1
|
Püsküllüoğlu M, Pieniążek M, Rudzińska A, Pietruszka A, Pacholczak-Madej R, Grela-Wojewoda A, Ziobro M. Cisplatin Monotherapy as a Treatment Option for Patients with HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer Experiencing Hepatic Visceral Crisis or Impending Visceral Crisis. Oncol Ther 2024; 12:419-435. [PMID: 38833126 PMCID: PMC11333679 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-024-00280-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hepatic visceral crisis (VC), characterized by a rapid total bilirubin increase with disease progression, poses a life-threatening risk in advanced breast cancer (ABC). International consensus guidelines define VC and touch on impending VC (IVC). Limited data exist on systemic treatments for hepatic VC/IVC. This study explores the safety and efficacy of cisplatin monotherapy in patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2- negative breast cancer (BC) and hepatic IVC/VC. METHODS In this retrospective single-center cohort study data of patients treated with cisplatin monotherapy (60-80 mg/m2, every 3-4 weeks) between 2016 and 2023 at a reference Cancer Centre in Southern Poland were analyzed. RESULTS 33 female patients (24/33 hormonal-positive) with the mean age 53.84 years were included. Participants progressed on median 2 prior palliative systemic treatment lines. In 10/23 patients hepatic VC and in 23/33 IVC (rapid, symptomatic liver progression; extensive liver involvement; alanine or aspartate aminotransferase > 2 × normal limit; significant increases in lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, or gamma-glutamyl transferase) were identified. Median progression-free survival was 1.87 months and median overall survival 2.67 months. 33% of the patients presented stable disease or partial response. Eight patients experienced adverse events grade ≥ 3: in five the dose of cisplatin was reduced; two stopped the treatment. CONCLUSION Due to the hepatotoxicity of BC-active drugs, specific recommendations for systemic treatment are scarce. Our study explored cisplatin's potential use, finding it to be a viable option in patients with performance status 0 or 1 experiencing hepatic IVC/VC, irrespective of liver function parameters and other factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirosława Püsküllüoğlu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Garncarska Street 11, Kraków Branch, 31-115, Kraków, Poland.
| | - Małgorzata Pieniążek
- Department of Oncology, Wrocław Medical University, Plac Hirszfelda 12, 53-413, Wrocław, Poland
- Lower Silesian Comprehensive Cancer Center, Plac Hirszfelda 12, 53-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Rudzińska
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Garncarska Street 11, Kraków Branch, 31-115, Kraków, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Pietruszka
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Garncarska Street 11, Kraków Branch, 31-115, Kraków, Poland
| | - Renata Pacholczak-Madej
- Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Świętej Anny 12, 31-008, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Garncarska Street 11, Krakow Branch, 31-115, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Chemotherapy, The District Hospital, Szpitalna Street 22, 34-200, Sucha Beskidzka, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Grela-Wojewoda
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Garncarska Street 11, Kraków Branch, 31-115, Kraków, Poland
| | - Marek Ziobro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Garncarska Street 11, Kraków Branch, 31-115, Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meegdes M, van der Velde MGAM, Geurts SME, van Kats MACE, Dercksen MW, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Case series of metastatic breast cancer patients with visceral crisis treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. J Chemother 2024; 36:343-350. [PMID: 37946508 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2023.2279831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
There is an ongoing clinical dilemma of how best to treat patients who present themselves with visceral crisis. The time needed to undo the state of visceral crisis is the most relevant outcome for this patient group. We describe four patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer who presented themselves with a visceral crisis. Two of them are male and three of them had synchronous metastatic breast cancer. Two patients had lymphangitis carcinomatosis of the lungs, one extensive disease of the eye and one of the liver. Time to first clinical response was observed within a few weeks in three patients. For one patient a switch to chemotherapy was needed. These cases show that treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors can achieve a rapid response in patients experiencing visceral crisis. We conclude that chemotherapy is not the sole possibility in visceral crisis, and that CDK4/6 inhibitors can be considered as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa Meegdes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sandra M E Geurts
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje A C E van Kats
