1
|
Kjelle E, Brandsæter IØ, Andersen ER, Hofmann BM. Cost of Low-Value Imaging Worldwide: A Systematic Review. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2024; 22:485-501. [PMID: 38427217 PMCID: PMC11178636 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00876-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Imaging with low or no benefit for the patient undermines the quality of care and amounts to vast opportunity costs. More than 3.6 billion imaging examinations are performed annually, and about 20-50% of these are of low value. This study aimed to synthesize knowledge of the costs of low-value imaging worldwide. METHODS This systematic review was based on the PRISMA statement. The database search was developed in Medline and further adapted to Embase-Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Primary empirical studies assessing the costs of low-value diagnostic imaging were included if published between 2012 and March 2022. Studies designed as randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, descriptive studies, cost analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, and mixed-methods studies were eligible. The analysis was descriptive. RESULTS Of 5,567 records identified, 106 were included. Most of the studies included were conducted in the USA (n = 76), and a hospital or medical center was the most common setting (n = 82). Thirty-eight of the included studies calculated the costs of multiple imaging modalities; in studies with only one imaging modality included, conventional radiography was the most common (n = 32). Aggregated costs for low-value examinations amounts to billions of dollars per year globally. Initiatives to reduce low-value imaging may reduce costs by up to 95% without harming patients. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first systematic review of the cost of low-value imaging worldwide, documenting a high potential for cost reduction. Given the universal challenges with resource allocation, the large amount used for low-value imaging represents a vast opportunity cost and offers great potential to improve the quality and efficiency of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin Kjelle
- Department of Health Sciences, Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway.
| | - Ingrid Øfsti Brandsæter
- Department of Health Sciences, Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Eivind Richter Andersen
- Department of Health Sciences, Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Bjørn Morten Hofmann
- Department of Health Sciences, Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway
- Centre of Medical Ethics at the University of Oslo, Blindern, Postbox 1130, 0318, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olivares-Tirado P, Zanga R. Waste in health care spending: A scoping review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT 2023. [DOI: 10.1080/20479700.2023.2185580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Olivares-Tirado
- Research and Development Department of the Superintendency of Health of Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Adjunct researcher at Health Service Development Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Rosendo Zanga
- Research and Development Department of the Superintendency of Health of Chile, Santiago, Chile
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Francisci S, Capodaglio G, Gigli A, Mollica C, Guzzinati S. Cancer cost profiles: The Epicost estimation approach. Front Public Health 2022; 10:974505. [PMID: 36211660 PMCID: PMC9533128 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.974505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Sustainability of cancer burden is becoming increasingly central in the policy makers' debate, and poses a challenge for the welfare systems, due to trends towards greater intensity of healthcare service use, which imply increasing costs of cancer care. Measuring and projecting the economic burden associated with cancer and identifying effective policies for minimising its impact are important issues for healthcare systems. Scope of this paper is to illustrate a novel comprehensive approach (called Epicost) to the estimation of the economic burden of cancer, based on micro-data collected from multiple data sources. It consists of a model of cost analysis to estimate the amount of reimbursement payed by the National Health Service to health service providers (hospitals, ambulatories, pharmacies) for the expenses incurred in the diagnoses and treatments of a cohort of cancer patients; these cancer costs are estimated in various phases of the disease reflecting patients' patterns of care: initial, monitoring and final phase. The main methodological features are illustrated using a cohort of colon cancer cases from a Cancer Registry in Italy. This approach has been successfully implemented in Italy and it has been adapted to other European countries, such as Belgium, Norway and Poland in the framework of the Innovative Partnership for Action Against Cancer (iPAAC) Joint Action, sponsored by the European Commission. It is replicable in countries/regions where population-based cancer registry data is available and linkable at individual level with administrative data on costs of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Francisci
- National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, National Health Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Guilia Capodaglio
- Screening and Health Impact Assessment Unit, Azienda Zero, Padova, Italy
| | - Anna Gigli
- Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Mollica
- Department of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Guzzinati
- Regional Epidemiological Service, Veneto Cancer Registry (RTV), Azienda Zero, Padova, Italy,*Correspondence: Stefano Guzzinati
