Sex differences in frailty and its association with low bone mineral density in rheumatoid arthritis

Effects of Frailty Syndrome on Osteoporosis, Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Muscle Strength and Balance in Community-Dwelling Older Adults (≥60 years) in Iran: Results From the Amirkola Health and Aging Project Cohort Study

Introduction

For older adults, maintaining muscle strength and balance is crucial to preserve an upright posture and independently manage their basic activities of daily living (ADL). This study aimed to examine whether muscle strength and balance mediate the relationship between frailty syndrome (FS) and osteoporosis in a large sample of community-dwelling older adults.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study is part of the second phase (2016-2017) of the Amirkola Health and Ageing Project (AHAP), a cohort study conducted on all elderly aged 60 and over in Amirkola, Northern Iran, since 2011. Data from 2018 older adults were collected by a trained person using bone mineral density (BMD), frailty index, activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), handgrip strength (HGS), quadriceps muscle strength (QMS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Timed Up and Go test (TUG test) and analyzed using analysis of variance, chi-square, and path analysis tests.

Results

The mean indices of femoral neck BMD and lumbar spine BMD, HGS, QMS, BBS, ADL, and IADL were lower in the frail older adults than in the pre-frail and non-frail older adults. In addition, the mean TUG test level was higher in the frail older adults than in the non-frail and pre-frail older adults. The results of the present study have indicated that frailty is significantly related to osteoporosis, and that balance and muscle strength can predict osteoporosis; these variables play a mediating role in the relationship between frailty and osteoporosis.

Conclusion

From the results of the present study, it can be concluded that frailty may increase the odds of osteoporosis. The results of the current study have indicated that balance (BBS and TUG test) and muscle strength (HGS and QMS) are associated with osteoporosis and these variables play a mediating role in the relationship between frailty and osteoporosis.

Psychometric Properties of Frailty Instruments in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Examine psychometric properties of frailty instruments used in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to inform selection of frailty instruments for clinical and research use.

METHODS

A systematic review was registered in PROSPERO. Studies measuring frailty in adults with RA published before May 25, 2022, were searched in six electronic databases. Level of evidence of psychometric properties were synthesized and graded for each frailty instrument using Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments methodology.

RESULTS

There were 22 articles included in the review, and psychometric properties of 16 frailty instruments were examined. RA cohorts were predominantly female with moderate RA disease activity, mean age was 60.1 years, and frailty prevalence ranged widely from 10% to 85%. Construct validity was the only psychometric property routinely examined for frailty instruments in RA, and nearly all (14/16) performed favorably in this domain. Frailty correlated most frequently with older age, higher RA disease activity, and worse physical function. Internal consistency, measurement error, and content validity were examined infrequently. Reliability and responsiveness data were not reported. Six frailty instruments were rated highest in adults with RA: three adaptations of Fried's Criteria, 32-Item and 45-Item Frailty Indexes, and the Comprehensive Rheumatologic Assessment of Frailty.

CONCLUSION

Six frailty instruments possessed the highest-rated psychometric properties in RA. These instruments demonstrated construct validity of frailty with important outcomes in RA. Frailty assessment shows promise to inform risk stratification in RA, but studies are needed to evaluate reliability, responsiveness, and validity to support accuracy of frailty measurement in adults with RA who may have disease-related features that differentially impact outcomes.

SLICC-Frailty Index and Its Association with Low Bone Mineral Density and Vertebral Fractures in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The Systemic Lupus International Clinics (SLICC)-Frailty Index (FI) is associated with adverse outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, to our knowledge, its association with bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebral fractures (VF), has not been investigated using a standardized methods. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between frailty assessed by SLICC-FI, and BMD and VF in Mestizo women with SLE. Adult women were included in this cross-sectional study. Information concerning the risk factors for VF and BMD in the lumbar spine and total hip was acquired. SLICC-FI was assessed at baseline. A semi-quantitative method was utilized to evaluate the prevalence of VF on lateral thoracolumbar radiographs. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI), SLE duration, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, bisphosphonate use, and BMD measurements. We included 202 women with SLE (mean age [SD] = 43.3 [13.6] years). The mean (SD) SLICC-FI value was 0.14 (0.09). Eleven (5.4%) patients were categorized as robust, 62 (30.7%) as relatively less fit, 84 (41.6%) as least fit, and 45 (22.3%) as frail. Both univariate and multivariate models showed associations between frailty (defined as SLICC-FI > 0.21) and prevalent VF in the entire population (OR 5.76, 95% CI 2.53-13.12; P < 0.001) and in the premenopausal group (OR 4.29, 95% CI; P = 0.047). We also found an association between the SLICC-FI and low BMD. In conclusion, frailty assessed by SLICC-FI might be associated with VF and low BMD in mestizo females with SLE.

