1
|
Lohfeld L, Sharma M, Bennett D, Gavin A, Hawkins ST, Irwin G, Mitchell H, O'Neill S, McShane CM. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer patient pathways and outcomes in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland - a scoping review. Br J Cancer 2024; 131:619-626. [PMID: 38704477 PMCID: PMC11333579 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02703-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic brought unplanned service disruption for breast cancer diagnostic, treatment and support services. This scoping review describes these changes and their impact in the UK and the Republic of Ireland based on studies published between January 2020 and August 2023. Thirty-four of 569 papers were included. Data were extracted and results thematically organized. Findings include fewer new cases; stage shift (fewer early- and more late-stage disease); and changes to healthcare organization, breast screening and treatment. Examples are accepting fewer referrals, applying stricter referral criteria and relying more on virtual consultations and multi-disciplinary meetings. Screening service programs paused during the pandemic before enacting risk-based phased restarts with longer appointment times to accommodate reduced staffing numbers and enhanced infection-control regimes. Treatments shifted from predominantly conventional to hypofractionated radiotherapy, fewer surgical procedures and increased use of bridging endocrine therapy. The long-term impact of such changes are unknown so definitive guidelines for future emergencies are not yet available. Cancer registries, with their large sample sizes and population coverage, are well placed to monitor changes to stage and survival despite difficulties obtaining definitive staging during diagnosis because surgery and pathological assessments are delayed. Multisite longitudinal studies can also provide guidance for future disaster preparedness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne Lohfeld
- Queen's University Belfast, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Royal Victoria Hospital, 247 Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland, UK.
| | - Meenakshi Sharma
- Queen's University Belfast, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Royal Victoria Hospital, 247 Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Damien Bennett
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6DP, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Anna Gavin
- Queen's University Belfast, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Royal Victoria Hospital, 247 Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland, UK
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6DP, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Sinéad T Hawkins
- Queen's University Belfast, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Royal Victoria Hospital, 247 Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland, UK
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6DP, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Gareth Irwin
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, 51 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Helen Mitchell
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6DP, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Siobhan O'Neill
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, 51 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Charlene M McShane
- Queen's University Belfast, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Royal Victoria Hospital, 247 Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Radomyski P, Trojanowski M, Michalek IM, Kycler W. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical staging, pathological staging and surgical management of breast cancer patients. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2024; 29:122-130. [PMID: 39165593 PMCID: PMC11333074 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.99357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This study analyzes the impact of the first six lockdown months during the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer (BC) patients at a regional cancer center in western Poland (Greater Poland region). Materials and methods Patient age, clinical stage, pathological stage, surgical management, and use of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) for patients diagnosed with BC during the pandemic (March-August 2020, n = 290) were compared with pre-COVID-19 data (March-August 2019, n = 405). Results There were statistically significant differences in the average age (58.2 pre-COVID-19 vs. 55.9 during COVID-19, p = 0.014), clinical stage (p = 0.017) with a stage shift (stage I being dominant pre-pandemic, stage II during the pandemic). Additionally, when comparing the 2019 and 2020 groups, there were statistically significant differences in clinically node-positive cases (27% vs. 37%, p = 0.007), pathologically node-positive cases (26% vs. 34%, p = 0.014), and NT use (27% vs. 43%, p = 0.001). Moreover, there was a notable increase in the prevalence of mastectomies from 44% to 53% (p = 0.017) and axillary lymph node dissections from 27% to 33% (p = 0.029). Conclusions The first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic had a discernible impact on BC patients in the Greater Poland region. Changes in patient age, clinical stage, pathological stage, and treatment approach were observed during this period. These findings underscore the importance of further research and adaptations in healthcare delivery to address the evolving needs of BC patients during times of crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Radomyski
- Radiology Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
