1
|
Elosiuba E, Layton O, Salem A. First Presentation and Diagnosis of a Rare Advanced Gynaecological Cancer in Emergency Department: A Case Report. JOURNAL OF THE WEST AFRICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS 2023; 13:116-118. [PMID: 37538213 PMCID: PMC10395844 DOI: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_27_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
A case of rare endometrial carcinosarcoma with locoregional spread and sigmoid fistula presenting for the very first time at a hospital emergency department (ED). A 56-year-old female presented with abdominal pain, diarrhea, fever, and pancytopenia, which was diagnosed as advanced gynaecological cancer following assessment, imaging, and tissue biopsy. Increased pressure on the ED owing to coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic may cause the first presentation of gynae-oncology cases to ED physician. A full return of all primary care services may reduce such pressure, improve early detection of gynaecological malignancies, allow early multidisciplinary team care, and result in better patient experience in the long run.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emeka Elosiuba
- Emergency Department, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK
| | - Olivia Layton
- Emergency Department, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK
| | - Ammar Salem
- Emergency Department, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mogharab V, Ostovar M, Ruszkowski J, Hussain SZM, Shrestha R, Yaqoob U, Aryanpoor P, Nikkhoo AM, Heidari P, Jahromi AR, Rayatdoost E, Ali A, Javdani F, Farzaneh R, Ghanaatpisheh A, Habibzadeh SR, Foroughian M, Ahmadi SR, Akhavan R, Abbasi B, Shahi B, Hakemi A, Bolvardi E, Bagherian F, Motamed M, Boroujeni ST, Jamalnia S, Mangouri A, Paydar M, Mehrasa N, Shirali D, Sanmarchi F, Saeed A, Jafari NA, Babou A, Kalani N, Hatami N. Global burden of the COVID-19 associated patient-related delay in emergency healthcare: a panel of systematic review and meta-analyses. Global Health 2022; 18:58. [PMID: 35676714 PMCID: PMC9175527 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-022-00836-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Apart from infecting a large number of people around the world and causing the death of many people, the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have changed the healthcare processes of other diseases by changing the allocation of health resources and changing people’s access or intention to healthcare systems. Objective To compare the incidence of endpoints marking delayed healthcare seeking in medical emergencies, before and during the pandemic. Methods Based on a PICO model, medical emergency conditions that need timely intervention was selected to be evaluated as separate panels. In a systematic literature review, PubMed was quarried for each panel for studies comparing the incidence of various medical emergencies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Markers of failure/disruption of treatment due to delayed referral were included in the meta-analysis for each panel. Result There was a statistically significant increased pooled median time of symptom onset to admission of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients; an increased rate of vasospasm of aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage; and perforation rate in acute appendicitis; diabetic ketoacidosis presentation rate among Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus patients; and rate of orchiectomy among testicular torsion patients in comparison of pre-COVID-19 with COVID-19 cohorts; while there were no significant changes in the event rate of ruptured ectopic pregnancy and median time of symptom onset to admission in the cerebrovascular accident (CVA) patients. Conclusions COVID-19 has largely disrupted the referral of patients for emergency medical care and patient-related delayed care should be addressed as a major health threat. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12992-022-00836-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vahid Mogharab
- Department of Pediatrics, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Mahshid Ostovar
- Research Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Jakub Ruszkowski
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.,Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | - Rajeev Shrestha
- Palliative Care and Chronic Disease Unit, Green Pasteur Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal
| | - Uzair Yaqoob
- Postgraduate trainee, Surgical Department, Hamdard University Hospital Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Poorya Aryanpoor
- Research Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Amir Mohammad Nikkhoo
- Research Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Parasta Heidari
- Research Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Athar Rasekh Jahromi
- Research Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Esmaeil Rayatdoost
- Research Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Anwar Ali
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Farshid Javdani
- Research Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Roohie Farzaneh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Aref Ghanaatpisheh
- Research Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Seyed Reza Habibzadeh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mahdi Foroughian
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Sayyed Reza Ahmadi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Reza Akhavan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Bita Abbasi
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Behzad Shahi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
