1
|
Koerner SA, Benoit RM, Beriwal S, Smith RP. Redefining bladder neck dose in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy-Can we improve urinary toxicity without impacting disease control? Brachytherapy 2024; 23:58-63. [PMID: 37821322 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to assess the impact of bladder neck dose (BND) on patient reported urinary toxicity, and feasibility of relative urethral sparing technique in prostate brachytherapy (PB). METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively identified bladder neck as a point dose on post-implant CT scans in patients treated with 131Cs PB. Urinary symptoms were assessed through EPIC questionnaires. Patient cohorts were identified based on mean BND as a percentage of prescription dose with toxicity assessment at each time point. RESULTS In our cohort of 542 patients, BND was associated with clinically significant acute urinary symptoms and chronic symptoms, as patients receiving >70% of the prescription dose had significantly worse overall EPIC scores than patients receiving ≤70% of prescription dose. There was no difference in bDFS between patients receiving BND ≤70% (96% bDFS) and >70% (94% bDFS) at a median follow up of 57 months. CONCLUSIONS BND has a significant impact on both acute and chronic urinary symptoms, with reduced symptoms reported with BND <70% of prescription dose. With a median follow up of 4.7 years, excellent bDFS has thus far been achieved with relative urethral and bladder neck sparing. Utilizing this constraint should improve urinary symptoms without impacting disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean A Koerner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ronald M Benoit
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ryan P Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sanders JW, Tang C, Kudchadker RJ, Venkatesan AM, Mok H, Hanania AN, Thames HD, Bruno TL, Starks C, Santiago E, Cunningham M, Frank SJ. Uncertainty in magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate postimplant dosimetry: Results of a 10-person human observer study, and comparisons with automatic postimplant dosimetry. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:822-832. [PMID: 37716820 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Uncertainties in postimplant quality assessment (QA) for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT) are introduced at two steps: seed localization and contouring. We quantified how interobserver variability (IoV) introduced in both steps impacts dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters for MRI-based LDRPBT, and compared it with automatically derived DVH parameters. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-five patients received MRI-based LDRPBT. Seven clinical observers contoured the prostate and four organs at risk, and 4 dosimetrists performed seed localization, on each MRI. Twenty-eight unique manual postimplant QAs were created for each patient from unique observer pairs. Reference QA and automatic QA were also performed for each patient. IoV of prostate, rectum, and external urinary sphincter (EUS) DVH parameters owing to seed localization and contouring was quantified with coefficients of variation. Automatically derived DVH parameters were compared with those of the reference plans. RESULTS Coefficients of variation (CoVs) owing to contouring variability (CoVcontours) were significantly higher than those due to seed localization variability (CoVseeds) (median CoVcontours vs. median CoVseeds: prostate D90-15.12% vs. 0.65%, p < 0.001; prostate V100-5.36% vs. 0.37%, p < 0.001; rectum V100-79.23% vs. 8.69%, p < 0.001; EUS V200-107.74% vs. 21.18%, p < 0.001). CoVcontours were lower when the contouring observers were restricted to the 3 radiation oncologists, but were still markedly higher than CoVseeds. Median differences in prostate D90, prostate V100, rectum V100, and EUS V200 between automatically computed and reference dosimetry parameters were 3.16%, 1.63%, -0.00 mL, and -0.00 mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Seed localization introduces substantially less variability in postimplant QA than does contouring for MRI-based LDRPBT. While automatic seed localization may potentially help improve workflow efficiency, it has limited potential for improving the consistency and quality of postimplant dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah W Sanders
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rajat J Kudchadker
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Henry Mok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Teresa L Bruno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christine Starks
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Edwin Santiago
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mandy Cunningham
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vieira E Brito D, Fereira A, Pereira J, Pereira-Lourenço M, Godinho R, Pereira B, Peralta P, Conceiçao P, Reis Mario A, Paula Rabaça C. Prior MRI-imaging impact of patients submitted to brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Actas Urol Esp 2023; 47:503-508. [PMID: 37086843 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer is a well-established option. Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) for staging and diagnosis of prostate cancer has come to change the current paradigm. In this study we aim to assess the impact of performing mpMRI to evaluate the presence of extracapsular lesions before brachytherapy in patients with prostate cancer concerning biochemical recurrence and time to nadir. METHODS Review data from 73 patients submitted to brachytherapy. The following factors were evaluated: age, initial PSA, MRI local staging results, ISUP, nadir, time to nadir, PSA at one-year, biochemical recurrence, and time to recurrence. RESULTS Median age was 68 years (51-72) and median follow-up 53 months (30-72). Concerning imaging modality 30,1% (n = 22) patients performed mpMRI. In the mpMRI group, 90.9% (n = 20) had at least one suspect lesion on mpMRI. Time to nadir was 27 months (3-64) in patients where mpMRI was not performed and 23.5 months (2-48) in patients submitted to mpMRI (P = .244). The median value of nadir was 0.42 ng/mL (<0.001-2) in patients submitted to mpMRI and vs 0.28 ng/mL (<0.001-4) in patients without MRI (P = .062) Recurrence utilizing Phoenix criteria was 9% (n = 2) in patients with MRI and 9.2% (n = 5) without mpMRI (P = .456), median follow-up of 43 months (12-72) for the MRI group with 58 months (30-78) for the non-mpMRI group. Both groups were statistically similar. CONCLUSION Our results allow us to conclude that in our series MRI did not influence biochemical recurrence, time to nadir, or nadir value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Vieira E Brito
