Effects of weight reduction on the breast cancer-related lymphedema: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI) and the incidence of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 1464 breast cancer patients treated at The Third Hospital of Nanchang between 2018 and 2021. Patients were categorized based on BMI (<25, 25 to < 30, ≥ 30 kg/m²). Variables such as axillary lymph node dissection, infections, radiotherapy, and comorbidities were taken into account.

RESULTS

The incidence of BCRL was 23.4%. Higher BMI was associated with increased risk of BCRL, with significant incidence rates observed at 1, 2, and 3 years in the higher BMI groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed BMI as an independent risk factor for BCRL.

CONCLUSION

Elevated BMI is associated with increased BCRL risk and decreased BCRL-free survival, underscoring the significance of weight management in breast cancer care.

New insights in breast cancer-related lymphedema

Upper limb lymphedema after breast cancer treatment including axillary dissection occurs in almost 20% of women. Its treatment consists of complete decongestive physiotherapy based on low-stretch bandage to reduce volume, followed by elastic compression to maintain it. In this article, we will detail recent data on lymphedema risk factors with possible genetic predisposition, prevention (surgical, compression), manual lymphatic drainage, physical activity, weight, advice, and treatments including gene therapy.

The impact of obesity on chronic oedema/lymphoedema of the leg - an international multicenter cross-sectional study (LIMPRINT)

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Obesity and chronic oedema/lymphoedema are two distinct but related conditions, rarely investigated together. The aim was to study the impact of increased weight on chronic oedema and related factors.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

A cross-sectional study, 38 centers, nine countries. Patients with clinically confirmed chronic oedema/lymphoedema of the leg were included. Weight category was estimated as: normal weight (BMI 20-30), class I-II obesity (BMI 30-40), or class III obesity (BMI > 40). Factors were tested for an association with increased weight, using a multivariable model.

RESULTS

A total of 7397 patients were included; 43% with normal weight, 36% class I-II obesity and 21% class III obesity. Increased weight was associated with more advanced stages of chronic oedema (ISL stage III; the most advanced form); affecting 14% in normal weight, 18% class I-II obesity and 39% class III obesity (p < 0.001). Ten factors were independently associated with increased weight: diabetes (OR 2.4), secondary lymphoedema (OR 2.7), cellulitis/erysipelas within 12 months (OR 1.2), bilateral lymphoedema (OR 3.6), compression therapy (OR 2.1), increased swelling duration (1-2 years OR 1.3, 2-5 years OR 2.5, 5-10 years OR 3.6, >10 years OR 3.5) decreased mobility (walking with aid OR 1.9, being chair bound OR 1.2) and age (reference<45 years; 45-64 years OR 1.5, 75-84 years OR 0.6, 85+ years OR 0.2). Increased weight was associated with a lower presentation of peripheral arterial disease (OR 0.7) and poorer chronic oedema control (OR 0.8). Patients with obesity had lower function, appearance and more severe symptoms (LYMQOL) and lower quality of life (EuroQol).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity negatively impacts chronic oedema, leading to more advanced stages. Achieving good control of swelling with compression is more difficult in these patients. Increased awareness of chronic oedema/lymphoedema as a complication of obesity is important for early detection and for developing effective strategies to prevent and manage them.

[Update of indications and techniques for the management of lymphedema after breast cancer surgery]

OBJECTIVES

Upper limb lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment is the leading cause of lymphedema in France. Despite improved surgical practices and de-escalation of radiotherapy, the risk of lymphedema after breast cancer still affects 5-20% of patients, with this variation depending on the measurement method used and the population studied. Lymphedema has a negative impact on quality of life and body image, and their possible occurrence remains a major concern for all women treated for breast cancer. The Sénologie Commission of the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) asked four specialists in breast surgery or lymphology to prepare a summary on the prevention, medical and surgical management of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment, and to discuss the medical and surgical innovations currently being evaluated.

METHODS

This synthesis was based on national and international guidelines on the management of upper limb lymphedema after breast surgery and a recent review of the literature focusing on the years 2020-2023.

RESULTS

From a preventive point of view, the restrictive instructions imposed for a long time (reduction in physical activity or the carrying of loads, air travel, exposure to the sun or cold, etc.) have altered patients' quality of life and should no longer be recommended. A good understanding of risk factors enables us to target preventive actions. Examples include obesity, a sedentary lifestyle, axillary clearance, radiotherapy of the axillary fossa in addition to axillary clearance, total mastectomy, taxanes or anti-HER-2 therapies in the adjuvant phase. Resumption of physical activity, minimally invasive axillary surgery, de-escalation of radiotherapy and breast-conserving surgical procedures have all demonstrated their preventive value. When lymphedema does occur, early management, through complete decongestive physiotherapy, can help reduce its volume and prevent its long-term worsening.