| | - Arman Hakemi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Ehsan Bolvardi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Farhad Bagherian
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Mahsa Motamed
- Department of Psychiatry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Sheida Jamalnia
- Medical Journalism Department, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Amir Mangouri
- Fellowship of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of General Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Paydar
- Research Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Neda Mehrasa
- Shiraz Azad University, Dental Branch, Shiraz, Iran
| | | | - Francesco Sanmarchi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ayesha Saeed
- Department of Biochemistry, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Narges Azari Jafari
- Neuroscience Research Department Center, Kashan University of Medical Science, Kashan, Iran
| | - Ali Babou
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, College of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
| | - Navid Kalani
- Research Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
| | - Naser Hatami
- Research Center for Non-Communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karim F, Sheehan H, Ganapathy R. The impact of Covid-19 on gynaecological emergencies. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2022; 42:2529-2530. [DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2035337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Karim
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Epsom General Hospital, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals, Epsom, UK
| | - Helen Sheehan
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, St Helier Hospital, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals, Sutton, UK
| | - Ramesh Ganapathy
- Department of Obstetrics & Fetal Medicine, Divisional Medical Director, Epsom General Hospital, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals, Epsom, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Acharya I, Thapa S. Surgical Emergencies among Gynecological Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Center: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2020; 58:1052-1055. [PMID: 34506370 PMCID: PMC8028531 DOI: 10.31729/jnma.5888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The management of gynecological emergencies is essential for the preservation of the life of affected woman, her sexual functions and fertility particularly in disease conditions that threaten her life. The main objective of the study is to determine the proportion of the surgical emergencies among gynecological surgeries in a tertiary care center. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in the department of gynecology and obstetrics in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal from April 2013 till March 2017. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Review Committee (IRC) in November 2019. This study was conducted among 515 gynecological surgeries by using convenience sampling methods. Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and proportion for binary data. Data were analyzed using EXCEL software. Results: In our study, the proportion of surgical emergencies among total gynecological surgeries performed in the department of gynecology and obstetrics in Shree Birendra Hospital was 120 (23.30%). The highest number of surgical emergencies was observed in the age group of 20-29 years old, followed by less than 19 years of old age group. Ectopic pregnancy accounting for 85 (70.83%) is found to be the most common surgical emergencies in our study. Out of all surgical emergency cases, most of them underwent salpingectomy 65 (54.16%) followed by salpingectomy with tubal ligation 20 (16.16%). Conclusions: Surgical emergencies among gynecological surgeries are found to be in greater proportion in the department of gynecology and obstetrics in Shree Birendra Hospital. Ectopic pregnancy accounted for more than half of the diagnoses in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indira Acharya
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shree Birendra Hospital, Chhauni, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Sumana Thapa
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shree Birendra Hospital, Chhauni, Kathmandu, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Potentially life-threatening gynecologic emergencies are high-risk conditions that may serve as a useful framework to improve quality and safety in emergency care. OBJECTIVE: To define and assess the prevalence of potentially life-threatening gynecologic emergencies among women presenting for acute pelvic pain for the purpose of developing measures to audit quality of care in emergency departments. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods multicenter study at gynecologic emergency departments in France and Belgium. A modified Delphi procedure was first conducted in 2014 among health care professionals to define relevant combinations of potentially life-threatening conditions and near misses in the field of gynecologic emergency care. A prospective case–cohort study in the spring of 2015 then assessed the prevalence of these potentially life-threatening emergencies and near misses among women of reproductive age presenting for acute pelvic pain. Women in the case group were identified at 21 participating centers. The control group consisted of a sample of women hospitalized for acute pelvic pain not caused by a potentially life-threatening condition and a 10% random sample of outpatients. RESULTS: Eight gynecologic emergencies and 17 criteria for near misses were identified using the Delphi procedure. Among the 3,825 women who presented for acute pelvic pain, 130 (3%) were considered to have a potentially life-threatening