- Electroradiology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Maciej Trojanowski
- Greater Poland Cancer Registry, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Irmina Maria Michalek
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCI), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Witold Kycler
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marty S, Lamé G, Guével E, Priou S, Chatellier G, Tournigand C, Kempf E. Impact of the Sars-Cov-2 outbreak on the initial clinical presentation of new solid cancer diagnoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:143. [PMID: 38287348 PMCID: PMC10823607 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11795-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic might have delayed cancer diagnosis and management. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the initial tumor stage of new cancer diagnoses before and after the pandemic. METHODS We systematically reviewed articles that compared the tumor stage of new solid cancer diagnoses before and after the initial pandemic waves. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to compare the rate of metastatic tumors and the distribution of stages at diagnosis. Subgroup analyses were performed by primary tumor site and by country. RESULTS From 2,013 studies published between January 2020 and April 2022, we included 58 studies with 109,996 patients. The rate of metastatic tumors was higher after the COVID-19 outbreak than before (pooled OR: 1.29 (95% CI, 1.06-1.57), I2: 89% (95% CI, 86-91)). For specific cancers, common ORs reached statistical significance for breast (OR: 1.51 (95% CI 1.07-2.12)) and gynecologic (OR: 1.51 (95% CI 1.04-2.18)) cancers, but not for other cancer types. According to countries, common OR (95% CI) reached statistical significance only for Italy: 1.55 (1.01-2.39) and Spain:1.14 (1.02-1.29). Rates were comparable for stage I-II versus III-IV in studies for which that information was available, and for stages I-II versus stage III in studies that did not include metastatic patients. CONCLUSIONS Despite inter-study heterogeneity, our meta-analysis showed a higher rate of metastatic tumors at diagnosis after the pandemic. The burden of social distancing policies might explain those results, as patients may have delayed seeking care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Marty
- Department of medical oncology, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 1 rue Gustave Eiffel, 94000, Créteil, France
| | - Guillaume Lamé
- Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Paris Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Etienne Guével
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Innovation and Data, IT Department, Paris, France
| | - Sonia Priou
- Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Paris Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Gilles Chatellier
- Department of medical informatics, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre-Université de Paris (APHP-CUP), Université de Paris, F-75015, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Department of medical oncology, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 1 rue Gustave Eiffel, 94000, Créteil, France
| | - Emmanuelle Kempf
- Department of medical oncology, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 1 rue Gustave Eiffel, 94000, Créteil, France.
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Myers C, Bennett K, Cahir C. Breast cancer care amidst a pandemic: a scoping review to understand the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on health services and health outcomes. Int J Qual Health Care 2023; 35:mzad048. [PMID: 37497806 PMCID: PMC10373113 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, health services for breast cancer (BC) have been disrupted. Our scoping review examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on BC services, health outcomes, and well-being for women. Additionally, this review identifies social inequalities specific to BC during the pandemic. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines, the literature search was conducted using scientific databases starting from March 2020 through November 2021. Studies were identified and selected by two researchers based on inclusion criteria, and the relevant data were extracted and charted to summarize the findings. Ninety-three articles were included in this review. Main themes included are as follows: (i) the impact of COVID-19 on BC services; (ii) the impact of COVID-19 on health outcomes and well-being in women with BC; and (iii) any variation in the impact of COVID-19 on BC by social determinants of health. There were apparent disruptions to BC services across the cancer continuum, especially screening services. Clinical repercussions were a result of such disruptions, and women with BC experienced worsened quality of life and psychosocial well-being. Finally, there were social inequalities dependent on social determinants of health such as age, race, insurance status, and region. Due to the disruption of BC services during the COVID-19 pandemic, women were impacted on their health and overall well-being. The variation in impact demonstrates how health inequities have been exacerbated during the pandemic. This comprehensive review will inform timely health-care changes to minimize long-term impacts of the pandemic and improve evidence-based multidisciplinary needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Myers
- School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Dublin D02 DH60, Ireland
| | - Kathleen Bennett
- Data Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Dublin D02 DH60, Ireland
| | - Caitriona Cahir
