Do we feel pain during anesthesia? A critical review on surgery-evoked circulatory changes and pain perception

Current perioperative nociception monitoring and potential directions

Perioperative nociception-antinociception balance is essential for the prevention of adverse postoperative events. Estimating the nociception level helps optimize intraoperative management. In the past two decades, various nociception monitoring devices have been developed for the identification of intraoperative nociception. However, each type of nociception monitoring device has advantages and disadvantages, limiting their clinical application in particular patients and settings. Therefore, this review aimed to summarize the information on nociceptor monitoring in current clinical settings, explore each technique's particularities, and possible future directions to provide a reference for clinicians and researchers.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia in Bariatric Surgery: Is It the One and Only? A Comprehensive Review of the Current Literature

Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a heterogeneous group of general anesthesia techniques in which the intraoperative use of opioids is eliminated. This strategy aims to decrease the risk of complications and improve the patient's safety and comfort. Such potential advantages are particularly beneficial for selected groups of patients, among them obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Opioids have been traditionally used as an element of balanced anesthesia, and replacing them requires using a combination of coanalgesics and various types of local and regional anesthesia, which also have their side effects, limitations, and potential disadvantages. Moreover, despite the growing amount of evidence, the empirical data on the superiority of OFA compared to standard anesthesia with multimodal analgesia are contradictory, and potential benefits in many studies are being questioned. Additionally, little is known about the long-term sequelae of such a strategy. Considering the above-mentioned issues, this study aims to present the potential benefits, risks, and difficulties of implementing OFA in bariatric surgery, considering the current state of knowledge and literature.

The Surgical Stress Response and Anesthesia: A Narrative Review

The human physiological response "to stress" includes all metabolic and hormonal changes produced by a traumatic event at the micro or macro cellular levels. The main goal of the body's first response to trauma is to keep physiological homeostasis. The perioperative non-specific adaptation response can sometimes be detrimental and can produce systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), characterized by hypermetabolism and hyper catabolism. We performed a narrative review consisting of a description of the surgical stress response's categories of changes (neurohormonal and immunological response) followed by reviewing methods found in published studies to modulate the surgical stress response perioperatively. We described various preoperative measures cited in the literature as lowering the burden of surgical trauma. This article revises the anesthetic drugs and techniques that have an impact on the surgical stress response and proven immune-modulatory effects. We also tried to name present knowledge gaps requiring future research. Our review concludes that proper preoperative measures, adequate general anesthetics, multimodal analgesia, early postoperative mobilization, and early enteral nutrition can decrease the stress response to surgery and ease patient recovery. Anesthetics and analgesics used during the perioperative period may modulate the innate and adaptive immune system and inflammatory system, with a consecutive impact on cancer recurrence and long-term outcomes.

Effect of lidocaine on intraoperative blood pressure variability in patients undergoing major vascular surgery

BACKGROUND

Dynamic fluctuations of arterial blood pressure known as blood pressure variability (BPV) may have short and long-term undesirable consequences. During surgical procedures blood pressure is usually measured in equal intervals allowing to assess its intraoperative variability, which significance for peri and post-operative period is still under debate. Lidocaine has positive cardiovascular effects, which may go beyond its antiarrhythmic activity. The aim of the study was to verify whether the use of intravenous lidocaine may affect intraoperative BPV in patients undergoing major vascular procedures.

METHODS

We performed a post-hoc analysis of the data collected during the previous randomized clinical trial by Gajniak et al. In the original study patients undergoing elective abdominal aorta and/or iliac arteries open surgery were randomized into two groups to receive intravenous infusion of 1% lidocaine or placebo at the same infusion rate based on ideal body weight, in concomitance with general anesthesia. We analyzed systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean arterial blood (MAP) pressure recorded in 5-minute intervals (from the first measurement before induction of general anaesthesia until the last after emergence from anaesthesia). Blood pressure variability was then calculated for SBP and MAP, and expressed as: standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), average real variability (ARV) and coefficient of hemodynamic stability (C10%), and compared between both groups.