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nagarajah S, Powis ML, Fazelzad R, Krzyzanowska MK, Kukreti V. Implementation and Impact of Choosing Wisely Recommendations in Oncology. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:703-712. [DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Choosing Wisely (CW) campaign, launched in 2012, includes oncology-specific recommendations to promote evidence-based care and deimplementation of low-value practices. However, it is unclear to what extent the campaign has prompted practice change. We systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the uptake of cancer-specific CW recommendations focusing on the period before the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic. We used Grimshaw's deimplementation framework to thematically group the findings and extracted information on implementation strategies, barriers, and facilitators from articles reporting on active implementation. In the 98 articles addressing 32 unique recommendations, most reported on passive changes in adherence pre-post publication of CW recommendations. Use of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer and reduction in staging imaging for early breast cancer were the most commonly evaluated recommendations. Most articles assessing passive changes in adherence pre-post CW publication reported improvement. All articles evaluating active implementation (10 of 98) reported improved compliance (range: 3%-73% improvement). Most common implementation strategies included provider education and/or stakeholder engagement. Preconceived views and reluctance to adopt new practices were common barriers; common facilitators included the use of technology and provider education to increase provider buy-in. Given the limited uptake of oncology-specific CW recommendations thus far, more attention toward supporting active implementation is needed. Effective adoption of CW likely requires a multipronged approach that includes building stakeholder buy-in through engagement and education, using technology-enabled forced functions to facilitate change along with policy and reimbursement models that disincentivize low-value care. Professional societies have a role to play in supporting this next phase of CW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonieya Nagarajah
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQuaL), Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Lynn Powis
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQuaL), Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rouhi Fazelzad
- Library and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika K. Krzyzanowska
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQuaL), Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vishal Kukreti
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQuaL), Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maltoni R, Balzi W, Rossi T, Fabbri F, Bravaccini S, Montella MT, Massa I, Bertoni L, Falcini F, Altini M. Appropriateness and Economic Analysis of Conventional Circulating Biomarkers Assessment in Early Breast Cancer: A Real-World Experience from the E.Pic.A Study. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:433-438. [PMID: 35200539 PMCID: PMC8870402 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29020039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The risk of relapse for early breast cancer (BC) patients persists even after decades and to date, no specific and sensitive effective circulating biomarker for recurrence prediction has been identified yet. The international guidelines do not recommend the assessment of the serum tumor markers CEA and CA15-3 in the follow-up of asymptomatic early BC patients. In our institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, as part of the E.Pic.A study, which was designed to assess the economic appropriateness of integrated care pathways in early BC, the use of CEA and CA15-3 as circulating tumor biomarkers in early BC patients was evaluated in 1502 patients one year after surgery, from 2015 to 2018, with an overall expense of EUR 51,764. A total of EUR 47,780 (92%) was used for execution of circulating tumor markers in early BC patients with stage 0, I and II tumors, neglecting the current guidelines and considered inappropriate by our professional board. We found that no patients with stage I BC experienced relapse in the 365 days after surgery, and in any case examination of the circulating markers CEA and CA15-3 was considered crucial for diagnosis of relapse. Our findings suggest that this inadequacy is a low-value area, supporting the reallocation of economic resources for interventions of a higher value for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Maltoni
- Healthcare Administration, IRCCS, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (W.B.); (M.T.M.); (I.M.); (L.B.)
- Correspondence:
| | - William Balzi
- Healthcare Administration, IRCCS, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (W.B.); (M.T.M.); (I.M.); (L.B.)
| | - Tania Rossi
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (T.R.); (F.F.); (S.B.)
| | - Francesco Fabbri
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (T.R.); (F.F.); (S.B.)
| | - Sara Bravaccini
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (T.R.); (F.F.); (S.B.)
| | - Maria Teresa Montella
- Healthcare Administration, IRCCS, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (W.B.); (M.T.M.); (I.M.); (L.B.)
| | - Ilaria Massa
- Healthcare Administration, IRCCS, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (W.B.); (M.T.M.); (I.M.); (L.B.)
| | - Lucia Bertoni
- Healthcare Administration, IRCCS, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (W.B.); (M.T.M.); (I.M.); (L.B.)
| | - Fabio Falcini
- Cancer Prevention Unit, Local Health Authority, 47121 Forlì, Italy;
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Mattia Altini
- Healthcare Administration, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, 48121 Ravenna, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Challenge of Sustainability of High-Cost Oncological Drugs: A Budgeting Model in an Italian Cancer Center. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182413413. [PMID: 34949032 PMCID: PMC8707715 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182413413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In Italy, drug expenditure governance is achieved by setting caps based on the percentage increase in hospital spending compared to the previous year. This method is ineffective in identifying issues and opportunities as it does not consider an analysis of the number of treated cases and per capita consumption in local and regional settings. The IRCCS (Scientific hospitalization and treatment institute) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori” in Meldola, has developed and adopted an effective management model designed to oversee pharmaceutical expenditure, guarantee prescription appropriateness and quality of care to patients. The budget setting follows a structured process which evaluates determining factors of the expenditure such as expected patients calculated according to the epidemiology and to national and regional indications of appropriateness, mean cost per patient calculated on the average period of demonstrated efficacy of the drug and use of drugs with the best cost-effectiveness ratio. Strict monitoring and integrated purchasing processes allow for immediate corrective actions on expenditures, as well as a continuous dialogue with the region in order to guarantee consistent funding of IRST activities. The model, presented in this article is efficient and implements concepts beyond the conventional “silos” approach and national and regional governance tools, in terms of patient centricity.