A Brief Overview: Sex Differences in Prevalent Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions

Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain disorders are some of the most prevalent and disabling chronic pain conditions worldwide. These chronic conditions have a considerable impact on the quality of life of individuals, families, communities, and healthcare systems. Unfortunately, the burden of MSK pain disorders does not fall equally across the sexes. Females consistently demonstrate more prevalent and severe clinical presentations of MSK disorders, and this disparity increases in magnitude with age. The aim of the present article is to review recent studies that have examined sex differences between males and females in four of the most common MSK pain disorders: neck pain, low back pain, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis.

Does the incidence of frailty differ between men and women over time?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

The mechanisms, risk factors and influence of sex on the incidence of frailty components are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to analyse sex differences in factors associated with the increase in the number of frailty components.

METHODS

A 12-year follow-up analysis was conducted with 1,747 participants aged ≥ 60 of the ELSA Study with no frailty at baseline. Generalised linear mixed models were used to analyse the increase in the number of frailty components stratified by sex, considering socioeconomic, behavioural, clinical and biochemical characteristics as exposure variables.

RESULTS

The increase in the number of frailty components in both sexes was associated with an advanced age (70 to 79 years and 80 years or older), low educational level, sedentary lifestyle, elevated depressive symptoms, joint disease, high C-reactive protein levels, perception of poor vision and uncontrolled diabetes (p < 0.05). Osteoporosis, low weight, heart disease, living with one or more people and perception of poor hearing were associated with an increase in the number of frailty components in men. High fibrinogen concentration, controlled diabetes, stroke and perception of fair vision were associated with the outcome in women (p < 0.05). Obese women and men and overweight women had a lower increase in the number of frailty components compared to those in the ideal weight range.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic factors, musculoskeletal disorders, heart disease and low weight seem to sustain the frailty process in men, whereas cardiovascular and neuroendocrine disorders seem to sustain the frailty process in women.

Frailty in people with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of observational studies

Background: Frailty, an age-related decline in physiological reserve, is an increasingly important concept in the management of chronic diseases. The implications of frailty in people with rheumatoid arthritis are not well understood. We undertook a systematic review to assess prevalence of frailty in people with rheumatoid arthritis, and the relationship between frailty and disease activity or clinical outcomes. Methods: We searched four electronic databases (January 2001 to April 2021) for observational studies assessing the prevalence of frailty (any frailty measure) in adults (≥18 years) with rheumatoid arthritis, or analysing the relationship between frailty and disease activity or clinical outcomes (e.g. quality of life, hospitalisation or mortality) in people with rheumatoid arthritis. Study quality was assessed using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Screening, quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. We used narrative synthesis. Results: We identified 17 analyses, from 14 different populations. 15/17 were cross-sectional. Studies used 11 different measures of frailty. Frailty prevalence ranged from 10% (frailty phenotype) to 36% (comprehensive rheumatologic assessment of frailty) in general adult populations with rheumatoid arthritis. In younger populations (<60 or <65 years) prevalence ranged from 2.4% (frailty phenotype) to 19.9% (Kihon checklist) while in older populations (>60 or >65) prevalence ranged from 31.2% (Kihon checklist) to 55% (Geriatric 8 tool). Frailty was cross-sectionally associated with higher disease activity (10/10 studies), lower physical function (7/7 studies) and longer disease duration (2/5 studies), and with hospitalization and osteoporotic fractures (1/1 study, 3.7 years follow-up). Conclusion: Frailty is common in rheumatoid arthritis, including those aged <65 years, and is associated with a range of adverse features. However, these is heterogeneity in how frailty is measured. We found few longitudinal studies making the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes over time and the extent to which frailty is caused by rheumatoid arthritis unclear.