RESULTS

All calculated indexes were comparable between groups. In the lidocaine and placebo groups systolic blood pressure SD, CV, AVR and C10% were 20.17 vs. 19.28, 16.40 vs. 15.64, 14.74 vs. 14.08 and 0.45 vs. 0.45 respectively. No differences were observed regarding type of surgery, operating and anaesthetic time, administration of vasoactive agents and intravenous fluids, including blood products.

CONCLUSION

In high-risk vascular surgery performed under general anesthesia, lidocaine infusion had no effect on arterial blood pressure variability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04691726 post-hoc analysis; date of registration 31/12/2020.

Nociception Effect on Frontal Electroencephalogram Waveform and Phase-Amplitude Coupling in Laparoscopic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Electroencephalographic pattern changes during anesthesia reflect the nociception-analgesia balance. Alpha dropout, delta arousal, and beta arousal with noxious stimulation have been described during anesthesia; however, data on the reaction of other electroencephalogram signatures toward nociception are scarce. Analyzing the effects of nociception on different electroencephalogram signatures may help us find new nociception markers in anesthesia and understand the neurophysiology of pain in the brain. This study aimed to analyze the electroencephalographic frequency pattern and phase-amplitude coupling change during laparoscopic surgeries.

METHODS

This study evaluated 34 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. The electroencephalogram frequency band power and phase-amplitude coupling of different frequencies were analyzed across 3 stages of laparoscopy: incision, insufflation, and opioid stages. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with a mixed model and the Bonferroni method for multiple comparisons were used to analyze the changes in the electroencephalogram signatures between the preincision and postincision/postinsufflation/postopioid phases.

RESULTS

During noxious stimulation, the frequency spectrum showed obvious decreases in the alpha power percentage after the incision (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM], 26.27 ± 0.44 and 24.37 ± 0.66; P < .001) and insufflation stages (26.27 ± 0.44 and 24.40 ± 0.68; P = .002), which recovered after opioid administration. Further phase-amplitude analyses showed that the modulation index (MI) of the delta-alpha coupling decreased after the incision stage (1.83 ± 0.22 and 0.98 ± 0.14 [MI × 10 3 ]; P < .001), continued to be suppressed during the insufflation stage (1.83 ± 0.22 and 1.17 ± 0.15 [MI × 10 3 ]; P = .044), and recovered after opioid administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Alpha dropout during noxious stimulation is observed in laparoscopic surgeries under sevoflurane. In addition, the modulation index of delta-alpha coupling decreases during noxious stimulation and recovers after the administration of rescue opioids. Phase-amplitude coupling of the electroencephalogram may be a new approach for evaluating the nociception-analgesia balance during anesthesia.

Effect of esketamine-based opioid-sparing anesthesia strategy on postoperative pain and recovery quality in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trail

Objective

Opioid-sparing anesthesia reduces intraoperative use of opioids and postoperative adverse reactions. The current study investigated the effect of esketamine-based opioid-sparing anesthesia on total laparoscopic hysterectomy patients' recovery.

Methods

Ninety patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly assigned to esketamine-based group (group K) or opioid-based group (group C). The allocation to groups was unknown to patients, surgeons, and postoperative medical staff. The inability to implement blinding for anesthesiologists was due to the distinct procedures followed by the various groups while administering drugs. The QoR-40 and VAS were used to measure recovery quality. Postoperative adverse events, perioperative opioid consumption, and intraoperative hemodynamics were secondary endpoints.

Results

There was an absence of notable discrepancy in the baseline data observed between the two groups. The QoR-40 scores exhibited greater values in group K when compared to group C on the first day following the surgical procedure (160.91 ± 9.11 vs 151.47 ± 8.35, respectively; mean difference 9.44 [95 %CI: 5.78-13.11]; P < 0.01). Within 24 h of surgery, the VAS score of group K was lower at rest and during movement. (P < 0.05 for each). Group K had much lower rates of nausea and vomiting within 24 h of surgery. (P < 0.05 for each). Group K received significantly lower total doses of sufentanil and remifentanil than group C. (17.28 ± 2.59 vs 43.43 ± 3.52; 0.51 ± 0.15 vs 1.24 ± 0.24). The proportion of patients who used ephedrine in surgery was higher in group C than in group K (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Esketamine-based opioid-sparing anesthesia strategy is feasible and enhanced recuperation following surgery by decreasing adverse effects associated with opioids and pain scores compared to an opioid-based anesthetic regimen.

