1
|
Philippoteaux C, Paccou J, Chazard E, Cortet B. Proton pump inhibitors, bone and phosphocalcic metabolism. Joint Bone Spine 2024; 91:105714. [PMID: 38458487 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for acid-related gastrointestinal disorders; however, concerns have arisen about their prolonged and inappropriate use. Although generally considered safe, recent evidence has linked PPI use with an increased risk of kidney disease, stomach cancer, pneumonia, dementia, cardiovascular events and potential bone health problems. This systematic review examines the effects of PPIs on bone health, including osteoporosis and changes in phosphocalcic and magnesium metabolism, through a comprehensive analysis of the recent literature. The relationship between PPIs, bone mineral density and fracture risk, especially in populations with comorbidities, is complex and we propose a focus based on recent data. Studies of the effect of PPI use on bone mineral density have shown mixed results and require further investigation. Observational studies have indicated an increased risk of fractures, particularly vertebral fractures, associated with PPI use. Recent meta-analyses have confirmed an association between PPI use and hip fractures with a dose-dependent effect. More recently, PPIs have been associated with serious disturbances in phosphocalcic and magnesium metabolism that require careful management and discontinuation. Proton pump inhibitor-induced hypomagnesemia (PPIH) is a well-established phenomenon. In addition, hypocalcemia secondary to severe hypomagnesemia has been described. Despite growing evidence of PPI-related risks, further research is essential to better understand the complex mechanisms, as most data are from observational studies and do not establish a causal relationship. This review emphasizes the need for judicious prescription practices, particularly in long-term use scenarios and rheumatological contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Philippoteaux
- Rheumatology Department, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France; Public Health Department, University Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR 2694, CERIM, METRICS, Lille, France.
| | - Julien Paccou
- Rheumatology Department, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France; Rheumatology Department, Lille University, Lille University Hospital, MabLab, Lille, France
| | - Emmanuel Chazard
- Public Health Department, University Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR 2694, CERIM, METRICS, Lille, France
| | - Bernard Cortet
- Rheumatology Department, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France; Rheumatology Department, Lille University, Lille University Hospital, MabLab, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Costa NDSD, Lima LS, Galiciolli MEA, Ribeiro DHF, Ribeiro MM, Garica GDPJ, Marçal IS, Silva JFD, Pereira ME, Oliveira CS, Guiloski IC. Drug-induced osteoporosis and mechanisms of bone tissue regeneration through trace elements. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2024; 84:127446. [PMID: 38615498 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2024.127446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Osteoporosis is associated with an imbalance in bone formation, with certain drugs used in disease treatment being implicated in its development. Supplementation with trace elements may contribute to bone regeneration, offering an alternative approach by enhancing bone mineral density (BMD) and thereby thwarting the onset of osteoporosis. This review aims to assess the mechanisms through which trace elements such as copper (Cu), iron (Fe), selenium (Se), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) are linked to increased bone mass, thus mitigating the effects of pharmaceuticals. Our findings underscore that the use of drugs such as aromatase inhibitors (AIs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), antiretrovirals, glucocorticoids, opioids, or anticonvulsants can result in decreased BMD, a primary contributor to osteoporosis. Research indicates that essential elements like Cu, Fe, Se, Mn, and Zn, through various mechanisms, can bolster BMD and forestall the onset of the disease, owing to their protective effects. Consequently, our study recommends a minimum daily intake of these essential minerals for patients undergoing treatment with the aforementioned drugs, as the diverse mechanisms governing the effects of trace elements Cu, Fe, Mn, Se, and Zn facilitate bone remodeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nayara de Souza da Costa
- Instituto de Pesquisas Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80035-000, Brazil; Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil
| | - Luíza Siqueira Lima
- Instituto de Pesquisas Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80035-000, Brazil; Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil
| | - Maria Eduarda Andrade Galiciolli
- Instituto de Pesquisas Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80035-000, Brazil; Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil
| | - Deborah Helen Fabiano Ribeiro
- Instituto de Pesquisas Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80035-000, Brazil; Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil
| | - Milena Mariano Ribeiro
- Instituto de Pesquisas Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80035-000, Brazil; Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil
| | - Gisele de Paula Júlia Garica
- Instituto de Pesquisas Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80035-000, Brazil; Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil
| | - Isabela Saragioto Marçal
- Instituto de Pesquisas Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80035-000, Brazil; Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil
| | - Juliana Ferreira da Silva
- Instituto de Pesquisas Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80035-000, Brazil; Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil
| | - Meire Ellen Pereira
- Instituto de Pesquisas Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80035-000, Brazil; Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil
| | - Cláudia Sirlene Oliveira
- Instituto de Pesquisas Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80035-000, Brazil; Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil
| | - Izonete Cristina Guiloski
- Instituto de Pesquisas Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80035-000, Brazil; Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba 80230-020, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yokota S, Ishizu H, Miyazaki T, Takahashi D, Iwasaki N, Shimizu T. Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis, and Subchondral Insufficiency Fracture: Recent Insights. Biomedicines 2024; 12:843. [PMID: 38672197 PMCID: PMC11048726 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The increased incidence of osteoarthritis (OA), particularly knee and hip OA, and osteoporosis (OP), owing to population aging, have escalated the medical expense burden. Osteoarthritis is more prevalent in older women, and the involvement of subchondral bone fragility spotlights its association with OP. Notably, subchondral insufficiency fracture (SIF) may represent a more pronounced condition of OA pathophysiology. This review summarizes the relationship between OA and OP, incorporating recent insights into SIF. Progressive SIF leads to joint collapse and secondary OA and is associated with OP. Furthermore, the thinning and fragility of subchondral bone in early-stage OA suggest that SIF may be a subtype of OA (osteoporosis-related OA, OPOA) characterized by significant subchondral bone damage. The high bone mineral density observed in OA may be overestimated due to osteophytes and sclerosis and can potentially contribute to OPOA. The incidence of OPOA is expected to increase along with population aging. Therefore, prioritizing OP screening, early interventions for patients with early-stage OA, and fracture prevention measures such as rehabilitation, fracture liaison services, nutritional management, and medication guidance are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Tomohiro Shimizu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan; (S.Y.); (H.I.); (T.M.); (D.T.); (N.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Händel MN, Cardoso I, von Bülow C, Rohde JF, Ussing A, Nielsen SM, Christensen R, Body JJ, Brandi ML, Diez-Perez A, Hadji P, Javaid MK, Lems WF, Nogues X, Roux C, Minisola S, Kurth A, Thomas T, Prieto-Alhambra D, Ferrari SL, Langdahl B, Abrahamsen B. Fracture risk reduction and safety by osteoporosis treatment compared with placebo or active comparator in postmenopausal women: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 2023; 381:e068033. [PMID: 37130601 PMCID: PMC10152340 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the comparative effectiveness of osteoporosis treatments, including the bone anabolic agents, abaloparatide and romosozumab, on reducing the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women, and to characterise the effect of antiosteoporosis drug treatments on the risk of fractures according to baseline risk factors. DESIGN Systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify randomised controlled trials published between 1 January 1996 and 24 November 2021 that examined the effect of bisphosphonates, denosumab, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab compared with placebo or active comparator. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Randomised controlled trials that included non-Asian postmenopausal women with no restriction on age, when interventions looked at bone quality in a broad perspective. The primary outcome was clinical fractures. Secondary outcomes were vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, and major osteoporotic fractures, all cause mortality, adverse events, and serious cardiovascular adverse events. RESULTS The results were based on 69 trials (>80 000 patients). For clinical fractures, synthesis of the results showed a protective effect of bisphosphonates, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab compared with placebo. Compared with parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, bisphosphonates were less effective in reducing clinical fractures (odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 2.00). Compared with parathyroid hormone receptor agonists and romosozumab, denosumab was less effective in reducing clinical fractures (odds ratio 1.85, 1.18 to 2.92 for denosumab v parathyroid hormone receptor agonists and 1.56, 1.02 to 2.39 for denosumab v romosozumab). An effect of all treatments on vertebral fractures compared with placebo was found. In the active treatment comparisons, denosumab, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab were more effective than oral bisphosphonates in preventing vertebral fractures. The effect of all treatments was unaffected by baseline risk indicators, except for antiresorptive treatments that showed a greater reduction of clinical fractures compared with placebo with increasing mean age (number of studies=17; β=0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 0.99). No harm outcomes were seen. The certainty in the effect estimates was moderate to low for all individual outcomes, mainly because of limitations in reporting, nominally indicating a serious risk of bias and imprecision. CONCLUSIONS The evidence indicated a benefit of a range of treatments for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women for clinical and vertebral fractures. Bone anabolic treatments were more effective than bisphosphonates in the prevention of clinical and vertebral fractures, irrespective of baseline risk indicators. Hence this analysis provided no clinical evidence for restricting the use of anabolic treatment to patients with a very high risk of fractures. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019128391.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Nicole Händel
