Surgery in elderly people: Preoperative, operative and postoperative care to assist healing

Shared Decision-Making and Collaborative Care Models for Pain Management: A Scoping Review of Existing Evidence

This article aims to summarize the existing evidence on shared decision-making and collaborative care models for acute and chronic pain management. We searched the PubMed database for articles published between 1980 and 2023 and scanned included articles' references to identify additional sources. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Studies met inclusion criteria if they implemented or evaluated shared decision-making or collaborative care interventions in patients with acute or chronic pain. A total of 690 articles were reviewed, with 32 full text articles meeting inclusion criteria. Most studies assessed changes in prescription opioid quantities and patient-reported pain levels. Secondary measures generally included patient satisfaction, 30-day refill rate, and use of non-opioid analgesics. Shared decision-making and collaborative care models are promising interventions to improve pain management. These interventions are effective at reducing opioid consumption among acute and chronic pain patients without compromising patient-reported pain levels. There is further research needed to evaluate how shared decision-making and collaborative care interventions impact patient-centered outcomes such as patient satisfaction, quality of life, and patient-provider communication.

Morbidity and mortality of elderly patients with pancreaticobiliary disease according to age and comprehensive geriatric assessment: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to analyze the influence of age and comprehensive geriatric evaluation on clinical results of pancreaticobiliary disease management in elderly patients.

METHODS

A prospective observational study has been undertaken, including 140 elderly patients (over 75 years) with benign pancreaticobiliary disease. Patients were divided according to age in the following groups: group 1: 75-79 years old; group 2: 80-84 years old; group 3: 85 years and older. They underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment with different scales: Barthel Index, Pfeiffer Index, Charlson Index, and Fragility scale, at admission and had been follow-up 90 days after hospital discharge to analyze its influence on morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 140 patients have been included (group 1=51; group 2=43 and group 3=46). Most of them, 52 cases (37.8%), had acute cholecystitis, followed by 29 cases of acute cholangitis (20.2%) and acute pancreatitis with 25 cases (17.9%). Significant differences has been observed on complications in different age groups (p=0.033). Especially in patients with a Barthel Index result ≤60, which suggests that these less functional patients had more severe complications after their treatment (p=0.037). The mortality rate was 7.1% (10 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found between age, morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with pancreaticobiliary disease. Comprehensive geriatric scales showed some utility in their association with specific complications.

Pain and aging: A unique challenge in neuroinflammation and behavior

Chronic pain is one of the most common, costly, and potentially debilitating health issues facing older adults, with attributable costs exceeding $600 billion annually. The prevalence of pain in humans increases with advancing age. Yet, the contributions of sex differences, age-related chronic inflammation, and changes in neuroplasticity to the overall experience of pain are less clear, given that opposing processes in aging interact. This review article examines and summarizes pre-clinical research and clinical data on chronic pain among older adults to identify knowledge gaps and provide the base for future research and clinical practice. We provide evidence to suggest that neurodegenerative conditions engender a loss of neural plasticity involved in pain response, whereas low-grade inflammation in aging increases CNS sensitization but decreases PNS sensitivity. Insights from preclinical studies are needed to answer mechanistic questions. However, the selection of appropriate aging models presents a challenge that has resulted in conflicting data regarding pain processing and behavioral outcomes that are difficult to translate to humans.

Prevalence of positive screening test for cognitive impairment among elderly urogynecologic patients

BACKGROUND

Impaired cognition has been correlated with adverse postoperative outcomes, such as an increased incidence of delirium, a longer length of hospital stay, and higher 6 month mortality. The incidence of cognitive impairment in the elderly is high. Per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1 in 8 adults aged 60 years and older deal with memory loss and confusion, and less than 20% inform their health care providers. Most studies in the elderly or cognitively impaired have been conducted at Veterans Administration hospitals, in which the majority of patients are male. As the female patient population ages, it is increasingly important to describe the prevalence of cognitive impairment in this specific population as well as identify and manage risk factors for cognitive decline in the ambulatory and perioperative setting.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence of positive screening for cognitive impairment in a urogynecology ambulatory population and to establish the feasibility of using standardized, validated screening questionnaires in a tertiary care setting.

