Enteroscopy

The evolving role of device-assisted enteroscopy: The state of the art as of August 2023

Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE), balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) in particular, has become a routine endoscopic procedure which has revolutionized our approach to small-bowel disease. Evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of BAE spans over 22-years of experience, making it an established pillar of minimally invasive care. The robust evidence for BAE's safety and efficacy has now been incorporated into international clinical guidelines, technical reviews, benchmarking performance measures and curricula. The more recently introduced motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) which had replaced the previous manual version, abruptly ended its 7-year stint in clinical practice, when it was withdrawn and recalled from the market by its manufacturing company in July 2023, due to several associated serious adverse events (including fatalities). This article, written by the original developer of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and other recognized international experts and pioneers in this field, focuses mainly on the technical aspects, evolving indications, and equipment-related technological advances. Despite the very recent withdrawal of MSE from clinical practice, for completeness, this technology and its technique is still briefly covered here, albeit importantly, along with a short description of reported, associated, serious adverse events which have contributed to its withdrawal/recall from the market and clinical practice.

Management of small bowel polyps: from small to big

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Benign small bowel polyps or mass are clinically poorly distinguishable from malignant small bowel masses, and the diagnostic conditions are almost the same. The important point for clinicians is first to take advantage of the different available diagnostic tools to optimize the diagnostic algorithm of a small bowel polyp or mass. Next, according to the clinical situation, associated disease or sporadic situation, the difficulty is to adapt the treatment decision to the patient situation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The last 20 years have been marked by the development of major diagnostic tools for small bowel diseases (capsule endoscopy, cross-sectional imaging with enteroclysis and balloon-assisted enteroscopy) and by the major decrease of intra-operative enteroscopy as a diagnostic mean.

SUMMARY

On the basis of considerable development of capsule endoscopy and the improvement of cross-sectional small bowel imagining, small bowel polyps represent now a frequent clinical situation for gastroenterologists.

A single-center United States experience with bleeding Dieulafoy lesions of the small bowel: diagnosis and treatment with single-balloon enteroscopy

INTRODUCTION

A Dieulafoy lesion (DL) of the small bowel can cause severe gastrointestinal bleeding, and presents a difficult clinical setting for endoscopists. Limited data exists on the therapeutic yield of treating DLs of the small bowel using single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE).

METHODS

Data were collected from Tampa General Hospital a 1 018-bed teaching hospital affiliated with University of South Florida in Tampa, Florida. Patients were selected from a database of patients that underwent SBE from January 2010 - August 2013.

RESULTS

Eight patients were found to have DL an incidence of 2.6 % of 309 SBE performed for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. 7/8 were identified in the jejunum, with one found in the duodenum. The mean age of patients with DL was 71.5 years old. 6/8 patients were on some form of anticoagulant/antiplatelet agent. The primary modality of therapy employed was electrocautery, multipolar electrocoagulation in seven patients and APC (argon plasma coagulation) in one patient. In three patients, electrocoagulation was unsuccessful and hemostasis was achieved with clip placement. Three patients required repeat SBE with one found to have rebleeding from a failed clip with hemostasis achieved upon reapplication of one clip.

CONCLUSION

In our United States' experience, SBE offers a reasonable therapeutic approach to treat DL of the small bowel with low rates of rebleeding, no adverse events, and no patient requiring surgery.

Wireless capsule endoscopy of the small intestine: a review with future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Here, we review the clinical applications of small bowel capsule endoscopy. Moreover, we provide an outlook on the exceptional future developments of small bowel capsule endoscopy. We discuss clinical algorithms for diagnosis of small bowel diseases. Multiple studies have shown the potential of capsule endoscopy for identification of the bleeding source located in the small bowel and the increased diagnostic yield over radiographic studies. Capsule endoscopy could detect villous atrophy and severe complications in patients with nonresponsive celiac disease. In addition, small bowel capsule endoscopy was proven as a valid tool to diagnose polyps and tumors and Crohn's disease.

SUMMARY

Major current clinical indications of capsule endoscopy in the small bowel include evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, diagnosis and surveillance of small bowel polyps and tumors, celiac disease and Crohn's disease. Recent developments have also passed the way for small bowel capsule endoscopy to become a therapeutic instrument.

Double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis of suspected isolated Crohn's disease of the small bowel

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) with isolated involvement of the small bowel remains a major challenge. Diagnostic procedures allowing direct insight into the midgut have become available with the introduction of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and video-capsule endoscopy (VCE). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of DBE in the diagnosis of isolated CD of the small bowel.

METHODS

Sixteen patients (seven males) with suspected CD of the small bowel after exclusion of abnormal changes in the upper gastrointestinal tract and colon by esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy including histology underwent DBE and high-resolution transabdominal ultrasound.

RESULTS

In seven of 16 (44%) patients, abnormal macroscopic findings were detected by DBE (e.g. ileitis terminalis, inflammatory stenosis, aphthous lesions or jejunal ulcers). In one of thecases, histology confirmed pathognomonic findings consistent with CD. However, the diagnosis of CD was confirmed in 11/16 (69%) patients taking into account the clinical presentation and course of the disease as well as the endoscopic and imaging results.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of CD with clinical expression limited to the small bowel, DBE is a helpful tool. Nevertheless, in these patients, the combination of clinical findings and additional imaging modalities is required for confirmation of the diagnosis. A suggestive medical history, high-resolution ultrasound, EGD and colonoscopy lead the algorithm before the assessment with DBE.

