The Lower Limb Functional Index – A reliable and valid functional outcome assessment in burns

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the 10-item spine functional index (SFI-10) in the Brazilians with musculoskeletal spine disorders

PURPOSE

To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Spine Functional Index (SFI) into Brazilian Portuguese (SFI-Br) in individuals with musculoskeletal spine disorders.

METHODS

Participants (n=194) answered the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for General Pain (RMDQ-g), and SFI-25 incorporating the SFI-10. Structural validity, from confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), used comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF). The best structure was considered from the lower values of the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Construct and criterion validity used Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho). Internal consistency used Cronbach's alpha, reliability used intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), with ceiling and floor effects determined. Error used the standard error of the measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change, 90% level (MDC90).

RESULTS

Adequate fit indices demonstrated an unequivocal one-factor structure only for the SFI-10 (chi-square/DF <3.00, CFI and TLI >0.90, RMSEA <0.08). The SFI-10-Br correlation was high with the SFI-Br (rho=0.914, p<0.001), moderate for the RMDQ-g (rho=-0.78), SF-36 functional capacity domain (rho=0.718) and NPRS (rho=-0.526); and adequate for the remaining SF-36 domains (rho>0.30). Test-retest reliability (ICC2,1=0.826) and internal consistency (alpha=0.864) were high. No ceiling or floor effects were observed, and error was satisfactory (SEM=9.08%, MDC90=25.15%).

CONCLUSION

The SFI Brazilian version was successfully produced with the 10-item version showing an unequivocal one-factor structure, high construct and criterion validity, reliability, internal consistency, and satisfactory error. Further research on responsiveness is required.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Persian version of the Lower Limb Functional Index

BACKGROUND

the Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI) is a regional patient reported outcome measure (PROM) for evaluation of lower limb musculoskeletal functional status. No Persian-language (LLFI-Pr) version is available.

OBJECTIVES

LLFI translation and cross-cultural adaptation to Persian and psychometric property evaluation.

STUDY DESIGN

prospective diagnostic assessment.

METHODS

to establish the LLFI-Pr face and content validity, double forward-backward translation protocols were used plus cognitive interviews and the 'content validity index'(CVI). Psychometric properties were determined from a convenience sample (n = 307, age 47.18 ± 11.52 years, female = 58.3%) that concurrently completed the LLFI-Pr and Persian Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-Pr). Test-retest reliability (ICC_2,1, sub-sample, n = 64) was determined during a non-intervention period of 3-7 days. Internal consistency used Cronbach's Alpha (α), error used MDC_90/95 from the SEM, and construct validity used Pearson's r between the LLFI-Pr and LEFS-Pr. Construct validity used exploratory factor analysis (EFA, suppression = 0.30) with non-Gaussian distribution protocols.

RESULTS

psychometric properties were high for test-retest reliability (ICC_2,1 = 0.90) and internal consistency (α = 0.77), moderate for construct validity (r = 0.63), with no floor or ceiling effects, error found SEM = 1.60, MDC₉₀ = 3.7% and MDC₉₅ = 4.42%. A two-factor (EFA) structure (total-variance = 22.01%), that consequently cannot be summated, was determined where five-items failed consistent factor-loading leaving a 20-item version with a high original-LLFI total-equivalency (r = 0.97). However, the general/region-specific item-ratio reduced from the recognized 60/40 ratio to 50/50.

CONCLUSION

the 20-item LLFI-Pr is a valid two-factor solution with sound psychometric properties for research and clinical Persian-language populations with lower limb disorders.

Does exercise influence burn-induced inflammation: A cross-over randomised controlled feasibility trial

Background

Burn injuries trigger a greater and more persistent inflammatory response than other trauma cases. Exercise has been shown to positively influence inflammation in healthy and diseased populations, however little is known about the latent effect of exercise on chronic inflammation in burn injured patients. The aims of the pilot study were to assess the feasibility of implementing a long duration exercise training program, in burn injured individuals including learnings associated with conducting a clinical trial in COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Fifteen participants with a burn injury between 5–20% total body surface area acquired greater than a year ago were randomised in a within-subject designed study, into one of two conditions, exercise–control or control–exercise. The exercise condition consisted of six weeks of resistance and cardiovascular exercises, completed remotely or supervised in a hospital gym. A comprehensive outcome measurement was completed at the initial, mid and end point of each exercise and control condition. To determine the success of implementation, the feasibility indicator for the data completeness across the comprehensive outcome battery was set at 80%.

Results

Half (49%) of eligible participants in the timeframe, were recruited and commenced the study. Six participants withdrew prior to completion and a total of 15 participants completed the study. Eight participants were randomised to the exercise-control and seven to the control exercise group. Five participants trained remotely and seven did supervised training. Three participants completed a mix of both supervised and remote training initiated due to COVID restrictions. Outcome measures were completed on 97% of protocolised occasions and 100% of participants completed the exercise training.

