Comparison of intracavitary brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy dose distribution for cervical cancer

Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies

The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is not well studied or reported in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies, despite its success in the definitive management of other cancer sites. This report describes a rigorous quality assurance process for patients to undergo dose escalation to the pelvis via stereotactic photon beam irradiation. Patients who receive SBRT must be ineligible for conventional brachytherapy boost and undergo comprehensive informed consent. Fiducial placement, bowel prep, Foley catheter placement with standardized bladder filling, computerized tomography (CT) simulation with whole-body immobilization, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assisted target delineation, planning aims based on the established brachytherapy literature, and physics consultation for SBRT plan optimization are necessary. Prior to each fraction, the simulation position is reproduced and verified with on-table cone beam CT, and the position is maintained with whole-body immobilization. Following treatment, the treating physician is active in survivorship and toxicity management. Gynecologic SBRT is an ongoing area of study, and preliminary successes in delivering high-quality stereotactic dose escalation suggest prospective investigation is warranted. By adhering to strict quality control measures and following a pre-defined best standard of practice, patients with gynecologic malignancies who are ineligible for traditional brachytherapy procedures can be safely treated with SBRT.

Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic MR-guided radiation therapy (SMART) and HDR brachytherapy boost in cervical cancer

PURPOSE

The standard of care in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Although previous studies compared HDR-BT with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), there is scarce data regarding the dosimetric outcomes of stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) boost in lieu of HDR-BT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this single-institutional in-silico comparative study, LACC patients who were definitively treated with external beam radiotherapy followed by HDR-BT were selected. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated in MRI and HDR-planning CT. An HDR-BT and a SMART boost plan were generated with a prescribed dose of 28 Gy in four fractions for all patients. The HDR-BT and SMART boost plans were compared in regard to target coverage as well OARs doses.

RESULTS

Mean EQD2 D90 to HR-CTV and IR-CTV for HDR-BT plans were 89.7 and 70.5 Gy, respectively. For SMART, the mean EQD2 D90 to HR-PTV, HR-CTV, and IR-CTV were 82.9, 95.4, and 70.2 Gy, respectively. The mean D2cc EQD2 of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon for HDR-BT plans were 86.4, 70.7, and 65.7 Gy, respectively. The mean D2cc EQD2 of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon for SMART plans were 81.4, 70.8, and 73.6 Gy, respectively. All dose constraints in terms of target coverage and OARs constraints were met for both HDR-BT and SMART plans.

CONCLUSIONS

This dosimetric study demonstrates that SMART can be applied in cases where HDR-BT is not available or ineligible with acceptable target coverage and OAR sparing. However, prospective clinical studies are needed to validate these results.

Boost modalities in cervical cancer: dosimetric comparison between intracavitary BT vs. intracavitary + interstitial BT vs. SBRT

PURPOSE / OBJECTIVE

This study compares the dosimetric plans of three distinct boost modalities in cervical cancer (CC): intracavitary (IC) with tandem/ovoids brachytherapy (BT), IC + interstitial (IS) BT, and Stereotactic-Body-Radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim is to determine the dosimetric impact in terms of target coverage and organ at risk (OAR) doses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

24 consecutive IC + IS BT boost treatment plans were retrospectively identified. For each plan included, two additional plans were created: IC-BT and SBRT. Importantly, no planning target volume (PTV) or planning (organ at) risk volume (PRV) margins were generated, therefore all structures were identical for any boost modality. Two different normalizations were performed: (1) Normalization to the target: prescription of 7.1 Gy to the D90% (defined as the minimum dose covering 90%) of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV); (2) Normalization to the OARs. HR-CTV coverage and OARs sparing were compared. The equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of EBRT and BT for CTV-HR and OARs were calculated using the linear-quadratic model with α/β of 10 (EQD2₁₀) and 3 (EQD2₃), respectively RESULTS: A total of 72 plans were investigated. In the first normalization, the mean EQD2_3-D2cc (defined as the minimal dose of the 2 cc) of OAR was significantly higher in the IC-BT plans, and the bladder D2cc hard constraint could not be reached. IC + IS BT leads to a 1 Gy mean absolute decrease of bladder EQD2₃-D2cc (relative dose: -19%), allowing to reach the hard constraint. SBRT (without PTV) delivers the lowest EQD2₃-D2cc to the OAR. In the second normalization, IC-BT provides a significantly lower dose to the EQD2₁₀-D90% (6.62 Gy) and cannot achieve the coverage goal. SBRT (without PTV) yields the highest dose to the D90% of HR-CTV and a significantly lower EQD2₁₀-D50% and D30%.

CONCLUSION

The key dosimetric benefit of BT over SBRT without PTV is a significantly higher D50% and D30% in the HR-CTV, which increases the local and conformal dose to the target. IC + IS BT vs. IC-BT provides significantly better target coverage and a lower dose to the OARs, making it the preferred boost modality in CC.

Brachytherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Boost: A Dosimetric Comparison

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer involves chemo-radiation followed by brachytherapy. However, some patients are unable to undergo brachytherapy intensification. Recent advancements in radiation technology have provided several techniques, with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) theoretically able to mimic the dose distribution of brachytherapy with a high dose gradient.

METHODS

We analyzed 20 high-dose-rate intra-cavity brachytherapy plans for women with cervical cancer and simulated an adjunctive stereotactic radiotherapy plan at the same doses used for brachytherapy (21 Gray [Gy] in three fractions). No planning tumoral volume (PTV) margin was added for SBRT dosimetry. We used the dose constraints for brachytherapy from the EMBRACE trial and the dose constraints for SBRT in three fractions. Dose distribution, maximum dose points on target volumes, bladder, rectum, and dose-volume histograms were compared between the two techniques.

RESULTS

The mean volume of the high-risk clinical tumoral volume (CTV) was 64 cm3, and the mean volume of the intermediate-risk CTV was 93 cm3. The mean minimum dose received by 90% of the high-risk CTV (D90 CTV HR) was 17 Gy for brachytherapy versus 8.3 Gy for SBRT. The average minimum dose received by 90% of the intermediate-risk CTV (D90 CTV IR) was 7.5 Gy for brachytherapy versus 8.9 Gy for SBRT. The mean minimum dose delivered to 2cc of the bladder was 74.6 Gy for brachytherapy versus 84.7 Gy for SBRT. The mean minimum dose delivered to 2cc of the rectum was 71.8 Gy for brachytherapy versus 74.7 Gy for SBRT.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed the dosimetric superiority of brachytherapy over SBRT in terms of target volume coverage and organ-at-risk sparing. Therefore, pending the results of further clinical studies, no current radiotherapy technique can replace brachytherapy for cervical cancer boost after external radiotherapy.

Embracing a future of progress in gynecologic brachytherapy

In the last 20 years, gynecologic brachytherapy has made tremendous advancements, most prominently evidenced by the evolution of cervical cancer brachytherapy. In its 20 year history, Brachytherapy has become known as a journal of science, education, and advocacy for our specialty and for our patients. In this review, we celebrate the 25 most impactful manuscripts in gynecologic brachytherapy in the journal's history.

3D-printed Magnetic Resonance (MR)-based gynecological phantom for image-guided brachytherapy training

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

There is a clinical need to develop anatomic phantoms for simulation-based learning in gynecological brachytherapy. Here, we provide a step-by-step approach to build a life-sized gynecological training phantom based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of an individual patient. Our hypothesis is that this phantom can generate convincing ultrasound (US) images that are similar to patient scans.

METHODS

Organs-at-risk were manually segmented using patient scans (MRI). The gynecological phantom was constructed using positive molds from 3D printing and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastisol. Tissue texture/acoustic properties were simulated using different plastic softener/hardener ratios and microbead densities. Nine readers (residents) were asked to evaluate 10 cases (1 ultrasound image per case) and categorize each as a "patient" or "phantom" image. To evaluate whether the phantom and patient images were equivalent, we used a multireader, multicase equivalence study design with two composite null hypotheses with proportion (pr) at H01: pr ≤ 0.35 and H02: pr ≥ 0.65. Readers were also asked to review US videos and identify the insertion of an interstitial needle into the pelvic phantom. Computed Tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images of the phantom were acquired for a feasibility study.

RESULTS

Readers correctly classified "patient" and "phantom" scans at pr = 53.3% ± 6.2% (p values 0.013 for H01 and 0.054 for H02, df = 5.96). Readers reviewed US videos and identified the interstitial needle 100% of the time in transabdominal view, and 78% in transrectal view. The phantom was CT and MR safe.

CONCLUSIONS

We have outlined a manufacturing process to create a life-sized, gynecological phantom that is compatible with multi-modality imaging and can be used to simulate clinical scenarios in image-guided brachytherapy procedures.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Boost with the CyberKnife for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Dosimetric Analysis and Potential Clinical Benefits