The association of hemodynamic parameters and clinical demographic variables with acute postoperative pain in female oncological breast surgery patients: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Appropriate administration of intraoperative analgesia is an essential factor in care and reasonable recovery times. Inappropriate intraoperative analgesia puts the patient at risk of acute postoperative pain (APOP). The absence of an objective standard for intraoperative nociceptive monitoring complicates pain care. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) have been suggested as useful parameters during general anesthesia for nociceptive monitoring. However, studies focusing on whether intraoperative heart rate variability (HRv) and mean arterial blood pressure variability (MABPv) during general anesthesia can accurately monitor nociception in patients have remained inconclusive. The current study aimed to (1) identify the association of intraoperative heart rate and blood pressure variability in patients undergoing low-risk surgery with the incidence of APOP in the immediate postoperative setting and (2) evaluate the associations of clinical demographic factors with the incidence of APOP.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. The outcome was moderate-to-severe APOP, defined as a numeric rating scale score of ≥ 4. HRv, MABPv, and potential confounders, such as age, body mass index, duration of surgery, smoking, depression, preoperative use of analgesics, and type of surgery, were used as independent variables.

RESULTS

Data from 764 female oncological breast surgery patients were analyzed. No statistically significant association of HRv and MABPv with APOP was found. Lower age was associated with higher odds of APOP (odds ratio [OR] 0.978, p = 0.001). Increased length of surgery (OR 1.013, p = 0.022) and a history of depression were associated with increased odds of APOP (OR 2.327, p = 0.010). The subtype of surgery was statistically significantly associated with APOP (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that heart rate and blood pressure variability intraoperatively, in female patients undergoing low-risk surgery, are not associated with, and thus not predictive of, APOP in the immediate postoperative setting.

Evaluation of Nociception during Pediatric Surgery: A Topical Review

The association between intraoperative nociception and increased patient's morbidity is well established. However, hemodynamic parameters, such as heart rate and blood pressure, may result in an inadequate monitor of nociception during surgery. Over the last two decades, different devices have been marketed to "reliably" detect intraoperative nociception. Since the direct measure of nociception is impractical during surgery, these monitors measures nociception surrogates such as sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems responses (heart rate variability, pupillometry, skin conductance), electroencephalographic changes, and muscular reflex arc. Each monitor carries its own advantages and disadvantages. The manuscript aims to give an overview of the most up-to-date information available in the literature on current nociceptor monitors available in clinical practice, with particular focus on their applications in pediatrics.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia and Postoperative Outcomes in Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Surgery is an essential component of the treatment of solid tumors, but the perioperative course can be complicated by different factors (including anesthesia). Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) may mitigate adverse outcomes of opioid-based anesthesia (OBA), but major questions remain on the actual impact in terms of analgesia and the improvement of surgical outcomes. To address this issue, we present a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of OFA compared to OBA in the specific subset of cancer patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane CENTRAL Library to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on adults undergoing oncological surgery, comparing OFA and OBA up to March 2022. Additional papers were added from the reference lists of identified sources. Papers were manually reviewed by two independent authors to ascertain eligibility and subsequent inclusion in qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

only two studies were eligible according to inclusion criteria. It was not possible to perform any meta-analysis. The two studies included patients undergoing prostate and gynecologic surgery on 177 patients, with significant heterogeneity in the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

randomized controlled trial specifically addressed to cancer patients are lacking. A knowledge gap exists, neither confirming nor rejecting the capacity of OFA to improve early postoperative outcomes in cancer surgery. Long-term consequences on specific oncological outcomes are far from being elucidated. We expect a growing body of literature in the coming years. Further studies are required with homogeneous methodology and endpoints.

