Up-regulation of cutaneous α1-adrenoceptors after a burn

Stimulation of alpha-1 adrenoceptors may intensify cutaneous inflammation in complex regional pain syndrome

ABSTRACT

Alpha-1 adrenoceptors are overexpressed in the epidermis of a subgroup of patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Activating α 1 -adrenoceptors in epidermal cells increases production of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6), a mediator of inflammation. To investigate whether this might exacerbate inflammation in CRPS, primary keratinocytes or dermal fibroblasts were cultured from skin biopsies obtained from the affected limb of 25 patients and a similar site in 28 controls. The fundamental proinflammatory cytokine, tumor necrosis factor alpha, was administered for 24 hours to initiate inflammation. After this, cells were incubated for 6 hours with the α 1 -adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine. Exposure to tumor necrosis factor alpha induced proinflammatory cytokine mRNA production and protein secretion in keratinocytes and fibroblasts and enhanced α 1B -adrenoceptor mRNA expression in keratinocytes. Additional stimulation of α 1 adrenoceptors with phenylephrine increased the production of IL-6 mRNA and protein secretion in both cell types. Under all conditions, gene and protein α 1 -adrenoceptor levels and cytokine gene expression and protein secretion were similar, overall, in patients and controls, except for abnormally high α 1 -adrenoceptor protein levels in the keratinocytes of 3 of 17 patients. These findings suggest that persistent inflammation in CRPS is not due to dysfunction of skin cells but is a normal response to extrinsic signals. After α 1 -adrenoceptor stimulation of keratinocytes, increases in IL-6 mRNA but not protein were proportional to basal α 1 -adrenoceptor protein levels. Skin cells play an important role in persistent inflammation in CRPS. Potentially, a positive feedback loop between α 1 -adrenoceptors and IL-6 production in skin cells contributes to this inflammatory state.

Emerging roles of keratinocytes in nociceptive transduction and regulation

Keratinocytes are the predominant block-building cells in the epidermis. Emerging evidence has elucidated the roles of keratinocytes in a wide range of pathophysiological processes including cutaneous nociception, pruritus, and inflammation. Intraepidermal free nerve endings are entirely enwrapped within the gutters of keratinocyte cytoplasm and form en passant synaptic-like contacts with keratinocytes. Keratinocytes can detect thermal, mechanical, and chemical stimuli through transient receptor potential ion channels and other sensory receptors. The activated keratinocytes elicit calcium influx and release ATP, which binds to P2 receptors on free nerve endings and excites sensory neurons. This process is modulated by the endogenous opioid system and endothelin. Keratinocytes also express neurotransmitter receptors of adrenaline, acetylcholine, glutamate, and γ-aminobutyric acid, which are involved in regulating the activation and migration, of keratinocytes. Furthermore, keratinocytes serve as both sources and targets of neurotrophic factors, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and neuropeptides. The autocrine and/or paracrine mechanisms of these mediators create a bidirectional feedback loop that amplifies neuroinflammation and contributes to peripheral sensitization.

The Adrenergic System in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Physiology and Clinical Considerations

ABSTRACT

The primary organ systems and tissues concerning plastic and reconstructive surgery include the integument, vasculature, subcutis, and peripheral nerves, because these may individually or collectively be injured requiring reconstruction, or indeed be used in reconstruction themselves through grafts, flaps, or anastomoses. Adrenergic receptors are present throughout these anatomic components on the vasculature, adipose, platelets, immune cells, keratinocytes, melanocytes, fibroblasts, peripheral nerves, and tendons. Herein, the influence of adrenergic signaling on the physiology of anatomic components related to plastic surgery is discussed, along with clinical considerations of this systems involvement in procedures, such as free flap reconstruction, skin grafting, fat grafting, and other areas relevant to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Current evidence as well as potential for further investigation is discussed.

Alpha and beta adrenergic receptors modulate keratinocyte migration

Keratinocyte migration into skin wounds is the step of the healing process that correlates with the wound closure rate. Keratinocyte migration, and wound epithelialization are decreased when beta 2-adrenergic receptors (B2AR) are activated by 1 μM epinephrine/adrenaline, resulting in delayed wound healing in human and mouse skin. In the present study, we found paradoxically, that in a subset of keratinocyte strains exposure to low concentrations of epinephrine (0.1 nM) increased, rather than decreased, their migratory rate. We find that both the alpha- and the beta-adrenergic receptors are expressed in human keratinocytes, and expression of alpha-2 AR subtypes demonstrated for the first time. Therefore, we tested if the alpha-AR could be modulating the increased migratory response observed in these cell strains. By using specific inhibitors to alpha-AR, we demonstrated that blocking A2B-AR could reverse the rapid cell migration induced by the 0.1 nM epinephrine. Phosphorylation of ERK was elevated after 1-10 minutes of the low epinephrine treatment and the A2B-AR inhibitor blocked the ERK phosphorylation. The results suggest that both the A2B-AR and B2AR mediate keratinocyte migration, in which with a low level of epinephrine treatment, A2B-AR could alter the B2AR signals and regulate the migration rate.