condition. The most common diagnoses were ectopic pregnancies with severe bleeding (n=54; 42%), complex pelvic inflammatory disease (n=30; 23%), adnexal torsion (n=20; 15%), hemorrhagic miscarriage (n=15; 12%), and severe appendicitis (n=6; 5%). The control group comprised 225 hospitalized women and 381 outpatients. Diagnostic errors occurred more frequently among women with potentially life-threatening emergencies than among either hospitalized (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.7) or outpatient (OR 14.7, 95% CI 8.1–26.8) women in the control group. Of the women with potentially life-threatening conditions, 26 met near-miss criteria compared with six with not potentially life-threatening conditions (OR 25.6, 95% CI 10.9–70.7). CONCLUSIONS: Potentially life-threatening gynecologic emergencies are high-risk conditions that may serve as a useful framework to improve quality and safety in emergency care.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Miscarriage occurs in 10% to 15% of pregnancies. The traditional treatment, after miscarriage, has been to perform surgery to remove any remaining placental tissues in the uterus ('evacuation of uterus'). However, medical treatments, or expectant care (no treatment), may also be effective, safe, and acceptable. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of any medical treatment for incomplete miscarriage (before 24 weeks). SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (13 May 2016) and reference lists of retrieved papers. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials comparing medical treatment with expectant care or surgery, or alternative methods of medical treatment. We excluded quasi-randomised trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias, and carried out data extraction. Data entry was checked. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 24 studies (5577 women). There were no trials specifically of miscarriage treatment after 13 weeks' gestation.Three trials involving 335 women compared misoprostol treatment (all vaginally administered) with expectant care. There was no difference in complete miscarriage (average risk ratio (RR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 2.10; 2 studies, 150 women, random-effects; very low-quality evidence), or in the need for surgical evacuation (average RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.26; 2 studies, 308 women, random-effects; low-quality evidence). There were few data on 'deaths or serious complications'. For unplanned surgical intervention, we did not identify any difference between misoprostol and expectant care (average RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.26; 2 studies, 308 women, random-effects; low-quality evidence).Sixteen trials involving 4044 women addressed the comparison of misoprostol (7 studies used oral administration, 6 studies used vaginal, 2 studies sublingual, 1 study combined vaginal + oral) with surgical evacuation. There was a slightly lower incidence of complete miscarriage with misoprostol (average RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.98; 15 studies, 3862 women, random-effects; very low-quality evidence) but with success rate high for both methods. Overall, there were fewer surgical evacuations with misoprostol (average RR 0.05, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.11; 13 studies, 3070 women, random-effects; very low-quality evidence) but more unplanned procedures (average RR 5.03, 95% CI 2.71 to 9.35; 11 studies, 2690 women, random-effects; low-quality evidence). There were few data on 'deaths or serious complications'. Nausea was more common with misoprostol (average RR 2.50, 95% CI 1.53 to 4.09; 11 studies, 3015 women, random-effects; low-quality evidence). We did not identify any difference in women's satisfaction between misoprostol and surgery (average RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.00; 9 studies, 3349 women, random-effects; moderate-quality evidence). More women had vomiting and diarrhoea with misoprostol compared with surgery (vomiting: average RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.85; 10 studies, 2977 women, random-effects; moderate-quality evidence; diarrhoea: average RR 4.82, 95% CI 1.09 to 21.32; 4 studies, 757 women, random-effects; moderate-quality evidence).Five trials compared different routes of administration, or doses, or both, of misoprostol. There was no clear evidence of one regimen being superior to another. Limited evidence suggests that women generally seem satisfied with their care. Long-term follow-up from one included study identified no difference in subsequent fertility between the three approaches. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The available evidence suggests that medical treatment, with misoprostol, and expectant care are both acceptable alternatives to routine surgical evacuation given the availability of health service resources to support all three approaches. Further studies, including long-term follow-up, are clearly needed to confirm these findings. There is an urgent need for studies on women who miscarry at more than 13 weeks' gestation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caron Kim
- WHODepartment of Reproductive Health and Research20 Avenue AppiaGenevaSwitzerland1211
| | | | | | - Martha Hickey
- The Royal Women's HospitalThe University of MelbourneLevel 7, Research PrecinctMelbourneVictoriaAustraliaParkville 3052
| | - Juan C Vazquez
- Instituto Nacional de Endocrinologia (INEN)Departamento de Salud ReproductivaZapata y DVedadoHabanaCuba10 400
| | - Lixia Dou
- The University of LiverpoolCochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's HealthFirst Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation TrustCrown StreetLiverpoolUKL8 7SS
