Improgan-induced hypothermia: a role for cannabinoid receptors in improgan-induced changes in nociceptive threshold and body temperature

Physiological basis for inhibition of morphine and improgan antinociception by CC12, a P450 epoxygenase inhibitor

Many analgesic drugs, including μ-opioids, cannabinoids, and the novel nonopioid analgesic improgan, produce antinociception by actions in the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). There they activate pain-inhibiting neurons, termed "OFF-cells," defined by a nociceptive reflex-related pause in activity. Based on recent functional evidence that neuronal P450 epoxygenases are important for the central antinociceptive actions of morphine and improgan, we explored the convergence of opioid and nonopioid analgesic drug actions in RVM by studying the effects of the P450 epoxygenase inhibitor CC12 on the analgesic drug-induced activation of these OFF-cells and on behavioral antinociception. In rats lightly anesthetized with isoflurane, we recorded the effects of intraventricular morphine and improgan, with and without CC12 pretreatment, on tail flick latency and activity of identified RVM neurons: OFF-cells, ON-cells (pronociceptive neurons), and neutral cells (unresponsive to analgesic drugs). CC12 pretreatment preserved reflex-related changes in OFF-cell firing and blocked the analgesic actions of both drugs, without interfering with the increase in spontaneous firing induced by improgan or morphine. CC12 blocked suppression of evoked ON-cell firing by improgan, but not morphine. CC12 pretreatment had no effect by itself on RVM neurons or behavior. These data show that the epoxygenase inhibitor CC12 works downstream from receptors for both μ-opioid and improgan, at the inhibitory input mediating the OFF-cell pause. This circuit-level analysis thus provides a cellular basis for the convergence of opioid and nonopioid analgesic actions in the RVM. A presynaptic P450 epoxygenase may therefore be an important target for development of clinically useful nonopioid analgesic drugs.

Neural basis for improgan antinociception

Improgan, the prototype compound of a novel class of non-opioid analgesic drugs derived from histamine antagonists, attenuates thermal and mechanical nociception in rodents following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration. Improgan does not bind to known opioid, histamine or cannabinoid receptors, and its molecular target has not been identified. It is known however, that improgan acts directly in the periaqueductal gray and the rostral ventromedial medulla to produce its antinociceptive effects, and that inactivation of the rostral ventromedial medulla prevents the antinociceptive effect of improgan given i.c.v. Here we used in vivo single-cell recording in lightly anesthetized rats to show that improgan engages pain-modulating neurons in the medulla to produce antinociception. Following improgan administration, OFF-cells, which inhibit nociception, became continuously active and no longer paused during noxious stimulation. The increase in OFF-cell firing does not represent a non-specific neuroexcitant effect of this drug, since ON-cell discharge, associated with net nociceptive facilitation, was depressed. NEUTRAL-cell firing was unaffected by improgan. The net response of rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) neurons to improgan is thus comparable to that evoked by mu-opioids and cannabinoids, well known RVM-active analgesic drugs. This common basis for improgan, opioid, and cannabinoid antinociception in the RVM supports the idea that improgan functions as a specific analgesic agent.

Where will the next generation of stroke treatments come from?

Remarkable progress has occurred over the last two decades in stroke interventions. Many have been developed on the basis of their efficacy in other disorders. This "inheritance" approach should continue, but two areas where completely novel therapeutic targets might emerge are the stimulation of neuroplasticity and unraveling the genetic code of stroke heterogeneity (Table 2). For the former, the next steps are to identify small-molecule, nontoxic compounds that most effectively enhance plasticity in animal models, and then subject them to clinical trial in humans. For the latter, more and larger-scale cooperative GWASs in carefully phenotyped stroke populations are required to better understand the polygenic nature of cerebrovascular disease. Then, the physiological relevance of genetic abnormalities can be determined in in vitro and in vivo systems before candidate compounds are developed.

Non-opioid antinociception produced by brain stem injections of improgan: significance of local, but not cross-regional, cannabinoid mechanisms

Improgan, a cimetidine derivative which lacks activity at known histamine, opioid or cannabinoid receptors, acts by an unknown mechanism in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) and raphe magnus (RM) to stimulate descending, analgesic circuits. These circuits may utilize cannabinoid mechanisms. To characterize further the nature of these circuits, the effects of intracerebral (i.c.) microinjections of rimonabant (a CB(1) receptor inverse agonist) were studied on antinociceptive responses following i.c. microinjections of improgan and the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212 (WIN) in rats. Separate intra-RM injections of improgan (30 microg) and WIN (8 microg) produced near-maximal antinociception on both the hot plate (HP) and tail flick (TF) nociceptive tests. Pretreatment with intra-RM rimonabant (20 microg) antagonized the antinociception produced by both intra-RM improgan and intra-RM WIN, but had no effects when given alone. Similar studies with improgan demonstrated rimonabant-sensitive sites within the dorsal and ventrolateral PAG. However, intra-RM pretreatment with rimonabant had no effect on antinociceptive responses following intra-PAG improgan. These studies show that improgan activates pain-relieving mechanisms in the PAG and the RM, both of which may utilize local cannabinoid mechanisms.