(1) Aim: To compare the treatment plans of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with CyberKnife (CK) and high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/ISBT) and examine the feasibility of CK-SBRT as a viable alternative to BT in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). (2) Methods: A BT plan of 28 Gy in four fractions delivered previously to 20 patients with LACC was compared with a CK plan based on the same CT images with structures delineation for BT. The SBRT treatment plan was further divided according to two different approaches, with the high-risk planning target volume (HR-PTV) defined by the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) without and with a 5 mm margin, which were named CK-CTV plan and CK-PTV plan, respectively. The dose distributions and dosimetric parameters of the target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were recorded and compared for the three boost plans. Radiobiological metrics were calculated based on the EUD for the hybrid plans. Additionally, the relationship between tumor volume and tolerance doses for the OARs in the BT plan and CK-PTV plan was investigated. (3) Results: Target coverage was better with the CK plan than with the BT plan, as the D95%, D98%, HI and CI of the CK-CTV plan and CK-PTV plan were higher than those of the BT plan; an exception was the D50%. Similarly, the TCP of the target was also significantly in favor of the CK hybrid plans (p < 0.01). For the OARs, the CK-CTV plan was superior to the BT plan as regards the rectum D2cc, bladder D2cc and bladder Dmax. The CK-PTV plan could achieve dosimetric parameters comparable to those of the BT plan for OARs concerning the small residual tumor volume. The NTCP of the rectum for the WPI+CK-CTV plans was significantly lower than that of the WPI+BT plans (p < 0.01). (4) Conclusions: CK-based SBRT can achieve better target coverage, dose sparing for the OARs and radiobiological effects compared with the BT plan for tumors that are not excessively large. CK-based SBRT could be an alternative option to administer a radiation boost for patients with LACC.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy boost in patients with cervical cancer

Our aim was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost in patients with cervical cancer. The data of 21 patients who received SBRT boost after definitive radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between March 2012 and April 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was applied to patients with a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis (IBM SPSS 23 software) and p < .05 value was considered significant. After definitive RT or CRT, there was a complete response in 9 (43%) patients, partial response in 11 (52%) patients and stable disease in 1 (5%) patient. The median follow-up period was 28 months (range, 7.5-88 months). Two-years cancer-specific survival rate was 80%. While 2-year LC rate was 75% in patients with residual tumour size <4 cm, it was 50% when there was ≥4 cm residual tumour after definitive CRT (p = .1). The treatment was well-tolerated and no acute or late toxicity was observed. Although brachytherapy (BRT) is an essential part of the treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer, SBRT may be used in patients with small residual disease who are not candidate for BRT. IMPACT STATEMENTCervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world, and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BRT) are the main treatment options. However, in rare cases where BRT is not feasible, it has been questioned whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as an alternative to BRT.What is already known on this subject? Nowadays, BRT still appears to be the gold standard treatment. However, studies with a small number of patients and short follow-up periods in the literature show that SBRT can be a good alternative in cases where BRT cannot be performed.What do the results of this study add? Our study is one of the series with the largest number of patients in the literature and with the longest follow-up period. In this area where there is no prospective study, we think that retrospective data with high patient numbers are enlightening.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our study shows that SBRT is an alternative option in cases with small residual disease where BRT cannot be applied, and it provides a basis for a prospective randomised study.

The value of brachytherapy in the age of advanced external beam radiotherapy: a review of the literature in terms of dosimetry

Brachytherapy (BT) has long been used for successful treatment of various tumour entities, including prostate, breast and gynaecological cancer. However, particularly due to advances in modern external beam techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), there are concerns about its future. Based on a comprehensive literature review, this article aims to summarize the role of BT in cancer treatment and highlight its particular dosimetric advantages. The authors conclude that image-guided BT supported by inverse dose planning will successfully compete with high-tech EBRT in the future and continue to serve as a valuable modality for cancer treatment.

Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Salvage Reirradiation: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Local recurrence in gynecological malignancies occurring in a previously irradiated field is a difficult clinical issue. Curative-intent treatment is salvage surgery and is associated with non-negligible peri-operative morbidity and has a substantial impact on long-term quality of life. Reirradiation, using three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT), might be a suitable alternative, especially in non-operable patients. The aim of this review is to report outcomes and toxicities of reirradiation 3D-IGBT in this context. 3D-IGBT appears to be a feasible alternative to salvage surgery in inoperable patients, with an acceptable outcome for patients who have no other curative therapeutic options, however long-term toxicities were high in some studies. Each case should be referred to highly experienced expert centers.

Abstract

Background: Local recurrence in gynecological malignancies occurring in a previously irradiated field is a challenging clinical issue. The most frequent curative-intent treatment is salvage surgery. Reirradiation, using three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT), might be a suitable alternative. We reviewed recent literature concerning 3D-IGBT for reirradiation in the context of local recurrences from gynecological malignancies. Methods: We conducted a large-scale literature research, and 15 original studies, responding to our research criteria, were finally selected. Results: Local control rates ranged from 44% to 71.4% at 2–5 years, and overall survival rates ranged from 39.5% to 78% at 2–5 years. Grade ≥3 toxicities ranged from 1.7% to 50%, with only one study reporting a grade 5 event. Results in terms of outcome and toxicities were highly variable depending on studies. Several studies suggested that local control could be improved with 2 Gy equivalent doses >40 Gy. Conclusion: IGBT appears to be a feasible alternative to salvage surgery in inoperable patients or patients refusing surgery, with an acceptable outcome for patients who have no other curative therapeutic options, however at a high cost of long-term grade ≥3 toxicities in some studies. We recommend that patients with local recurrence from gynecologic neoplasm occurring in previously irradiated fields should be referred to highly experienced expert centers. Centralization of data and large-scale multicentric international prospective trials are warranted. Efforts should be made to improve local control while limiting the risk of toxicities.

Brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy as a boost in locally advanced cervical cancer: a Gynaecology Study Group in the Italian Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) review

This review analyzes the experience and trends in external beam radiotherapy for delivering a boost in locally advanced cervical cancer, identifying whether radiation therapy modalities impact clinical outcomes with the ultimate aim of evaluating alternatives to brachytherapy. Three independent Italian radiation oncologists conducted a literature search on different external beam radiotherapy boost modalities in locally advanced cervical cancer. The search yielded 30 studies. Eight dosimetric studies, evaluating target coverage and dose to organs at risk, and nine clinical investigations, reporting clinical outcomes, were analyzed. Dosimetric studies comparing external beam radiotherapy boost with brachytherapy produced divergent results, while clinical studies were limited by their retrospective nature, heterogeneous doses, radiation schedules, volumes and techniques, diverse follow-up times, and small cohorts of patients. Evidence emerged that high-tech external beam radiotherapy seemed no better than image-guided brachytherapy for delivering a boost in locally advanced cervical cancer. Prospective clinical studies comparing high-tech external beam radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy should be encouraged.

[Can stereotactic body radiotherapy replace brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer? French society for radiation oncology statement]

Brachytherapy is part of the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancers, accounting for about half of the total delivered dose. The benefit of dose escalation is the most important in advanced cases or if the tumor has responded poorly. The use of interstitial implantations makes it possible to reach doses of the order of 85 to 90Gy (including external beam radiotherapy contribution) in most patients, through image-guided approaches. Brachytherapy delivery is one of the quality criteria for patient care. To date, no data allow us to consider as an alternative the use of external boost through intensity-modulated or stereotactic body radiotherapy. Indeed, the doses delivered to the tumor and the capacity to spare normal tissues remains lower, as compared to what is permitted by brachytherapy. It is therefore appropriate for centers that do not have access to the technique to establish networks with centers where brachytherapy is performed, to allow each patient to have access to the technique. It is also necessary to promote brachytherapy teaching. The issue of reimbursement will be crucial in the coming years to maintain expertise that is today insufficiently valued in its financial aspects, but has a very high added value for patients.

Long-term results of robotic radiosurgery for non brachytherapy patients with cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

Consolidation brachytherapy is a critical treatment component for cervical cancer patients undergoing primary chemoradiation. Some patients are unsuitable for brachytherapy for a variety of reasons. The use of alternatives (LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery or external beam boosts) compromise oncologic results in cervical cancer patients. Thus, we evaluated the value of brachytherapy-like doses prescriptions using robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife®, CR, Acuuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

METHODS

From 06/2011 to 06/2015, 31 patients (median age 53 years; range 30-77 years) with histologically proven FIGO stages IB-IVB cervical cancer underwent primary chemoradiation. All patients were either not suitable for intracervical brachytherapy for a variety of reasons or refused the brachytherapy. To achieve an adequate dose within the tumor, a CK boost was applied after fiducial implantation. In 29 patients, a dose of either five times 6 Gy or five times 5 Gy was prescribed to the target volume. Two patients received three times 5 Gy. The target dose was prescribed to the 70% isodose. Treatment toxicity was documented once weekly regarding vaginal mucositis, bladder, and bowel irritation according to CTCAE v. 4.03. If possible 3 months after completion of treatment intracervical curettage was performed to exclude residual tumor and the patients were followed up clinically. Sparing of organs at risk (OAR) and outcome in terms of local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients, 30 have completed CK boost therapy. The median follow-up time was 40 months (range 5-84 months). General treatment tolerability was good. Except for 1 patient, who had diarrhea grade 3, no treatment related side effects above grade 2 were reported. Sparing of OAR was excellent. The 1‑, 3‑, and 5‑year OS rates were 89, 60, and 57% respectively across all stages. Seven patients showed progression (28%), only two of them with local relapse (8%), resulting in an LC rate of 92% after 3 and 5 years. Mean PFS was 41 months (range 2-84 months). Patients with local recurrence had PFS of 5 and 8 months. Five patients developed distant metastases. Fifteen patients (48%) underwent intracervical curettage 3 months after completion of treatment of which 14 (93%) had complete pathologic response.

