Re-evaluating the contribution of sensorimotor mu rhythm phase and power to human corticospinal output: A replication study

Personalized whole-brain activity patterns predict human corticospinal tract activation in real-time

BACKGROUND

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions could feasibly treat stroke-related motor impairments, but their effects are highly variable. Brain state-dependent TMS approaches are a promising solution to this problem, but inter-individual variation in lesion location and oscillatory dynamics can make translating them to the poststroke brain challenging. Personalized brain state-dependent approaches specifically designed to address these challenges are needed.

METHODS

As a first step towards this goal, we tested a novel machine learning-based EEG-TMS system that identifies personalized brain activity patterns reflecting strong and weak corticospinal tract (CST) activation (strong and weak CST states) in healthy adults in real-time. Participants completed a single-session study that included the acquisition of a TMS-EEG-EMG training dataset, personalized classifier training, and real-time EEG-informed single-pulse TMS during classifier-predicted personalized CST states.

RESULTS

MEP amplitudes elicited in real-time during classifier-predicted personalized strong CST states were significantly larger than those elicited during corresponding weak and random CST states. MEP amplitudes elicited in real-time during classifier-predicted personalized strong CST states were also significantly less variable than those elicited during corresponding weak CST states. Personalized CST states lasted for ∼1-2 seconds at a time and ∼1 second elapsed between consecutive similar states. Individual participants exhibited unique differences in spectro-spatial EEG patterns between classifier-predicted personalized strong and weak CST states.

CONCLUSION

Our results show for the first time that personalized whole-brain EEG activity patterns predict CST activation in real-time in healthy humans. These findings represent a pivotal step towards using personalized brain state-dependent TMS interventions to promote poststroke CST function.

Motor sequence learning elicits mu peak-specific corticospinal plasticity

Motor cortical (M1) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions increase corticospinal output and improve motor learning when delivered during sensorimotor mu rhythm trough but not peak phases, suggesting that the mechanisms supporting motor learning may be most active during mu trough phases. Based on these findings, we predicted that motor sequence learning-related corticospinal plasticity would be most evident when measured during mu trough phases. Healthy adults were assigned to either a sequence or no-sequence group. Participants in the sequence group practiced the implicit serial reaction time task (SRTT), which contained an embedded, repeating 12-item sequence. Participants in the no-sequence group practiced a version of the SRTT that contained no sequence. We measured mu phase-independent and mu phase-dependent MEP amplitudes using EEG-informed single-pulse TMS before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after the SRTT in both groups. All participants performed a retention test one hour after SRTT acquisition. In both groups, mu phase-independent MEP amplitudes increased following SRTT acquisition, but the pattern of mu phase-dependent MEP amplitude changes after SRTT acquisition differed between groups. Relative to the no-sequence group, the sequence group showed greater peak-specific MEP amplitude increases 30 minutes after SRTT acquisition. Further, the magnitude of these peak-specific MEP amplitude increases was negatively associated with the magnitude of sequence-specific learning. Contrary to our original hypothesis, results revealed that motor sequence-specific learning elicits peak-specific corticospinal plasticity. Findings provide first direct evidence for the presence of a mu phase-dependent motor learning mechanism in the human brain.

New and Noteworthy

Recent work suggests that motor learning's neural mechanisms may be most active during specific sensorimotor mu rhythm phases. If so, motor sequence learning-induced corticospinal plasticity should be more evident during some mu phases than others. Our results show that motor sequence-specific learning elicits corticospinal plasticity that is most prominent during mu peak phases. Further, this peak-specific plasticity correlates with learning. Findings establish the presence of a mu phase-dependent motor learning mechanism in the human brain.