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M Wouter Dercksen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalinsky K, Spring L, Yam C, Bhave MA, Ntalla I, Lai C, Sjekloca N, Stwalley B, Stokes M, Taylor A, Nanda R. Real-world use patterns, effectiveness, and tolerability of sacituzumab govitecan for second-line and later-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in the United States. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07412-9. [PMID: 38904892 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07412-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) have poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, is approved for patients with mTNBC who have received ≥ 2 systemic therapies (≥ 1 in the metastatic setting) based on the ASCENT study (NCT02574455). The current study describes real-world SG use and outcomes in patients with mTNBC in the United States. METHODS This retrospective, observational study included adult patients with mTNBC from the ConcertAI Patient360™ database who received SG in the second line (2L) and later from April 2020 to May 2022. SG use patterns, effectiveness, and tolerability are described. RESULTS This analysis included 230 patients (median age 60 years, 26% Black, 17% with ECOG performance status ≥ 2, 66% in community settings; median of 2 prior lines of treatment in the metastatic setting); median follow-up was 7.2 months. Median (95% CI) real-world overall survival was 10.0 (8.3-11.1) months for all patients and 13.9 (9.8-not estimable) months in the 2L subgroup (n = 77). Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered concomitantly with SG in 134 (58%) patients; 35 (15%) received G-CSF for the first time. Median (IQR) time from SG start to G-CSF use was 8.5 (8.0-29.0) days. Seventeen (7%) patients discontinued SG due to toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Using a real-world, ethnically diverse population of patients with mTNBC presenting with poor prognosis, these data reinforced the findings from ASCENT. In routine clinical practice, SG is an effective treatment in the 2L setting, consistent with treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Kalinsky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road Northeast, Bldg C, Fl 2, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Laura Spring
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clinton Yam
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Manali Ajay Bhave
- Breast Oncology Program, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ioanna Ntalla
- Real-World Evidence, Gilead Sciences Europe Ltd., Stockley Park, UK
| | - Catherine Lai
- Clinical Development, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA
| | - Nikoleta Sjekloca
- Global Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences Europe Ltd., Stockley Park, UK
| | - Brian Stwalley
- US Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA
| | | | - Aliki Taylor
- Real-World Evidence, Gilead Sciences Europe Ltd., Stockley Park, UK
| | - Rita Nanda
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Andrade MDO, Bonadio RRDCC, Diz MDPE, Testa L. Visceral crisis in metastatic breast cancer: an old concept with new perspectives. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2024; 79:100362. [PMID: 38754225 PMCID: PMC11112279 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Visceral Crisis (VC) in breast cancer is a critical scenario when the burden of metastatic disease results in rapid deterioration of organ functions. There are no widely accepted objective clinical criteria for the definition of VC, and different studies have reported diverse clinical conditions such as visceral crises. Diagnosis of VC is associated with a dismal prognosis and the management of this condition is currently based on limited retrospective evidence and expert opinions. International guidelines have recommended cytotoxic polychemotherapy in the management of VC, to achieve rapid symptomatic control and preserve organ function. Nevertheless, in the case of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, the role of chemotherapy as the treatment of choice for VC has been recently questioned, since endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitors yielded similar response rates, with better quality of life. For HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, combined chemotherapy (plus HER2-directed therapy for HER2-positive) remains a standard option for VC, but novel effective drugs such as antibody-drug conjugates are emerging and their role in the VC context shall soon be elucidated. This review aims to critically discuss the definition, prognosis, management, and future directions regarding the visceral crisis in metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matheus de Oliveira Andrade
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | - Maria Del Pilar Estevez Diz
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Laura Testa
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schlefman J, Brenin C, Millard T, Dillon P. Estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: contemporary nuances to sequencing therapy. Med Oncol 2023; 41:19. [PMID: 38103078 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-023-02255-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
