1
|
Chae MS, Lee S, Choi YJ, Koh HJ. Impact of Preoperative Gum Chewing on Postoperative Anti-Emetic Use in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Ovarian Masses: A Prospective, Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1135. [PMID: 39064564 PMCID: PMC11279347 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60071135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Revised: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common issue for females undergoing gynecological surgeries, including those assisted by robotic systems. Despite available prophylactic measures, the incidence of PONV remains high, negatively impacting recovery and increasing healthcare costs. This study evaluates whether preoperative gum chewing reduces the need for anti-emetic drugs in females undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian mass. Materials and Methods: This prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial enrolled 92 adult females scheduled for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery to treat benign ovarian mass. Following exclusions, the remaining participants were randomly assigned to either a gum-chewing group or a no-gum-chewing group. The gum-chewing group chewed sugar-free gum for 15 min in the holding area before surgery. The primary outcome measured was the need for anti-emetics to control PONV during the first hour in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes included the number of anti-emetic requests. No preemptive anti-emetics were administered during surgery. Results: Out of the initial 92 patients, 88 were included in the final analysis, with 44 in each group. The incidence of PONV requiring anti-emetics in the PACU was significantly lower in the gum-chewing group (79.5%) compared to the no-gum-chewing group (95.5%). Additionally, the number of anti-emetic requests was higher in the no-gum-chewing group. No postoperative complications such as tooth or jaw pain/injury or gastric content regurgitation were reported. Conclusions: Preoperative gum chewing for 15 min immediately before surgery significantly reduced the incidence of PONV in females undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian mass. This simple, non-pharmacological intervention improved patient comfort and reduced the need for anti-emetic medications without any adverse effects. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to develop guidelines for incorporating preoperative gum chewing into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Suk Chae
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea;
| | - Subin Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Youn Jin Choi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Jung Koh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao K, Gao Y, Zhang J, Wang S, Chen J, Guo F, Wang S. Penehyclidine for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery Under Combined Intravenous and Inhalation Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Drug Des Devel Ther 2024; 18:685-697. [PMID: 38445065 PMCID: PMC10913797 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s453327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose We designed this study to investigate the effect of intravenous use of penehyclidine on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Patients and Methods Ninety-two Women Patients (Aged ≥ 18) Scheduled for Elective Gynecologic Laparoscopy Were Enrolled in the Current Study. Patients Were Equally Randomized Assigned Into Penehyclidine group (PHC group: received a bolus of penehyclidine 10 μg/kg during the induction of anesthesia, then followed by a continuous infusion of 10 μg/kg penehyclidine at a fixed rate of 2.0 mL/h in postoperative intravenous analgesia pump over 48h, 0.5 mg upper limit respectively) or Control group (received 0.9% saline in replace of penehyclidine at the same time points). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the postanesthesia care unit and ward area. Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores and general comfort questionnaire (GCQ) scores were assessed on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2. Results Patients between two groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Compared with the Control group, the incidence and severity of PONV, postoperative nausea (PON), and postoperative vomiting (POV) were significantly lower in the PHC group at 2h (PONV: P = 0.002, P = 0.004, respectively; PON: P = 0.018, P = 0.038, respectively; POV: P = 0.011, P = 0.072, respectively), 24h (PONV: P = 0.003, P = 0.001, respectively; PON: P = 0.010, P = 0.032, respectively; POV: P = 0.006, P = 0.044, respectively), and 48h (PONV: P = 0.003, P = 0.002, respectively; PON: P = 0.007, P = 0.019, respectively; POV: P = 0.002, P = 0.013, respectively) after surgery. The QoR-15 and GCQ scores of the PHC group were significantly higher than those of the Control group at POD 1, 2 (P < 0.001; P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Our findings suggest that perioperative intravenous application of penehyclidine can effectively prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecological laparoscopic surgery patients and improve postoperative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yali Gao
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianping Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shan Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiaqi Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fenglin Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
| | - Sheng Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meyer TA, Hutson LR, Morris PM, McAllister RK. A Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Update: Current information on New Drugs, Old Drugs, Rescue/Treatment, Combination Therapies and Nontraditional Modalities. Adv Anesth 2023; 41:17-38. [PMID: 38251617 DOI: 10.1016/j.aan.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
This article's objective is to present the latest evidence and information on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). PONV continues to affect 30% of the surgical population causing patient dissatisfaction, extending length of stay, and increasing overall costs. This review includes the introduction of 2 new intravenous formulations of antiemetics (amisulpride, aprepitant), updates on nontraditional therapies, suggestions for combination prophylaxis, emerging data on rescue treatment, and considerations for special populations and settings. Both of the new antiemetics provide promising options for pharmacologic interventions for PONV with favorable safety profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tricia A Meyer
- Texas A&M University-School of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA.