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Isabel Cardoso
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Cecilie von Bülow
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Occupational Science, User Perspectives and Community-Based Interventions, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Jeanett Friis Rohde
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Anja Ussing
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Sabrina Mai Nielsen
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Robin Christensen
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jean-Jacques Body
- Department of Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Adolfo Diez-Perez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institut Hospital del Mar of Medical Investigation, Autonomous University of Barcelona and CIBERFES (Frailty and Healthy Aging Research Network), Instituto Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Centre of Bone Health, Frankfurt and Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Muhammad Kassim Javaid
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Xavier Nogues
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Parc de Salut Mar, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian Roux
- INSERM U 1153, Hospital Paris-Centre, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Salvatore Minisola
- Department of Clinical, Internal, Anaesthesiologic, and Cardiovascular Sciences, Rome University, Rome, Italy
| | - Andreas Kurth
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Marienhaus Klinikum Mainz, Major Teaching Hospital, University Medicine Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thierry Thomas
- Université Jean Monnet Saint-Étienne, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Rheumatology Department, INSERM U1059, F-42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Bente Langdahl
- Departments of Clinical Medicine and of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bo Abrahamsen
- Department of Clinical Research, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ayers C, Kansagara D, Lazur B, Fu R, Kwon A, Harrod C. Effectiveness and Safety of Treatments to Prevent Fractures in People With Low Bone Mass or Primary Osteoporosis: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:182-195. [PMID: 36592455 DOI: 10.7326/m22-0684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing in the United States. PURPOSE To evaluate low bone mass and osteoporosis treatments to prevent fractures. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE ALL, Ovid Evidence Based Medicine Reviews: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2014 through February 2022. STUDY SELECTION Adults receiving eligible interventions for low bone mass or osteoporosis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for fracture outcomes, and RCTs and large observational studies (n ≥1000) for harms. DATA EXTRACTION Abstracted by 1 reviewer and verified by a second. Independent, dual assessments of risk of bias and certainty of evidence (CoE). DATA SYNTHESIS We included 34 RCTs (in 100 publications) and 36 observational studies. Bisphosphonates and denosumab reduced hip, clinical and radiographic vertebral, and other clinical fractures in postmenopausal females with osteoporosis (moderate to high CoE). Bisphosphonates for 36 months or more may increase the risk for atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) and osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), but the absolute risks were low. Abaloparatide and teriparatide reduced clinical and radiographic vertebral fractures but increased the risk for withdrawals due to adverse events (WAEs; moderate to high CoE). Raloxifene and bazedoxifene for 36 months or more reduced radiographic vertebral but not clinical fractures (low to moderate CoE). Abaloparatide, teriparatide, and sequential romosozumab, then alendronate, may be more effective than bisphosphonates in reducing clinical fractures for 17 to 24 months in older postmenopausal females at very high fracture risk (low to moderate CoE). Bisphosphonates may reduce clinical fractures in older females with low bone mass (low CoE) and radiographic vertebral fractures in males with osteoporosis (low to moderate CoE). LIMITATION Few studies examined participants with low bone mass, males, or Black-identifying persons, sequential therapy, or treatment beyond 3 years. CONCLUSION Bisphosphonates, denosumab, abaloparatide, teriparatide, and romosozumab, followed by alendronate, reduce clinical fractures in postmenopausal females with osteoporosis. Abaloparatide and teriparatide increased WAEs; longer duration bisphosphonate use may increase AFF and ONJ risk though these events were rare. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE American College of Physicians. (PROSPERO: CRD42021236220).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Ayers
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (C.A.)