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Polena V, Huchon C, Varas Ramos C, Rouzier R, Dumont A, Fauconnier A. Non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of potentially life-threatening gynaecological emergencies: a systematic review. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0114189. [PMID: 25723401 PMCID: PMC4344336 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2014] [Accepted: 11/05/2014] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify non-invasive tools for diagnosis of the major potentially life-threatening gynaecological emergencies (G-PLEs) reported in previous studies, and to assess their diagnostic accuracy. METHODS MEDLINE; EMBASE; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library) were searched to identify all eligible studies published in English or French between January 1990 and December 2012. Studies were considered eligible if they were primary diagnostic studies of any designs, with a gold standard and with sufficient information for construction of a 2 × 2 contingency table, concerning at least one of the following G-PLEs: complicated ectopic pregnancy, complicated pelvic inflammatory disease, adnexal torsion and haemoperitoneum of any gynaecological origin. Extraction of data and assessment of study quality were conducted by two independent reviewers. We set the thresholds for the diagnostic value of signs retrieved at Sensibility ≥ 95% and LR-≤ 0.25, or Specificity ≥ 90% and LR+ ≥ 4. RESULTS We identified 8288 reports of diagnostic studies for the selected G-PLEs, 45 of which met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally low. The most common diagnostic tools evaluated were transvaginal ultrasound (20/45), followed by medical history (18/45), clinical examination (15/45) and laboratory tests (14/45). Standardised questioning about symptoms, systolic blood pressure<110 mmHg, shock index>0.85, identification of a mass by abdominal palpation or vaginal examination, haemoglobin concentration <10 g/dl and six ultrasound and Doppler signs presented high performances for the diagnosis of G-PLEs. Transvaginal ultrasound was the diagnostic tool with the best individual performance for the diagnosis of all G-PLEs. CONCLUSION This systematic review suggests that blood pressure measurement, haemoglobin tests and transvaginal ultrasound are cornerstone examinations for the diagnosis of G-PLEs that should be available in all gynaecological emergency care services. Standardised questioning about symptoms could be used for triage of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viola Polena
- EA 7285 Research Unit "Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health", Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), 78180, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- EA 7285 Research Unit "Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health", Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), 78180, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Intercommunal Hospital Centre of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78103, Poissy, France
| | - Catalina Varas Ramos
- EA 7285 Research Unit "Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health", Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), 78180, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Roman Rouzier
- EA 7285 Research Unit "Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health", Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), 78180, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, 35 rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Alexandre Dumont
- EA 7285 Research Unit "Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health", Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), 78180, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR 216, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Fauconnier
- EA 7285 Research Unit "Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health", Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), 78180, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Intercommunal Hospital Centre of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78103, Poissy, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Menakaya UA, Adno A, Burnet S, Trivedi A, Smoleniec J, Condous G. Acute gynaecological services in Australia--time for a change. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 54:195-7. [PMID: 24888593 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Uchefuna A Menakaya
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy Unit and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Masselli G, Brunelli R, Monti R, Guida M, Laghi F, Casciani E, Polettini E, Gualdi G. Imaging for acute pelvic pain in pregnancy. Insights Imaging 2014; 5:165-81. [PMID: 24535757 PMCID: PMC3999369 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-014-0314-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2013] [Revised: 01/08/2014] [Accepted: 01/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute pelvic pain in pregnancy presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Standard imaging techniques need to be adapted to reduce harm to the foetus from X-rays because of their teratogenic and carcinogenic potential. Ultrasound remains the primary imaging investigation of the pregnant abdomen. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of gynaecological and obstetric problems during pregnancy and in the setting of acute abdomen during pregnancy. MRI overcomes some of the limitations of ultrasound, mainly the size of the gravid uterus. MRI poses theoretical risks to the foetus and care must be taken to minimise these with the avoidance of contrast agents. Teaching Points • Ultrasound and MRI are the preferred investigations for acute pelvic pain during pregnancy. • Ultrasound remains the primary imaging investigation because of availability and portability. • MRI helps differentiate causes of acute pelvic pain when ultrasound is inconclusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Masselli
