1
|
Tang C, Sanders J, Thames H, Swanson DM, Crook JM, Bruno T, Blanchard P, Ciezki J, Keyes M, Song D, Singh T, Merrick G, Stock R, Sullivan FJ, Mok H, Millar J, Frank SJ. Outcomes after PD-103 versus I-125 for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy monotherapy: An international, multi-institutional study. Radiother Oncol 2023; 183:109599. [PMID: 36889593 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Pd-103 and I-125 are commonly used in low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Comparisons of outcomes by isotope type are limited, but Pd-103 has distinct radiobiologic advantages over I-125 despite its lesser availability outside the United States. We evaluated oncologic outcomes after Pd-103 vs I-125 LDR monotherapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed databases at 8 institutions for men who received definitive LDR monotherapy with Pd-103 (n = 1,597) or I-125 (n = 7,504) for prostate cancer. Freedom from clinical failure (FFCF) and freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) stratified by isotope were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier univariate and Cox multivariate analyses. Biochemical cure rates (prostate-specific antigen level ≤ 0.2 ng/mL between 3.5 and 4.5 years of follow-up) by isotype were calculated for men with at least 3.5 years of follow-up and compared by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Compared with I-125, Pd-103 led to higher 7-year rates of FFBF (96.2% vs 87.6%, P < 0.001) and FFCF (96.5% vs 94.3%, P < 0.001). This difference held after multivariate adjustment for baseline factors (FFBF hazard ratio [HR] = 0.31, FFCF HR = 0.49, both P < 0.001). Pd-103 was also associated with higher cure rates on univariate (odds ratio [OR] = 5.9, P < 0.001) and multivariate (OR = 6.0, P < 0.001) analyses. Results retained significance in sensitivity analyses of data from the 4 institutions that used both isotopes (n = 2,971). CONCLUSIONS Pd-103 monotherapy was associated with higher FFBF, FFCF, and biochemical cure rates, and suggests that Pd-103 LDR may lead to improved oncologic outcomes compared with I-125.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad Tang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Jeremiah Sanders
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Howard Thames
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David M Swanson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Teresa Bruno
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Mira Keyes
- BC Cancer, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Daniel Song
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Henry Mok
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Steven J Frank
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bittner NHJ, Cox BW, Davis B, King M, Lawton CAF, Merrick GS, Orio P, Ouhib Z, Rossi P, Showalter T, Small W, Schechter NR. ACR-ABS-ASTRO Practice Parameter for Transperineal Permanent Brachytherapy of Prostate Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2022; 45:249-257. [PMID: 35588224 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM/OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND The American College of Radiology (ACR), American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) have jointly developed the following practice parameter for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer is the interstitial implantation of low-dose rate radioactive seeds into the prostate gland for the purpose of treating localized prostate cancer. METHODS This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the Commission on Radiation Oncology, in collaboration with ABS and ASTRO. RESULTS This practice parameter provides a framework for the appropriate use of low-dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer either as monotherapy or as part of a treatment regimen combined with external-beam radiation therapy. The practice parameter defines the qualifications and responsibilities of all involved radiation oncology personnel, including the radiation oncologist, medical physicist, dosimetrist, radiation therapist, and nursing staff. Patient selection criteria and the utilization of supplemental therapies such as external-beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy are discussed. The logistics of the implant procedure, postimplant dosimetry assessment, and best practices with regard to safety and quality control are presented. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to established standards can help to ensure that permanent prostate brachytherapy is delivered in a safe and efficacious manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Martin King
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Peter Orio
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Zoubir Ouhib
- Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Lynn Cancer Institute, Boca Raton, FL
| | | | | | - William Small
- Keck Medical Center of USC, Norris Comprehensive Cancer, Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Naomi R Schechter
- Keck Medical Center of USC, Norris Comprehensive Cancer, Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sanders JW, Mok H, Hanania AN, Venkatesan AM, Tang C, Bruno TL, Thames HD, Kudchadker RJ, Frank SJ. Computer-aided segmentation on MRI for prostate radiotherapy, Part I: Quantifying human interobserver variability of the prostate and organs at risk and its impact on radiation dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 2021; 169:124-131. [PMID: 34921895 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Quantifying the interobserver variability (IoV) of prostate and periprostatic anatomy delineation on prostate MRI is necessary to inform its use for treatment planning, treatment delivery, and treatment quality assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty five prostate cancer patients underwent MRI-based low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT). The patients were scanned with a 3D T2-weighted sequence for treatment planning and a 3D T2/T1-weighted sequence for quality assessment. Seven observers involved with the LDRPBT workflow delineated the prostate, external urinary sphincter (EUS), seminal vesicles, rectum, and bladder on all 50 MRIs. IoV was assessed by measuring