Frailty in people with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of observational studies

Background: Frailty, an age-related decline in physiological reserve, is an increasingly important concept in the management of chronic diseases. The implications of frailty in people with rheumatoid arthritis are not well understood. We undertook a systematic review to assess prevalence of frailty in people with rheumatoid arthritis, and the relationship between frailty and disease activity or clinical outcomes. Methods: We searched four electronic databases (January 2001 to April 2021) for observational studies assessing the prevalence of frailty (any frailty measure) in adults (≥18 years) with rheumatoid arthritis, or analysing the relationship between frailty and disease activity or clinical outcomes (e.g. quality of life, hospitalisation or mortality) in people with rheumatoid arthritis. Study quality was assessed using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Screening, quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. We used narrative synthesis. Results: We identified 17 analyses, from 14 different populations. 15/17 were cross-sectional. Studies used 11 different measures of frailty. Frailty prevalence ranged from 10% (frailty phenotype) to 36% (comprehensive rheumatologic assessment of frailty) in general adult populations with rheumatoid arthritis. In younger populations (<60 or <65 years) prevalence ranged from 2.4% (frailty phenotype) to 19.9% (Kihon checklist) while in older populations (>60 or >65) prevalence ranged from 31.2% (Kihon checklist) to 55% (Geriatric 8 tool). Frailty was cross-sectionally associated with higher disease activity (10/10 studies), lower physical function (7/7 studies) and longer disease duration (2/5 studies), and with hospitalization and osteoporotic fractures (1/1 study, 3.7 years follow-up). Conclusion: Frailty is common in rheumatoid arthritis, including those aged <65 years, and is associated with a range of adverse features. However, these is heterogeneity in how frailty is measured. We found few longitudinal studies making the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes over time and the extent to which frailty is caused by rheumatoid arthritis unclear.

Frailty in rheumatoidrmdopen-2021-002111 arthritis and its relationship with disease activity, hospitalisation and mortality: a longitudinal analysis of the Scottish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis cohort and UK Biobank

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of frailty in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its association with baseline and longitudinal disease activity, all-cause mortality and hospitalisation.

PARTICIPANTS

People with RA identified from the Scottish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (SERA) inception cohort (newly diagnosed, mean age 58.2 years) and UK Biobank (established disease identified using diagnostic codes, mean age 59 years). Frailty was quantified using the frailty index (both datasets) and frailty phenotype (UK Biobank only). Disease activity was assessed using Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) in SERA. Associations between baseline frailty and all-cause mortality and hospitalisation was estimated after adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, smoking and alcohol, plus DAS28 in SERA.

RESULTS

Based on the frailty index, frailty was common in SERA (12% moderate, 0.2% severe) and UK Biobank (20% moderate, 3% severe). In UK Biobank, 23% were frail using frailty phenotype. Frailty index was associated with DAS28 in SERA, as well as age and female sex in both cohorts. In SERA, as DAS28 lessened over time with treatment, mean frailty index also decreased. The frailty index was associated with all-cause mortality (HR moderate/severe frailty vs robust 4.14 (95% CI 1.49 to 11.51) SERA, 1.68 (95% CI 1.26 to 2.13) UK Biobank) and unscheduled hospitalisation (incidence rate ratio 2.27 (95% CI 1.45 to 3.57) SERA 2.74 (95% CI 2.29 to 3.29) UK Biobank). In UK Biobank, frailty phenotype also associated with mortality and hospitalisation.

CONCLUSION

Frailty is common in early and established RA and associated with hospitalisation and mortality. Frailty in RA is dynamic and, for some, may be ameliorated through controlling disease activity in early disease.