- Data Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Dublin D02 DH60, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Olimpiadi Y, Goldenberg AR, Postlewait L, Gillespie T, Arciero C, Styblo T, Cao Y, Switchenko JM, Rizzo M. Outcomes of the same-day discharge following mastectomy before, during and after COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:761-767. [PMID: 36621857 PMCID: PMC10874497 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The majority of patients undergoing mastectomy before the COVID-19 pandemic were admitted for 23-h observation to the hospital. Indications for observation included drain care education, pain control and observation for possible early surgical complications. This study compared the rates of outpatient mastectomy before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic and indirectly evaluated the safety of same-day discharge. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing mastectomy using Current Procedural Terminology code 19303. RESULTS A total of 357 patients were included: 113 were treated pre-COVID-19, 82 patients during COVID-19 and 162 post-COVID-19. The rate of outpatient mastectomies tripled during the pandemic from 17% to 51% (p < 0.001); after the pandemic remain high at 48%. The rate of bilateral mastectomies decreased during the pandemic to 30% from 48% prepandemic (p = 0.015). Pectoralis muscle block utilization increased during the COVID-19 period from 36% to 59% (p = 0.002). No difference in complication rates, including surgical site infections, hematomas, and readmissions, pre and during COVID. CONCLUSIONS The rate of outpatient mastectomy increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. During this timeframe, perioperative complications did not increase, suggesting the safety of this practice. After the pandemic, the rate of outpatient mastectomy continued to be significantly higher than pre-COVID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuliya Olimpiadi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Alison R. Goldenberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lauren Postlewait
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Theresa Gillespie
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Cletus Arciero
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Toncred Styblo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yicun Cao
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jeffrey M. Switchenko
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Monica Rizzo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Impact of COVID-19 on the Diagnosis and Surgical Care of Patients with Breast Cancer-a Retrospective Observational Cohort Study from Kerala, South India. Indian J Surg Oncol 2023; 14:6-10. [PMID: 35936988 PMCID: PMC9345015 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01610-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has strained the healthcare system worldwide. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and surgical care of patients with breast cancer in Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi. This is a single-centre retrospective observational cohort study conducted in a tertiary care institution intended to analyse the management of patients with breast cancer before and after the pandemic outbreak. The number of mammograms dropped from 3689 in the pre-pandemic phase to 1901 in the post-pandemic phase, whilst the number of core biopsies remained almost the same (391 before the pandemic and 367 after the pandemic). The number of new patients decreased by 57.7% (from 614 to 354). However, the number of breast cancer surgeries has remained almost the same (318 before the pandemic and 287 after the pandemic). The number of breast conservation surgeries dropped from 127 in 2019 to 93 in 2020 (p-value = 0.01). Conversely, 24 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 2019, and this number increased to 37 in 2020, representing a statistically significant increase (p = 0.04). Even during a pandemic, cancer care is possible with proper resource allocation and by adopting a multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
|
7
|
Prodhan AHMSU, Islam DZ, Khandker SS, Jamiruddin MR, Abdullah A, Godman B, Opanga S, Kumar S, Sharma P, Adnan N, Pisana A, Haque M. Breast Cancer Management in the Era of Covid-19; Key Issues, Contemporary Strategies, and Future Implications. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2023; 15:51-89. [PMID: 36733464 PMCID: PMC9888303 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s390296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, several priority diseases were not getting sufficient attention. Whilst breast cancer is a fatal disease affecting millions worldwide, identification and management of these patients did not initially attract critical attention to minimize the impact of lockdown, post-lockdown, and other measures. Breast cancer patients' conditions may not remain stable without proper care, worsening their prognosis. Proper care includes the timely instigation of surgery, systemic therapy, and psychological support. This includes low-and middle-income countries where there are already concerns with available personnel and medicines to adequately identify and treat these patients. Consequently, there was a need to summarize the current scenario regarding managing breast cancer care during COVID-19 across all countries, including any guidelines developed. We systematically searched three scientific databases and found 76 eligible articles covering the medical strategies of high-income countries versus LMICs. Typically, diagnostic facilities in hospitals were affected at the beginning of the pandemic following