Intraoperative Assessment of Surgical Stress Response Using Nociception Monitor under General Anesthesia and Postoperative Complications: A Narrative Review

We present a narrative review focusing on the new role of nociception monitor in intraoperative anesthetic management. Higher invasiveness of surgery elicits a higher degree of surgical stress responses including neuroendocrine-metabolic and inflammatory-immune responses, which are associated with the occurrence of major postoperative complications. Conversely, anesthetic management mitigates these responses. Furthermore, improper attenuation of nociceptive input and related autonomic effects may induce increased stress response that may adversely influence outcome even in minimally invasive surgeries. The original role of nociception monitor, which is to assess a balance between nociception caused by surgical trauma and anti-nociception due to anesthesia, may allow an assessment of surgical stress response. The goal of this review is to inform healthcare professionals providing anesthetic management that nociception monitors may provide intraoperative data associated with surgical stress responses, and to inspire new research into the effects of nociception monitor-guided anesthesia on postoperative complications.

General anesthetic techniques for enhanced recovery after surgery: Current controversies

General anesthesia technique can influence not only immediate postoperative outcomes, but also long-term outcomes beyond hospital stay (e.g., readmission after discharge from hospital). There is lack of evidence regarding superiority of total intravenous anesthesia over inhalation anesthesia with regards to postoperative outcomes even in high-risk population including cancer patients. Optimal balanced general anesthetic technique for enhance recovery after elective surgery in adults includes avoidance of routine use preoperative midazolam, avoidance of deep anesthesia, use of opioid-sparing approach, and minimization of neuromuscular blocking agents and appropriate reversal of residual paralysis. Given that the residual effects of drugs used during anesthesia can increase postoperative morbidity and delay recovery, it is prudent to use a minimal number of drug combinations, and the drugs used are shorter-acting and administered at the lowest possible dose. It is imperative that the discerning anesthesiologist consider whether each drug used is really necessary for accomplishing perioperative goals.

Intraoperative Nociception Monitoring

Nociception refers to the process of encoding and processing noxious stimuli. Its monitoring can have potential benefits. Under anesthesia, nociceptive signals are continuously generated to cause involuntary effects on the autonomic nervous system, reflex movement, and stress response. Most available systems depend on the identification and measurement of these indirect effects to indicate nociception-antinociception balance. Despite advances in monitoring technology and availability, their limitations presently override their benefits. Hence, their utility and applicability in present-day anesthesia care is uncertain. Future technologies might allow automated closed-loop multimodal anesthesia systems, which includes the components of hypnosis and analgesic balance for a patient.

Perioperative Opioid Administration

Opioids form an important component of general anesthesia and perioperative analgesia. Discharge opioid prescriptions are identified as a contributor for persistent opioid use and diversion. In parallel, there is increased enthusiasm to advocate opioid-free strategies, which include a combination of known analgesics and adjuvants, many of which are in the form of continuous infusions. This article critically reviews perioperative opioid use, especially in view of opioid-sparing versus opioid-free strategies. The data indicate that opioid-free strategies, however noble in their cause, do not fully acknowledge the limitations and gaps within the existing evidence and clinical practice considerations. Moreover, they do not allow analgesic titration based on patient needs; are unclear about optimal components and their role in different surgical settings and perioperative phases; and do not serve to decrease the risk of persistent opioid use, thereby distracting us from optimizing pain and minimizing realistic long-term harms.

Nociception level index: do intra-operative values allow the prediction of acute postoperative pain?

Nociception Level Index (NOL) guided analgesia has previously been found to correlate with noxious stimuli during surgery. It was aim of this study to investigate the relationship between intra-operative NOL and acute postoperative pain. After IRB approval, 80 patients scheduled for non-emergency surgery were enrolled. NOL data were recorded from induction of anaesthesia until the end of surgery. After admission to the postoperative acute care unit (PACU), pain scores (numeric rating scale [NRS, 0-10] were obtained 5-minutely for 15 min. NOL data of 74 patients were analyzed. Receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis identified the NOL reaction to the knife to skin incision (median NOL within 60 s post knife to skin) vs. the median NOL during surgery vs. NOL at the end of surgery to have the highest correlation coefficient (ρ = 0.3; P = 0.01) as well as the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC 0.68; P = 0.01) for the prediction of moderate-severe pain in PACU. A NOL > 20 after skin incision predicted moderate-severe postoperative pain with the highest combined sensitivity (73%) and specificity (58%). A NOL < 10 after skin incision excluded moderate-severe pain in PACU with a negative predictive value of 83%. The NOL reaction to skin incision, but not NOL during surgery appears to allow the exclusion and, to a lesser degree the prediction of moderate-severe pain in PACU. The results may also strengthen the manufacturers recommendation of an intraoperative NOL range of 10-25.Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12619001596190.