Frailty in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may cause damage to multiple organs and may further restrict the patient's physical, psychological and social functions. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the prevalence of frailty and prefrailty and the influential factors in RA patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and CNKI were searched to identify related articles. Articles published before July 23^rd, 2021 that assessed frailty in patients with RA qualified for the systematic review and meta-analysis. A quality appraisal of the studies was performed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Newcastle-Ottawa Scales. The pooled results were displayed as odds ratios or standardized mean differences (ORs/SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The article search generated 2,273 articles, of which 16 satisfied the inclusion criteria and were merged in the final review. A total of 8,556 RA patients were finally included. The pooled prevalence of frailty in the patients with RA was 33.5% (95% CI: 25.2-41.7%), and the pooled prevalence of prefrailty was 39.9% (95% CI: 29.4-50.3%). Subgroup analyses showed that frailty was more prevalent in females (24.7%) than in males (19.1%). The prevalence of prefrailty in females was similar to that in males among the RA patients. Frailty in RA was associated with the female sex (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.07) and disease activity (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.03-2.09).

CONCLUSION

Frailty is prevalent in RA patients. Female gender and disease activity are associated with the prevalence of frailty in RA patients.

Bone Health

The gold standard for diagnosis of osteoporosis is measurement of an individual's bone mineral density on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan. If this value is less than or equal to 2.5 standard deviations less than that of an adult female reference population, a person is said to have osteoporosis, with this risk increasing as a person ages. Female gender is a large risk factor in developing osteoporosis, regardless of ethnic or racial group. Frailty is another key factor in determining likelihood to develop osteoporotic fractures. Bisphosphonates are the first line agents for treatment of osteoporosis.

Factors associated with frailty in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the Institute of Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis cohort study

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of, and the factors associated with, frailty in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with RA enrolled in the Institute of Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort completed self-administered questionnaires, which included the 5-item frailty screening index. Patients were classified as frail, prefrail, or robust based on the 5 components of the frailty screening index. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between clinical variables and frailty. Among 3,290 Japanese patients with RA (86.7% female, mean age 62.4 years) who participated this frailty study, 549 (16.7%) patients were categorized as frailty, 2,063 (62.7%) as prefrailty, and 678 (20.6%) as robust. In multivariable models, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m² (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41 to 2.47), BMI < 18.5 kg/m² (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.71), disease activity scores in 28 joints (DAS28) (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.47), Japanese version of Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (J-HAQ) (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.52), the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.85), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.98), and methotrexate (MTX) use (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.94) were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with frailty. BMI (both overweight and underweight), DAS28, J-HAQ, EQ-5D, NSAID use, and MTX nonuse appear to be associated with frailty in Japanese patients with RA. Key Points • This is the largest study showing the prevalence and the associated factors of frailty in patients with RA. • Maintaining normal BMI appears to be important for preventing frailty in patients with RA. • We confirmed the significant associations of frailty with high disease activity, high degree of disability, and poor health related QOL in Japanese patients with RA. • NSAID use and MTX nonuse were associated with the frailty in Japanese patients with RA, which could be explained by patients' background.

Evaluation of a Patient-reported Frailty Tool in Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Frailty is associated with mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but how best to measure frailty is unclear. We aimed to compare 2 frailty metrics, the self-reported Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, and Loss of weight (FRAIL) scale (FS) and the Fried phenotype (FP), in SLE to evaluate differences between frail and nonfrail women and whether frailty is associated with self-reported disability.

METHODS

Adult women aged < 70 years with validated SLE and mild/moderate disease enrolled in this cross-sectional study between August 2018 and October 2019. Correlation and agreement between the FS and the FP were determined. Differences in sociodemographic and disease characteristics, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and biomarkers between frail and nonfrail participants were evaluated, as well as the association of frailty with Valued Life Activities disability.

RESULTS

Of 67 participants, 27% and 18% were frail according to the FS and the FP, respectively. Correlation (r = 0.51; P < 0.0001) and agreement (κ = 0.46; P = 0.0004) between the FS and the FP were significant. Frail women had greater disease damage, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and interleukin 6, and worse PROMs according to both frailty definitions. Both frailty measures were associated with self-reported disability after adjustment for age, comorbidity, and disease activity and damage; this relationship was attenuated for the FP.

