Breast cancer survival in Brazil: How much health care access impact on cancer outcomes?

Temporal Variation of Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Real-World Experience From 2000 to 2014

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported a higher prevalence of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in US Hispanic/Latina populations. However, survival outcomes and treatment approaches over time in Latin American females are scarcely reported. We aimed to evaluate the temporal variation in treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) outcomes of females with TNBC according to cancer stage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study on 1840 females from 2000 to 2014. Patients were classified in 3 calendar periods (2000-2004, 2005-2009, and 2010-2014). The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable regression analyses were employed.

RESULTS

Stage III cancer was identified in half of the population. Five-year OS estimates for cancer stages I, II, and IV remained unchanged across all calendar periods. However, we found worsening 5-year OS estimates in stage III females (49% in 2000-2004 and 31% in 2010-2014; P < .001). Despite increased uptake of overall use of neoadjuvant therapy in stage III females, the time from diagnosis to treatment initiation (P = .013) and time to complete the planned cycles (P < .001) increased over time. Fifty-sex percent of stage IV patients were untreated. Females aged ≥70 years were less likely to receive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival estimates were lower than those reported in high-income countries. Most females were diagnosed with advanced disease, and the OS for stage III females worsened over time. Our outcomes show difficulties in delivering timely neoadjuvant therapy in an overwhelmed healthcare system. Public health authorities should improve screening practices, develop regional clinical guidelines, and expand trial enrollment.

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Among Latin American Adolescents and Young Adults Compared to Middle-Aged and Elder Females: A Cohort Analysis Over 15 Years

Purpose: Outcomes of females with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are rarely explored in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). We compared clinical and survival outcomes of Latin American AYAs (≤39 years) with middle-aged (40-59 years) and older (≥60 years) females with TNBC by cancer stage. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study among treated females with cancer stages I-III diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 in Peru. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Time-to-event methods were used for analyses. Results: Of 1582 females with TNBC, 350 (22%) were AYAs, 887 (56%) were middle-aged, and 345 (22%) were older women. Tumor size >5 cm, histological grade III, and brain metastasis were more common features in AYAs. AYAs were treated more frequently with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 102 months, the 5-year OS/EFS for AYAs was 55%/53%, similar to middle-aged (54%/49%) and older females (56%/51%). AYAs were not at higher risk for decreased OS or EFS in the multivariable Cox analysis. Our findings remained consistent by cancer stage. Conclusion: Although Latin American AYAs with TNBC have more aggressive clinical features at diagnosis, survival outcomes were comparable with middle-aged and older women with TNBC, suggesting that age is not a risk factor for worse survival outcomes if treatment is given according to cancer stage. Our findings should be interpreted with caution given the lack of information on certain covariates such as comorbidities. Strategies for early detection in primary care and prompt referral for treatment initiation should be developed.

Deep inspiration breath hold: dosimetric benefits to decrease cardiac dose during postoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer patients

Background

Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is the standard treatment for almost all patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Even with modern RT techniques, parts of the heart may still receive higher doses than those recommended by clinically validated dose limit restrictions, especially when the left breast is irradiated. Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) may reduce irradiated cardiac volume compared to free breathing (FB) treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric impact on the heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in FB and DIBH RT planning in patients with left breast cancer.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with left-sided breast cancer submitted to breast surgery followed by postoperative RT from 2015 to 2019. All patients were planned with FB and DIBH and hypofractionated dose prescription (40.05 Gy in 15 fractions).

Results

68 patients were included in the study. For the coverage of the planned target volume evaluation [planning target volume (PTV) eval] there was no significant difference between the DIBH versus FB planning. For the heart and LAD parameters, all constraints evaluated favored DIBH planning, with statistical significance. Regarding the heart, median V16.8 Gy was 2.56% in FB vs. 0% in DIBH (p < 0.001); median V8.8 Gy was 3.47% in FB vs. 0% in DIBH (p < 0.001) and the median of mean heart dose was 1.97 Gy in FB vs. 0.92 Gy in DIBH (p < 0.001). For the LAD constraints D2% < 42 Gy, the median dose was 34.87 Gy in FB versus 5.8 Gy in DIBH (p < 0.001); V16.8 Gy < 10%, the median was 15.87% in FB versus 0% in DIBH (p < 0.001) and the median of mean LAD dose was 8.13Gy in FB versus 2.92Gy in DIBH (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The DIBH technique has consistently demonstrated a significant dose reduction in the heart and LAD in all evaluated constraints, while keeping the same dose coverage in the PTV eval.

Postdiagnosis body fatness, weight change and breast cancer prognosis: Global Cancer Update Program (CUP global) systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Previous evidence on postdiagnosis body fatness and mortality after breast cancer was graded as limited-suggestive. To evaluate the evidence on body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-hip-ratio and weight change in relation to breast cancer prognosis, an updated systematic review was conducted. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant studies published up to 31 October, 2021. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate summary relative risks (RRs). The evidence was judged by an independent Expert Panel using pre-defined grading criteria. One randomized controlled trial and 225 observational studies were reviewed (220 publications). There was strong evidence (likelihood of causality: probable) that higher postdiagnosis BMI was associated with increased all-cause mortality (64 studies, 32 507 deaths), breast cancer-specific mortality (39 studies, 14 106 deaths) and second primary breast cancer (11 studies, 5248 events). The respective summary RRs and 95% confidence intervals per 5 kg/m2 BMI were 1.07 (1.05-1.10), 1.10 (1.06-1.14) and 1.14 (1.04-1.26), with high between-study heterogeneity (I2  = 56%, 60%, 66%), but generally consistent positive associations. Positive associations were also observed for waist circumference, waist-hip-ratio and all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality. There was limited-suggestive evidence that postdiagnosis BMI was associated with higher risk of recurrence, nonbreast cancer deaths and cardiovascular deaths. The evidence for postdiagnosis (unexplained) weight or BMI change and all outcomes was graded as limited-no conclusion. The RCT showed potential beneficial effect of intentional weight loss on disease-free-survival, but more intervention trials and well-designed observational studies in diverse populations are needed to elucidate the impact of body composition and their changes on breast cancer outcomes.