- Umberto I Hospital, Radiology Department, Sapienza University, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Miscarriage occurs in 10% to 15% of pregnancies. The traditional treatment, after miscarriage, has been to perform surgery to remove any remaining placental tissues in the uterus ('evacuation of uterus'). However, medical treatments, or expectant care (no treatment), may also be effective, safe and acceptable. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of any medical treatment for incomplete miscarriage (before 24 weeks). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 November 2012) and reference lists of retrieved papers. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials comparing medical treatment with expectant care or surgery or alternative methods of medical treatment. Quasi-randomised trials were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction. Data entry was checked. MAIN RESULTS Twenty studies (4208 women) were included. There were no trials specifically of miscarriage treatment after 13 weeks' gestation.Three trials involving 335 women compared misoprostol treatment (all vaginally administered) with expectant care. There was no statistically significant difference in complete miscarriage (average risk ratio (RR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 2.10; two studies, 150 women, random-effects), or in the need for surgical evacuation (average RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.26; two studies, 308 women, random-effects). There were few data on 'deaths or serious complications'.Twelve studies involving 2894 women addressed the comparison of misoprostol (six studies used oral administration, four studies used vaginal, one study sub-lingual, one study combined vaginal + oral) with surgical evacuation. There was a slightly lower incidence of complete miscarriage with misoprostol (average RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.99, 11 studies, 2493 women, random-effects) but with success rate high for both methods. Overall, there were fewer surgical evacuations with misoprostol (average RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.13; 11 studies, 2654 women, random-effects) but more unplanned procedures (average RR 5.82, 95% CI 2.93 to 11.56; nine studies, 2274 women, random-effects). There were few data on 'deaths or serious complications'. Nausea was more common with misoprostol (average RR 2.41, 95% CI 1.44 to 4.03; nine studies, 2179 women, random-effects).Five trials compared different routes of administration and/or doses of misoprostol. There was no clear evidence of one regimen being superior to another. Limited evidence suggests that women generally seem satisfied with their care. Long-term follow-up from one included study identified no difference in subsequent fertility between the three approaches. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The available evidence suggests that medical treatment, with misoprostol, and expectant care are both acceptable alternatives to routine surgical evacuation given the availability of health service resources to support all three approaches. Women experiencing miscarriage at less than 13 weeks should be offered an informed choice. Future studies should include long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Neilson
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Casciani E, Masselli G, Luciani ML, Polidori NF, Piccioni MG, Gualdi G. Errors in Imaging of Emergencies in Pregnancy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2012; 33:347-70. [DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2012.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
12
|
Lee ASD, Cohen SL, Anderson JR, Chanmugam A, Bienstock JL. The effect of gynecologic algorithm pathways on emergency department visit times. J Emerg Med 2012; 44:217-24. [PMID: 22555055 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2011] [Revised: 08/24/2011] [Accepted: 02/15/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of multidisciplinary algorithmic pathways is one strategy to improve efficiency and quality of care in Emergency Departments (EDs). To this end, in the fall of 2005, we implemented algorithmic pathways for evaluation of ED patients with common gynecologic complaints. OBJECTIVES The goals of this initiative were to improve length of stay as a marker for operational efficiency and to reduce health care disparities by ensuring consistent management regimens for all patients. METHODS A retrospective observational comparison study was performed through a review of consults in the year preceding and the year after implementation of the pathways. The length of stay was calculated based on time of initial triage until discharge. The length of stay from both groups was compared using an unpaired Student's t-test analysis. RESULTS There was an 85-min decrease in the mean visit time between the pre-intervention group (108 patients, 610 min, SD 345.4) and the post-intervention group (105 patients, 525 min, SD 251.5), p=0.04. CONCLUSIONS Algorithmic pathways had a positive impact on patient care as measured by the average amount of time our patients spent in the ED. Gynecologic care in the ED was standardized, and length of stay for patients with gynecologic complaints decreased. The implementation of algorithms resulted in more consistent care with earlier initiation of pertinent studies, while facilitating more rapid critical decision-making by providers from both departments. Further analysis is required to examine cost-effectiveness as well as patient safety and provider satisfaction issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy S D Lee