Recent advances in small bowel diseases: Part II

As is the case in all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology, in 2009 and 2010 there were many advances in our knowledge and understanding of small intestinal diseases. Over 1000 publications were reviewed, and the important advances in basic science as well as clinical applications were considered. In Part II we review six topics: absorption, short bowel syndrome, smooth muscle function and intestinal motility, tumors, diagnostic imaging, and cystic fibrosis.

Anesthetic management for small bowel enteroscopy in a World Gastroenterology Organization Endoscopy Training Center

AIM

To study the anesthetic management of patients undergoing small bowel enteroscopy in the World Gastroenterology Organization (WGO) Endoscopy Training Center in Thailand.

METHODS

Patients who underwent small bowel enteroscopy during the period of March 2005 to March 2011 in Siriraj Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center were retrospectively analyzed. The patients' characteristics, pre-anesthetic problems, anesthetic techniques, anesthetic agents, anesthetic time, type and route of procedure and anesthesia-related complications were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-four patients underwent this procedure during the study period. The mean age of the patients was 57.6 ± 17.2 years, and most were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class II (53.2%). Indications for this procedure were gastrointestinal bleeding (59.7%), chronic diarrhea (14.3%), protein losing enteropathy (2.6%) and others (23.4%). Hematologic disease, hypertension, heart disease and electrolyte imbalance were the most common pre-anesthetic problems. General anesthesia with endotracheal tube was the anesthetic technique mainly employed (50.6%). The main anesthetic agents administered were fentanyl, propofol and midazolam. The mean anesthetic time was 94.0 ± 50.5 min. Single balloon and oral (antegrade) intubation was the most common type and route of enteroscopy. The anesthesia-related complication rate was relatively high. The overall and cardiovascular-related complication rates including hypotension in the older patient group (aged ≥ 60 years old) were significantly higher than those in the younger group.

CONCLUSION

During anesthetic management for small bowel enteroscopy, special techniques and drugs are not routinely required. However, for safety reasons anesthetic personnel need to optimize the patient's condition.

Use of bio-degradable stents for the treatment of refractory benign gastrointestinal stenoses

Bio-degradable stents are be made of different synthetic polymers (like polylactide or polyglycolide) or their co-polymers (polydioxanone). They can be used for treating benign stenoses of the small and large intestine, particularly in Crohn's disease. Endoscopic introduction of bio-degradable stents into small and large intestinal stenoses is feasible and relatively simple. Initial results are encouraging and the complication rate is low. However, there are still some difficulties that need to be overcome. The rate of early stent migration is still rather high (up to one third of patients). This might be solved by changes in the shape or rigidity of the stents as well as by further improvement in the design. Proof of long-term efficacy and safety requires further studies.

Primary segmental and multiple adenocarcinomas of the small bowel

Small bowel tumors are rare; most are single and located in the duodenum. When a patient presents with unreasonable abdominal pain and distension, with normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy, it is important to consider this disease. Here, we report a case of segmental and multiple adenocarcinoma of the small bowl presenting with unreasonable abdominal pain and distension in a 76-year-old woman, and provide a brief review on this subject. Our report highlights the fact that segmental and multiple small bowel tumors are very rare and the clinical characteristics are generally vague and nonspecific.

Update on celiac disease - etiology, differential diagnosis, drug targets, and management advances

Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated enteropathy triggered by exposure to wheat gluten and similar proteins found in rye and barley that affects genetically susceptible persons. This immune-mediated enteropathy is characterized by villous atrophy, intraepithelial lymphocytosis, and crypt hyperplasia. Once thought a disease that largely presented with malnourished children, the wide spectrum of disease activity is now better recognized and this has resulted in a shift in the presenting symptoms of most patients with CD. New advances in testing, both serologic and endoscopic, have dramatically increased the detection and diagnosis of CD. While the gluten-free diet is still the only treatment for CD, recent investigations have explored alternative approaches, including the use of altered nonimmunogenic wheat variants, enzymatic degradation of gluten, tissue transglutaminase inhibitors, induction of tolerance, and peptides to restore integrity to intestinal tight junctions.

Therapeutic double-balloon enteroscopy: a binational, three-center experience

BACKGROUND/AIMS

There are few reports focusing on therapeutic small bowel endoscopy. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of therapeutic small bowel endoscopy in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of a prospectively collected database comprising all patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic small bowel endoscopy in three centers.