Fighting Cancer around the World: A Framework for Action

Tackling cancer is a major challenge right on the global level. Europe is only the tip of an iceberg of cancer around the world. Prosperous developed countries share the same problems besetting Europe-and the countries and regions with fewer resources and less propitious conditions are in many cases struggling often heroically against a growing tide of disease. This paper offers a view on these geographically wider, but essentially similar, challenges, and on the prospects for and barriers to better results in this ceaseless battle. A series of panels have been organized by the European Alliance for Personalised Medicine (EAPM) to identify different aspects of cancer care around the globe. There is significant diversity in key issues such as NGS, RWE, molecular diagnostics, and reimbursement in different regions. In all, it leads to disparities in access and diagnostics, patients' engagement, and efforts for a better understanding of cancer.

Stakeholders' Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Care Quality for Women With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The considerable growth in the number of patients with breast cancer leads to substantial pressure on healthcare services; however, the main measures that will evaluate what is important to the key stakeholders in improving the quality of breast cancer care are not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to synthesize providers' and patients' experiences and perspectives regarding barriers and quality breast cancer care in health services.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched, and articles published in English up to August 2020 were screened. Two reviewers independently screened all articles. Data were obtained directly from different stakeholder groups including patients, health providers, and professionals.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 21 eligible articles that met inclusion criteria and reported perspectives of 847 health providers and 24 601 patients regarding healthcare quality. Health providers and patients with breast cancer noted information needs, psychosocial support, responsibility for care, and coordination of care as important quality improvement characteristics of the healthcare system.

CONCLUSION

Shifting to high-quality breast cancer care would likely be a complicated process, and there is a need for the cancer care services to consider important characteristics of quality cancer care as a care priority, that is, to be responsive.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Breast cancer survivorship care programs and interventions may need to consider the barriers or common challenges to care noted in this review, especially regarding information sharing and the need for social support and care cooperation.

Modelo de regresión de Cox para análisis de supervivencia en pacientes con cáncer de mama en la provincia de Manabí, Ecuador

El cáncer de mama es un problema de salud pública, que ha venido incrementándose, ubicándose como el cáncer de mayor incidencia en las mujeres, su repercusión en la población en general ocupaba el segundo lugar a nivel mundial, siendo la neoplasia maligna más frecuente en la población femenina y en relación a los decesos por cáncer y afecta con más frecuencia a los países del primer mundo y en vías de desarrollo. Estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo realizado a pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer de mama en el Hospital Oncológico de Manabí, Ecuador. La supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad a seis años se estableció a partir del tiempo trascurrido desde el diagnóstico hasta la ocurrencia de un evento o fecha del último contacto, con límite a diciembre de 2015. De los 403 pacientes, los límites de edad fueron 15 y 90 años, con media de 56.08 años. Se considero el tamaño del tumor, donde (T1) representa el 26.55%, (T2) representaron 45.66%, la supervivencia global fue de 80% a 6 años. Los pacientes en etapas avanzadas tuvieron menores probabilidades de supervivir con un porcentaje del 43%. Con el modelo de regresión de Cox, fue posible demostrar asociación estadísticamente significativa entre el tamaño del tumor y la supervivencia. El estudio demuestra que los pacientes en etapas avanzadas tienen menores probabilidades de supervivir, por lo que es imperativo que se continúen esfuerzos en promoción de la salud hasta conseguir que la detección sea en etapas curables.

Breast imaging hindered during covid-19 pandemic, in Brazil

OBJECTIVE

To report the decrease in breast imaging after covid-19 pandemic, obtaining the number of mammograms performed in 2019 and 2020. Additionally, to investigate if there was an increase in the proportion of women undergoing mammography for diagnostic purposes, with palpable lesions.

METHOD

This is a cross-sectional study, based on the number of mammograms performed by the Brazilian public health services, provided by DATASUS, an open access database. Mammograms from private institutions were not included. This study compares the number of mammograms performed in 2019 and 2020, in women aged 50-69 years, stratified by month, in each federal state, and the presence of palpable lumps (physician-reported).

RESULTS

In total, 1,948,471 mammograms were performed in 2019 and 1,126,688 in 2020, for the population studied. These values represent a 42% decline. Monthly, a significant decreased is observed after April 2020. The results varied slightly according to federal state; yet the entire country was affected. Rondônia was the most affected state, with 67% decline. The proportion of women presenting palpable lumps increased from 7.06% on average in 2019 to 7.94% in 2020 (OR = 1.135, 95%CI 1.125-1.145, p = 0,001).

DISCUSSION

The number of mammograms performed in 2020 declined considerably. Out of the women who presented for mammogram, the proportion of palpable lumps was significantly higher in 2020. Considering the detection rate of digital mammography, the loss of 800,000 exams means 4,000 undiagnosed breast cancer cases, by the end of 2020.