Collapse
|
7
|
Pellini F, Di Filippo G, Mirandola S, Deguidi G, Filippi E, Pollini GP. Effects of Lean Thinking and Emerging Technologies on Breast Cancer Patients' Therapeutic Process During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case-Control Matched Study. Front Surg 2021; 8:582980. [PMID: 33791333 PMCID: PMC8006315 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.582980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the sudden disruption of routine medical care, and the subsequent reorganization of hospital structures and therapeutic algorithms, aiming at protecting patients and health professionals. This was inevitably bound to affect our Breast Unit, dilating both pre- and post-operative times. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on patients' flow of organizational and logistic changes (key interventions) based on lean thinking implemented after the COVID-19 outbreak. Materials and Methods: Clinical and demographic data were retrospectively collected from patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer at the Verona University Hospital from January 2018 to June 2020. Patients enrolled (n = 341) were divided into two groups according to date of admission: before (Group A; n = 294) and after (Group B; n = 47) the implementation of key interventions. Each case in Group B was subsequently matched 1:1 by means of case-control matching with cases from Group A for age, comorbidities, and type of surgery (Subgroup A1; N = 47). Pre-admission time (T0) and length of stay (T1) were compared between the three groups. Results: Median T0 was 312 h, whereas median T1 was 24 h. Patients in Group B had a higher frequency of comorbidities (57.4 vs. 25.2%, p = 0.001) and underwent mastectomy more often than patients in Group A (61.7 vs. 36.7%, p = 0.001). Both median T0 and T1 were higher in group B than in group A (384 vs. 300 h, p = 0.001, 48 vs. 24 h, p = 0.001, respectively). Median T0 and T1 did not significantly differ between Group B and Subgroup A1 (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: Lean thinking and new technologies could prove useful to the optimization of preoperative and postoperative times during the current pandemic, minimizing healthcare personnel and patients' exposure to SARS-CoV-2, and promoting a rational use of limited resources, while complying with oncological principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Pellini
- Complex Operative Unit of Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, Oncologic Surgery Department, AOUI, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona, Italy
| | - Giacomo Di Filippo
- Complex Operative Unit of Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, Oncologic Surgery Department, AOUI, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona, Italy
| | - Sara Mirandola
- Complex Operative Unit of Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, Oncologic Surgery Department, AOUI, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Deguidi
- Complex Operative Unit of Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, Oncologic Surgery Department, AOUI, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisa Filippi
- Complex Operative Unit of Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, Oncologic Surgery Department, AOUI, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Paolo Pollini
- Complex Operative Unit of Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, Oncologic Surgery Department, AOUI, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang Q, Zhong X, Zhang W, Luo T, He P, Zheng H. Cost-effectiveness of different surgical treatment approaches for early breast cancer: a retrospective matched cohort study from China. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:107. [PMID: 33530955 PMCID: PMC7856742 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07840-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Both breast-conserving surgery and breast reconstruction surgery are less popular in China, although they can improve patients’ quality of life. The main reason comes from the economy. There is currently no economic evaluation of different surgical treatment options for early breast cancer. Our study aims to assess the economic impact and long-term cost-effectiveness of different surgical treatments for early breast cancer. The surgical approaches are including mastectomy (MAST), breast-conserving therapy (BCT), and mastectomy with reconstruction (MAST+RECON). Methods Based on demographic data, disease-related information and other treatments, we applied propensity score matching (PSM) to perform 1: 1 matching among patients who underwent these three types of surgery in the tertiary academic medical center from 2011 to 2017 to obtain a balanced sample of covariates between groups. A Markov model was established. Clinical data and cost data were obtained from the medical records. Health utility values were derived from clinical investigations. Strategies were compared using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results After PSM, there were 205 cases in each group. In the matched data set, the distribution of covariates was fully balanced. The total cost of MAST, MAST+RECON and BCT was $37,392.84, $70,556.03 and $82,330.97, respectively. The quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) were 17.11, 18.40 and 20.20, respectively. Compared with MAST, MAST+RECON and BCT have an ICER of $25,707.90/QALY and $14,543.08/QALY, respectively. The ICER of BCT vs. MAST was less than the threshold of $27,931.04. The reliability and stability of the results were confirmed by Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis. Conclusions We believe that in the context of the limited resources in China, after comparing the three surgical approaches, BCT is the more cost-effective and preferred solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Yang
- Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaorong Zhong
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610040, Sichuan, China.