CONCLUSION

Brachytherapy remains the standard of care for patients diagnosed with cervical cancer and indication for primary chemoradiation. In terms of local control, CyberKnife®-based boost concepts provide excellent local control. It can be an alternative for patients who cannot receive adequate brachytherapy. Distant relapse still remains a challenge in this context.

Non-invasive stereotactic ablative boost in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer

INTRODUCTION

The current literature is insufficient to guide care for patients with cervical cancer ineligible for brachytherapy. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy boost is a clinical necessity for these patients, but highly debated among radiation oncologists.

OBJECTIVE

To report toxicity and survival outcomes in a large cohort of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with a non-invasive stereotactic ablative radiotherapy boost instead of brachytherapy METHODS: Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were entered, between January 2008 and December 2018, who were recommended definitive intent external boost after pelvic radiotherapy to 45-50.4 Gy concurrent with weekly cisplatin and simultaneous/sequential nodal boost up to 55-66 Gy. Simulation CT was facilitated using radio-opaque fiducials, empty rectum, dedicated bladder filling, and whole body vaculoplastic immobilization. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to report local/regional recurrences, distant metastases, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 25 months (range 6-54). Patients received stereotactic ablative radiotherapy due to refusal of brachytherapy (9/25, 36%), medical co-morbidities limiting implantation (9/25, 36%), or technical infeasibility (7/25, 28%). Typical fractionation was 24-30 Gy in 4-5 fractions (24/25, 96%). The most common long-term toxicity was grade 1-2 vaginal dryness, discomfort, stenosis, and/or dyspareunia (4/25, 16%). One patient had new post-treatment grade 4 fistula in an area of previous tumor erosion (1/25, 4%). Overall survival, cancer specific survival, loco-regional control, and distant control were 95.5%, 100%, 95.5%, and 89.1%, respectively, at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Further study of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy boost for cervical cancer is needed; a brachytherapy-similar approach portends clinical success with 95.5% overall survival and loco-regional control at 2 years.

Comparing efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy versus helical tomotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer

Objective

Boost radiation using brachytherapy (BT) is a standard treatment for local disease control in concomitant chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) for advanced cervical cancer. However, it is associated with gastrointestinal and genitourinary complications. Hence, this study investigates the feasibility of helical tomotherapy (HT) as an alternative to BT.

Methods

Medical records of patients who underwent CCRT between 2000 and 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with stage IIB–IVA cancers were selected based on the 2009 criteria of The International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. External beam radiation combined with chemotherapy was followed by either BT or HT. The propensity score matching of both groups was calculated using logistic regression analysis. Disease outcomes and treatment-related adverse events were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

The matched population included 70 BT patients and 35 HT patients. The 5-year progression-free survival rates for BT and HT were 72.6% and 72.5%, respectively (p=0.721). There was no difference in the overall survival rate between the two groups (p=0.203). The presence of acute and chronic gastrointestinal complications was also similar between the groups (p=0.460 and p=0.563, respectively). The chronic genitourinary toxicities were also comparable (p=0.105).

Conclusions

HT boost treatment showed comparable disease outcomes with those observed with conventional BT in patients with advanced cervical cancer. HT could be a complementary boost protocol as a single modality or hybrid with BT in selected patients. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are warranted to confirm long-term outcomes.

IMRT and brachytherapy comparison in gynaecological cancer treatment: thinking over dosimetry and radiobiology

Background

The role of radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the management of locally advanced cervical and endometrial cancer is well established. However, in some cases, intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBRT) is not recommended or cannot be carried out. We aimed to investigate whether external-beam irradiation delivered by means of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) might replace ICBRT in gynaecological cancer when the standard ICBRT boost delivering cannot be administered for technical or clinical reasons.

Materials and methods

Fifteen already delivered treatments for gynaecological cancer patients were analysed. The treatments were performed through 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) to the whole-pelvis up to the dose of 45–50.4 Gy followed by a boost dose administered with ICBRT in high-dose-rate or pulsed-dose-rate modality. For each patient, IMRT plans were elaborated to mimic the ICBRT. We analysed the ICBRT boost versus IMRT boost in terms of dosimetric and radiobiological aspects.

Results

Mean conformity index value calculated on boost volume was 0.73 for ICBRT and 0.97 for IMRT. Mean conformation number was 0.24 for ICBRT boost and 0.78 for IMRT boost. Mean normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values for 3D-CRT plus ICBRT and for IMRT (pelvis plus boost) were, respectively, 28% and 5% for rectum; 1.5% and 0.1% for urinary bladder and 8.9% and 6.1% for bowel.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that IMRT may represent a viable alternative in delivering the boost in patients diagnosed with gynaecological cancer not amenable to ICBRT.

