1
|
Martin CZ, Lapierre P, Haché S, Lucien D, Green AM. Vestibular contributions to online reach execution are processed via mechanisms with knowledge about limb biomechanics. J Neurophysiol 2021; 125:1022-1045. [PMID: 33502952 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00688.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies of reach control with the body stationary have shown that proprioceptive and visual feedback signals contributing to rapid corrections during reaching are processed by neural circuits that incorporate knowledge about the physical properties of the limb (an internal model). However, among the most common spatial and mechanical perturbations to the limb are those caused by our body's own motion, suggesting that processing of vestibular signals for online reach control may reflect a similar level of sophistication. We investigated this hypothesis using galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) to selectively activate the vestibular sensors, simulating body rotation, as human subjects reached to remembered targets in different directions (forward, leftward, rightward). If vestibular signals contribute to purely kinematic/spatial corrections for body motion, GVS should evoke reach trajectory deviations of similar size in all directions. In contrast, biomechanical modeling predicts that if vestibular processing for online reach control takes into account knowledge of the physical properties of the limb and the forces applied on it by body motion, then GVS should evoke trajectory deviations that are significantly larger during forward and leftward reaches as compared with rightward reaches. When GVS was applied during reaching, the observed deviations were on average consistent with this prediction. In contrast, when GVS was instead applied before reaching, evoked deviations were similar across directions, as predicted for a purely spatial correction mechanism. These results suggest that vestibular signals, like proprioceptive and visual feedback, are processed for online reach control via sophisticated neural mechanisms that incorporate knowledge of limb biomechanics.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Studies examining proprioceptive and visual contributions to rapid corrections for externally applied mechanical and spatial perturbations during reaching have provided evidence for flexible processing of sensory feedback that accounts for musculoskeletal system dynamics. Notably, however, such perturbations commonly arise from our body's own motion. In line with this, we provide compelling evidence that, similar to proprioceptive and visual signals, vestibular signals are processed for online reach control via sophisticated mechanisms that incorporate knowledge of limb biomechanics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Z Martin
- Département de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Philippe Lapierre
- Département de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Haché
- Département de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Diderot Lucien
- Département de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrea M Green
- Département de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blouin J, Saradjian AH, Pialasse JP, Manson GA, Mouchnino L, Simoneau M. Two Neural Circuits to Point Towards Home Position After Passive Body Displacements. Front Neural Circuits 2019; 13:70. [PMID: 31736717 PMCID: PMC6831616 DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2019.00070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
A challenge in motor control research is to understand the mechanisms underlying the transformation of sensory information into arm motor commands. Here, we investigated these transformation mechanisms for movements whose targets were defined by information issued from body rotations in the dark (i.e., idiothetic information). Immediately after being rotated, participants reproduced the amplitude of their perceived rotation using their arm (Experiment 1). The cortical activation during movement planning was analyzed using electroencephalography and source analyses. Task-related activities were found in regions of interest (ROIs) located in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), dorsal premotor cortex, dorsal region of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the sensorimotor cortex. Importantly, critical regions for the cognitive encoding of space did not show significant task-related activities. These results suggest that arm movements were planned using a sensorimotor-type of spatial representation. However, when a 8 s delay was introduced between body rotation and the arm movement (Experiment 2), we found that areas involved in the cognitive encoding of space [e.g., ventral premotor cortex (vPM), rostral ACC, inferior and superior posterior parietal cortex (PPC)] showed task-related activities. Overall, our results suggest that the use of a cognitive-type of representation for planning arm movement after body motion is necessary when relevant spatial information must be stored before triggering the movement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Blouin
- Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Marseille, France
| | - Anahid H Saradjian
- Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Marseille, France
| | | | - Gerome A Manson
- Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Marseille, France.,Centre for Motor Control, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laurence Mouchnino
- Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Marseille, France
| | - Martin Simoneau
- Faculté de Médecine, Département de Kinésiologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale (CIRRIS), Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keyser J, Medendorp WP, Selen LPJ. Task-dependent vestibular feedback responses in reaching. J Neurophysiol 2017; 118:84-92. [PMID: 28356472 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00112.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2017] [Revised: 03/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
