Efficacy and quality of life after 6-9 years of deep brain stimulation for depression

Effects of deep brain stimulation on dopamine D2 receptor binding in patients with treatment-refractory depression

BACKGROUND

Depression is a chronic psychiatric disorder related to diminished dopaminergic neurotransmission. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown effectiveness in treating patients with treatment-refractory depression (TRD). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of DBS on dopamine D2 receptor binding in patients with TRD.

METHODS

Six patients with TRD were treated with bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST)-nucleus accumbens (NAc) DBS were recruited. Ultra-high sensitivity [11C]raclopride dynamic total-body positron emission tomography (PET) imaging was used to assess the brain D2 receptor binding. Each patient underwent a [11C]raclopride PET scan for 60-min under DBS OFF and DBS ON, respectively. A simplified reference tissue model was used to generate parametric images of binding potential (BPND) with the cerebellum as reference tissue.

RESULTS

Depression and anxiety symptoms improved after 3-6 months of DBS treatment. Compared with two-day-nonstimulated conditions, one-day BNST-NAc DBS decreased [11C]raclopride BPND in the amygdala (15.9 %, p < 0.01), caudate nucleus (15.4 %, p < 0.0001) and substantia nigra (10.8 %, p < 0.01).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited to the small sample size and lack of a healthy control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic BNST-NAc DBS improved depression and anxiety symptoms, and short-term stimulation decreased D2 receptor binding in the amygdala, caudate nucleus, and substantia nigra. The findings suggest that DBS relieves depression and anxiety symptoms possibly by regulating the dopaminergic system.

Deep brain stimulation for refractory major depressive disorder: a comprehensive review

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a promising treatment for select patients with refractory major depressive disorder (MDD). The clinical effectiveness of DBS for MDD has been demonstrated in meta-analyses, open-label studies, and a few controlled studies. However, randomized controlled trials have yielded mixed outcomes, highlighting challenges that must be addressed prior to widespread adoption of DBS for MDD. These challenges include tracking MDD symptoms objectively to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of DBS with sensitivity and specificity, identifying the patient population that is most likely to benefit from DBS, selecting the optimal patient-specific surgical target and stimulation parameters, and understanding the mechanisms underpinning the therapeutic benefits of DBS in the context of MDD pathophysiology. In this review, we provide an overview of the latest clinical evidence of MDD DBS effectiveness and the recent technological advancements that could transform our understanding of MDD pathophysiology, improve the clinical outcomes for MDD DBS, and establish a path forward to develop more effective neuromodulation therapies to alleviate depressive symptoms.

Opportunities and challenges for the use of deep brain stimulation in the treatment of refractory major depression

Major Depressive Disorder continues to remain one of the most prevalent psychiatric diseases globally. Despite multiple trials of conventional therapies, a subset of patients fail to have adequate benefit to treatment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment in this difficult to treat population and has shown strong antidepressant effects across multiple cohorts. Nearly two decades of work have provided insights into the potential for chronic focal stimulation in precise brain targets to modulate pathological brain circuits that are implicated in the pathogenesis of depression. In this paper we review the rationale that prompted the selection of various brain targets for DBS, their subsequent clinical outcomes and common adverse events reported. We additionally discuss some of the pitfalls and challenges that have prevented more widespread adoption of this technology as well as future directions that have shown promise in improving therapeutic efficacy of DBS in the treatment of depression.

Normalized affective responsiveness following deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle in depression

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the supero-lateral medial forebrain bundle (slMFB) is associated with rapid and sustained antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Beyond that, improvements in social functioning have been reported. However, it is unclear whether social skills, the basis of successful social functioning, are systematically altered following slMFB DBS. Therefore, the current study investigated specific social skills (affective empathy, compassion, and theory of mind) in patients with TRD undergoing slMFB DBS in comparison to healthy subjects. 12 patients with TRD and 12 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects (5 females) performed the EmpaToM, a video-based naturalistic paradigm differentiating between affective empathy, compassion, and theory of mind. Patients were assessed before and three months after DBS onset and compared to an age- and gender-matched sample of healthy controls. All data were analyzed using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests. DBS treatment significantly affected patients' affective responsiveness towards emotional versus neutral situations (i.e. affective empathy): While their affective responsiveness was reduced compared to healthy subjects at baseline, they showed normalized affective responsiveness three months after slMFB DBS onset. No effects occurred in other domains with persisting deficits in compassion and intact socio-cognitive skills. Active slMFB DBS resulted in a normalized affective responsiveness in patients with TRD. This specific effect might represent one factor supporting the resumption of social activities after recovery from chronic depression. Considering the small size of this unique sample as well as the explorative nature of this study, future studies are needed to investigate the robustness of these effects.