| | - Larry R Hutson
- Texas A&M University-School of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA; Baylor College of Medicine - Temple, TX, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-Temple, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Phillip M Morris
- Texas A&M University-School of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-Temple, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Russell K McAllister
- Texas A&M University-School of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA; Baylor College of Medicine - Temple, TX, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-Temple, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, TX 76508, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rashad AE, El Hefnawy E, Elmorshedi M, Abuyousif YA, Salem A, Attia M, El Nakeeb A, Zaid A, Aldossary HM, Mohammed MN. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (a Retrospective Multicentric Study). Obes Surg 2023; 33:3237-3245. [PMID: 37624489 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06803-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent unappealing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) sequel. The study's purpose was to determine the prevalence, risk factors of PONV, and management of PONV after LSG. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter retrospective study included patients with morbid obesity who had LSG between January 2022 and April 2023. The age range for LSG was 16 to 65 years, and the eligibility requirements included morbid obesity according to international guidelines. RESULTS PONV was experienced by 74.6% of patients who underwent LSG at 6 h postoperative. Multivariate analysis revealed that female gender, smokers, preoperative GERD, gastropexy, and severity of pain were found to be independent risk variables of the development of PONV, while antral preservation, opioid-free analgesia, and intraoperative combined analgesia were found to be independent protective variables against the development of PONV. Combined intravenous ondansetron and metoclopramide improved 92.6% of patients who developed PONV. Dexamethasone and antihistamines drugs are given for 42 cases with persistent PONV after using intravenous ondansetron and metoclopramide. Pain management postoperatively by opioid-free analgesia managed PONV. Helicobacter pylori status has no role in the development of PONV after LSG. CONCLUSION Female gender, smoking, presence of preoperative GERD, gastropexy, and severity of pain were found to be independent risk variables of the development of PONV, while antral preservation, opioid-free analgesia, and intraoperative combined analgesia were observed to be independent protective factors against the occurrence of PONV. Combined intravenous ondansetron and metoclopramide improved PONV. Dexamethasone and antihistamines drugs are given for persistent PONV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aly E Rashad
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
- Wadi Aldawaser Armed Forces Hospital, Wadi Aldawaser, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 18511
| | - Emad El Hefnawy
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Elmorshedi
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
| | | | - Ali Salem
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Attia
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
| | - Ayman El Nakeeb
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
- Wadi Aldawaser Armed Forces Hospital, Wadi Aldawaser, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 18511.