| | - Devan Kansagara
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, and Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (D.K.)
| | - Brittany Lazur
- Center for Evidence-based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (B.L.)
| | - Rongwei Fu
- Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon (R.F.)
| | - Amy Kwon
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (A.K.)
| | - Curtis Harrod
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, and Center for Evidence-based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (C.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lespessailles E, Toumi H. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Bone Health: An Update Narrative Review. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms231810733. [PMID: 36142643 PMCID: PMC9504265 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are an antacid drug often used in acid-related disorders. They decrease acid secretion in the stomach by blocking an enzyme called H+/K+ ATPase which controls acid production. Introduced to the market in 1989, their use has increased rapidly worldwide and they are now among the top 10 most prescribed drugs in the United States. As of 2015, the FDA has already approved six drugs of this class (omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole). Recently, the risks and benefits of long-term PPI use were questioned and many studies indicated that their use should be carefully considered, especially in young patients, whose treatment with these drugs could last many years. Even greater concerns have been raised about a potential positive association between PPIs and osteoporotic fracture risk including the hip, spine and wrist. Although based on observational studies, there is substantial evidence associating the long-term use of PPIs and fracture. This relationship is only partially admitted due to the lack of consistent effects of PPIs on bone mineral density loss. Therefore, this narrative review aimed to discuss the recent findings pertaining to the risk of osteoporotic fracture associated with PPIs, in particular prolonged use, and to call for further research to elucidate the mechanisms associated with this bone fragility.
Collapse
|
7
|
Briganti SI, Naciu AM, Tabacco G, Cesareo R, Napoli N, Trimboli P, Castellana M, Manfrini S, Palermo A. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Fractures in Adults: A Critical Appraisal and Review of the Literature. Int J Endocrinol 2021; 2021:8902367. [PMID: 33510787 PMCID: PMC7822697 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8902367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the large number of patients worldwide being on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for acid-related gastrointestinal disorders, uncertainty remains over their long-term safety. Particularly, the potential side effects of these drugs on bone health have been evaluated in the last years. The purpose of our narrative review is to gather and discuss results of clinical studies focusing on the interactions between PPIs and fracture risk. Data generated mainly from nested case-control studies and meta-analysis suggest that long-term/high-dose PPIs users are characterized by an increased risk of fragility fractures, mainly hip fractures. However, in these studies, the PPIs-induced bone impairment is often not adjusted for different confounding variables that could potentially affect bone health, and exposure to PPIs was reported using medical prescriptions without adherence evaluation. The mechanisms of the PPI-related bone damage are still unclear, but impaired micronutrients absorption, hypergastrinemia, and increased secretion of histamine may play a role. Clinicians should pay attention when prescribing PPIs to subjects with a preexistent high risk of fractures and consider antiosteoporotic drugs to manage this additive effect on the bone. However, further studies are needed to clarify PPIs action on the bone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anda Mihaela Naciu
- Unit of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Gaia Tabacco
- Unit of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Cesareo
- Unit of Metabolic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, S. Maria Goretti Hospital, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Nicola Napoli
- Unit of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Trimboli
- Scienza Biomediche, Università Della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Marco Castellana
- Population Health Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology “Saverio de Bellis”, Research Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Silvia Manfrini
- Unit of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Palermo