When reaching for an earth-fixed object during self-rotation, the motor system should appropriately integrate vestibular signals and sensory predictions to compensate for the intervening motion and its induced inertial forces. While it is well established that this integration occurs rapidly, it is unknown whether vestibular feedback is specifically processed dependent on the behavioral goal. Here, we studied whether vestibular signals evoke fixed responses with the aim to preserve the hand trajectory in space or are processed more flexibly, correcting trajectories only in task-relevant spatial dimensions. We used galvanic vestibular stimulation to perturb reaching movements toward a narrow or a wide target. Results show that the same vestibular stimulation led to smaller trajectory corrections to the wide than the narrow target. We interpret this reduced compensation as a task-dependent modulation of vestibular feedback responses, tuned to minimally intervene with the task-irrelevant dimension of the reach. These task-dependent vestibular feedback corrections are in accordance with a central prediction of optimal feedback control theory and mirror the sophistication seen in feedback responses to mechanical and visual perturbations of the upper limb.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Correcting limb movements for external perturbations is a hallmark of flexible sensorimotor behavior. While visual and mechanical perturbations are corrected in a task-dependent manner, it is unclear whether a vestibular perturbation, naturally arising when the body moves, is selectively processed in reach control. We show, using galvanic vestibular stimulation, that reach corrections to vestibular perturbations are task dependent, consistent with a prediction of optimal feedback control theory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Keyser
- Radboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - W Pieter Medendorp
- Radboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luc P J Selen
- Radboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blouin J, Bresciani JP, Guillaud E, Simoneau M. Prediction in the Vestibular Control of Arm Movements. Multisens Res 2016; 28:487-505. [PMID: 26595953 DOI: 10.1163/22134808-00002501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The contribution of vestibular signals to motor control has been evidenced in postural, locomotor, and oculomotor studies. Here, we review studies showing that vestibular information also contributes to the control of arm movements during whole-body motion. The data reviewed suggest that vestibular information is used by the arm motor system to maintain the initial hand position or the planned hand trajectory unaltered during body motion. This requires integration of vestibular and cervical inputs to determine the trunk motion dynamics. These studies further suggest that the vestibular control of arm movement relies on rapid and efficient vestibulomotor transformations that cannot be considered automatic. We also reviewed evidence suggesting that the vestibular afferents can be used by the brain to predict and counteract body-rotation-induced torques (e.g., Coriolis) acting on the arm when reaching for a target while turning the trunk.
Collapse
|
5
|
Choux C, Gasq D, Edouard P. Modifications des paramètres stabilométriques des membres supérieurs en fonction de situations d’instabilité. Sci Sports 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scispo.2015.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
6
|
Reichenbach A, Bresciani JP, Bülthoff HH, Thielscher A. Reaching with the sixth sense: Vestibular contributions to voluntary motor control in the human right parietal cortex. Neuroimage 2015; 124:869-875. [PMID: 26424179 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Revised: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 09/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The vestibular system constitutes the silent sixth sense: It automatically triggers a variety of vital reflexes to maintain postural and visual stability. Beyond their role in reflexive behavior, vestibular afferents contribute to several perceptual and cognitive functions and also support voluntary control of movements by complementing the other senses to accomplish the movement goal. Investigations into the neural correlates of vestibular contribution to voluntary action in humans are challenging and have progressed far less than research on corresponding visual and proprioceptive involvement. Here, we demonstrate for the first time with event-related TMS that the posterior part of the right medial intraparietal sulcus processes vestibular signals during a goal-directed reaching task with the dominant right hand. This finding suggests a qualitative difference between the processing of vestibular vs. visual and proprioceptive signals for controlling voluntary movements, which are pre-dominantly processed in the left posterior parietal cortex. Furthermore, this study reveals a neural pathway for vestibular input that might be distinct from the processing for reflexive or cognitive functions, and opens a window into their investigation in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Reichenbach
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstr. 38, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Jean-Pierre Bresciani
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstr. 38, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition, University of Grenoble, BP47, 38040 Grenoble, Cedex 9, France; Department of Medicine, University of Fribourg, Boulevard de Pérolles 90, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Heinrich H Bülthoff
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstr. 38, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Anam-dong 5ga, Seonbuk-gu, Seoul 136-713, Republic of Korea.