A beat-by-beat cardiovascular index, CARDEAN, to titrate opioid administration in the setting of orthopaedic surgery: a prospective randomized trial

To determine whether a beat-by-beat cardiovascular index (CARDEAN: cardiovascular depth of analgesia, Alpha-2 Ltd, Lyon, France) reduces the incidence of tachycardia in ASA I-III patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. A total of 76 patients were prospectively randomized into (1) a control group or (2) the CARDEAN group, in which the nurse anaesthetist was blinded to CARDEAN application. In addition to conventional signs, an external observer instructed the nurse anaesthetist to administer sufentanil 0.1 µg kg^-1 when the CARDEAN crossed a threshold (≥ 60). The primary outcome was the incidence of tachycardia (> 120% of reference heart rate, HR). Non-invasive blood pressure (BP), electrocardiogram (ECG), O₂ saturation-photoplethysmography and the bispectral index (40 < BIS < 60) were monitored. HR and an estimation of beat-by-beat BP changes acquired from photoplethysmography and ECG were combined in an algorithm that detected hypertension followed by tachycardia (index scaled 0-100). Sufentanil 0.1 µg kg^-1 was administered when tachycardia, hypertension or movement ("conventional signs") was observed. Data for 66 patients (27 with known hypertension) were analysed. In the CARDEAN group, (a) the dose of sufentanil was higher (control: 0.46 µg kg^-1 100 min^-1, CARDEAN: 0.57 µg kg^-1 100 min^-1, p = 0.016), (b) the incidence rates of tachycardia and untoward events were lower (respectively: - 44%; control: 2.52 events 100 min^-1 [1.98-3.22]; CARDEAN: 1.42 [1.03-1.96], p = 0.005, hazard ratio: 0.56; movement, muscular contraction, or coughing: control: 0.74 events 100 min^-1 [0.47-1.16]; CARDEAN: 0.31 [0.15-0.62], p = 0.038), and (c) extubation occurred more often in the operating room (control: 76.5%, CARDEAN: 97%, p = 0.016). CARDEAN-titrated opioid administration was associated with a higher dose of sufentanil, a reduction in tachycardia and earlier emergence in ASA I-III patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery.

Opioid free anesthesia: evidence for short and long-term outcome

The introduction of synthetic opioids in clinical practice played a major role in the history of anesthesiology. For years, anesthesiologists have been thinking that opioids are needed for intraoperative anesthesia. However, we now know that opioids (especially synthetic short-acting molecules) are definitely not ideal analgesics and may even be counterproductive, increasing postoperative pain. As well, opioids have revealed important drawbacks associated to poor perioperative outcomes. As a matter of fact, efforts in postoperative pain management in the last 30 years were driven by the idea of reducing/eliminating opioids from the postoperative period. However, a modern concept of anesthesia should eliminate opioids already intra-operatively towards a balanced, opioid-free approach (opioid-free anesthesia - OFA). In OFA drugs and techniques historically proven for their efficacy are combined in rational and defined protocols. They include ketamine, alpha-2 agonists, lidocaine, magnesium, anti-inflammatory drugs and regional anesthesia. Promising results have been obtained on perioperative outcome. For sure, analgesia is not reduced with OFA, but it is effective and with less opioid-related side effects. These benefits may be of particular importance in some high-risk patients, like OSAS, obese and chronic opioid-users/abusers. OFA may also increase patient-reported outcomes; despite it is difficult to specifically rule out the effect of intraoperative opioids. Finally, few data are available on long-term outcomes (persistent pain and opioid abuse, cancer outcome). New studies and data are required to elaborate the optimal approach for each patient/surgery, but interest and publication are increasing and may open the road to the wider adoption of OFA.

Effect of opioid-free anaesthesia on post-operative period in cardiac surgery: a retrospective matched case-control study

Background

No study has been conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of an opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) protocol in cardiac surgery to improve patient care. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of OFA on post-operative morphine consumption and the post-operative course.