Alpha 1 adrenoceptor expression in skin, nerves and blood vessels of patients with painful diabetic neuropathy

Diabetic neuropathy (dNP) patients often suffer from severe neuropathic pain. It was suggested that alpha-1 adrenoceptor (α₁-AR) hyperresponsiveness contributes to pain in dNP. The aim of our study was to quantify α₁-AR expression using immunohistochemistry in skin biopsies of nine patients with painful diabetic neuropathy compared to 10 healthy controls. Additionally, the association between α₁-AR expression and activation with spontaneous and sympathetically maintained pain (SMP) induced by intradermal injection of the α₁-agonist phenylephrine was investigated. For control purposes the α₂-agonist clonidine was injected in a different session. We found that dermal nerve density was significantly lower in dNP than in controls. However, α₁-AR expression was significantly greater on cutaneous blood vessels and keratinocytes of dNP patients than controls. A similar trend, which failed to reach significance, was observed for dermal nerves. Intradermal injection of phenylephrine induced only minor pain, which resolved after a few minutes. Adrenergically evoked pain persisted for more than 15 min in only one patient, but none of the patients fulfilled the criteria for SMP (pain increase after injection of phenylephrine and decrease after clonidine). In conclusion, our results imply that SMP does not occur in dNP. However, elevated expression of α₁-AR on keratinocytes and dermal blood vessels is an important finding, since this could contribute to dNP progression and supports the theory of receptor up-regulation of denervated structures. The implications of this α₁-upregulation should be examined in further studies.

Peripheral Mechanisms of Neuropathic Pain-the Role of Neuronal and Non-Neuronal Interactions and Their Implications for Topical Treatment of Neuropathic Pain

Neuropathic pain in humans arises as a consequence of injury or disease of somatosensory nervous system at peripheral or central level. Peripheral neuropathic pain is more common than central neuropathic pain, and is supposed to result from peripheral mechanisms, following nerve injury. The animal models of neuropathic pain show extensive functional and structural changes occurring in neuronal and non-neuronal cells in response to peripheral nerve injury. These pathological changes following damage lead to peripheral sensitization development, and subsequently to central sensitization initiation with spinal and supraspinal mechanism involved. The aim of this narrative review paper is to discuss the mechanisms engaged in peripheral neuropathic pain generation and maintenance, with special focus on the role of glial, immune, and epithelial cells in peripheral nociception. Based on the preclinical and clinical studies, interactions between neuronal and non-neuronal cells have been described, pointing out at the molecular/cellular underlying mechanisms of neuropathic pain, which might be potentially targeted by topical treatments in clinical practice. The modulation of the complex neuro-immuno-cutaneous interactions in the periphery represents a strategy for the development of new topical analgesics and their utilization in clinical settings.

Decreased neural expression of the noradrenaline transporter in the papillary dermis after partial sciatic nerve lesion

After peripheral nerve injury, regeneration or collateral sprouting of noradrenergic nerve fibres in the papillary dermis of the injured limb may contribute to sympathetically-maintained pain. The aim of this study was to determine whether noradrenergic nerve fibre regeneration after partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSL) in Wistar rats was accompanied by parallel shifts in expression of the noradrenaline transporter (NAT). Four or 28 days after PSL surgery, immunohistochemistry was used to examine NAT expression in plantar hind paw skin in relation to pan-neuronal markers (class III beta-tubulin and protein gene product 9.5), peptidergic afferents containing calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), nonpeptidergic afferents labelled by isolectin B₄ (IB₄), and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a marker for cutaneous noradrenergic nerve fibres. Most dermal nerve fibre populations decreased shortly after PSL. However, four weeks after PSL, an increase in staining intensity of CGRP and novel expression of TH were observed in the papillary dermis on the injured side. In contrast, neural expression of NAT was reduced in this region. Loss of NAT might have implications for sympathetically-maintained pain, as failure to rapidly clear noradrenaline could exacerbate aberrant sympathetic-sensory signalling between closely apposed noradrenergic and peptidergic nerve fibres.

A positive feedback loop between alpha1-adrenoceptors and inflammatory cytokines in keratinocytes

A positive feedback loop between inflammatory cytokines and alpha₁-adrenoceptors (α₁-AR) (a target of the sympathetic nervous system neurotransmitter norepinephrine) influences inflammatory responses in immune cells. This cross-talk between the sympathetic nervous system and immune system may play a role in promoting chronic inflammation. Emerging evidence shows that α₁-AR interact with inflammatory cytokines in keratinocytes, and this epidermal adrenergic signalling may contribute to skin inflammatory responses following injury, disease or stress. In this study, utilizing an in vitro approach, we hypothesized that α₁-AR interact in a positive feedback loop with inflammatory mediators in keratinocytes. The pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) was used to induce an inflammatory state in cultured keratinocytes. TNFα increased interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and nerve growth factor (NGF) production and gene expression levels of α₁-AR subtype B (α_1B-AR). Additional stimulation of α₁-AR further increased IL-6 levels, while maintaining high levels of IL-8 and decreasing levels of IL-1β and NGF. Our results suggest that reciprocal influences between α₁-ARs and inflammatory cytokines may play a role in normal inflammatory responses. However, if unchecked, this cycle could contribute to pathology (e.g. chronic inflammatory diseases, chronic pain conditions, and stress-induced cancer progression).

