Behavioral avoidance moderates the effect of exposure therapy for irritable bowel syndrome: A secondary analysis of results from a randomized component trial

Latent profile analysis reveals the central role of psychological symptoms in driving disease severity in chronic constipation

BACKGROUND

Chronic constipation (CC) is defined by symptom criteria reflecting heterogenous physiology. However, many patients with CC have significant psychological comorbidities-an alternative definition using a biopsychosocial classification model could be warranted to inform future treatments. We sought to: (1) empirically derive psychological symptom profiles of patients with CC using latent profile analysis and (2) validate these profiles by comparing them on symptom severity, GI-specific anxiety, body mass index (BMI), and anorectal manometry findings.

METHODS

Participants included adults presenting for anorectal manometry for CC (N = 468, 82% female, Mage = 47). Depression/anxiety symptoms and eating disorder (ED) symptoms (EAT-26) were used as indicators (i.e., variables used to derive profiles) representing unique psychological constructs. Constipation symptoms, GI-specific anxiety, BMI, and anorectal manometry results were used as validators (i.e., variables used to examine the clinical utility of the resulting profiles).

KEY RESULTS

A 5-profile solution provided the best statistical fit, comprising the following latent profiles (LPs): LP1 termed "high dieting, low bulimia;" LP2 termed "high ED symptoms;" LP3 termed "moderate ED symptoms;" LP4 termed "high anxiety and depression, low ED symptoms;" and LP5 termed "low psychological symptoms." The low psychological symptom profile (61% of the sample) had lower abdominal and overall constipation severity and lower GI-specific anxiety compared to the four profiles characterized by higher psychological symptoms (of any type). Profiles did not significantly differ on BMI or anorectal manometry results.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Profiles with high psychological symptoms had increased constipation symptom severity and GI-specific anxiety in adults with CC. Future research should test whether these profiles predict differential treatment outcomes.

Effect moderators in Internet-based exposure therapy for fibromyalgia: The role of pain intensity

BACKGROUND

A recent randomized controlled trial (N = 140) was indicative of large and sustained average improvements of Internet-based exposure for fibromyalgia, as compared to a waitlist. However, little is known about who benefits the most from this treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To test for potential moderating effects of age, educational attainment, the duration of fibromyalgia, baseline overall fibromyalgia severity, pain intensity, fibromyalgia-related avoidance behaviour and symptom preoccupation on the waitlist-controlled effect of 10 weeks of Internet-based exposure for fibromyalgia.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02638636). We used linear mixed effects models to determine whether the waitlist-controlled effect of exposure therapy on overall fibromyalgia severity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire) differed as a function of the potential moderators.

RESULTS

Only pain intensity (0-10) was found to be a significant moderator, where a higher baseline pain intensity predicted a more limited waitlist-controlled effect of Internet-based exposure (B = 3.48, 95% CI: 0.84-6.13). Standardized point estimates of effects were small for the sociodemographic variables, and in the moderate range for some clinical variables that did not reach statistical significance such as behavioural avoidance and time with the fibromyalgia diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that Internet-based exposure treatment was more useful for participants with lower baseline levels of pain, and less so for participants with higher baseline levels of pain. The treatment had relatively similar effects across the other tested moderators.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study evaluated potential effect moderators in exposure-based treatment for fibromyalgia. Results indicated that a higher level of pain intensity at baseline was predictive of a less favourable outcome. It may be extra important to monitor progression for these patients and to provide additional therapeutic support when needed.

Future of Brain-Gut Behavior Therapies: Mediators and Moderators

With growing evidence to support their efficacy, brain-gut behavior therapies are increasingly viewed as a key component to integrated care management of disorders of gut-brain interaction. However, the types of brain-gut behavior therapies differ in how and for whom they purportedly work. We provide a conceptual review of these brain-gut behavior therapies, with an emphasis on describing how (ie, mechanisms) and for whom (ie, moderators) they work as hypothesized and/or supported by evidence. Based on evidence to date, we recommend that brain-gut behavior therapies prioritize gastrointestinal-specific targets, such as gastrointestinal-specific anxiety.