CONCLUSION

Frailty prevalence was high in this cohort of women with SLE using both frailty definitions, suggesting that frailty may be accelerated in women with SLE, particularly when based exclusively on self-report. Frailty remained associated with self-reported disability in adjusted analyses. The FS may be an informative point-of-care tool to identify frail women with SLE.

Osteoporosis and fractures in rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased risk for osteoporotic fracture. We highlight RA-specific risk factors for bone mineral density (BMD) loss and fractures and considerations regarding the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with RA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity, although associated with low BMD in early RA, is not associated with accelerated BMD loss over time when compared to ACPA negative individuals. Studies have found reduced BMD in individuals on low doses of glucocorticoids (GCs). Poor functional status and frailty are additional important risk factors for low BMD and fractures. Heightened fracture risk in RA may be mitigated by tight disease control, and biologic therapies are associated with more stable BMD compared to nonbiologic therapies. Evidence-based guidelines specific for treating osteoporosis in patients with RA do not exist. Thus, treatment decisions are based on general osteoporosis guidelines, taking into account additional RA-specific risk factors.

SUMMARY

Recent studies have advanced knowledge of RA-specific risk factors for BMD loss and fractures. Future studies applying these findings to modify established fracture risk algorithms as well as evaluating osteoporosis treatments in RA cohorts are needed to reduce the risk of disabling fractures in these patients.

Is there an association between rheumatoid arthritis and bone changes in the temporomandibular joint diagnosed by cone-beam computed tomography? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the relation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and bone changes in the temporomandibular joint diagnosed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis were recorded in the PROSPERO database, using the CRD42020153246 protocol. The electronic searches were performed in the following databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, Cochrane, and Open Grey. Cross-sectional studies that evaluated patients with RA with bone changes in the temporomandibular joint diagnosed by CBCT, without language restriction or publication date, were included. Meta-analysis was performed in Stata Software (StataCorp, TX, USA, version 12.0), using the metan, and a random effects model, and the risk of different bone alterations occurring in adults with and without arthritis was estimated using odds ratios (ORs) as a pooled measure of effect. Forest plots were used to present the isolated and the pooled effects (ORs and 95% CI).

RESULTS

Six studies were used for qualitative synthesis and 2 studies for quantitative synthesis. All studies diagnosed higher prevalence changes in the bone structures of the TMJ of RA patients, described as erosion, flattening, sclerosis, and osteophytes. Meta-analysis showed that the chance of bone changes occurring in components of the TMJ is greater in individuals who have RA.

CONCLUSION

There is an association between RA and bone changes in TMJ structures diagnosed through CBCT, as RA patients were more likely to have osteoarthritic changes in this joint.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding the existence of an association between bone alterations in TMJ and RA can assist in the management of patients.

Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary and revision hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

The increasing number of hip arthroplasties (HA), due to the growing elderly population, is associated with the risk of femoral periprosthetic fractures (FPFs). The purpose of this study was to identify potential risk factors for the development of FPFs after HA.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted in five data bases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Cinahl, ICTRP) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines up to May 2019, using the key words “risk factor,” “periprosthetic fracture,” and “hip replacement or arthroplasty.” Meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes of HA and subgroup analysis based on the factors that were implicated in FPFs was performed.

Results

Sixteen studies were included (sample size: 599,551 HA patients, 4253 FPFs, incidence 0.71%). Risk factors statistically associated with increased incidence of FPFs were female gender (+ 40%), previous revision arthroplasty surgery (× 3 times), and the presence of rheumatoid arthritis (× 2.1 times), while osteoarthritis (− 57%), cement application (− 59%), and insertion of Biomet (− 68%) or Thompson’s prosthesis (− 75%) were correlated with low prevalence of FPFs. Obesity, cardiac diseases, advanced age, bad general health (ASA grade ≥ 3), and use of Exeter or Lubinus prosthesis were not linked to the appearance of FPFs.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggested that female gender, rheumatoid arthritis, and revision arthroplasty are major risk factors for the development of FPFs after a HA. In those patients, frequent follow-ups should be planned. Further prospective studies are necessary to clarify all the risk factors contributing to the appearance of FPFs after HA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-020-02152-0.