RESULTS

A total of 614 double-balloon enteroscopies were performed in 534 patients. The most common pathological findings were angiodysplasias and vascular lesions (n = 98, 18%), mucosal ulcers and erosions (n = 95, 17.8%), polyps and tumors (including patients with familiar polyposis syndrome such as Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, familiar adenomatous polyps syndrome, neurofibromatosis, adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors and gastrointestinal stromal tumors) (n = 52, 9.7%), and strictures (Crohn's disease, ischemia, tumors) (n = 12, 2.2%). The mean duration of therapeutic small bowel enteroscopy was 67 min (range 30-115) compared to 50 min (range 25-105) for diagnostic procedures (p < 0.05). A therapeutic small bowel endoscopy was performed in 121 patients (22%). Therapeutic procedures included argon plasma coagulation of vascular lesions (n = 73), polypectomy (n = 49), mucosectomy (n = 5), stricture dilation (n = 7), foreign body extraction (n = 7), injection of fibrin glue (n = 10), and clip placement (n = 5). There were a total of 5 complications (0.9%; paralytic ileus, n = 2, pancreatitis, n = 1, bleeding n = 2). No perforations or deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopists performing double-balloon enteroscopy should be trained and prepared to provide therapeutic interventions for small bowel disorders including argon plasma coagulation, injection, hemoclipping, polypectomy, mucosectomy and foreign body extraction. Therapeutic small bowel endoscopy, albeit associated with complications in about 1% of cases, can be considered a relatively safe procedure.

Therapeutic and interventional endoscopy for gastrointestinal bleeding

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding remains a common clinical problem encountered by every emergency room and trauma physician. Endoscopy remains the main approach to the diagnosis and therapy of GI bleeding.

OBJECTIVES

To present the modern endoscopic approach for GI bleeding.

METHODS

Narrative review based on our expertise and inclusion of classic articles dealing with interventional and therapeutic GI endoscopy.

RESULTS

GI hemorrhage is now classified as upper, middle, and lower GI bleeding. Upper GI bleeding is defined as hemorrhage originating from the oropharynx to the ligament of Treitz (or papilla of Vater), middle GI bleeding occurs distal to the papilla of Vater to the terminal ileum, and lower GI bleeding is defined as bleeding distal to the ileocecal valve, including the entire colon and anorectum. Endoscopic methods used to diagnosed and treat GI bleeding include esophagogastroduodenoscopy, duodenoscopy, capsule endoscopy, double- and single-balloon enteroscopy, spiral enteroscopy, and colonosocopy.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first review paper dedicated to endoscopic therapy for bleeding involving any part of the luminal GI tract (i.e., esophagus, stomach, small bowel, and colon). Modern endoscopy permits the investigation and treatment of the majority of conditions affecting the entire hollow GI tract.

New endoscopic approaches in IBD

Recent advances in endoscopic imaging techniques have revolutionized the diagnostic approach of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). New, emerging endoscopic imaging techniques visualized a plethora of new mucosal details even at the cellular and subcellular level. This review offers an overview about new endoscopic techniques, including chromoendoscopy, magnification endoscopy, spectroscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy and endocytoscopy in the face of IBD.

Occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: Causes and diagnostic approach in 2009

Gastrointestinal bleeding can be obscure or occult (OGIB), the causes and diagnostic approach will be discussed in this editorial. The evaluation of OGIB consists on a judicious search of the cause of bleeding, which should be guided by the clinical history and physical findings. The standard approach to patients with OGIB is to directly evaluate the gastrointestinal tract by endoscopy, abdominal computed tomography, angiography, radionuclide scanning, capsule endoscopy. The source of OGIB can be identified in 85%-90%, no bleeding sites will be found in about 5%-10% of cases. Even if the bleedings originating from the small bowel are not frequent in clinical practice (7.6% of all digestive haemorrhages, in our casuistry), they are notoriously difficult to diagnose. In spite of progress, however, a number of OGIB still remain problematic to deal with at present in the clinical context due to both the difficulty in exactly identifying the site and nature of the underlying source and the difficulty in applying affective and durable diagnostic approaches so no single technique has emerged as the most efficient way to evaluate OGIB.

Incidence of bleeding lesions within reach of conventional upper and lower endoscopes in patients undergoing double-balloon enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is a useful method for evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB).

AIM

To determine the incidence of lesions within reach of conventional upper and lower endoscopes as the cause of OGIB in patients referred for DBE.

METHODS

All patients undergoing DBE for OGIB during a 3.5-year period at a university hospital were studied. OGIB was defined according to American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-three DBEs were performed in 107 patients for obscure overt (n=85) and obscure occult (n=22) GIB. Lesions outside the SB as possible sources of GIB were found in 51 patients (47.6%) and a definite source of bleeding outside the small bowel (SB) was detected in 26 patients (24.3%). Lesions considered to explain a definite source of GIB were: gastric ulcer (n=3), duodenal ulcer (n=3), Cameron's lesions (n=2), gastric antral vascular ectasias (n=4), radiation proctitis (n=1), radiation ileitis (n=2), duodenal angiodysplasias (n=1), haemorrhoids with stigmata of recent bleed (n=1), colon angiodysplasias (n=3), colon diverticulosis (n=3), colonic Crohn's disease (n=1), anastomotic ulcers (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of non-SB lesions definitely explaining the source of GIB in patients referred for DBE was 24.3%. Therefore, repeat esophago-gastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and ileocolonoscopy should be taken into consideration before DBE.