Clinical, demographic and theory-derived maintaining factors as moderators of treatment outcome in internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for children and adolescents with social anxiety disorder

Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) is an efficacious treatment for social anxiety disorder (SAD) in youth. However, we have limited knowledge about patient characteristics that may be associated with better (or worse) treatment outcome. Particularly concerning factors suggested to be involved in the maintenance of SAD (e.g., anticipatory anxiety and post-event processing). The aim of the current study was to evaluate possible predictors and moderators of the effect of ICBT in a randomised controlled trial where children and adolescents (N = 103; 10-17 years) with SAD received either ICBT or internet-delivered supportive therapy, ISUPPORT. Examined variables were pre-treatment levels of social anxiety, depression symptoms, putative maintaining factors as well as demographic variables like age and gender. Latent growth curve models were used to examine predictors and moderators of changes in youth and clinician rated social anxiety symptoms, from pre-treatment to 3-month follow-up. Baseline depression symptoms moderated the outcome, with higher depression scores being associated with greater reduction of SAD symptoms in ICBT compared to ISUPPORT. More difficulties at baseline with anticipatory anxiety, post-event processing, focus of attention and safety behaviours predicted greater reduction of SAD symptoms, regardless of treatment condition. No other clinical or demographic variable predicted or moderated the outcome. In summary, baseline depression severity may be an important moderator of ICBT, but the preliminary finding needs replication in sufficiently powered trials.

Review article: exclude or expose? The paradox of conceptually opposite treatments for irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a heterogeneous disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) maintained by interacting biological, psychological, and social processes. Interestingly, there are two contrasting yet evidence-based treatment approaches for reducing IBS symptoms: exclusion diets such as those low in fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) and exposure-based cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT). Exclusion diets recommend patients avoid foods thought to be symptom-inducing, whereas exposure-based CBT encourages patients to expose themselves to foods.

AIMS

To address the paradox of conceptually opposite exclusion diets and exposure-based CBT for IBS.

METHODS

In this conceptual review, we describe the rationale, practical implementation, evidence base and strengths and weaknesses of each treatment. We conducted up-to-date literature search concerning the low FODMAP diet and CBT, and performed a secondary analysis of a previously conducted trial to illustrate a key point in our review.

RESULTS

The low FODMAP diet has demonstrated efficacy, but problems with adherence, nutritional compromise, and heightened gastrointestinal-specific anxiety raise caution. Exposure-based CBT has demonstrated efficacy with substantial evidence for gastrointestinal-specific anxiety as a key mechanism of action. Mediation analysis also showed that increased FODMAP intake mediated decreased symptom severity in exposure-based CBT. However, there is minimal evidence supporting which treatment "works best for whom" and how these approaches could be best integrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though exclusion diets and exposure-based CBT are conceptually opposite, they each have proven efficacy. Clinicians should familiarise themselves with both treatments. Further research is needed on predictors, mechanisms and moderators of treatment outcomes.

Exposure based cognitive behavioral group therapy for IBS at a gastroenterological clinic - a clinical effectiveness study

BACKGROUND

Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may benefit from psychological treatment when diet changes and medications do not sufficiently reduce symptoms. Our research team has developed an exposure based cognitive behavioral therapy protocol (ECBT), which has been shown to be effective in several randomized controlled trials.

AIM

To investigate the effectiveness of ECBT in clinical routine care at a gastroenterological clinic in Stockholm and to find predictors for treatment outcome.

METHOD

A ten session ECBT based on our protocol was given face to face by licensed psychologists in groups of 4-6 patients. A total of 129 patients provided information regarding IBS symptoms, quality of life, gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety (GSA), and depression pre and post-treatment. We used linear regression analyses to identify patient characteristics that predicted treatment outcome.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was symptom severity measured with The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale for IBS (GSRS-IBS). Average pre-and post-treatment GSRS-IBS scores were 49.24 (SD = 11.54) and 37.03 (SD = 10.03), corresponding to a 34.0% reduction in symptom severity (p < .001). Reductions were also found in GSA, 43.9% (p < .001) and depression, 38.6% (p < .001). IBS-related quality of life was on average increased by 68.2% (p < .001). The effect sizes were large and varied between (Cohen's d) 0.95 and 1.84. None of the patients' pre-treatment characteristics predicted outcome.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that ECBT for IBS delivered face-to-face in a group-format is very effective, also in a routine care setting. We did not find any reliable predictors for treatment outcome. The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with ID: NCT04756414.