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Portugués de Oncología, Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - A Fereira
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Portugués de Oncología, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - J Pereira
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Portugués de Oncología, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - M Pereira-Lourenço
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Portugués de Oncología, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - R Godinho
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Portugués de Oncología, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - B Pereira
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Portugués de Oncología, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - P Peralta
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Portugués de Oncología, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - P Conceiçao
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Portugués de Oncología, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - A Reis Mario
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Portugués de Oncología, Coimbra, Portugal; Servicio de Radioterapia, Instituto Portugués de Oncología, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - C Paula Rabaça
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Portugués de Oncología, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Takayesu JSK, Heckman P, Short E, Hurley P, Narayana V, McLaughlin PW. Quality rectal hydrogel placement allows for gel-enabled dose-escalated EBRT (GEDE-EBRT) without rectal interference in prostate cancer. Med Dosim 2023; 48:286-292. [PMID: 37666707 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
Multiple trials have shown that dose-escalation of radiation for prostate cancer provides a biochemical progression-free survival benefit (bPFS); however, rectal constraints are often limiting. In this dosimetric study, we hypothesized that a well-placed rectal hydrogel (RH) would permit improved dose-escalation and target coverage. We selected patients with good-quality RH and created plans with and without RH, prescribing 70 Gy in 28 fractions to the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles (PSV), and a peripheral zone (PZ) boost to 84 Gy, 98 Gy, or 112 Gy. We then compared plans with and without RH, prescribing a 112 Gy boost to 1 to 2 cm simulated dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL). In the 18 plans created with a PZ boost, the PTV_boost D95% was higher in RH plans compared to non-RH plans (median 98.5 Gy vs 75.53 Gy, p < 0.01). The PSV planning target volume (PTV_PSV) D95% was also marginally higher with RH (71.87 Gy vs 71.04 Gy, p < 0.01). All rectal metrics were improved with RH. For the 32 plans created for simulated DILs treated to 112 Gy, the PTV_boost coverage (median D95% 112.48 Gy vs 102.63 Gy, p < 0.01) and rectal metrics were improved with RH. Four non-RH plans with at least a 4 mm rectal-PTV_boost gap achieved D95% > 98% of the prescription dose for the PTV_boost. Our study showed that placement of a high-quality RH allowed for GEDE-EBRT up to 112 Gy in 28 fractions (EQD2 160 Gy with α/β = 2.5). This concept should be tested prospectively, particularly to assess for increases in nonrectal toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie S K Takayesu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Paul Heckman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Assarian Cancer Center, Ascension Providence Hospital, Novi, MI, USA
| | - Eric Short
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Assarian Cancer Center, Ascension Providence Hospital, Novi, MI, USA
| | - Patrick Hurley
- Department of Urology, Ascension Providence Hospital, Novi, MI, USA
| | - Vrinda Narayana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ito M, Makita C, Mori T, Takano H, Kumano T, Matsuo M, Iinuma K, Kawase M, Nakane K, Nakano M, Koie T. Associations of Clinical and Dosimetric Parameters with Urinary Toxicities after Prostate Brachytherapy: A Long-Term Single-Institution Experience. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5680-5689. [PMID: 37366909 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
To examine the association of clinical, treatment, and dose parameters with late urinary toxicity after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for prostate cancer, we retrospectively studied patients with prostate cancer who underwent LDR-BT from January 2007 through December 2016. Urinary toxicity was assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptom Score (OABSS). Severe and moderate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were defined as IPSS ≥ 20 and ≥ 8, respectively; OAB was defined as a nocturnal frequency of ≥ 2 and a total OABSS of ≥ 3. In total, 203 patients (median age: 66 years) were included, with a mean follow-up of 8.4 years after treatment. The IPSS and OABSS worsened after 3 months of treatment; these scores improved to pretreatment levels after 18-36 months in most patients. Patients with a higher baseline IPSS and OABSS had a higher frequency of moderate and severe LUTS and OAB at 24 and 60 months, respectively. LUTS and OAB at 24 and 60 months were not correlated with the dosimetric factors of LDR-BT. Although the rate of long-term urinary toxicities assessed using IPSS and OABSS was low, the baseline scores were related to long-term function. Refining patient selection may further reduce long-term urinary toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaya Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gifu Takayama Red Cross Hospital, 3-11, Tenmancho, Takayama City 500-8717, Gifu, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Chiyoko Makita