the lockdown and other measures. This resulted in more advanced-stage cancers being detected at initial presentation across countries, negatively impacting patient outcomes. Other than increased telemedicine, instigating neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy more often, reducing non-essential visits, and increasing the application of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy to meet the challenges, encouragingly, there was no other significant difference among patients in high-income versus LMICs. Numerous guidelines regarding patient management evolved during the pandemic to address the challenges posed by lockdowns and other measures, which were subsequently adopted by various high-income countries and LMICs to improve patient care. The psychological impact of COVID-19 and associated lockdown measures, especially during the peak of COVID-19 waves, and the subsequent effect on the patient's mental health must also be considered in this high-priority group. We will continue to monitor the situation to provide direction in future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dewan Zubaer Islam
- Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh
| | - Shahad Saif Khandker
- Department of Biochemistry, Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical College, Dhaka, 1344, Bangladesh
| | | | - Adnan Abdullah
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia
| | - Brian Godman
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK,Centre of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates,Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa, South Africa
| | - Sylvia Opanga
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Santosh Kumar
- Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
| | - Paras Sharma
- Department of Pharmacognosy, BVM College of Pharmacy, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, 474006, India
| | - Nihad Adnan
- Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh,Correspondence: Nihad Adnan, Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh, Email ;Mainul Haque, The Unit of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, Universiti Pertahanan, Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kem Perdana Sugai Besi, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia, Tel +60109265543, Email
| | - Alice Pisana
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mainul Haque
- The Unit of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, Universiti Pertahanan, Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Petropoulou Z, Arkadopoulos N, Michalopoulos NV. Breast Cancer and COVID-19: Challenges in Surgical Management. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5360. [PMID: 36358779 PMCID: PMC9653580 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The harsh healthcare reality imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in wide clinical practice alterations, postponements, and shortages, affecting both patients and caregivers. Breast-cancer management, from diagnosis to treatment and follow up, was a field that did not escape such changes, facing a challenging set of obstacles in order to maintain adequate cancer care services while diminishing viral spread among patients and personnel. In this review article, we discuss the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on several aspects of breast-cancer management, and the subsequent modifications adopted by clinicians, scientific groups, and governments as a response to the novel conditions. Screening and diagnosis, as well as breast-cancer treatment paths-especially surgical interventions-were the most affected domains, while patients' psychological burden also emerged as a notable consequence. The aftermath of diagnostic and surgical delays is yet to be assessed, while the treatment alterations and the introduction of new therapeutic schemes might signify the opening of a novel era in breast-cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Petropoulou
- 4th Department of Surgery, Medical School, “Attikon” University Hospital, University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Farsi Y, Shojaeian F, Ahmad Safavi-naini SA, Honarvar M, Mohammadzadeh B, Nasiri MJ. The comparison of Post-Operative Complications pre Covid era versus during Covid-Era based on Clavien-Dindo-classification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. [DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.25.22271519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2024]
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionCoronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID -19) pandemic challenged the healthcare system drastically, and it was concomitant with a remarkable decline in surgeries and modified routine care of patients worldwide. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the surgical complications before COVID -19 (Pre-COVID) and after COVID -19 (post-COVID) appearance using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC).Methodsbetween January 1, 2019, to November 3, 2021, we performed a comprehensive search in PubMed/Medline and Scopus for studies reporting the postoperative complications based on/transformable to CDC.ResultFrom 909 screened articles, 34 studies were included for systematic review. Among included articles, 11 were eligible for meta-analysis. Nineteen thousand one hundred thirty-seven patients (pre-COVID: 3522, post-COVID: 15615) were included, mostly undergoing elective surgeries (86.32%). According to CDC classification, there were no significant change between pre-COVID and post-COVID for grade 1 (Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95-CI): 0.99, 0.60-1.63, p=0.96), grade 2 (OR and 95-CI: 0.65, 0.42-1.01, p = 0.055), grade 3 (OR and 95-CI: 0.86, 0.48-1.57, p=0.64), grade 4 (OR and 95-CI: 0.85, 0.46-1.57, p =0.60). However, the postoperative mortality was lower before the COVID -19 outbreak (OR and 95-CI: 0.51, 0.27-0.95, p= 0.035). The included studies for systematic review and meta-analysis had a low risk of bias and unsignificant publication bias.ConclusionAlthough delivering routine surgery was challenging, the postoperative complications during the pandemic remained identical to the pre-pandemic era. The stricter patient selection tending to choose more critical states and more advanced clinical stages of the operated patients may explain some extent of higher mortality during the pandemic. Adopting preventive strategies helped deliver surgeries during the outbreak of COVID -19 while limiting the capacity of operations and admissions.