Targeting maladaptive reactivity to negative affect in emerging adults with cannabis use disorder: A preliminary test and proof of concept

A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for persons with comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Anxiety and substance use disorders are highly comorbid and represent two of the leading causes of disease burden globally. Psychosocial interventions are important treatment options for people with co-occurring anxiety and substance use disorders (A-SUD). To date, few reviews have assessed the efficacy of psychosocial treatments for patients with A-SUD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize this literature and assess the efficacy of psychosocial interventions among patients with A-SUD.

METHODS

We searched all relevant records published until March 2023 in Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Two authors extracted and reconciled relevant data and assessed risk of bias. Random effects models were used to calculate effect sizes using Hedges' g for post treatment and follow-up time points. Main outcomes of the review were anxiety, alcohol use, and use of other substances. We examined effects on depression as a secondary outcome since it commonly co-occurs with A-SUD.

RESULTS

Psychosocial interventions for co-occurring A-SUD showed moderate effects on anxiety (g = 0.44), alcohol (Hedges' g = 0.29), and other substance use (g = 0.38) at post intervention. Large effects were observed on depression (g = 0.88) at post intervention with high heterogeneity. These effects were maintained at follow-up for anxiety (Hedges' g = 0.38), other substances (g = 0.44), and depression (g = 0.50). Moderation analyses for demographic factors, intervention characteristics, community level factors, anxiety reduction, and alcohol use reduction, were non-significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The current meta-analysis is the first to investigate specifically the effects of psychosocial interventions on patients with anxiety and a co-occurring SUD. The analyses indicated promising moderate-sized effects of treatment on anxiety, alcohol, all other drug use, and depression. The findings point to important avenues for psychosocial treatment emphasis and development while highlighting critical gaps in knowledge to be addressed in future research.

Integrated behavioral treatments for comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders: A model for understanding integrated treatment approaches and meta-analysis to evaluate their efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Substance use disorders (SUD) and anxiety disorders are highly comorbid, and this comorbidity is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Emerging research in the last decade has shifted from addressing these problems separately to the development and evaluation of behavioral treatments that integrate care for anxiety disorders (or elevated symptoms of anxiety) and SUD.

METHODS

An extensive literature search revealed a sufficient number of studies (K=11) to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of integrated SUD/anxiety disorder behavioral treatment to SUD treatment alone on substance use and anxiety symptom outcomes. Randomized clinical trials including those with SUD and either anxiety disorders or elevations in constructs implicated in the maintenance of anxiety disorder/SUD comorbidity were included. This study meta-analyzes the effects of these studies.

RESULTS

Integrated treatments outperformed SUD treatments alone on both substance use and anxiety outcomes, with small to moderate effects favoring integrated treatments. There was no significant heterogeneity across studies in the primary analyses, such that moderator analyses to identify variables that yielded differential patterns of effect sizes were not conducted.

DISCUSSION

Integrated treatments for SUD/anxiety disorders demonstrate an incremental but significant and clinically meaningful improvement over SUD treatment alone for SUD/anxiety disorder comorbidity. Implications for future research and clinical practice paradigm shifting are discussed.

Maternal Childhood Maltreatment, Internal Working Models, and Perinatal Substance Use: Is There a Role for Hyperkatifeia? A Systematic Review

The parent-infant relationship is critical for socioemotional development and is adversely impacted by perinatal substance use. This systematic review posits that the mechanisms underlying these risks to mother-infant relationships center on 3 primary processes: (1) mothers' childhood maltreatment experiences; (2) attachment styles and consequent internal working models of interpersonal relationships; and (3) perinatal substance use. Further, the review considers the role of hyperkatifeia, or hypersensitivity to negative affect which occurs when people with substance use disorders are not using substances, and which drives the negative reinforcement in addiction. The authors performed a systematic review of articles (published 2000-2022) related to these constructs and their impact on mother-infant relationships and offspring outcomes, including original clinical research articles addressing relationships between these constructs, and excluding case studies, reviews, non-human animal studies, intervention studies, studies with fewer than 30% female-sex participants, clinical guidelines, studies limited to obstetric outcomes, mechanistic/biological studies, and studies with methodological issues precluding interpretation. Overall 1844 articles were screened, 377 were selected for full text review, and data were extracted from 157 articles. Results revealed strong relationships between mothers' childhood maltreatment experiences, less optimal internal working models, and increased risk for perinatal substance use, and importantly, all of these predictors interacted with hyperkatifeia and exerted a marked impact on mother-infant relationships with less data available on offspring outcomes. These data strongly support the need for future studies addressing the additive impact of maternal childhood maltreatment experiences, suboptimal internal working models, and perinatal substance use, with hyperkatifeia as a potential moderator, and their interacting effects on mother-infant socioemotional outcomes.