Conclusions

Conducting a long duration exercise training study on burn injured individuals is feasible using the described methods. The knowledge gained helps improve the methodology in larger-scale projects. Insights into the impact of COVID-19 on this clinical trial and success enhancing adaptations for the researcher, research practice and the participant, are presented.

Polish Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI) Demonstrates a Valid Outcome Measure for the Lower Limb Region and Joints

This study aimed to perform linguistic and cross-cultural adaptation to establish a Polish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI) as well as an evaluation of the psychometric properties. This was a two-stage, cross-sectional study. The first stage-linguistic and cultural adaptation, complied with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines to produce the Lower Limb Functional Index, Polish version (LLFI-PL). The subjects were recruited to the second stage of the study from a sample of convenience (n = 125, age x- = 52.86 ± 19.53 years, 56% female, symptoms duration x- = 17.69 ± 18.39 weeks). Baseline reliability was performed on the LLFI-PL with retest period at 3-7 days. The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQol Health Questionnaire 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), and an 11-point Pain Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) were completed to assess the validity of the LLFI-PL. Statistical analysis showed high internal consistency (α = 0.94), and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2.1 = 0.96). The measurement error was SEM = 1.69% with MDC90 = 3.93%. Construct validity demonstrated strong correlations between the LLFI-PL and WOMAC (r = 0.81) and moderate correlations with the EQ-5D-5L (r = -0.63) and P-NRS (r = -0.39). Exploratory factor analysis confirmed a single-factor structure. The LLFI-PL is a psychometrically sound questionnaire for Polish-speaking patients with lower limb musculoskeletal conditions. The results support findings from the previous original English, Spanish, and Turkish versions.

Treadmill versus overground gait training in patients with lower limb burn injury: A matched control study

INTRODUCTION

Gait impairment is commonly seen in patients with a lower limb burn injury (LLBI). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two different gait training modes on gait symmetry, functional mobility and kinesiophobia in patients with LLBI.

METHODS

This matched control study was conducted between January 2017 and August 2018. Patients with LLBI (n=28) were allocated to 2 different groups by matching according to burn localization, age, and gender. Group 1 (overground group: n=14) received overground gait training in addition to standard burn rehabilitation, and Group 2 (treadmill group: n=14) received treadmill gait training in addition to standard burn rehabilitation. The rehabilitation program and gait training were started when the patient was admitted to the hospital and ended on discharge. These physical therapy interventions were performed 5 days per week. The gait training intensity, including walking speed and duration, was determined according to patient tolerance. Gait parameters, functional mobility, kinesiophobia and pain values were evaluated with GAITRite, the timed up-and-go test (TUG), Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale and Visual Analogue Scale, respectively. These evaluations were made twice; on admission and immediately prior to discharge. Gait symmetry was calculated using the Symmetry Index.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the groups and initial outcome values were similar. In the comparison of the differences between the overground and treadmill groups, the change in kinesiophobia and TUG values were significantly higher in the treadmill group (p=0.01, p=0.02, respectively). The intragroup comparisons showed significant differences in SI in respect of step length (p=0.004), swing (p=0.006), stance (p=0.008) and velocity (p=0.001), cadence (p=0.001), TUG (p=0.001), kinesiophobia (p=0.001) and pain (p=0.001) in the overground group. Statistically significant differences were determined in step length (p=0.01), swing (p=0.01), stance (p=0.02) and velocity (p=0.001), cadence (p=0.001), TUG (p=0.001), kinesiophobia (p=0.001) and pain (p=0.001) in the treadmill group, when pre and post-training values were compared.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study have shown that treadmill gait training was more effective in the improvement of functional mobility and reduction in kinesiophobia levels of patients with LLBI compared to overground gait training. Both overground and treadmill gait training also provide greater improvements in the velocity and cadence, and gait symmetry for step length, swing and stance in patients with LLBI.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03217526.

Instruments to assess function or functionality in adults after a burn injury: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of functionality or function, through valid and reliable instruments, is essential during rehabilitation of adults after a burn injury. Currently, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the most appropriate tool that should be used to assess function or functionality; there is also no synthesis of the current studies published in this area.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate and report the instruments used to assess function or functionality in adults after a burn injury; to identify the characteristics and evidence on their measurement properties; and to evaluate their clinical utility.