| | - Ahmed Zaid
- Wadi Aldawaser Armed Forces Hospital, Wadi Aldawaser, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 18511
| | | | - Mohammed N Mohammed
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
- Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ji JY, Kim NS, Seo YH, Jung HS, Chun HR, Park JS, Choi JS, Ahn JM, Kim WJ. Comparing the effects of continuous infusion of esmolol and ramosetron alone and in combination on nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30105. [PMID: 36107614 PMCID: PMC9439737 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Although PONV is usually mild, severe thing can delay recovery and prolong hospitalization. We aimed to investigate the effects of ramosetron and esmolol, alone and in combination, on PONV, and pain. METHODS We enrolled 165 patients in their 20s to 50s who had an American Society of Anesthesiology physical status score of 1 or 2 and were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy. They were randomly allocated into 3 groups: groups R, E, and E+R. Patients in group R received 0.3 mg of ramosetron following surgery. Those in group E were intravenously administered a bolus of esmolol (1.0 mg/kg) before endotracheal intubation. They were continuously infused with esmolol during the surgery to maintain their heart rate at 60 to 100 beats per minute and mean blood pressure at 60 to 100 mm Hg, followed by a bolus of esmolol (1.0 mg/kg) following surgery. Patients in group E+R were intravenously administered a bolus of esmolol (1.0 mg/kg) before endotracheal intubation, infused esmolol during surgery, and administered 0.3 mg of ramosetron and a bolus of esmolol (1.0 mg/kg) following surgery. We monitored the PONV stages (none, nausea, retching, and vomiting) and symptom severity in 3 postoperative stages (0-30 minutes, 30 minutes to 6 hours, and 6-24 hours), the latter by using the visual analog scale (VAS). We conducted an analysis of variance to compare VAS scores between groups. RESULTS Patients in groups E (mean ± standard deviation VAS score, 3.62 ± 1.00) and E+R (3.66 ± 0.71) exhibited less pain (P < .05) until 30 minutes following surgery compared to group R (5.72 ± 1.41). More patients in group E (28/50, 56%) experienced nausea compared to those in groups R (15/50, 30%) and E+R (8/50, 16%) until 30 minutes after surgery (P < .05). However, there were no differences in the severity of retching and vomiting between the groups in any of the phases (P > .05). CONCLUSION Despite reducing pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, esmolol did not prevent PONV, whether used alone or in combination with ramosetron.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Young Ji
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
| | - Nan Seol Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
- *Correspondence: Nan Seol Kim, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, 31, Soonchunhyang 6-gil, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea (e-mail: )
| | - Yong Han Seo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
| | - Ho Soon Jung
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
| | - Hea Rim Chun
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
| | - Jin Soo Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
| | - Jeong Soo Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
| | - Jae Min Ahn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
| | - Woo Jong Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ma W, Qi Y, Liu C, Wang M, Zhang Y, Yao W. Effect of individualized treatment strategy on postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:266. [PMID: 35986239 PMCID: PMC9389684 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01809-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) have always been a concern of clinicians and may increase medical costs for patients. Consensus guidelines recommend using multiple antiemetics with different mechanisms as prophylaxis in patients at high risk of PONV. Individualized risk scores for nausea and vomiting and individualized treatment strategies are feasible. This study evaluated the effect of individualized treatment strategies on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic gynaecological operations. METHODS This was a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 119 adult patients who underwent gynaecological laparoscopic surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into an individualized treatment group or a control group, with the individualized treatment group receiving individualized prevention according to a preoperative risk score of nausea and vomiting and the control group receiving no individualized prevention. Vomiting, retching, nausea, and use of rescue medication were all recorded for 24 h after the operation. The primary outcome variable was complete response, defined as no emesis or the use of rescue medication 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS The complete response rate was higher in the individualized treatment group (56.7%) than in the control group (23.7%) (95% CI, 0.01-0.27; P < 0.001). The incidences of emesis (18.3% vs. 44.1%, P = 0.002) were significantly lower in the individualized treatment group than in the control group. There were no differences in any nausea (26.7% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.391) or rescue medication use (6.7% vs. 8.5%, P = 0.743). Adverse events and laboratory and electrocardiogram abnormalities occurred no more frequently in the individualized treatment group than in the control group. CONCLUSION In conclusion, this single-centre, double-blind, randomized study suggests that an individualized PONV prophylactic treatment strategy based on the number of PONV risk factors could be a safe and effective regimen to reduce the incidence of PONV in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjing Ma