Real-time TMS-EEG for brain state-controlled research and precision treatment: a narrative review and guide

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) modulates neuronal activity, but the efficacy of an open-loop approach is limited due to the brain state's dynamic nature. Real-time integration with electroencephalography (EEG) increases experimental reliability and offers personalized neuromodulation therapy by using immediate brain states as biomarkers. Here, we review brain state-controlled TMS-EEG studies since the first publication several years ago. A summary of experiments on the sensorimotor mu rhythm (8-13 Hz) shows increased cortical excitability due to TMS pulse at the trough and decreased excitability at the peak of the oscillation. Pre-TMS pulse mu power also affects excitability. Further, there is emerging evidence that the oscillation phase in theta and beta frequency bands modulates neural excitability. Here, we provide a guide for real-time TMS-EEG application and discuss experimental and technical considerations. We consider the effects of hardware choice, signal quality, spatial and temporal filtering, and neural characteristics of the targeted brain oscillation. Finally, we speculate on how closed-loop TMS-EEG potentially could improve the treatment of neurological and mental disorders such as depression, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, schizophrenia, and stroke.

Personalized whole-brain activity patterns predict human corticospinal tract activation in real-time

BACKGROUND

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions could feasibly treat stroke-related motor impairments, but their effects are highly variable. Brain state-dependent TMS approaches are a promising solution to this problem, but inter-individual variation in lesion location and oscillatory dynamics can make translating them to the poststroke brain challenging. Personalized brain state-dependent approaches specifically designed to address these challenges are therefore needed.

METHODS

As a first step towards this goal, we tested a novel machine learning-based EEG-TMS system that identifies personalized brain activity patterns reflecting strong and weak corticospinal tract (CST) output (strong and weak CST states) in healthy adults in real-time. Participants completed a single-session study that included the acquisition of a TMS-EEG-EMG training dataset, personalized classifier training, and real-time EEG-informed single pulse TMS during classifier-predicted personalized CST states.

RESULTS

MEP amplitudes elicited in real-time during personalized strong CST states were significantly larger than those elicited during personalized weak and random CST states. MEP amplitudes elicited in real-time during personalized strong CST states were also significantly less variable than those elicited during personalized weak CST states. Personalized CST states lasted for ~1-2 seconds at a time and ~1 second elapsed between consecutive similar states. Individual participants exhibited unique differences in spectro-spatial EEG patterns between personalized strong and weak CST states.

CONCLUSION

Our results show for the first time that personalized whole-brain EEG activity patterns predict CST activation in real-time in healthy humans. These findings represent a pivotal step towards using personalized brain state-dependent TMS interventions to promote poststroke CST function.

MEP and TEP features variability: is it just the brain-state?

Objective.The literature investigating the effects of alpha oscillations on corticospinal excitability is divergent. We believe inconsistency in the findings may arise, among others, from the electroencephalography (EEG) processing for brain-state determination. Here, we provide further insights in the effects of the brain-state on cortical and corticospinal excitability and quantify the impact of different EEG processing.Approach.Corticospinal excitability was measured using motor evoked potential (MEP) peak-to-peak amplitudes elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); cortical responses were studied through TMS-evoked potentials' TEPs features. A TMS-EEG-electromyography (EMG) dataset of 18 young healthy subjects who received 180 single-pulse (SP) and 180 paired pulses (PP) to determine short-intracortical inhibition (SICI) was investigated. To study the effect of different EEG processing, we compared the brain-state estimation deriving from three published methods. The influence of presence of neural oscillations was also investigated. To evaluate the effect of the brain-state on MEP and TEP features variability, we defined the brain-state based on specific EEG phase and power combinations, only in trials where neural oscillations were present. The relationship between TEPs and MEPs was further evaluated.Main results.The presence of neural oscillations resulted in more consistent results regardless of the EEG processing approach. Nonetheless, the latter still critically affected the outcomes, making conclusive claims complex. With our approach, the MEP amplitude was positively modulated by the alpha power and phase, with stronger responses during the trough phase and high power. Power and phase also affected TEP features. Importantly, similar effects were observed in both TMS conditions.Significance.These findings support the view that the brain state of alpha oscillations is associated with the variability observed in cortical and corticospinal responses to TMS, with a tight correlation between the two. The results further highlight the importance of closed-loop stimulation approaches while underlining that care is needed in designing experiments and choosing the analytical approaches, which should be based on knowledge from offline studies to control for the heterogeneity originating from different EEG processing strategies.