CONCLUSION

Surgical (lymph node transplants, lympho-vascular anastomoses) and medical (prolymphangiogenic growth factors) approaches to lymphedema treatment are numerous, but require long-term evaluation of their efficacy and adverse effects.

Effects of Functional and Nutraceutical Foods in the Context of the Mediterranean Diet in Patients Diagnosed with Breast Cancer

Several studies report that breast cancer survivors (BCS) tend to have a poor diet, as fruit, vegetable, and legume consumption is often reduced, resulting in a decreased intake of nutraceuticals. Moreover, weight gain has been commonly described among BCS during treatment, increasing recurrence rate and mortality. Improving lifestyle and nutrition after the diagnosis of BC may have important benefits on patients' general health and on specific clinical outcomes. The Mediterranean diet (MD), known for its multiple beneficial effects on health, can be considered a nutritional pool comprising several nutraceuticals: bioactive compounds and foods with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. Recent scientific advances have led to the identification of nutraceuticals that could amplify the benefits of the MD and favorably influence gene expression in these patients. Nutraceuticals could have beneficial effects in the postdiagnostic phase of BC, including helping to mitigate the adverse effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Moreover, the MD could be a valid and easy-to-follow option for managing excess weight. The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the recent scientific literature on the possible beneficial effects of consuming functional and nutraceutical foods in the framework of MD in BCS.

Effectiveness of physical exercise programmes in reducing complications associated with secondary lymphoedema to breast cancer: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) is one of the most underestimated and debilitating complications associated with the treatment that women with breast cancer receive. Several systematic reviews (SRs) of different physical exercise programmes have been published, presenting disperse and contradictory clinical results. Therefore, there is a need for access to the best available and summarised evidence to capture and evaluate all the physical exercise programmes that focus on reducing BCRL.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of different physical exercise programmes in reducing the volume of lymphoedema, pain intensity and improving quality of life.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

The protocol of this overview is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols, and its methodology is based on Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Only those SRs involving physical exercise by patients with BCRL will be included, whether on its own or combined with other exercises or other physical therapy interventions.The outcomes of interest to be considered will be lymphoedema volume, quality of life, pain intensity, grip strength, range of motion, upper limb function and any adverse event. The MEDLINE/PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, PEDro and Embase databases will be searched for reports published from database inception to April 2023.Two researchers will perform study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment independently. Any discrepancy will be resolved by consensus, or ultimately, by a third-party reviewer. We will use Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System to assess the overall quality of the body of evidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The results of this overview will be published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals and the scientific dissemination will take place in national or international conferences. This study does not require approval from an ethics committee, as it does not directly collect information from patients.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022334433.

Body mass index increases the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema at 6-18 months after surgery: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is an incurable complication occurring after breast cancer treatment. The influence of obesity/overweight on the development of BCRL at different points after surgery was seldom verified. We aimed to determine the cut-off BMI/weight value associated with an increased risk of BCRL at different postoperative time in Chinese breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

Patients who underwent breast surgery plus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were retrospectively evaluated. Disease and treatment characteristics of participants were collected. BCRL was diagnosed by circumference measurements. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship of lymphedema risk with BMI/weight and other disease- and treatment-related factors.

RESULTS

518 patients were included. Lymphedema occurred more frequently among breast cancer patients with preoperative BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² (37.88%) than among those with preoperative BMI < 25 kg/m²(23.32%), with significant differences at 6-12 and 12-18 months after surgery (χ² = 23.183, P = 0.000; χ² = 5.279, P = 0.022). By multivariable logistics analysis, preoperative BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² presented a significantly greater risk of lymphedema than a preoperative BMI < 25 kg/m² (OR [95% CI] = 2.928 [1.565, 5.480]). Other factors, including radiation (breast/chest wall + axilla vs. none: OR [95% CI] = 3.723[2.271-6.104]), was an independent risk factor for lymphedema.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative obesity was an independent risk factor for BCRL in Chinese breast cancer survivors, and a preoperative BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² indicated greater likelihood of lymphedema development within 6-18 months postoperatively.