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oral misoprostol for the management of incomplete abortion in Ecuador. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 115:135-9. [PMID: 21872244 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2011] [Revised: 06/06/2011] [Accepted: 07/27/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of introducing misoprostol for the treatment of incomplete abortion in Quito, Ecuador. METHODS In a randomized prospective study conducted at a large tertiary-level maternity hospital and a private secondary-level clinic between November 2006 and November 2007, women with incomplete abortion were treated with either 600 μg of oral misoprostol (n=122) or manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) (n=120). All participants were requested to return for follow-up care on day 7 to determine the success of the treatment and to document their satisfaction with the method and the adverse effects experienced. RESULTS Sixteen percent of women (39/242) did not return for their follow-up visit and their outcomes are unknown. Among those who did return, 94% (100/106) of women showed successful completion of abortion after treatment with misoprostol, as compared with 100% (97/97) of women treated with MVA. Most women described their adverse effects after treatment as tolerable (misoprostol, 95%; MVA, 91%). Nearly all women reported being satisfied with their treatment (196/203); there were no differences among the women's reports of satisfaction according to treatment received. CONCLUSION An oral dose of 600 μg of misoprostol was found to be an acceptable and effective non-surgical option for treating incomplete abortion. Clinical trials.gov NCT00674232.
Collapse
|
14
|
Neilson JP, Gyte GML, Hickey M, Vazquez JC, Dou L. Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage (less than 24 weeks). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD007223. [PMID: 20091626 PMCID: PMC4042279 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007223.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Miscarriage occurs in 10% to 15% of pregnancies. The traditional treatment, after miscarriage, has been to perform surgery to remove any remaining pregnancy tissues in the uterus. However, it has been suggested that drug-based medical treatments, or expectant care (no treatment), may also be effective, safe and acceptable. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of any medical treatment for early incomplete miscarriage (before 24 weeks). SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (September 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials comparing medical treatment with expectant care or surgery. Quasi-randomised trials were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction. Data entry was checked. MAIN RESULTS Fifteen studies (2750 women) were included, there were no studies on women over 13 weeks' gestation. Studies addressed a number of comparisons and data are therefore limited.Three trials compared misoprostol treatment (all vaginally administered) with expectant care. There was no significant difference in complete miscarriage (average risk ratio (RR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 2.10; two studies, 150 women), or in the need for surgical evacuation (average RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.26; two studies, 308 women). There were few data on 'deaths or serious complications'.Nine studies involving 1766 women addressed the comparison of misoprostol (four oral, four vaginal, one vaginal + oral) with surgical evacuation. There was no statistically significant difference in complete miscarriage (average RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.00, eight studies, 1377 women) with success rate high for both methods. Overall, there were fewer surgical evacuations with misoprostol (average RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.18; eight studies, 1538 women) but more unplanned procedures (average RR 6.32, 95% CI 2.90 to 13.77; six studies, 1158 women). There were few data on 'deaths or serious complications'. Limited evidence suggests that women generally seem satisfied with their care. Long-term follow up from one included study identified no difference in subsequent fertility between the three approaches. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The available evidence suggests that medical treatment, with misoprostol, and expectant care are both acceptable alternatives to routine surgical evacuation given the availability of health service resources to support all three approaches. Women experiencing miscarriage at less than 13 weeks should be offered an informed choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Neilson
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gillian ML Gyte
- Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Martha Hickey
- The University of Melbourne, The Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Juan C Vazquez
- Departamento de Salud Reproductiva, Instituto Nacional de Endocrinologia (INEN), Habana, Cuba
| | - Lixia Dou
- Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Neilson JP, Gyte GML, Hickey M, Vazquez JC. Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage (less than 24 weeks). THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2008. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
16
|
Fawole A, Awonuga D. Gynaecological emergencies in the tropics: recent advances in management. Ann Ib Postgrad Med 2007; 5:12-20. [PMID: 25161432 PMCID: PMC4110985 DOI: 10.4314/aipm.v5i1.63539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ao Fawole
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University College Hospital, Ibadan
| | - Do Awonuga
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University College Hospital, Ibadan
| |
Collapse
|