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD): Hope and Concern

In this chapter, we explore the historical evolution, current applications, and future directions of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). We begin by highlighting the early efforts of neurologists and neurosurgeons who laid the foundations for today's DBS techniques, moving from controversial lobotomies to the precision of stereotactic surgery. We focus on the advent of DBS, emphasizing its emergence as a significant breakthrough for movement disorders and its extension to psychiatric conditions, including TRD. We provide an overview of the neural networks implicated in depression, detailing the rationale for the choice of common DBS targets. We also cover the technical aspects of DBS, from electrode placement to programming and parameter selection. We then critically review the evidence from clinical trials and open-label studies, acknowledging the mixed outcomes and the challenges posed by placebo effects and trial design. Safety and ethical considerations are also discussed. Finally, we explore innovative directions for DBS research, including the potential of closed-loop systems, dual stimulation strategies, and noninvasive alternatives like ultrasound neuromodulation. In the last section, we outline recommendations for future DBS studies, including the use of alternative designs for placebo control, the collection of neural and behavioral recordings, and the application of machine-learning approaches.

The ventral capsule and ventral striatum-Stereotactic targets for the management of treatment-resistant depression. A systematic literature review

Background

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is still an experimental treatment modality for psychiatric disorders including treatment-resistant depression (TRD). There is preliminary evidence that stimulation of brain reward circuit structures including the ventral striatum (VS) may exert an antidepressant effect. The main nucleus of the reward circuit is the nucleus accumbens (NAc). The NAc is a major structure of VS that plays a critical role in reward-seeking behavior, motivation, and addiction.

Aims

This study aimed to review the current studies including randomized clinical trials, open-label trials, and case reports of NAc/VS and VC DBS for TRD in humans.

Method

The literature was reviewed using a medical database-Medical Literature, Analysis, and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) on NAc/VS or VC DBS in TRD. The identified studies were assessed based on the patient's characteristics, clinical outcomes, and adverse events related to DBS as well as the stereotactic technique used to guide the implantation of DBS electrodes. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of DBS for TRD were presented and discussed.

Results

The searched literature revealed one case report, three open-label studies (OLS), one multicenter open-label study (mOLS), and two randomized clinical trials (RCTs). There were three additional studies reporting the clinical outcomes in the long term in TRD patients included in the two mentioned RCTs. The total number of patients with TRD treated by NAc/VS or VC is estimated to be 85 individuals worldwide. The response rate to DBS defined as a 50% reduction of postoperative Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores was achieved in 39.8% of the operated patients (range, 23-53%). The remission defined as MADRS scores of < 10 was found in 17.8% after DBS (range, 0-40%). The mean follow-up was 19.7 months (range 3.7-24 months).

Conclusion

The current results of NAc/VS and VC DBS are still limited by a relatively small number of patients treated worldwide. Nevertheless, the results suggest that NAc/VS and VC can be regarded as promising and efficacious targets for DBS, taking into account the response and remission rates among TRD patients with no other treatment option. The adverse events of NAc/VS and VC DBS are reversible due to the adjustment of stimulation parameters. The most common adverse events were hypomanic/manic states, suicidal thoughts/attempts, and suicides. Patients with TRD after NAc/VS and VC DBS should be strictly followed to prevent or diminish these stimulation-induced adverse events.

Predictive neuromodulation of cingulo-frontal neural dynamics in major depressive disorder using a brain-computer interface system: A simulation study

Introduction

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD). MDD involves the dysfunction of a brain network that can exhibit complex nonlinear neural dynamics in multiple frequency bands. However, current open-loop and responsive DBS methods cannot track the complex multiband neural dynamics in MDD, leading to imprecise regulation of symptoms, variable treatment effects among patients, and high battery power consumption.

Methods

Here, we develop a closed-loop brain-computer interface (BCI) system of predictive neuromodulation for treating MDD. We first use a biophysically plausible ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC)-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) neural mass model of MDD to simulate nonlinear and multiband neural dynamics in response to DBS. We then use offline system identification to build a dynamic model that predicts the DBS effect on neural activity. We next use the offline identified model to design an online BCI system of predictive neuromodulation. The online BCI system consists of a dynamic brain state estimator and a model predictive controller. The brain state estimator estimates the MDD brain state from the history of neural activity and previously delivered DBS patterns. The predictive controller takes the estimated MDD brain state as the feedback signal and optimally adjusts DBS to regulate the MDD neural dynamics to therapeutic targets. We use the vACC-dlPFC neural mass model as a simulation testbed to test the BCI system and compare it with state-of-the-art open-loop and responsive DBS treatments of MDD.

Results

We demonstrate that our dynamic model accurately predicts nonlinear and multiband neural activity. Consequently, the predictive neuromodulation system accurately regulates the neural dynamics in MDD, resulting in significantly smaller control errors and lower DBS battery power consumption than open-loop and responsive DBS.

Discussion

Our results have implications for developing future precisely-tailored clinical closed-loop DBS treatments for MDD.