Adipose Tissue in Lymphedema: A Central Feature of Pathology and Target for Pharmacologic Therapy

Lymphedema is a chronic condition of impaired lymphatic flow that results in limb swelling and debilitation. The pathophysiology of lymphedema is characterized by lymphatic stasis that triggers inflammation, fibrosis, and adipose tissue deposition in the extremities. Most often, this condition occurs in cancer survivors in the years after treatment with combinations of surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy, with the major risk factor being lymph node dissection. Interestingly, obesity and body mass index are independent risk factors for development of lymphedema, suggesting interactions between adipose and lymphatic tissue biology. Currently, treatment of lymphedema involves palliative approaches, including compression garments and physical therapy, and surgical approaches, including liposuction, lymphovenous bypass, and vascularized lymph node transfer. Emerging lymphedema therapies that focus on weight loss or reducing inflammation have been tested in recent clinical trials, yielding mixed results with no effect on limb volumes or changes in bioimpedance measurements. These studies highlight the need for novel therapeutic strategies that target the driving forces of lymphedema. In this light, animal models of lymphedema demonstrate a role of adipose tissue in the progression of lymphedema and suggest these processes may be targeted in the treatment of lymphedema. Herein, we review both conventional and experimental therapies for lymphedema as well as the defining characteristics of its pathophysiology. We place emphasis on the aberrant fibroadipose tissue accumulation in lymphedema and propose a new approach to experimental treatment at the level of adipocyte metabolism.

Breast cancer-related lymphoedema: Risk factors and prediction model

AIMS

To identify the risk factors for lymphoedema following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in a European sample and to propose a lymphoedema prediction model for this population.

DESIGN

Predictive retrospective cohort study comparing women who developed lymphoedema in 2 years of undergoing ALND with those who did not developed lymphoedema.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical records of 504 women who, between January 2008 and May 2018, underwent surgery for breast cancer that involved ALND. Logistic regression was used to identify significant risk factors for lymphoedema. The prediction accuracy of the model was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Of the 504 women whose records were analysed, 156 developed lymphoedema. Significant predictors identified in the regression model were level of lymph node dissection, lymph node status, post-operative complications, body mass index (BMI) and number of lymph nodes extracted. The prediction model showed good sensitivity (80%) in the study population.

CONCLUSIONS

The factor contributing most to the risk of lymphoedema was the level of lymph node dissection, and the only patient-related factor in the prediction model was BMI. The model offers good predictive capacity in this population and it is a simple tool that breast care units could use to assess the risk of lymphoedema following ALND. Nurses with specialist knowledge of lymphoedema have a key role to play in ensuring that women receive holistic and individualized care.

IMPACT

What problem did the study address? Secondary lymphoedema is one of the main complications in the treatment of breast cancer. What were the main findings? The prediction model included five factors associated with the risk of lymphoedema following ALND. The strongest predictor was the level of lymph node dissection, and the only patient-related factor was BMI. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The prediction model offers breast care units a tool for assessing the risk of lymphoedema in women undergoing surgery involving ALND. The results highlight the importance of weight reduction as a preventive measure and support a more conservative surgical approach.

Cellulitis risk factors for patients with primary or secondary lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Limb lymphedema is a chronic disease with primary and secondary forms, with the latter occurring essentially after cancer treatment. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed the cellulitis frequency and its associated risk factors for patients with primary or secondary limb lymphedema.

METHODS

Information from all 1991 patients referred to a specialized lymphedema center from January to June 2018 was collected, including previous cellulitis episodes and the clinical and lymphedema characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 1846 patients whose information could be analyzed, 695 (37.6%) had experienced one or more cellulitis episodes, and 23.3% had had recurrent cellulitis. Cellulitis occurred in 39.5%, 30.5%, and 38.6% (P = .02) of the patients with secondary upper limb, secondary lower limb, and primary lower limb lymphedema, respectively. The corresponding duration of lymphedema was 106.5, 97, and 243.1 months. For secondary upper limb lymphedema, a long interval from lymphedema onset to the first consultation at our specialized center, younger age at lymphedema onset, and the use of radiotherapy were independently associated with cellulitis. However, axillary lymph node excision, the use of chemotherapy, and segmentation of the upper limb lymphedema were not associated with cellulitis. A longer interval from lymphedema onset to the first consultation and lymph node excision were associated with cellulitis in those with lower limb secondary lymphedema but higher body mass index and younger age at lymphedema onset were not. For primary lower limb lymphedema, male sex, greater body mass index, and younger age at lymphedema onset were associated with cellulitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Different risk factors for cellulitis were identified for patients with lymphedema at risk. Awareness of those factors is important for physicians to recognize lymphedema promptly and refer patients to specialized centers to optimize treatment.