Daily-level relationships between negative affect, negative emotion differentiation, and cannabis behaviors among a high-risk sample of young adults

Prior research suggests that higher trait negative emotion differentiation (NED; one's ability to make subtle distinctions between different negative emotional states) is associated with consuming less alcohol when experiencing high negative affect (NA) in daily life. Yet, whether these findings extend to cannabis use behaviors is unclear. The present study used intensive daily data to test whether NED moderated the relationship between NA and cannabis behaviors. A community sample of 409 young adults who used alcohol and cannabis completed a baseline survey and five 2-week bursts of online surveys across two years. Multilevel models tested cross-level interactions between trait NED (person-level) and daily NA (daily-level) predicting cannabis use, hours high, negative consequences, craving, and coping motives. In contrast to expectations, on days with higher reported NA, people with higher NED (compared to those with lower NED) had a greater likelihood of experiencing any cannabis craving, experienced more intense craving, and reported higher cannabis coping motives. NED x NA interaction was not significant for likelihood of cannabis use, hours high, or negative consequences. Post-hoc descriptive analyses suggest notable person-specific heterogeneity in these findings. Individuals with higher ability to differentiate between negative emotions reported higher coping motives and craving when experiencing higher NA. However, these associations were variable for individuals within the sample. It may be that high NED individuals crave and purposefully use cannabis to reduce NA states. Findings are inconsistent with the alcohol literature and have important implications for intervention efforts aimed at reducing coping-motivated cannabis use among young adults.

Transdiagnostic Processes Linking Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms to Alcohol Use Severity

Objective: The high comorbidity between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) is well-established and complex. However, there is a need to explore transdiagnostic constructs that may underlie this association to better understand what accounts for this comorbidity and to inform treatment development. Method: Thus, the present study utilized a large, cross-sectional dataset (N = 513; Mage = 38.25 years, SD = 10.07; 49.9% female), based on national recruitment, to (1) examine whether the associations between PTSD symptom severity (PCL-5) and alcohol use severity (AUDIT) were statistically mediated by (a) anxiety sensitivity (SSASI); and (b) difficulties with emotion regulation (DERS-16); and (2) examine whether coping motives for drinking moderate this indirect effect. Sex assigned at birth was included as a covariate. Results: When examining the hypothesized mediators (SSASI and DERS-16) in separate models, there was a statistically significant indirect effect of PCL-5 on AUDIT through both SSASI and DERS. However, when both SSASI and DERS were entered into a model simultaneously, only SSASI served as a statistically significant mediator. Coping motives for drinking did not moderate the observed indirect effect. Conclusions: The current findings highlight anxiety sensitivity and emotion regulation as transdiagnostic processes that may explain, at least partially, the relationship between PTSD symptom severity and alcohol use; however, stronger evidence was evident for anxiety sensitivity. These findings may help inform the development of refined, streamlined interventions for PTSD and alcohol use that directly target these processes.

Distress tolerance and reactivity to negative affective cues in naturalistic environments of cannabis-using emerging adults

BACKGROUND

Distress tolerance (DT) has been implicated as an important factor in the experience of negative affect (NA) and cannabis craving. However, previous research is limited by its use of laboratory paradigms that may not replicate in naturalistic settings. The current study examined how DT influenced reactivity to NA cues in daily life in a sample of frequent (≥3 times per week) cannabis-using emerging adults (age 18-21).

METHODS

Using cue-reactivity ecological momentary assessment (CREMA), 63 (54 % female; 85.7 % white; M_age = 19.62) participants reported on their cannabis craving and affect (sadness, relaxation) four semi-random times per day for two weeks (56 possible CREMA sessions/participant). We assessed affect and cannabis craving before and after exposure to neutral and NA cues. Multilevel modeling was used to examine within- and between-participant effects of cues, DT, and sex, as well as within- and between-participant average pre-cue affect and craving, on post-cue affect and craving.

RESULTS

NA cues consistently predicted higher-than-normal post-cue sadness and lower relaxation, but not greater-than-normal post-cue craving. Cue type interacted with sex and DT to predict post-cue sadness, but not craving. Female participants and those reporting low DT reported higher sadness following NA cues compared to males and those with high DT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequent cannabis-using emerging adults differed in affect, but not cannabis craving, reactivity to NA cues as a function of sex and DT. Our results were partially consistent with prior human laboratory and CREMA research finding greater reactivity to NA cues among females and individuals with low DT.