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takayuki Mori
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hirota Takano
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Kumano
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masayuki Matsuo
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Koji Iinuma
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Makoto Kawase
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Keita Nakane
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masahiro Nakano
- Department of Urology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, 4-6-1, Noisshiki, Gifu City 500-8717, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vieira e Brito D, Fereira A, Pereira J, Pereira-Lourenço M, Godinho R, Pereira B, Peralta P, Conceiçao P, Reis Mario A, Paula Rabaça C. Impacto de la realización de RMmp antes de la braquiterapia en pacientes con cáncer de próstata. Actas Urol Esp 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
|
7
|
Frank SJ. A CALL TO ARMS: The Case for MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS) vs. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy or Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:12-14. [PMID: 36725197 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.09.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sanders JW, Kudchadker RJ, Tang C, Mok H, Venkatesan AM, Thames HD, Frank SJ. Prospective Evaluation of Prostate and Organs at Risk Segmentation Software for MRI-based Prostate Radiation Therapy. Radiol Artif Intell 2022; 4:e210151. [PMID: 35391775 PMCID: PMC8980936 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The segmentation of the prostate and surrounding organs at risk (OARs) is a necessary workflow step for performing dose-volume histogram analyses of prostate radiation therapy procedures. Low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT) is a curative prostate radiation therapy treatment that delivers a single fraction of radiation over a period of days. Prior studies have demonstrated the feasibility of fully convolutional networks to segment the prostate and surrounding OARs for LDRPBT dose-volume histogram analyses. However, performance evaluations have been limited to measures of global similarity between algorithm predictions and a reference. To date, the clinical use of automatic segmentation algorithms for LDRPBT has not been evaluated, to the authors' knowledge. The purpose of this work was to assess the performance of fully convolutional networks for prostate and OAR delineation on a prospectively identified cohort of patients who underwent LDRPBT by using clinically relevant metrics. Thirty patients underwent LDRPBT and were imaged with fully balanced steady-state free precession MRI after implantation. Custom automatic segmentation software was used to segment the prostate and four OARs. Dose-volume histogram analyses were performed by using both the original automatically generated contours and the physician-refined contours. Dosimetry parameters of the prostate, external urinary sphincter, and rectum were compared without and with the physician refinements. This study observed that physician refinements to the automatic contours did not significantly affect dosimetry parameters. Keywords: MRI, Neural Networks, Radiation Therapy, Radiation Therapy/Oncology, Genital/Reproductive, Prostate, Segmentation, Dosimetry Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah W. Sanders
- From the Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics
(R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology
(A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Rajat J. Kudchadker
- From the Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics
(R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology
(A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Chad Tang
- From the Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics
(R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology
(A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Henry Mok
- From the Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics
(R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology
(A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Aradhana M. Venkatesan
- From the Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics
(R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology
(A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Howard D. Thames
- From the Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics
(R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology
(A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Steven J. Frank
- From the Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics
(R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology
(A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leeman JE, Chen YH, Catalano P, Bredfeldt J, King M, Mouw KW, D'Amico AV, Orio P, Nguyen PL, Martin N. Radiation Dose to the Intraprostatic Urethra Correlates Strongly With Urinary Toxicity After Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Combined Analysis of 23 Prospective Clinical Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:75-82. [PMID: 34711459 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.06.