- grid.452929.10000 0004 8513 0241Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2 Zheshan Street, Wuhu, 241000 Anhui China
| | - Yupeng Qi
- grid.452929.10000 0004 8513 0241Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No.2 Zheshan Street, Wuhu, 241000 Anhui China
| | - Can Liu
- grid.452929.10000 0004 8513 0241Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2 Zheshan Street, Wuhu, 241000 Anhui China
| | - Mingfang Wang
- grid.452929.10000 0004 8513 0241Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2 Zheshan Street, Wuhu, 241000 Anhui China
| | - Yun Zhang
- grid.452929.10000 0004 8513 0241Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2 Zheshan Street, Wuhu, 241000 Anhui China
| | - Weidong Yao
- grid.452929.10000 0004 8513 0241Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2 Zheshan Street, Wuhu, 241000 Anhui China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schlesinger T, Weibel S, Meybohm P, Kranke P. Drugs in anesthesia: preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2021; 34:421-427. [PMID: 33958529 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be a burden for patients, medical staff and healthcare facilities because of inadequate adherence to available recommendations. This review gives an overview on recent recommendations, new evidence and remaining issues in the field of PONV management. RECENT FINDINGS A wide range of drugs is available for the management of PONV including corticosteroids, 5-HT3-antagonists, dopamine-antagonists, neurokinin-receptor-1 (NK1)-antagonists, antihistamines and anticholinergics. The updated PONV guidelines from 2020 recommend a universal multimodal strategy for PONV prophylaxis, which is an important paradigm shift to improve implementation of the existing evidence. A recent Cochrane network meta-analysis ranked single drugs and drug combinations for PONV prophylaxis in terms of efficacy and safety. Notably, NK1-antagonists and new 5-HT3-antagonists ranged among the most effective drugs. However, safety data on antiemetics are generally scarce. SUMMARY Numerous drug (combinations) and strategies are available for PONV management. New and very effective (single) drugs could result in a simplification compared with a combination of several drugs, and thus lead to better implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Schlesinger
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pourfakhr P, Aghabagheri M, Zabihi Mahmoudabadi H, Najjari K, Talebpour M, Khajavi MR. Prophylactic Administration of Diphenhydramine/Acetaminophen and Ondansetron Reduced Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting and Pain Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Obes Surg 2021; 31:4371-4375. [PMID: 34313917 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05589-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain following bariatric surgery are problematic and affect the outcome of patients. Intraoperative multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis is essential to improve postoperative outcomes. This study investigated the effect of adding diphenhydramine to acetaminophen and ondansetron in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting and pain following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-two patients scheduled for LSG were assigned to receive a single preinduction dose of diphenhydramine 0.4 mg/kg VI (D group) in addition to acetaminophen 1g and ondansetron 4 mg IV at the end of surgery and just acetaminophen 1 g and ondansetron 4 mg IV (C group) in a randomized, double-blind trial. PONV was assessed in recovery and 24 hours after surgery in the ward. Postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and patients' level of sedation were also assessed. RESULTS The PONV rates in the recovery of the D group and the C group were 30% and 56% (P = .001). It also had a more significant reduction in the D group than in the C group in the first 24 h after surgery (40% vs. 66%). The severity of pain score and level of sedation and analgesic requirements was significantly reduced in this period in the D group. CONCLUSION Prophylactic diphenhydramine 0.4 mg/kg at the induction of general anesthesia in combination with acetaminophen 1 g and ondansetron 4 mg at the end of surgery reduced the incidence of PONV and postoperative severity of pain in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pejman Pourfakhr
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Imam Khomeini St, Tehran, 11367-46911, Iran
| | - Mojtaba Aghabagheri
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Imam Khomeini St, Tehran, 11367-46911, Iran
| | | | - Khosrow Najjari
- Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Talebpour
- Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Khajavi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Imam Khomeini St, Tehran, 11367-46911, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|