STUDY DESIGN

After institutional review board approval, all English-speaking patients 65 years old or older presenting to our ambulatory urogynecology clinic were invited to participate. Cognitive impairment was assessed using both the validated Mini-Cog test and the Eight-Item Interview to Differentiate Aging and Dementia screen for mild dementia. A Mini-Cog score <3 suggests cognitive impairment, whereas an Eight-Item Interview to Differentiate Aging and Dementia score of ≥2 discriminates dementia from normal cognition. Because of the association of depression and cognition in the elderly, the Geriatric Depression Scale (short form of 15 items) was administered, with a score >5 suggesting depression. Demographic and medical history were abstracted from the medical record.

RESULTS

A total of 371 subjects were asked to participate (39 were excluded and 37 declined); 295 subjects (79.5%) were included in the study. Mean subject age was 74.5 years, and 96.6% were white, with an average of 4.1 chronic medical comorbidities. Cognitive impairment was identified in all age groups per the Mini-Cog as follows: 65-74 years, 5.3%; 75-84 years, 13.7%; and 85 years and older, 30%. There was a significant difference in the positive screen for cognitive impairment between ages 65-74 vs >75 (P ≤ .001). According to the Eight-Item Interview to Differentiate Aging and Dementia, all 3 age groups perceived themselves to have early cognitive changes: 65-74 years, 25.9%; 75-84 years, 31.9%; and 85 years and older, 40% (P = .231). The most commonly identified areas of impairment were having daily problems with thinking and memory (62%), problems with judgment (52%), and trouble learning new tools or gadgets (44%). There was no difference in the number of patients who screened positive for depression across age groups: 65-74 years, 5.9%; 75-84 years, 6.3%; and 85 years and older, 10% (P = .697).

CONCLUSION

In our study population positive screening for cognitive impairment, as measured by validated questionnaires, was prevalent among women aged >75 years. Screening for potential cognitive impairment in an ambulatory urogynecology population is feasible and useful in clinical practice. Our subjects were interested in cognitive screening because a third of them self-reported early cognitive changes. These tools are effective in screening for previously unrecognized impaired cognition, a definitive diagnosis, and hence treatment requires additional evaluation. Future studies could evaluate which screening tools for cognitive impairment would be most helpful in assessing patients prior to surgery in an effort to further decrease perioperative morbidity in elderly woman.

Reconsidering do-not-resuscitate orders in the perioperative setting

Many of our elderly have now signed advance directives or physicians' order sets of life-sustaining treatment forms. Frequently, choices have been made for no life-sustaining interventions at the end of life or do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. As the proportion of elderly grows and more patients seek surgical intervention for comfort or to improve their quality of life, the medical and ethical issues of DNR orders in the perioperative setting become increasingly more complex. Many health care providers neither recognize the complexity and significance of the DNR order during the perioperative period nor have hospitals established actions toward resolution of this situation. This article will discuss how this complex issue should be explored, definitions established, and positions recommended.

Surgery of the Elderly Patient

The world population is becoming older. As many diseases that require surgery also increase with age, surgeons have to become familiar with special issues that are unique to elderly patients requiring surgery. This review highlights the perioperative care of the elderly patient.

Preanesthesia evaluation for ambulatory surgery: do we make a difference?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ambulatory surgery is considered low risk; however, both surgery-related and patient-related factors combine to determine the overall risk of a procedure. The preanesthesia evaluation is useful to gather information and determine whether additional testing or medical optimization is necessary prior to surgery with the goal to prevent adverse events and improve outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature focused on the preanesthesia evaluation provides guidelines for patient-centered testing. Routine, protocolized preoperative testing is expensive and has not shown to improve outcomes. The preanesthesia visit is useful for patient evaluation, not specifically testing, but for the synthesis of information, medical optimization, additional targeted testing if indicated, assessment of risk, and plan for perioperative management.

SUMMARY

Current literature supports a preanesthesia visit that focuses on individual patient evaluations and patient-directed effective interventions. This is in contrast to the previous routine, protocolized preoperative preparations. The challenge for anesthesiologists lies in understanding both surgery-specific and patient-specific risk factors, and targeting interventions to optimize the outcomes.