The treatment landscape of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer has evolved dramatically in recent years. While the combination of endocrine therapy and a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor is accepted as standard first-line treatment in most settings without visceral crisis, newer therapies have challenged traditional treatment models where cytotoxic chemotherapy was previously felt to be the only second-line option at time of progression. The incorporation of next-generation sequencing has led to the identification of molecular targets for therapeutic agents, including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and ESR1, though similar pathways can be targeted even in the absence of a mutation, such as with use of inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin. Current data also supports the use of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors beyond progression, even prior to the patient's first introduction to chemotherapy. The abundance of therapeutic options not only delay time to cytotoxic chemotherapy and antibody-drug conjugate initiation, but has resulted in improvement in breast cancer survivorship. Many unanswered questions remain, however, as to the most efficacious way to sequence these novel agents. To assist in this decision-making, we will review the existing data on systemic therapy and propose a treatment paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Schlefman
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia Cancer Center, 1240 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0334, USA
| | - Christiana Brenin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia Cancer Center, 1240 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0334, USA
| | - Trish Millard
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia Cancer Center, 1240 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0334, USA
| | - Patrick Dillon
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia Cancer Center, 1240 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0334, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Behrouzi R, Armstrong AC, Howell SJ. CDK4/6 inhibitors versus weekly paclitaxel for treatment of ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer with impending or established visceral crisis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 202:83-95. [PMID: 37584881 PMCID: PMC10504109 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07035-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) with visceral crisis (VC) or impending VC (IVC) is commonly treated with chemotherapy instead of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). However, there is little evidence to confirm which treatment is superior. This study compared outcomes of patients with ER+/HER2- ABC and IVC/VC treated with CDK4/6i or weekly paclitaxel. METHODS Patients with ER+/HER2- ABC receiving first line treatment at a large tertiary UK cancer centre from 1-Mar-2017 to 30-Jun-2021 were retrospectively identified. Hospital records were screened for IVC/VC affecting the liver, lungs/mediastinum, gastrointestinal tract and/or bone marrow. Baseline demographics, clinical data and survival outcomes were recorded up to 30-Jul-2022. RESULTS 27/396 (6.8%) patients with ABC who received CDK4/6i and 32/86 (37.2%) who received paclitaxel had IVC/VC. Median time to treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the CDK4/6i compared to paclitaxel cohort: TTF 17.3 vs. 3.5 months (HR 0.33, 95%CI 0.17-0.61, p = 0.0002), PFS 17.8 vs. 4.5 months (HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.21-0.67, p = 0.002), OS 24.6 vs. 6.7 months (HR 0.37, 95%CI 0.20-0.68, p = 0.002). The median time to first improvement in IVC/VC was similar in patients receiving CDK4/6i compared to paclitaxel (3.9 vs. 3.6 weeks, p = 0.773). Disease control at 4 months was not significantly different in the CDK4/6i and paclitaxel cohorts (77.8% vs. 59.4%, p = 0.168). In multivariate analysis, treatment with CDK4/6i was independently associated with a longer PFS compared to paclitaxel (HR 0.31, 95%CI 0.12-0.78, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION In this retrospective study, patients with ER+/HER2- ABC and IVC/VC treated with CDK4/6i had a significantly better survival compared to those treated with weekly paclitaxel. Further prospective studies that minimise possible selection bias are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roya Behrouzi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
| | - Anne C Armstrong
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Sacha J Howell
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Benvenuti C, Gaudio M, Jacobs F, Saltalamacchia G, De Sanctis R, Torrisi R, Santoro A, Zambelli A. Clinical Review on the Management of Breast Cancer Visceral Crisis. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11041083. [PMID: 37189701 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11041083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Visceral crisis is a life-threatening clinical condition requiring urgent treatment and accounts for 10-15% of new advanced breast cancer diagnoses, mainly hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2 negative. As its clinical definition is an open topic with nebulous criteria and much room for subjective interpretation, it poses a challenge for daily clinical practice. International guidelines recommend combined chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with visceral crisis, but with modest results and a very poor prognosis. Visceral crisis has always been a common exclusion criterion in breast cancer trials, and the available evidence mainly comes from limited retrospective studies which are not sufficient to draw solid conclusions. The outstanding efficacy of innovative drugs, such as CDK4/6 inhibitors, questions the role of chemotherapy in this setting. In the lack of clinical reviews, we aim to critically discuss the management of visceral crisis, advocating future treatment perspectives for this challenging condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Benvenuti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| | - Mariangela Gaudio