contour similarity metrics, differences in organ volumes, and differences in dosimetry parameters between unique observer pairs. Measurements from a group of 3 radiation oncologists (G1) were compared against those from a group consisting of the other 4 clinical observers (G2). RESULTS IoV of the prostate was lower for G1 than G2 (Matthew's correlation coefficient [MCC], G1 vs. G2: planning-0.906 vs. 0.870, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.899 vs. 0.861, p < 0.001). IoV of the EUS was highest of all the organs for both groups, but was lower for G1 (MCC, G1 vs. G2: planning-0.659 vs. 0.402, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.684 vs. 0.398, p < 0.001). Large differences in prostate dosimetry parameters were observed (G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔD90: planning-76.223 Gy, postimplant-36.545 Gy; G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔV100: planning-13.927%, postimplant-8.860%). CONCLUSIONS While MRI is optimal in the management of prostate cancer with radiation therapy, significant interobserver variability of the prostate and external urinary sphincter still exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah W Sanders
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - Henry Mok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Teresa L Bruno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - Rajat J Kudchadker
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shah C, Vicini F, Beriwal S, Thaker N, Frank SJ, Rossi P, Orio P, Chang AJ, Joshi N, Campbell SR, Naghavi A, Chao S, Kamrava M, Deufel CL, Mourtada F, Suh JH. American brachytherapy society radiation oncology alternative payment model task force: Quality measures and metrics for brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 21:63-74. [PMID: 34732290 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brachytherapy is an essential technique to deliver radiation therapy and is involved in the treatment of multiple disease sites as monotherapy or as an adjunct to external beam radiation therapy. With a growing focus on the cost and value of cancer treatments as well new payment models, it is essential that standardized quality measures and metrics exist to allow for straightforward assessment of brachytherapy quality and for the development of clinically significant and relevant clinical data elements. We present the American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement on quality measures and metrics for brachytherapy as well as suggested clinical data elements. METHODS AND MATERIALS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in disease site specific brachytherapy created a consensus statement based on a literature review and clinical experience. RESULTS Key quality measures (ex. workup, clinical indications), dosimetric metrics, and clinical data elements for brachytherapy were evaluated for each modality including breast cancer, cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, prostate cancer, keratinocyte carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and uveal melanoma. CONCLUSIONS This consensus statement provides standardized quality measures and dosimetric quality metrics as well as clinical data elements for each disease site to allow for standardized assessments of brachytherapy quality. Moving forward, a similar paradigm can be considered for external beam radiation therapy as well, providing comprehensive radiation therapy quality measures, metrics, and clinical data elements that can be incorporated into new payment models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| | | | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Nikhil Thaker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Peter Orio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Albert J Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nikhil Joshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University, Chicago, IL
| | - Shauna R Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Arash Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Samuel Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Firas Mourtada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, ChristianaCare, Newark, DE
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
King MT, Keyes M, Frank SJ, Crook JM, Butler WM, Rossi PJ, Cox BW, Showalter TN, Mourtada F, Potters L, Stock RG, Kollmeier MA, Zelefsky MJ, Davis BJ, Merrick GS, Orio PF. Low dose rate brachytherapy for primary treatment of localized prostate cancer: A systemic review and executive summary of an evidence-based consensus statement. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:1114-1129. [PMID: 34509378 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this guideline is to present evidence-based consensus recommendations for low dose rate (LDR) permanent seed brachytherapy for the primary treatment of prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS The American Brachytherapy Society convened a task force for addressing key questions concerning ultrasound-based LDR prostate brachytherapy for the primary treatment of prostate cancer. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify prospective and multi-institutional retrospective studies involving LDR brachytherapy as monotherapy or boost in combination with external beam radiation therapy with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Outcomes included disease control, toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS LDR prostate brachytherapy monotherapy is an appropriate treatment option for low risk and favorable intermediate risk disease. LDR brachytherapy boost in combination with external beam radiation therapy is appropriate for unfavorable intermediate risk and high-risk disease. Androgen deprivation therapy is recommended in unfavorable intermediate risk and high-risk disease. Acceptable radionuclides for LDR brachytherapy include iodine-125, palladium-103, and cesium-131. Although brachytherapy monotherapy is associated with increased urinary obstructive and irritative symptoms that peak within the first 3 months after treatment, the median time toward symptom resolution is approximately 1 year for iodine-125 and 6 months for palladium-103. Such symptoms can be mitigated with short-term use of alpha blockers. Combination therapy is associated with worse urinary, bowel, and sexual symptoms than monotherapy. A prostate specific antigen <= 0.2 ng/mL at 4 years after LDR brachytherapy may be considered a biochemical definition of cure. CONCLUSIONS LDR brachytherapy is a convenient, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin T King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
