Ethical issues in infertility

Klinefelter syndrome: etiology and clinical considerations in male infertility†

Klinefelter syndrome (KS) is the most prevalent chromosomal disorder occurring in males. It is defined by an additional X chromosome, 47,XXY, resulting from errors in chromosomal segregation during parental gametogenesis. A major phenotype is impaired reproductive function, in the form of low testosterone and infertility. This review comprehensively examines the genetic and physiological factors contributing to infertility in KS, in addition to emergent assisted reproductive technologies, and the unique ethical challenges KS patients face when seeking infertility treatment. The pathology underlying KS is increased susceptibility for meiotic errors during spermatogenesis, resulting in aneuploid or even polyploid gametes. Specific genetic elements potentiating this susceptibility include polymorphisms in checkpoint genes regulating chromosomal synapsis and segregation. Physiologically, the additional sex chromosome also alters testicular endocrinology and metabolism by dysregulating interstitial and Sertoli cell function, collectively impairing normal sperm development. Additionally, epigenetic modifications like aberrant DNA methylation are being increasingly implicated in these disruptions. We also discuss assisted reproductive approaches leveraged in infertility management for KS patients. Application of assisted reproductive approaches, along with deep comprehension of the meiotic and endocrine disturbances precipitated by supernumerary X chromosomes, shows promise in enabling biological parenthood for KS individuals. This will require continued multidisciplinary collaboration between experts with background of genetics, physiology, ethics, and clinical reproductive medicine.

Medical ethics in childbirth: a structural equation modeling approach in south of Iran

BACKGROUND

The existence of a valid instrument to evaluate the attitude of mothers towards compliance with medical ethics during childbirth can lead to appropriate interventions to create a positive attitude. The purpose of this study is to determine the construct validity of the MEAVDQ (Medical Ethics Attitude in Vaginal Delivery Questionnaire).

METHODS

The study was carried out with 350 women. The main research instrument was MEAVDQ. This 59-item questionnaire comprises three parts A, B, J. Part A is concerned with the first principles. Part B deals with the second and third principles and part J addresses the fourth principle of medical ethics. Structural Equations Modeling (SEM) was used to determine the construct validity of MEAVDQ.

RESULTS

The results of SEM revealed that there was a positive correlation between structures A and B. The relationship between structures B and J was also positive and significant. On the other hand, there was a direct and indirect relationship between structures A and J. One-unit increase in structure A led to 0.16 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.33) direct increase in structure J. Also, one-unit increase score increases in structure A caused 0.39 indirect rise (95% CI: 0.26, 0.53) in structure J with the mediating role of the structure B.

CONCLUSIONS

It can be suggested to midwifery policy maker and midwives that respect for the first principle of medical ethics and autonomy is the most important principle of medical ethics in childbirth. By respecting the autonomy of mothers, a positive birth experience can be created for them.

The search for the principle of justice for infertile couples: characterization of the brazilian population and bioethical discussion

BACKGROUND

Infertility is an increasingly prevalent disease in society and is considered by the World Health Organization to be a public health problem. An important ethical issue arises from the clarification of reproductive rights in a fair and equal way. The objective of this study was to deepen and update the knowledge and discussion about the difficulty of accessing infertility treatments in Brazil.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was carried out through the application of an online questionnaire that collected the socioeconomic characteristics of couples and identify how barriers to infertility care affect the most vulnerable populations. We included couples who sought medical assistance to achieve pregnancy at two clinics in the states of São Paulo and Minas Gerais.

RESULTS

A total of 201 questionnaires were analyzed. Most couples self-declared as white and the average age of wives was 36 years and husbands 38 years. 65% (65%) of couples would proceed with the treatment in a different city to which they lived, 37% evaluated as having easy access to a medical specialist only after indication, and more than half of the participating have thought about giving up the treatment due to some difficulty in accessing it. 39% of participants sought more than one medical service to find better reception, 42% of couples sought more than one medical service to define where it would be better financially, and 67.2% referred to the high cost of treatments, that is, financial issues, as a great difficulty in accessing medical services and/or treatment. Although 72.6% of couples considered having a good quality of life, 54.2% admitted that infertility and the search for treatment generated anxiety/stress in the couple's life.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for public education on reproductive health and for policymakers to raise awareness of the importance of the difficulty that many couples face in seeking treatment to become pregnant, especially in countries with less financial resources. Indeed, it is commonly accepted that there is a universal human right to access healthcare of appropriate quality as a matter of justice. Discussion of access to reproductive technologies should be considered taking into account the longstanding ethical debate regarding fertility, fecundity, and infertility, as well as reproductive care.

Impact of governmental support to the IVF clinical pregnancy rates: differences between public and private clinical settings in Kazakhstan-a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Infertility rates have been increasing in low-income and middle-income countries, including Kazakhstan. The need for accessible and affordable assisted reproductive technologies has become essential for many subfertile women. We aimed to explore whether the public funding and clinical settings are independently associated with in vitro fertilisation (IVF) clinical pregnancy and to determine whether the relationship between IVF clinical pregnancy and clinical settings is modified by payment type.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Three private and two public IVF clinics located in major cities.