Methods

After retrospectively registering to clinicaltrial.gov (NCT03816592), we performed a retrospective matched cohort study (1:1) on cardiac surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass between 2018 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: OFA (lidocaine, dexamethasone and ketamine) or opioid anaesthesia (OA) (sufentanil). The main outcome was the total postoperative morphine consumption in the 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were rescue analgesic use, a major adverse event composite endpoint, and ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS).

Results

One hundred ten patients were matched (OFA: n = 55; OA: n = 55). On inclusion, demographic and surgical data for the OFA and OA groups were comparable. The total morphine consumption was higher in the OA group than in the OFA group (15 (6–34) vs 5 mg (2–18), p = 0.001). The pain score during the first 48 post-operative hours did not differ between the two groups. Creatinine values did not differ on the first post-operative day (80 (IQR: 66–115) vs 77 mmol/l (IQR: 69–95), p = 0.284). Incidence of the composite endpoint was lower in the OFA group (25 patients (43%) vs 38 patients (68%), p = 0.021). The time to extubation and the ICU stays were shorter in the OFA group (3 (1–5) vs 5 (3–6) hours, p = 0.001 and 2 (1–3) vs 3 (2–5) days, p = 0.037).

Conclusion

The use of OFA was associated with lower morphine consumption. OFA might be associated with shorter intubation time and ICU stays. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered to ct2 (identifier: NCT03816592) on January 25, 2019.

Association between intraoperative nociception and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery

A higher degree of surgical invasiveness, which increases intraoperative nociception, might induce postoperative complications. Although several nociceptive indices for use during surgery are available in clinical practice, association between intraoperative nociception and postoperative complications has not been reported. An index representing intraoperative nociception, which is the averaged value of Nociceptive Response throughout the surgery (mean NR) was applied to examine the association in the present study. The retrospective study evaluated consecutive adult patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists-physical status (ASA-PS) I or II, whose preoperative C-reactive protein level was < 0.3 mg dL^-1. We first used ordinal logistic analysis to examine the association between preoperative and intraoperative risk factors and complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification. Next, we performed propensity score matched analysis to evaluate the effects of mean NR throughout surgery on postoperative complications. Ordinal logistic analysis (n = 158) revealed that duration of surgery (P < 0.001), mean NR during surgery (P = 0.002), and ASA-PS (P = 0.016) were risk factors for postoperative complications. Then all patients were divided into two propensity score matched groups, based on a mean NR of < 0.85 and ≥ 0.85, with matching for age, ASA-PS, body mass index and duration of surgery. The severity of postoperative complications was significantly higher in the high NR group than in the low NR group (P = 0.005). In conclusion, there was likely an association between intraoperative nociception and postoperative complications in patients without serious preoperative conditions and comorbidities.

Effects of Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Nociceptive Levels After Skin Incision During Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Background

Regional anesthesia provides excellent analgesic effects after surgery. However, the effects of regional anesthesia on nociceptive levels during surgery under general anesthesia have not been quantitatively evaluated. To reveal the effects of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) on nociceptive levels after skin incision during general anesthesia, we performed a retrospective cohort study in patients without serious preoperative conditions or comorbidities undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Nociceptive levels during general anesthesia were calculated using our previously determined Nociceptive Response (NR) equation, which utilizes common hemodynamic parameters.

Material/Methods

Data on 77 adult patients who underwent VATS from May 2018 to August 2018 were retrospectively obtained from our institutional database. We then performed propensity score matching between patients who received thoracic PVB (PVB group: n=29) and those who did not (Control group: n=48). The averaged values of systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), perfusion index (PI), bispectral index (BIS), and NR from 10 to 5 minutes before skin incision (T0), 5 to 10 minutes (T1), 10 to 15 minutes (T2), 15 to 20 minutes (T3), and 20 to 25 minutes after skin incision (T4), were calculated.

Results

Twenty-four propensity score-matched patients in each group were analyzed. Mean NR values at T1 and T2 in the PVB group were significantly lower than those in the Control group. SBP, HR, PI, and BIS, however, showed no significant differences between the 2 groups, except for SBP at T2.

Conclusions

Thoracic PVB prevented an increase in NR values, which quantitatively represent nociceptive levels under general anesthesia, in patients undergoing VATS.