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical trials assessing evaluation prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have used a wide range of allowed doses to the intraprostatic urethra, but the relationship between urethral dose and urinary toxicity has not been thoroughly evaluated. The goal of this study was to characterize urinary toxicity outcomes according to urethral dose administered during prostate SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS The MEDLINE (PubMed) database was searched for published prospective studies of prostate SBRT through August 2020 that documented a maximum urethral dose metric (MUDM). Reported acute and late urinary toxicity rates were collected. Logistic regression and weighted Pearson correlation models were used to assess associations between urinary toxicity rates and MUDM. RESULTS Twenty-three unique studies (n = 2232 patients) met the inclusion criteria and included a wide range of MUDMs (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2]: 69-141.75 Gy; α/β = 3 Gy). The median follow-up ranged from 3 to 67 months (median, 32 months). On logistic regression analysis, the MUDM EQD2 was significantly associated with multiple urinary toxicity endpoints, including acute grade (G) 2+ (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; P < .001), late G2+ (OR, 1.03; P < .0001), and late G3+ (OR, 1.04; P = .003) urinary toxicity. On weighted Pearson correlation analysis, the MUDM was more closely associated with all evaluated urinary toxicity endpoints than prescription dose, including acute G2+ (r = 0.51; P = .02), late G2+ (r = 0.9; P < .0001), and late G3+ toxicity (r = 0.7; P = .003). Multivariate analysis accounting for age, prostate size, bladder dosimetry, and baseline urinary function confirmed associations between urinary outcomes and MUDM. Within the studied dose range, each increase of 1 Gy to the MUDM corresponded to a 0.8% and 1.0% increase in acute G2+ and late G2+ toxicity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Radiation dose to the urethra correlates closely with urinary toxicity in patients with prostate cancer treated with SBRT. Attention should be paid to the urethral dose when delivering prostate SBRT to high doses, and approaches for urethral dose reduction warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan E Leeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Yu-Hui Chen
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul Catalano
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeremy Bredfeldt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Martin King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kent W Mouw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anthony V D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter Orio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Neil Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pommier P, Ferré M, Blanchard P, Martin É, Peiffert D, Robin S, Hannoun-Lévi JM, Marchesi V, Cosset JM. Prostate cancer brachytherapy: SFRO guidelines 2021. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:344-355. [PMID: 34955422 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Prostate brachytherapy techniques are described, concerning both permanent seed implant and high dose rate brachytherapy. The following guidelines are presented: brachytherapy indications, implant procedure for permanent low dose rate implants and high dose rate with source projector, as well as dose and dose-constraints objectives, immediate postoperative management, post-treatment evaluation, and long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Pommier
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69373 Lyon cedex 08, France.
| | - M Ferré
- Département de physique médicale, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - P Blanchard
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France
| | - É Martin
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Pr-Marion, BP 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - D Peiffert
- Service universitaire de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis-Vautrin, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, CS 30519, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy cedex, France
| | - S Robin
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69373 Lyon cedex 08, France
| | - J-M Hannoun-Lévi
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice cedex 2, France
| | - V Marchesi
- Unité de physique médicale, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis-Vautrin, avenue de Bourgogne, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - J M Cosset
- Centre de radiothérapie Charlebourg/La Défense, groupe Améthyst, 65, avenue Foch, 92250 La Garenne-Colombes, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sanders JW, Mok H, Hanania AN, Venkatesan AM, Tang C, Bruno TL, Thames HD, Kudchadker RJ, Frank SJ. Computer-aided segmentation on MRI for prostate radiotherapy, Part I: Quantifying human interobserver variability of the prostate and organs at risk and its impact on radiation dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 2021; 169:124-131. [PMID: 34921895 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Quantifying the interobserver variability (IoV) of prostate and periprostatic anatomy delineation on prostate MRI is necessary to inform its use for treatment planning, treatment delivery, and treatment quality assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty five prostate cancer patients underwent MRI-based low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT). The patients were scanned with a 3D T2-weighted sequence for treatment planning and a 3D T2/T1-weighted sequence for quality assessment. Seven observers involved with the LDRPBT workflow delineated the prostate, external urinary sphincter (EUS), seminal vesicles, rectum, and bladder on all 50 MRIs. IoV was assessed by measuring contour similarity metrics, differences in organ volumes, and differences in dosimetry parameters between unique observer pairs. Measurements from a group of 3 radiation oncologists (G1) were compared against those from a group consisting of the other 4 clinical observers (G2). RESULTS IoV of the prostate was lower for G1 than G2 (Matthew's correlation coefficient [MCC], G1 vs. G2: planning-0.906 vs. 0.870, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.899 vs. 0.861, p < 0.001). IoV of the EUS was highest of all the organs for both groups, but was lower for G1 (MCC, G1 vs. G2: planning-0.659 vs. 0.402, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.684 vs. 0.398, p < 0.001). Large differences in prostate dosimetry parameters were observed (G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔD90: planning-76.223 Gy, postimplant-36.545 Gy; G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔV100: planning-13.927%, postimplant-8.860%). CONCLUSIONS While MRI is optimal in the management of prostate cancer with radiation therapy, significant interobserver variability of the prostate and external urinary sphincter still exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah W Sanders