| | - Mira Keyes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Juanita M Crook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Wayne M Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
| | - Peter J Rossi
- Calaway Young Cancer Center, Valley View Hospital, Glenwood Springs, CO
| | - Brett W Cox
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Firas Mourtada
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE
| | - Louis Potters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
| | - Richard G Stock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Marisa A Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brian J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gregory S Merrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
| | - Peter F Orio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Booher J, Domenig P, Goldman B, Campbell T, Verdecchia K, Boura JA, Chuba PJ. Comparison of Three Groups of Patients Having Low Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy: Prostate-Specific Antigen Failure and Overall Survival. Cureus 2021; 13:e18185. [PMID: 34707958 PMCID: PMC8532522 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To examine dosimetric and clinical outcomes for Cs-131 radioactive seed implant compared to Pd-103 and I-125. Background/Significance Cs-131 is a novel isotope with relatively short half-life (9.7 days) that may have clinical advantages in seed implant treatments of prostate cancers. There may be a shorter duration of symptoms and increased PSA control rates. Methods We performed a retrospective study in which clinical and dosimetric outcomes were compared for 186 prostate implants performed over a ten-year time period at three different Ascension hospitals. Isotopes that were used included Cs-131 (n=66; half-life 9.7 days), I-125 (n=60; half-life 60 days), and Pd-103 (n=60; half-life 17 days) Results The implants used standard radiation dosages. These were 145 Gy for I-125 alone or 109 Gy when combined with external beam radiation. In the case of Cs-131 used alone, the dose was 115 Gy or 85 Gy when combined with an external beam. For Pd-103, 125 Gy was used for monotherapy and 90 Gy when combined with an external beam. The Cs-131 dosimetry was found to be similar to I-125 and Pd-103 on a quantitative basis. However, there was better homogeneity, and the delivered activity per seed and the number of seeds employed were greater compared to other isotopes. We compared the corrected total source strengths (i.e. normalized to sample mean values) and were able to demonstrate similar distributions for the three isotopes. Dosimetric analysis also suggested there was superior homogeneity with Cs-131. The median PSA value at 60 months was 0.11 ng/ml. There were only a few PSA failures in the three groups of cases, nonetheless, the Cs-131 had the fewest. Conclusions One attractive option for men with early-stage prostate cancer is interstitial brachytherapy. The use of the shorter-acting Cs-131 isotope may be expected to have dose-related side effects that resolve more rapidly. This series suggests a trend for improved PSA control outcomes for Cs-131 patients compared with I-125 and Pd-103.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Domenig
- Urology, Ascension Macomb-Oakland Hospital, Warren, USA
| | | | - Todd Campbell
- Urology, Ascension Macomb Oakland Hospital, Warren, USA
| | - Kyle Verdecchia
- Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital Detroit, Detroit, USA
| | - Judith A Boura
- Research, Ascension Macomb-Oakland Hospital, Warren, USA
| | - Paul J Chuba
- Radiation Oncology, Ascension Macomb-Oakland Hospital, Warren, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cesium-131 prostate brachytherapy: A single institutional long-term experience. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:298-304. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
8
|
Ling DC, Chen KS, Benoit RM, Beriwal S, Smith RP. Long-Term Patient-Reported Rectal Bleeding and Bowel-Related Quality of Life After Cs-131 Prostate Brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:622-630. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
9
|
Blanchard P, Graff-Cailleaud P, Bossi A. [Prostate brachytherapy: New techniques, new indications]. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:352-358. [PMID: 29858134 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2017] [Revised: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Prostate brachytherapy has been for a long time one of the standard treatments for low risk prostate cancer, with high rates of biochemical control and low levels of urinary and sexual late toxicity compared to other available techniques, namely external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. The aim of this article is to review the recent innovations of prostate brachytherapy, which suggest a bright future for the technique. We will discuss the extension of indications of permanent implant brachytherapy to favorable intermediate-risk patients, the use of novel isotopes such as Palladium 103 and Cesium 131, and the benefit of brachytherapy as a boost following external beam radiotherapy for intermediate and high-risk patients. We will also discuss the rise of high dose rate brachytherapy, as a boost or monotherapy, the increasing use of MRI for patient selection and treatment planning, as well as the development of brachytherapy as a means of focal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Blanchard
- Département de radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France; Inserm unité 1018, Oncostat, CESP, 16, avenue Paul-Vaillant-Couturier, 94807 Villejuif cedex, France.
| | - P Graff-Cailleaud
- Département de radiothérapie, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, avenue Hubert-Curien, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - A Bossi
- Département de radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|