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ngandu NK, Mmotsa TM, Dassaye R, Thabetha A, Odendaal W, Langdown N, Ndwandwe D. Hospital acquired COVID-19 infections amongst patients before the rollout of COVID-19 vaccinations, a scoping review. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:140. [PMID: 35144556 PMCID: PMC8830001 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07128-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hospital settings are at increased risk of spreading Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections, hence non-pharmaceutical prevention interventions (NPPIs) and prioritized vaccination of healthcare workers and resident patients are critical. The status of COVID-19 hospital acquired infections (HAIs) in low-income settings is unclear. We aimed to identify and summarize the existing evidence on COVID-19 HAIs amongst patients, prior to the rollout of vaccines in countries worldwide. Methods We conducted a scoping review of English peer-reviewed literature in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus using a combination of selected search terms. Full texts articles presenting results on COVID-19 HAIs in hospitalised patients before the rollout of vaccines in countries worldwide were eligible. Data extracted from eligible articles included estimates of COVID-19 HAIs, country, and type of hospital setting, and was summarized narratively. Quality assessment of included articles was not possible. Results Literature searches generated a total of 5920 articles, and 45 were eligible for analysis. Eligible articles were from Europe, North America, Asia, and Brazil and none were from low-income countries. The proportion of COVID-19 HAIs ranged from 0% when strict NPPIs were applied, to 65% otherwise. The estimates of COVID-19 HAIs did not differ by country but were lower in studies conducted after implementation of NPPIs and in specialized hospital settings for operative surgery. Studies conducted before the implementation of NPPIs or in long-term care and psychiatric wards often reported high estimates of HAI. Although there was no clear trend in general wards, those situated in academic hospitals managed to reduce HAI rates under strict NPPI protocols. Operative surgery settings, unlike psychiatric settings, effectively prevented COVID-19 HAI using tailored NPPIs. Conclusion The available evidence shows a high risk of COVID-19 HAIs, the feasibility of preventing HAIs in different healthcare settings and the importance of appropriately tailored NPPIs. There were no data from low-income settings, therefore, it is unclear whether the reported NPPI approaches could be equally effective elsewhere. We recommend routine monitoring of COVID-19 HAIs in countries with low vaccination coverage, to identify and close gaps in NPPIs and understand gains made from vaccinating healthcare workers and hospitalized patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07128-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobubelo K Ngandu
- HIV Prevention Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Tshiamo M Mmotsa
- HIV Prevention Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Reshmi Dassaye
- HIV Prevention Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alice Thabetha
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Willem Odendaal
- HIV Prevention Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Natasha Langdown
- Knowledge and Information Management Services, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Duduzile Ndwandwe
- Cochrane, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Arikan AE, Kara H, Dülgeroğlu O, Uras C. Breast Surgery can be Performed Safely During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis. ISTANBUL MEDICAL JOURNAL 2022. [DOI: 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.28582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
|
12
|
Kara H, Arikan AE, Dulgeroglu O, Tutar B, Tokat F, Uras C. Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Affected Breast Cancer Stage and Surgical Volume? Front Surg 2022; 9:811108. [PMID: 35198597 PMCID: PMC8859320 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.811108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study investigates the effects of COVID-19 on the breast cancer stage and the volume of breast cancer surgery in a specialized breast institute. Methods Data of 332 patients who were diagnosed and treated for breast cancer between December 2019 and November 2020 were evaluated retrospectively according to periods of pandemic. Results A significant decrease in the number of operations, especially upfront surgeries rather than surgeries after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, was detected in the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic. It was found that patients with complaints were mostly admitted during