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| | - Flavia Jacobs
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institut Jules Bordet, L'Univeristé Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Saltalamacchia
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| | - Rita De Sanctis
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| | - Rosalba Torrisi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| | - Alberto Zambelli
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang R, Lu G, Lv Z, Jia L, Cui J. Different treatment regimens in breast cancer visceral crisis: A retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1048781. [PMID: 36330468 PMCID: PMC9623315 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1048781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Breast cancer visceral crisis (VC) is caused by excessive tumor burden leading to severe organ dysfunction with poor prognosis. Traditional chemotherapy reduces the quality of life of patients without significantly improving survival. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with VC and the prognosis by using different treatment options. Methods According to the 5th European School of Oncology (ESO)–European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer guidelines (ABC 5), patients who were treated in the First Hospital of Jilin University from 2018 to 2022 and diagnosed with breast cancer VC were retrospectively analyzed. The analysis focused on the characteristics of the patients, the treatment regimens, and prognosis. Results A total of 133 patients were included in this study. As for metastasis breast cancer subtype, 92 (69.18%) were hormone receptor (HR) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative, 20 (15.04%) had HER-2 overexpression, and 21 (15.78%) were triple negative. All patients had an mOS of 11.2 months (range, 1.1–107.8 months). In different types of VC, the median overall survival (mOS) of bone marrow metastasis (BMM) was 18.0 months (range, 2.0–107.8 months), that of diffuse liver metastasis (DLM) was 8.1 months (range, 1.3–30.2 months), and that of meningeal metastasis (MM) was 9.0 months (range, 1.2–53.8 months). In 92 HR+, Her-2− patients using different treatment regimens, mOS was 6.2 months (range, 1.2–29.8 months) in the chemotherapy group while it was 24.3 months (range, 3.1–107.8 months) in the endocrine therapy (ET) group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores and type of VC were associated with survival. Conclusion Prognosis varied in different types of VC. Patients with BMM had the best prognosis, and DLM had the worst. As treatment options continue to progress, our retrospective study showed a significant prolongation of overall survival (OS) in patients with VC compared to previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lin Jia
- *Correspondence: Lin Jia, ; Jiuwei Cui,
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pan C, Kang J, Hwang JS, Li J, Boese AC, Wang X, Yang L, Boggon TJ, Chen GZ, Saba NF, Shin DM, Magliocca KR, Jin L, Kang S. Cisplatin-mediated activation of glucocorticoid receptor induces platinum resistance via MAST1. Nat Commun 2021; 12:4960. [PMID: 34400618 PMCID: PMC8368102 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24845-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Agonists of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) are frequently given to cancer patients with platinum-containing chemotherapy to reduce inflammation, but how GR influences tumor growth in response to platinum-based chemotherapy such as cisplatin through inflammation-independent signaling remains largely unclear. Combined genomics and transcription factor profiling reveal that MAST1, a critical platinum resistance factor that reprograms the MAPK pathway, is upregulated upon cisplatin exposure through activated transcription factor GR. Mechanistically, cisplatin binds to C622 in GR and recruits GR to the nucleus for its activation, which induces MAST1 expression and consequently reactivates MEK signaling. GR nuclear translocation and MAST1 upregulation coordinately occur in patient tumors collected after platinum treatment, and align with patient treatment resistance. Co-treatment with dexamethasone and cisplatin restores cisplatin-resistant tumor growth, whereas addition of the MAST1 inhibitor lestaurtinib abrogates tumor growth while preserving the inhibitory effect of dexamethasone on inflammation in vivo. These findings not only provide insights into the underlying mechanism of GR in cisplatin resistance but also offer an effective alternative therapeutic strategy to improve the clinical outcome of patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy with GR agonists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoyun Pan
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - JiHoon Kang
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jung Seok Hwang
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Austin C Boese
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Xu Wang
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Likun Yang
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Titus J Boggon
- Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Georgia Z Chen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nabil F Saba
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Dong M Shin
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lingtao Jin
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Sumin Kang
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|