PARTICIPANTS

Women aged ≥18 seeking first or repeated IVF treatment and agreed to complete a survey were included in the study. Demographical and previous medical history data were collected from a survey, while clinical data from medical records. The total response rate was 14%.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical pregnancy was defined as a live intrauterine pregnancy identified by ultrasound scan at 8 gestational weeks. The outcome data were missing for 22% of women.

RESULTS

Out of 446 women in the study, 68.2% attended private clinics. Two-thirds of women attending public clinics and 13% of women attending private clinics were publicly funded. Private clinics retrieved, on average, a higher number of oocytes (11.5±8.4 vs 8.1±7.2, p<0.001) and transferred more embryos (2.2±2.5 vs 1.4±1.1, p<0.001) and had a statistically significantly higher pregnancy rate compared with public clinics (79.0% vs 29.7%, p<0.001). Publicly funded women had on average a higher number of oocytes retrieved and a statistically significantly higher probability of clinical pregnancy (RR=1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.47) than self-paid women, after adjusting for covariates. There was no statistically significant interaction between clinical setting and payment type.

CONCLUSIONS

Private clinics and public funding were independently associated with higher IVF clinical pregnancy rates. There is also a need to further investigate whether the increase in public funding will influence clinical pregnancy rates.

The impact of religion and culture on medically assisted reproduction in the Middle East and Europe

Infertility is a medico-socio-cultural problem associated with gender-based suffering. Infertility treatment, including assisted reproductive technology (ART), is a human right. Culture and religion were among the stumbling blocks to early acceptance of ART, particularly in the Middle East and to a lesser extent in Europe. This was mostly due to the different cultural and religious perspectives on the moral status of the embryo in the two regions and the concerns about what could be done with human embryos in the laboratory. There is an increased demand for ART in both the Middle East and Europe, although the reasons for this increased demand are not always the same. Although Europe leads the world in ART, there is an unmet need for ART in many countries in the Middle East. Where ART is not supported by governments or insurance companies, a large percentage of couples paying for ART themselves will stop before they succeed in having a baby. There are similarities and differences in ART practices in the two regions. If a healthcare provider has a conscientious objection to a certain ART modality, he/she is ethically obliged to refer the patient to where they could have it done, provided it is legal.

Disparities in fertility knowledge among women from low and high resource settings presenting for fertility care in two United States metropolitan centers

Background

Few studies have examined health literacy and fertility knowledge among women from low income, socio-culturally diverse communities presenting for fertility care in the United States. Our study sought to examine demographic predictors of fertility-related knowledge among infertile women from low and high-resource communities in two major metropolitan centers in the United States.

Methods

Fertility Knowledge Assessments were administered to women presenting for fertility care at county medical centers serving low-resource, largely immigrant patients and to women from largely affluent populations presenting to comprehensive fertility centers in two cities. The influence of demographic predictors on fertility knowledge was examined through regression analysis.

Results

A total of 143 women were included in our analysis. In the county hospital/low resource clinic (LR, n = 70), the mean age was 32.8 ± 6.1 years vs 35.0 ± 5.0 years in the fee-for-service/high resource clinic (HR, n = 73). Among the LR patients, 74% were immigrants, 71% had an annual income <$25,000 and 52% had completed high school. Among HR patients, 36% were immigrants, 60% had an annual income >$100,000, and 95% had some college or above. On average, women from HR settings scored 3.0 points higher on the Fertility Knowledge Assessment than their LR counterparts (p < 0.001). Upon multivariate analysis, education level remained the sole independent factor associated with fertility knowledge assessment score (p < 0.001). Stratifying by resource level revealed that income was highly associated with fertility knowledge (p < 0.01) among high resource individuals even when adjusting for education level.

Conclusions

Women from low resource, largely immigrant communities, seeking fertility care have greater disparities in fertility knowledge and lower health literacy compared to women from high resource clinical settings. Further studies are needed to understand these barriers and to develop targeted inventions to lower disparities and improve care for these vulnerable populations.

Learning to play God: a call for training OB-GYN residents in reproductive ethics

In this unique time of technological advancement in medicine and the culture of public discourse that surrounds it, trainees in obstetrics and gynecology require more intensive education in medical ethics to appropriately guide patient decision-making and to become more responsible voices in such an ethically complex field.

Is it ethical to provide IVF add-ons when there is no evidence of a benefit if the patient requests it?

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) 'add-ons' are therapeutic or diagnostic tools developed in an endeavour to improve the success rate of infertility treatment. However, there is no conclusive evidence that these interventions are a beneficial or effective adjunct of assisted reproductive technologies. Additionally, IVF add-ons are often implemented in clinical practice before their safety can be thoroughly ascertained. Yet, patients continue to request and pay large sums for such additional IVF tools. Hence, this essay set out to examine if it is ethical to provide IVF add-ons when there is no evidence of a benefit if the patient requests it. In order to determine what is ethical-namely, morally good and righteous, the question was considered in relation to three key values of medical ethics-autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence. It was determined that providing IVF add-ons might be morally acceptable in specific circumstances, if true informed consent can be given, there is a potential of cost-effective physiological or psychological benefit and the risk of harm is minimal, particularly with regard to the unborn child.