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - Henry Mok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Teresa L Bruno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - Rajat J Kudchadker
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shah C, Vicini F, Beriwal S, Thaker N, Frank SJ, Rossi P, Orio P, Chang AJ, Joshi N, Campbell SR, Naghavi A, Chao S, Kamrava M, Deufel CL, Mourtada F, Suh JH. American brachytherapy society radiation oncology alternative payment model task force: Quality measures and metrics for brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 21:63-74. [PMID: 34732290 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brachytherapy is an essential technique to deliver radiation therapy and is involved in the treatment of multiple disease sites as monotherapy or as an adjunct to external beam radiation therapy. With a growing focus on the cost and value of cancer treatments as well new payment models, it is essential that standardized quality measures and metrics exist to allow for straightforward assessment of brachytherapy quality and for the development of clinically significant and relevant clinical data elements. We present the American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement on quality measures and metrics for brachytherapy as well as suggested clinical data elements. METHODS AND MATERIALS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in disease site specific brachytherapy created a consensus statement based on a literature review and clinical experience. RESULTS Key quality measures (ex. workup, clinical indications), dosimetric metrics, and clinical data elements for brachytherapy were evaluated for each modality including breast cancer, cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, prostate cancer, keratinocyte carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and uveal melanoma. CONCLUSIONS This consensus statement provides standardized quality measures and dosimetric quality metrics as well as clinical data elements for each disease site to allow for standardized assessments of brachytherapy quality. Moving forward, a similar paradigm can be considered for external beam radiation therapy as well, providing comprehensive radiation therapy quality measures, metrics, and clinical data elements that can be incorporated into new payment models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| | | | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Nikhil Thaker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Peter Orio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Albert J Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nikhil Joshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University, Chicago, IL
| | - Shauna R Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Arash Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Samuel Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Firas Mourtada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, ChristianaCare, Newark, DE
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
King MT, Keyes M, Frank SJ, Crook JM, Butler WM, Rossi PJ, Cox BW, Showalter TN, Mourtada F, Potters L, Stock RG, Kollmeier MA, Zelefsky MJ, Davis BJ, Merrick GS, Orio PF. Low dose rate brachytherapy for primary treatment of localized prostate cancer: A systemic review and executive summary of an evidence-based consensus statement. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:1114-1129. [PMID: 34509378 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this guideline is to present evidence-based consensus recommendations for low dose rate (LDR) permanent seed brachytherapy for the primary treatment of prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS The American Brachytherapy Society convened a task force for addressing key questions concerning ultrasound-based LDR prostate brachytherapy for the primary treatment of prostate cancer. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify prospective and multi-institutional retrospective studies involving LDR brachytherapy as monotherapy or boost in combination with external beam radiation therapy with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Outcomes included disease control, toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS LDR prostate brachytherapy monotherapy is an appropriate treatment option for low risk and favorable intermediate risk disease. LDR brachytherapy boost in combination with external beam radiation therapy is appropriate for unfavorable intermediate risk and high-risk disease. Androgen deprivation therapy is recommended in unfavorable intermediate risk and high-risk disease. Acceptable radionuclides for LDR brachytherapy include iodine-125, palladium-103, and cesium-131. Although brachytherapy monotherapy is associated with increased urinary obstructive and irritative symptoms that peak within the first 3 months after treatment, the median time toward symptom resolution is approximately 1 year for iodine-125 and 6 months for palladium-103. Such symptoms can be mitigated with short-term use of alpha blockers. Combination therapy is associated with worse urinary, bowel, and sexual symptoms than monotherapy. A prostate specific antigen <= 0.2 ng/mL at 4 years after LDR brachytherapy may be considered a biochemical definition of cure. CONCLUSIONS LDR brachytherapy is a convenient, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin T King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
| | - Mira Keyes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Juanita M Crook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Wayne M Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
| | - Peter J Rossi
- Calaway Young Cancer Center, Valley View Hospital, Glenwood Springs, CO
| | - Brett W Cox
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Firas Mourtada
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE
| | - Louis Potters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
| | - Richard G Stock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Marisa A Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brian J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gregory S Merrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
| | - Peter F Orio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|