| | - Axel Thielscher
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstr. 38, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Danish Research Center for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark; Biomedical Engineering Section, Technical University of Denmark, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, Building 101A, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tremblay L, Kennedy A, Paleressompoulle D, Borel L, Mouchnino L, Blouin J. Biases in the perception of self-motion during whole-body acceleration and deceleration. Front Integr Neurosci 2013; 7:90. [PMID: 24379764 PMCID: PMC3864246 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 11/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Several studies have investigated whether vestibular signals can be processed to determine the magnitude of passive body motions. Many of them required subjects to report their perceived displacements offline, i.e., after being submitted to passive displacements. Here, we used a protocol that allowed us to complement these results by asking subjects to report their introspective estimation of their displacement continuously, i.e., during the ongoing body rotation. To this end, participants rotated the handle of a manipulandum around a vertical axis to indicate their perceived change of angular position in space at the same time as they were passively rotated in the dark. The rotation acceleration (Acc) and deceleration (Dec) lasted either 1.5 s (peak of 60°/s2, referred to as being “High”) or 3 s (peak of 33°/s2, referred to as being “Low”). The participants were rotated either counter-clockwise or clockwise, and all combinations of acceleration and deceleration were tested (i.e., AccLow-DecLow; AccLow-DecHigh; AccHigh-DecLow; AccHigh-DecHigh). The participants’ perception of body rotation was assessed by computing the gain, i.e., ratio between the amplitude of the perceived rotations (as measured by the rotating manipulandum’s handle) and the amplitude of the actual chair rotations. The gain was measured at the end of the rotations, and was also computed separately for the acceleration and deceleration phases. Three salient findings resulted from this experiment: (i) the gain was much greater during body acceleration than during body deceleration, (ii) the gain was greater during High compared to Low accelerations and (iii) the gain measured during the deceleration was influenced by the preceding acceleration (i.e., Low or High). These different effects of the angular stimuli on the perception of body motion can be interpreted in relation to the consequences of body acceleration and deceleration on the vestibular system and on higher-order cognitive processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luc Tremblay
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Kennedy
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dany Paleressompoulle
- Fédération de Recherche 3C Comportement-Cerveau-Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Aix-Marseille University Marseille, France
| | - Liliane Borel
- Fédération de Recherche 3C Comportement-Cerveau-Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Aix-Marseille University Marseille, France ; Laboratoire de Neurosciences Intégratives et Adaptatives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Aix-Marseille University Marseille, France
| | - Laurence Mouchnino
- Fédération de Recherche 3C Comportement-Cerveau-Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Aix-Marseille University Marseille, France ; Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Aix-Marseille University Marseille, France
| | - Jean Blouin
- Fédération de Recherche 3C Comportement-Cerveau-Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Aix-Marseille University Marseille, France ; Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Aix-Marseille University Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
It is all me: the effect of viewpoint on visual-vestibular recalibration. Exp Brain Res 2011; 213:245-56. [PMID: 21597929 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2723-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2010] [Accepted: 05/03/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Participants performed a visual-vestibular motor recalibration task in virtual reality. The task consisted of keeping the extended arm and hand stable in space during a whole-body rotation induced by a robotic wheelchair. Performance was first quantified in a pre-test in which no visual feedback was available during the rotation. During the subsequent adaptation phase, optical flow resulting from body rotation was provided. This visual feedback was manipulated to create the illusion of a smaller rotational movement than actually occurred, hereby altering the visual-vestibular mapping. The effects of the adaptation phase on hand stabilization performance were measured during a post-test that was identical to the pre-test. Three different groups of subjects were exposed to different perspectives on the visual scene, i.e., first-person, top view, or mirror view. Sensorimotor adaptation occurred for all three viewpoint conditions, performance in the post-test session showing a marked under-compensation relative to the pre-test performance. In other words, all viewpoints gave rise to a remapping between vestibular input and the motor output required to stabilize the arm. Furthermore, the first-person and mirror view adaptation induced a significant decrease in variability of the stabilization performance. Such variability reduction was not observed for the top view adaptation. These results suggest that even if all three viewpoints can evoke substantial adaptation aftereffects, the more naturalistic first-person view and the richer mirror view should be preferred when reducing motor variability constitutes an important issue.
Collapse
|