| | - Ting Luo
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ping He
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong Zheng
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Altini M, Solinas L, Bucchi L, Gentili N, Gallegati D, Balzi W, Falcini F, Massa I. Assessment of Cancer Care Costs in Disease-Specific Cancer Care Pathways. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17134765. [PMID: 32630745 PMCID: PMC7369964 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
In view of an efficient use of the Italian National Health Service-funded healthcare resources, a novel data-processing strategy combining information from multiple sources was developed in a regional cancer network of northern Italy. The goal was to calculate the annual overall cost of care pathways of six disease groups in 10,486 patients. The evaluation was conceived as a population-based cost description from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. Costs occurred during a defined time period for a cross-section of patients at varying stages of their disease were measured. The total cancer care cost was €81,170,121 (11.1% of total local health expenditure), with a cost per patient of €7741.17 and a cost per capita of €204.62. Surgical, inpatient and day-hospital medical admissions, radiotherapy, drugs, outpatient care, emergency admissions, and home and hospice care accounted for 21.2%, 24.1%, 6.2%, 28.2%, 14.0%, 0.9%, and 5.4% of the total cost, respectively. The highest cost items included drugs (cost per capita, €22.95; 11.2% of total cost) and medical admissions (€14.51; 7.1%) for blood cancer, and surgical (€14.56; 7.1%) and medical admissions (€13.60; 6.6%) for gastrointestinal cancer. The information extracted allows multidisciplinary cancer care teams to be more aware of the costs of their clinical decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Altini
- Healthcare Administration, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (M.A.); (W.B.)
| | - Laura Solinas
- Management and Accounting Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (L.S.); (D.G.)
| | - Lauro Bucchi
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0543-739-455; Fax: +39-0543-739-459
| | - Nicola Gentili
- Information Technology Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Davide Gallegati
- Management and Accounting Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (L.S.); (D.G.)
| | - William Balzi
- Healthcare Administration, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (M.A.); (W.B.)
| | - Fabio Falcini
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
- Cancer Prevention Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Ilaria Massa
- Unit of Biostatistic and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Massa I, Balzi W, Altini M, Bertè R, Bosco M, Cassinelli D, Vignola V, Cavanna L, Foca F, Dall'Agata M, Nanni O, Rossi R, Maltoni M. The challenge of sustainability in healthcare systems: frequency and cost of diagnostic procedures in end-of-life cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26:2201-2208. [PMID: 29387995 PMCID: PMC5982433 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4067-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Literature data on the overuse and misuse of diagnostic procedures leading to end-of-life aggressiveness are scarce due to the limited amount of estimated economic waste. This study investigated the potential overuse of diagnostic procedures in a population of end-of-life patients. METHODS This is a retrospective study on consecutive advanced patients admitted into two Italian hospices. Frequency and relative costs of X-ray imaging, CT scans, MRI, and interventional procedures prescribed in the 3 months before admission were collected in patient electronic charts and/or in administrative databases. We conducted a deeper analysis of 83 cancer patients with a diagnosis of at least 1 year before admission to compare the number of examinations performed at two distant time periods. RESULTS Out of 541 patients, 463 (85.6%) had at least one radiological exam in the 3 months before last admission. The mean radiological exam number was 3.9 ± 3.2 with a relative mean cost of 278.60 ± 270.20 € per patient with a statistically significant (p < 0.001) rise near death. In the 86-patient group, a higher number of procedures was performed in the last 3 months of life than in the first quarter of the year preceding last admission (38.43 ± 28.62 vs. 27.95 ± 23.21, p < 0.001) with a consequent increase in cost. CONCLUSIONS Patients nearing death are subjected to a high level of "diagnostic aggressiveness." Further studies on the integration of palliative care into the healthcare pathway could impact the appropriateness of interventions, quality of care, and, ultimately, estimated costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Massa
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy.
| | - William Balzi
- Healthcare Administration, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Mattia Altini
- Healthcare Administration, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Raffaella Bertè
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29100, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Monica Bosco
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29100, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Davide Cassinelli
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29100, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Valentina Vignola
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29100, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Luigi Cavanna
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29100, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Flavia Foca
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Monia Dall'Agata
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Oriana Nanni
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Romina Rossi
- Palliative Care Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Marco Maltoni
- Palliative Care Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy.,Palliative Care Unit, Valerio Grassi Hospice, Forlimpopoli Hospital, Via Duca D'Aosta 33, 47034, Forlimpopoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|