- Unit of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Llorente I, García-Castañeda N, Valero C, González-Álvaro I, Castañeda S. Osteoporosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Dangerous Liaisons. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020; 7:601618. [PMID: 33330566 PMCID: PMC7719815 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.601618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis has been classically considered a comorbidity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, recent advances in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis in RA have shown a close interplay between cells of the immune system and those involved in bone remodeling, introducing new actors into the classic route in which osteoclast activation is related to the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway. In fact, the inflammatory state in early stages of RA, mediated by interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α has the ability to activate and differentiate osteoclasts not only through their relationship with RANKL, but also through the Wnt/DKK1/sclerostin pathway, leading to bone loss. The role of synovial fibroblasts and activated T lymphocytes in the expression of the RANKL system and its connection to bone destruction is also depicted. In addition, autoantibodies such as rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies are other pathogenic mechanisms for the development of bone erosions and systemic osteoporosis in RA, even before the onset of arthritis. The aim of this review is to unravel the relationship between different factors involved in the development of osteoporosis in RA patients, both the classic factors and the most novel, based on the relationship of autoantibodies with bone remodeling. Furthermore, we propose that bone mineral density measured by different techniques may be helpful as a biomarker of severity in early arthritis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Llorente
- Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Valero
- Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Santos Castañeda
- Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.,Cátedra UAM-Roche, EPID-Future, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hakam AE, Vila G, Duarte PM, Mbadu MP, Ai Angary DS, Shuwaikan H, Aukhil I, Neiva R, da Silva HDP, Chang J. Effects of different antidepressant classes on dental implant failure: A retrospective clinical study. J Periodontol 2020; 92:196-204. [PMID: 32725908 DOI: 10.1002/jper.19-0714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have suggested an association between taking antidepressants and dental implant failure. This study aimed to investigate the association of different antidepressant classes with dental implant failure. METHODS This retrospective study included patients that received dental implants at the University of Florida from 2011 to 2016. The variables of implant failure, antidepressant use and classes (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRI], serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRI], tricyclic antidepressants [TCA], atypical antidepressants [AA], and monoamine oxidase inhibitors [MAOI]), age, sex, smoking, mild systemic diseases, and implant location were obtained from patients' records. Odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) of implant failure in patients taking different antidepressant classes, in relationship to non-antidepressant users, were estimated, and the influence of multiple variables on implant failure were investigated. RESULTS A total of 771 patients and 1,820 implants were evaluated. The statistically significant predictors for implant failure included smoking (OR = 5.221), use of antidepressants (OR = 4.285), posterior maxilla location (OR = 2.911), mild systemic disease (OR = 2.648), and age (OR = 1.037) (P <0.05). The frequency of implant failure was 33.3% in TCA users, 31.3% in SNRI users, 6.3% in SSRI users, 5.2% in Atypical antidepressant users, and 3.9% in non-users. Significant associations were observed between the use of SNRI (OR: 11.07; 95% CI: 3.265 to 33.82) and TCA (OR: 12.16; 95% CI: 1.503 to 71.58) and implant failure (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS Users of antidepressants were at higher risk of implant failure than non-users. Patients taking SNRI and TCA were at the highest risk of implant loss, when compared with non-users. Conclusions about TCA, however, are based on a limited number of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abeer Essam Hakam
- Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Gabriela Vila
- Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Poliana Mendes Duarte
- Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Marcia Phemba Mbadu
- Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Hotoun Shuwaikan
- Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ikramuddin Aukhil
- Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Rodrigo Neiva
- Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Jia Chang
- Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|