Results from chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cervical cancer with or without intracavitary brachytherapy

Purpose

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT-IC) boost and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost in patients treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

Material and methods

It is a retrospective review of 92 patients with stage IB1-IVA cervical cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy between 2008 and 2013. All patients received pelvic 3D conformal EBRT (range, 45-50.4 Gy) concomitant with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m²), and a BT-IC boost (37 patients: 4 fractions of 6 Gy prescribed to a point A) to the tumor or a 3D conformal EBRT boost (55 patients: 16.2 Gy), if the former was not technically feasible.

Results

The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates for both groups were 68% and 55%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were better and statistically significant in the BT-IC group with 82% and 79%, respectively, as compared to the EBRT group with 58% and 38%, respectively. In multivariate analysis controlling for maximum tumor dimension, lymph node status, and FIGO stage, EBRT boost was associated with a statistical significant increase in the risk of recurrence (HR: 3.56; 95% CI: 1.27-10.02; p = 0.016) and a trend towards an increase in the risk of death (HR: 3.14; 95% CI: 0.97-10.17; p = 0.056). Lymph node status was also significantly associated with a greater risk of recurrence.

Conclusions

BT-IC boost was associated with a lower recurrence rate and better overall survival and recurrence-free survival. EBRT boost patients had a three-fold increase in the risk of recurrence. Brachytherapy is essential in the treatment of cervical cancer and improved alternatives are needed for patients who are not candidates for standard brachytherapy applicators.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, and Brachytherapy Boost Modalities in Invasive Cervical Cancer: A Study of the National Cancer Data Base

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Our objective was to determine whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and brachytherapy boost techniques have comparable overall survival in treating cervical cancer when adjusted for known prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the National Cancer Database to study women with invasive cervical cancer who were treated with radiation between 2004 and 2013. A logistic regression model was built to identify factors associated with the receipt of SBRT and IMRT. Outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of all 15,905 patients, 14,394 (90.5%) received brachytherapy, 42 (0.8%) received SBRT, and 1468 (9.2%) received IMRT. After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) for patients who received SBRT boost versus brachytherapy boost (hazard ratio = 1.477, 95% confidence interval = 0.746-2.926, P = 0.263) but a significant OS detriment in patients who received IMRT boost versus brachytherapy boost (hazard ratio = 1.455, 95% confidence interval = 1.300-1.628, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a propensity-matched analysis, those who received SBRT boost had equal OS when compared with brachytherapy, but those who received IMRT boost had worse OS when compared with brachytherapy.

Brachytherapy: A critical component of primary radiation therapy for cervical cancer: From the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) and the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS)

Brachytherapy is well-established as an integral component in the standard of care for treatment of patients receiving primary radiotherapy for cervical cancer. A decline in brachytherapy has been associated with negative impacts on survival in the era of modern EBRT techniques. Conformal external beam therapies such intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) should not be used as alternatives to brachytherapy in patients undergoing primary curative-intent radiation therapy for cervical cancer. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is evolving as the preferred brachytherapy method. With careful care coordination EBRT and brachytherapy can be successfully delivered at different treatment centers without compromising treatment time and outcome in areas where access to brachytherapy maybe limited.

What is the evidence for the clinical value of SBRT in cancer of the cervix?

AIM

The aim of this review is to describe and analyze indications and results of the use of SBRT in uterine cervix cancer, reviewing articles published from January 2010 up to August 2017, for any one of the four indications listed:1Patient refusal or anatomic impediments to interstitial or intracavitary brachytherapy (BCT), i.e. SBRT as an "alternative" for BCT;2Patients with voluminous tumors, or asymmetric tumors where BCT alone would not achieve curative doses, i.e. SBRT as a primary adjunct to BCT;3Pelvic and para aortic adenopathy where SBRT could be used as a boost, i.e. SBRT as a primary adjunct to external beam pelvic radiotherapy;4Small volume recurrences (postoperative or post radiotherapy), i.e. SBRT for salvage.

BACKGROUND

Cervix cancer standard treatment involves pelvic irradiation and chemotherapy, recent advances in irradiation techniques might offer new possible approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic review of the English language literature about Cervix cancer, SBRT, published from January 2010 to January 2018 identified through a database search of PubMed, and Ovid MEDLINE, using pre-defined search phrases.

RESULTS

The results in the literature, in general, demonstrate rather weak efficacy of SBRT. In this review, we did not find strong evidence to recommend routine SBRT as a primary treatment for cervico-uterine cancers, i.e. as a replacement for BCT; in highly selected cases it might be considered useful as salvage therapy for relapsed cervix cancer.

CONCLUSION

The existing data to not warrant recommending SBRT for the definitive treatment of cervix cancer, but may have some value in the recurrent/relapsed setting.