METHODS

We systematically searched the literature via six electronic databases and via screening reference lists of relevant studies. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016048065) and reported according to the PRISMA statement. Studies in which function or functionality of upper and/or lower limbs of adults after a burn injury was assessed were included. Exclusion criteria comprised studies in pediatric populations and conference abstracts.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies were included. Twelve questionnaires and seven objective tests for function or functionality were identified. Three specific tools were found; four generic instruments have been validated in burns. Nine studies evaluated the instruments' measurement properties, presenting at least one property classified as 'fair' quality. Finally, 18 instruments demonstrated clinical utility.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrated that most instruments used to assess function or functionality in adults with a burn injury have not been specifically developed for this population and had their measurement properties poorly studied. Conversely, almost all instruments had clinical utility.

The efficacy of resistance training in addition to usual care for adults with acute burn injury: A randomised controlled trial

Resistance training immediately after a burn injury has not been investigated previously. This randomised, controlled trial assessed the impact of resistance training on quality of life plus a number of physical, functional and safety outcomes in adults with a burn injury. Patients were randomly assigned to receive, in addition to standard physiotherapy, four weeks of high intensity resistance training (RTG) or sham resistance training (CG) three days per week, commenced within 72h of the burn injury. Outcome data was collected at six weeks, three and six months after burn injury. Quality of life at 6 months was the primary endpoint. Data analysis was an available cases analysis with no data imputed. Regression analyses were used for all longitudinal outcome data and between-group comparisons were used for descriptive analyses. Forty-eight patients were randomised resistance training (RTG) (n=23) or control group (CG) (n=25). The RTG demonstrated improved outcomes for the functional domain of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (p=0.017) and the Quick Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (p<0.001). Between group differences were seen for C-reactive protein and retinol binding protein (p=0.001). Total quality of life scores, lower limb disability, muscle strength and volume were not seen to be different between groups (p>0.05). Resistance training in addition to usual rehabilitation therapy showed evidence of improving functional outcomes, particularly in upper limb burn injuries. Additionally, resistance training commenced acutely after a burn injury was not seen to be harmful to patients.

Decreased neuroplasticity in minor burn injury survivors compared to non-injured adults: A pilot study in burn injury survivors aged 45 years and older

OBJECTIVE

Neuroplasticity is the capacity of the brain to change or adapt with experience: brain changes occur with use, disuse, and injury. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can be used to induce neuroplasticity in the human brain. Here, we examined rTMS-induced neuroplasticity in the primary motor cortex in burns survivors and controls without injury, and whether neuroplasticity is associated with functional recovery in burns survivors.

METHODS

Sixteen burn injury survivors (total body surface area of burn injury <15%) and 13 non-injured control participants were tested. Repetitive TMS (specifically, spaced continuous theta-burst stimulation[cTBS]) was applied to induce neuroplasticity 6 and 12 weeks after injury in burn survivors and in two sessions separated by 6 weeks in controls. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single-pulse TMS were measured before and after rTMS to measure neuroplasticity. Burns survivors completed a functional assessment 12 weeks after injury.

RESULTS

Non-injured controls showed decreased MEP amplitude 15-30 min after spaced cTBS in both experimental sessions. Burn survivors showed a smaller change in MEP amplitude after spaced cTBS compared to controls 6 weeks after burn injury but no difference compared to controls 12 weeks after burn injury. In burn survivors, there was a significant positive association between general health outcome (Short-Form Health Survey) and the change in MEP amplitude after spaced cTBS 12 weeks after injury (r=.73, p = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings suggest that burn survivors have a reduced capacity for neuroplasticity early in the recovery period (6 weeks after injury), which normalizes later in the recovery period (12 weeks after injury). Furthermore, the results provide preliminary evidence to suggest that burn survivors with normalized neuroplasticity 12 weeks after injury recover faster after burn injury.

Lower limb functional status and its determinants in moderate/major burns 3-6 months following injury: A two-center observational study

INTRODUCTION

Severe complications which may cause impaired physical functionoften develops over time following severe burn to the lower extremities. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical determinants of lower limb functional status, functional mobility and exercise capacity in moderate/major burns 3-6 months following the injury.

METHODS

The study included 42 patients, 12 with moderate injury and 30 with major injury, aged 19-59 years old. Lower Limb Functional Index was used to determine the lower limb functional status. Functional mobility and exercise capacity were evaluated with the Timed Up and Go test and the 6-min walk test, respectively. Scar quality and kinesiophobia were assessed with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, respectively. Active range of motion (ROM) was measured with a universal goniometer.

RESULTS

Significant and independent predictors of lower limb functional status, functional mobility and exercise capacity related to POSAS score, kinesiophobia level, gender, burn severity, the number of operations, the presence of burnsinvolving any of the lower limb joints, knee ROM limitations, limitation in any of the lower limb joint ROMs, comorbidities, and truncal burns (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Burn characteristics and clinical evaluations of patients are important determinants of the lower limb functional status, mobility and exercise capacity in burn patients. These predictors should be considered to improve physical functions related to the lower limb when creating a personalized rehabilitation program.