogenesis of MS. Here, we review the nuanced roles of B cells in MS autoimmunity, the clinical data supporting use of ocrelizumab and other anti-CD20 therapies in the treatment of MS, as well as safety and practical considerations for prescribing. Last, we summarize remaining unanswered questions regarding the proper role of anti-CD20 therapy in MS, its limitations, and the future landscape of B-cell-based approaches to treatment. Ann Neurol 2018;83:13-26.

Challenges in the Role of Gammaglobulin Replacement Therapy and Vaccination Strategies for Hematological Malignancy

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma (MM) are prone to present with antibody production deficits associated with recurrent or severe bacterial infections that might benefit from human immunoglobulin (Ig) (IVIg/SCIg) replacement therapy. However, the original IVIg trial data were done before modern therapies were available, and the current indications do not take into account the shift in the immune situation of current treatment combinations and changes in the spectrum of infections. Besides, patients affected by other B cell malignancies present with similar immunodeficiency and manifestations while they are not covered by the current IVIg indications. A potential beneficial strategy could be to vaccinate patients at monoclonal B lymphocytosis and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance stages (for CLL and MM, respectively) or at B-cell malignancy diagnosis, when better antibody responses are attained. We have to re-emphasize the need for assessing and monitoring specific antibody responses; these are warranted to select adequately those patients for whom early intervention with prophylactic anti-infective therapy and/or IVIg is preferred. This review provides an overview of the current scenario, with a focus on prevention of infection in patients with hematological malignancies and the role of Ig replacement therapy.