External beam techniques to boost cervical cancer when brachytherapy is not an option-theories and applications

The management of locally advanced cervical cancer relies on brachytherapy (BT) as an integral part of the radiotherapy delivery armamentarium. Occasionally, intracavitary BT is neither possible nor available. In these circumstances, post-external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) interstitial brachytherapy and/or hysterectomy may represent viable options that must be adequately executed in a timely manner. However, if these options are not applicable due to patient related or facility related reasons, a formal contingency plan should be in place. Innovative EBRT techniques such as intensity modulated and stereotactic radiotherapy may be considered for patients unable to undergo brachytherapy. Relying on provocative arguments and recent data, this review explores the rationale for and limitations of non-brachytherapy substitutes in that setting aiming to establish a formal process for the optimal execution of this alternative plan.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Retreatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancers, Assessment of Toxicity, and Treatment Response: Initial Results and Literature Review

AIM

To evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy in the retreatment of locally recurrent cervical cancers. Brachytherapy is the main choice to treat gynecologic cancers.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent cervical cancer, previously submitted to radiotherapy, were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy using a CyberKnife system (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, California) with a fiducial tracking system.

RESULTS

From August 2011 to October 2014, 5 patients have been treated. Median age was 81 years (range, 70-84 years). Two patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma endometrioid and 3 with squamous cell carcinoma. Toxicity was scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. After a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 8-34 months), no severe (>grade 3) acute/late genitourinary or low gastrointestinal toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary results of stereotactic body radiation therapy "simulating" high dose rate for recurrent cervical cancers confirm a minimal toxicity and an optimal outcome. The stereotactic body radiation therapy is an alternative to high dose rate brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors.

Dosimetric comparison of MRI-based HDR brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with advanced cervical cancer: A virtual brachytherapy study

AIM

To evaluate the treatment plans of 3D image-guided brachytherapy (BT) and stereotactic robotic radiotherapy with online image guidance - CyberKnife (CK) in patients with locally advanced cervix cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten pairs of plans for patients with locally advanced inoperable cervical cancer were created using MR based 3D brachytherapy and stereotaxis CK. The dose that covers 98% of the target volume (HR CTV D98) was taken as a reference and other parameters were compared.

RESULTS

Of the ten studied cases, the dose from D100 GTV was comparable for both devices, on average, the BT GTV D90 was 10-20% higher than for CK. The HR CTV D90 was higher for CK with an average difference of 10-20%, but only fifteen percent of HR CTV (the peripheral part) received a higher dose from CK, while 85% of the target volume received higher doses from BT. We found a significant organ-sparing effect of CK compared to brachytherapy (20-30% lower doses in 0.1 cm(3), 1 cm(3), and 2 cm(3)).

CONCLUSION

BT remains to be the best method for dose escalation. Due to the significant organ-sparing effect of CK, patients that are not candidates for BT could benefit from stereotaxis more than from classical external beam radiotherapy.

[Stereotactic radiotherapy for pelvic tumors]

Extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy is booming. The development and spread of dedicated accelerators coupled with efficient methods of repositioning can now allow treatments of mobile lesions with moderate size, with high doses per fraction. Intuitively, except for the prostate, pelvic tumours, often requiring irradiation of regional lymph node drainage, lend little to this type of treatment. However, in some difficult circumstances, such as boost or re-radiation, stereotactic irradiation condition is promising and clinical experiences have already been reported.

Robotic radiosurgery as an alternative to brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To compare MRI-guided brachytherapy (BT) and two different dose prescriptions for robotic radiosurgery (RRS) in locally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eleven patients with FIGO stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer underwent RRS instead of BT for various reasons. A total dose of 30 Gy was administered in five fractions. The maximum dose was chosen such that the prescribed dose was 70 % of the maximum dose (RRS70). To simulate BT more closely, additional plan calculations were carried out for a higher maximum dose with the same enclosing dose of 30 Gy being now 25 % of the maximum dose (RRS25). BT plans were calculated for the same patients (BTRRS). Finally, the resulting three sets of treatment plans were compared with 38 other patients treated with MRI-guided BT and the same dose prescription (BTref). Plan comparisons were performed based on DVH parameters with regard to target coverage (V100), conformation number (CN), and sparing of the organs at risk (OARs).

RESULTS

The best coverage of V100 = 100 ± 0 % was obtained with RRS25, followed by RRS70 with 97.1 ± 2.7 %, BTref with 90.9 ± 8.9 %, and the intraindividual BTRRS with 80.6 ± 6.4 %. The sparing of OARs was associated with D0.1 cc, D2 cc, and D5 cc to the rectum, sigmoid, and bladder walls. OAR doses were compliant with the GEC-ESTRO guidelines and comparable among RRS70, RRS25, BTRRS, and BTref. By contrast, RRS25 could not fulfill these guidelines, exceeding considerably the tolerable dose constraints for the walls of the critical OARs.