this period (p = 0.024). No statistical significance was found for age, sex, side of the tumor, type of tumor, surgery to breast, and axilla. Following the early period of the pandemic, it was observed that patients with mostly luminal, early-stage, and less axillary nodal involvement (p < 0.05) were admitted, and as a result, it was founded that upfront surgeries increased, although no change in TNM staging was observed. However, it did affect the decision of initial treatment. Thus, the number of upfront surgeries was significantly higher than the NCT group (p = 0.027) following the early period. Conclusion Surgical volume is significantly affected in the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic. To overcome overload due to delayed surgeries related to pandemics, some hospitals should be spared for oncological treatments. Following the early period, mostly luminal type, early-stage patients were admitted, probably because of increased self-awareness and short wave duration, but the breast cancer stage was not affected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halil Kara
- Vocational School of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of General Senology, Research Institute of Senology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Akif Enes Arikan
- Department of General Senology, Research Institute of Senology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
- *Correspondence: Akif Enes Arikan
| | - Onur Dulgeroglu
- Vocational School of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of General Senology, Research Institute of Senology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Burcin Tutar
- Department of Radiology, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fatma Tokat
- Department of General Senology, Research Institute of Senology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cihan Uras
- Department of General Senology, Research Institute of Senology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kim YI, Park IJ. Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations. Ann Surg Treat Res 2022; 102:295-305. [PMID: 35800996 PMCID: PMC9204020 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2022.102.6.295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The impacts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been globally paradigm shifting in all aspects. Surgeons have experienced unprecedented changes regarding operation schedules, preparations before surgery, and the precautions needed both during and after surgery. Many medical centers simultaneously reported a decrease in their numbers of surgeries, whether they were elective or emergent, or for cancerous or benign resections. However, accumulated surgical outcomes from the last 2 years of experience presented postoperative morbidity and mortality data that were comparable to the pre-pandemic era, whether in elective or urgent settings. Although COVID-19 showed a significant association with postoperative morbidity and mortality, the majority of noninfected patients could be treated successfully with stringent mitigation protocols. Initially recommended to be avoided at the start of the pandemic, minimally invasive surgery seems to be safe and feasible according to reported surgical outcomes. Numerous sets of guidelines have now been produced from medical societies and adhering to the basic precautions has been found to be practicable. It is crucial that health care systems and surgical staff remain vigilant and attentive to the ever-changing situation in this pandemic in order to provide optimal medical support to their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Il Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Ja Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Breast Reconstruction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3852. [PMID: 34584831 PMCID: PMC8460228 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic posed unique challenges for breast reconstruction. Many professional organizations initially placed restrictions on breast reconstruction, leading surgeons to conceive innovative protocols for offering breast reconstruction. This study reviewed the current evidence on breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide guidance for surgeons facing future crises. Methods The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for studies (1) describing implant and autologous breast reconstruction following mastectomy and (2) occurring during or pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Of the 1347 studies identified, 26 were included. Studies discussed type of reconstruction (18, 69%), complications (11, 42%), timing of reconstruction (10, 38%), protocols (10, 38%), COVID-19 screening (7, 27%), and length of hospital stay (7, 27%). The type of reconstruction varied depending on the stage of the pandemic: early on, autologous breast reconstruction was halted to preserve resources, but was later resumed. Within implant-based reconstruction, direct-to-implant was favored over serial tissue expansion. Several protocols were developed, with many emphasizing multidisciplinary collaborations for patient selection, use of specialized measures to reduce risk of COVID-19 transmission, and optimization of same-day discharge. Complication rates following breast reconstruction were similar to pre-pandemic rates. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has forever changed the landscape of breast reconstruction by raising important questions about delivery of care, cost, and resource utilization. The findings of this review may inform surgeons as they plan for similar future crises or strive for improved patient care and efficacy even during nonpandemic times.
Collapse
|