Burn Pain: A Systematic and Critical Review of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment

Objective

This review aims to examine the available literature on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of burn-induced pain.

Methods

A search was conducted on the epidemiology of burn injury and treatment of burn pain utilizing the database Medline, and all relevant articles were systemically reviewed. In addition, a critical review was performed on the pathophysiology of burn pain and animal models of burn pain.

Results

The search on the epidemiology of burn injury yielded a total of 163 publications of interest, 72 of which fit the inclusion/exclusion criteria, with no publications providing epidemiological data on burn injury pain management outcomes. The search on the treatment of burn pain yielded a total of 213 publications, 14 of which fit the inclusion/exclusion criteria, highlighting the limited amount of evidence available on the treatment of burn-induced pain.

Conclusions

The pathophysiology of burn pain is poorly understood, with limited clinical trials available to assess the effectiveness of analgesics in burn patients. Further studies are needed to identify new pharmacological targets and treatments for the effective management of burn injury pain.

Patient-controlled analgesia for background pain of major burn injury

BACKGROUND

Studies have suggested that intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) can be used safely for the treatment of background pain in burn patients. However, no comprehensive protocols have been published. How patient or surgical factors correlate with the amount of opioid consumption remains unclear. The aim of this study is to provide an IV-PCA protocol for alleviating pain for burn injuries, and to assess factors correlated with opioid consumption.

METHODS

At the Mackay Memorial Hospital, a retrospective analysis from June 27th to October 31st of 2015 was carried out to investigate the use of IV-PCA in relation to the demographic and clinical data of patients who suffered from burn injuries due to a massive explosion of flammable powder. A standardized morphine IV-PCA protocol with rapid escalation was implemented. Variables assessed included age, weight, gender, days of usage, total surface area burned (TBSAB) and operations.

RESULTS

Among the 23 patients who received IV-PCA for burn pain control, it was noted that the larger the TBSAB and the higher the visual analogue scale (VAS), the more amount of morphine was consumed. Correlations between morphine consumption positively with weight (P < 0.01), female gender (P < 0.01), severity of injury (P = 0.01), and negatively with receiving operations (P = 0.01) were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

As the daily morphine consumption was positively correlated with TBSAB, VAS, weight, female gender, the use of our IV-PCA protocol was sufficient in the management of background pain for patients with major burn injury.

Up-regulation of α1-adrenoceptors in burn and keloid scars

Stimulation of α₁-adrenoceptors evokes inflammatory cytokine production, boosts neurogenic inflammation and pain, and influences cellular migration and proliferation. Hence, these receptors may play a role both in normal and abnormal wound healing. To investigate this, the distribution of α₁-adrenoceptors in skin biopsies of burn scars (N=17), keloid scars (N=12) and unscarred skin (N=17) was assessed using immunohistochemistry. Staining intensity was greater on vascular smooth muscle in burn scars than in unscarred tissue, consistent with heightened expression of α₁-adrenoceptors. In addition, expression of α₁-adrenoceptors was greater on dermal nerve fibres, blood vessels and fibroblasts in keloid scars than in either burn scars or unscarred skin. These findings suggest that increased vascular expression of α₁-adrenoceptors could alter circulatory dynamics both in burn and keloid scars. In addition, the augmented expression of α₁-adrenoceptors in keloid tissue may contribute to processes that produce or maintain keloid scars, and might be a source of the uncomfortable sensations often associated with these scars.

Skin matters! The role of keratinocytes in nociception: a rational argument for the development of topical analgesics

Treatment of neuropathic pain using topical formulations is still in its infancy. Only few topical analgesic formulations have become available for clinical use, and among these, analgesic creams are still rare. This is unfortunate because analgesic creams offer a number of advantages over patches, such as convenience, ease of adapting the frequency of application, and dose, and “rubbing cream where it hurts” involves the patient much more in the therapeutic process compared to patches and other localized treatment modalities. Although the literature supporting the efficacy and safety of analgesic creams (mostly compounded) is growing since the last decade, most pain physicians have not yet noticed and appreciated the therapeutic potential and clinical value of these creams. This is most probably due to a prejudice that topical application should need to act transdermally, more or less as a slow-release formulation, such as in patches delivering opioids. We will discuss this prejudice and show that there are multiple important targets in the skin to be reached by topical analgesic or anti-inflammatory compounds, and that the keratinocyte is one of those targets. By specifically targeting the keratinocyte, analgesia seems possible, effective, and safe, and thus topical analgesic creams may hold promise as a novel treatment modality for neuropathic pain.