CONCLUSION

Despite of the excellent coverage and higher maximum dose, the unacceptably high exposure to the OARs disqualified RRS25 as an alternative for BT in cervical cancer patients. By contrast, RRS70 offered the best protection for the OARs, comparable to BT, and even better target coverage and conformity than BT.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy as an alternative to brachytherapy in gynecologic cancer

Introduction. Brachytherapy plays a key role in the treatment of many gynecologic cancers. However, some patients are unable to tolerate brachytherapy for medical or other reasons. For these patients, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) offers an alternative form of treatment. Methods. Retrospective review of patients prospectively collected on SBRT database is conducted. A total of 11 gynecologic patients who could not have brachytherapy received SBRT for treatment of their malignancies. Five patients have been candidates for interstitial brachytherapy, and six have required tandem and ovoid brachytherapy. Median SBRT dose was 25 Gy in five fractions. Results. At last followup, eight patients were alive, and three patients had died of progressive disease. One patient had a local recurrence. Median followup for surviving patients was 420 days (median followup for all patients was 120 days). Two patients had acute toxicity (G2 dysuria and G2 GI), and one patient had late toxicity (G3 GI, rectal bleeding requiring cauterization). Conclusions. Our data show acceptable toxicity and outcome for gynecologic patients treated with SBRT who were unable to receive a brachytherapy boost. This treatment modality should be further evaluated in a phase II study.

Patterns of care in patients with cervical cancer 2012: results of a survey among German radiotherapy departments and out-patient health care centers

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based primary or adjuvant chemoradiation is the treatment of choice for patients with cervical cancer. However, despite national guidelines and international recommendations, many aspects in diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer are not based on valid data.

METHODS

To evaluate the current patterns of care for patients with cervical cancer in Germany, a questionnaire with 25 items was sent to 281 radiooncologic departments and out-patient health care centers.

RESULTS

The response rate was 51%. While 87% of institutions treat 0-25 patients/year, 12 % treat between 26 and 50 and only 1% treat more than 50 patients/year. In 2011, the stage distribution of 1,706 treated cervical cancers were IB1, IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIA/IIIB, and IV in 11, 12, 11, 22, 28, and 16%, respectively. CT (90%) and MRI (86%) are mainly used as staging procedures in contrast to PET-CT with 14%. Interestingly, 27% of institutions advocate surgical staging prior to chemoradiation. In the majority of departments 3D-based (70%) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (76%) are used for percutaneous radiation, less frequently volumetric arc techniques (26%). Nearly all colleagues (99.3%) apply conventional fractioning of 1.8-2 Gy for external-beam radiotherapy, in 19% combined with a simultaneous integrated boost. Cisplatinum mono is used as a radiosensitizer with 40 mg/m(2) weekly by 90% of radiooncologists. For boost application in the primary treatment, HDR (high-dose rate) brachytherapy is the dominant technique (84%). In patients after radical hysterectomy pT1B1/1B2, node negative and resection in sound margins adjuvant chemoradiation is applied due to the occurrence of 1-4 other risk factors in 16-97%. There is a broad spectrum of recommended primary treatment strategies in stages IIB and IVA.

CONCLUSION

Results of the survey underline the leading role but also differences in the use of chemoradiation in the treatment of cervical cancer patients in Germany.

Is there a role for an external beam boost in cervical cancer radiotherapy?

Objectives: Some patients are medically unfit for or averse to undergoing a brachytherapy boost as part of cervical cancer radiotherapy. In order to be able to definitively treat these patients, we assessed whether we could achieve a boost plan that would mimic our brachytherapy plans using external beam radiotherapy.

Methods: High dose rate brachytherapy plans of 20 patients with stage IIB cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy were included in this study. Patients had undergone computer tomography (CT) simulations with tandem and ovoids in place. Point “A” dose was 600–700 cGy. We attempted to replicate the boost dose distribution from brachytherapy plans using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA), volumetric modulated arc therapy (Rapid Arc, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA), or TomoTherapy (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with the brachytherapy 100% isodose line as our target. Target coverage, normal tissue dose, and brachytherapy point doses were compared with ANOVA. Two-sided p-values ≤0.05 were considered significant.

Results: External beam plans had excellent planning target volume (PTV) coverage, with no difference in mean PTV V95% among planning techniques (range 98–100%). External beam plans had lower bladder Dmax, small intestine Dmax, and vaginal mucosal point dose than brachytherapy plans, with no difference in bladder point dose, mean bladder dose, mean small intestine dose, or rectal dose. Femoral head dose, parametria point dose, and pelvic sidewall point dose were higher with external beam techniques than brachytherapy.

Conclusions: External beam plans had comparable target coverage and potential for improved sparing of most normal tissues compared to tandem and ovoid brachytherapy.