A Rome Working Team Report on Brain-Gut Behavior Therapies for Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This Rome Foundation Working Team Report reflects the consensus of an international interdisciplinary team of experts regarding the use of behavioral interventions, specifically brain-gut behavior therapies (BGBTs), in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs).

METHODS

The committee members reviewed the extant scientific literature and, when possible, addressed gaps in this literature through the lens of their clinical and scientific expertise. The Delphi method was used to create consensus on the goals, structure, and framework before writing the report. The report is broken into 5 parts: 1) definition and evidence for BGBT, 2) the gut-brain axis as the mechanistic basis for BGBT, 3) targets of BGBTs, 4) common and unique therapeutic techniques seen in BGBT, and 5) who and how to refer for BGBT.

RESULTS

We chose to not only review for the reader the 5 existing classes of BGBT and their evidence, but to connect DGBI-specific behavioral targets and techniques as they relate directly, or in some cases indirectly, to the gut-brain axis. In doing so, we expect to increase gastrointestinal providers' confidence in identifying and referring appropriate candidates for BGBT and to support clinical decision making for mental health professionals providing BGBT.

CONCLUSIONS

Both gastrointestinal medical providers and behavioral health providers have an opportunity to optimize care for DGBIs through a collaborative integrated approach that begins with an effective patient-provider relationship, thoughtful communication about the brain-gut axis and, when appropriate, a well communicated referral to BGBT.

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly-Chances, Challenges, and Clinical Implications of Avoidance Research in Psychosomatic Medicine

Avoidance behaviors are shaped by associative learning processes in response to fear of impending threats, particularly physical harm. As part of a defensive repertoire, avoidance is highly adaptive in case of acute danger, serving a potent protective function. However, persistent or excessive fear and maladaptive avoidance are considered key factors in the etiology and pathophysiology of anxiety- and stress-related psychosomatic disorders. In these overlapping conditions, avoidance can increase the risk of mental comorbidities and interfere with the efficacy of cognitive behavioral treatment approaches built on fear extinction. Despite resurging interest in avoidance research also in the context of psychosomatic medicine, especially in conditions associated with pain, disturbed interoception, and disorders of the gut-brain axis, current study designs and their translation into the clinical context face significant challenges limiting both, the investigation of mechanisms involved in avoidance and the development of novel targeted treatment options. We herein selectively review the conceptual framework of learning and memory processes, emphasizing how classical and operant conditioning, fear extinction, and return of fear shape avoidance behaviors. We further discuss pathological avoidance and safety behaviors as hallmark features in psychosomatic diseases, with a focus on anxiety- and stress-related disorders. Aiming to emphasize chances of improved translational knowledge across clinical conditions, we further point out limitations in current experimental avoidance research. Based on these considerations, we propose means to improve existing avoidance paradigms to broaden our understanding of underlying mechanisms, moderators and mediators of avoidance, and to inspire tailored treatments for patients suffering from psychosomatic disorders.

Cognitive behavioral treatment for irritable bowel syndrome: a recent literature review

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a gastrointestinal psychosomatic disorder that often develops and worsens with stress. Hence, it is important to treat it from both, its physical and mental aspects. We reviewed recent research on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)—one of the most widely studied psychological treatments for IBS—since it focuses on addressing the cognitions and behaviors associated with IBS symptoms, and combines diverse content, such as cognitive techniques, exposure, stress management, and mindfulness, whose effects have been widely studied. Research on CBT for IBS varies not only in terms of content of the interventions, but also in terms of implementation (individual or group, face-to-face or online). Internet-delivered CBT has recently shown the possibility of providing more accessible and cost-effective psychological intervention to IBS patients in formats, other than face-to-face. In recent years, many standardized scales that allow for IBS-specific psychological assessments have been used in clinical studies of CBT for IBS. Tools that competently deliver effective interventions and properly measure their effectiveness are expected to spread to many people suffering from IBS.