Neurosensory findings among electricians with self-reported remaining symptoms after an electrical injury: A case series

Clinical Evaluation of Nerve Function in Electrical Accident Survivors with Persisting Neurosensory Symptoms

Objective: Work related electrical accidents are prevalent and can cause persisting symptoms. We used clinical neurophysiological techniques to assess neurosensory function following electrical accidents and correlated test results with the patients’ symptoms. Methods: We studied 24 patients who reported persisting neurosensory symptoms following a workplace electrical accident. We assessed nerve function using quantitative sensory testing (QST), thermal roller testing, laser evoked potential (LEP), and electroneurography. The patients’ results were compared with previously established normative data. Results: Altogether, 67% of the patients showed at least one neurosensory impairment with a large heterogeneity in test results across patients. At a group level, we observed significant deviations in in QST, LEP, and sensory and motor neurography. Overall, we found a weak correlation between test results and self-reported symptoms. Conclusions: In a majority of patients with neurosensory symptoms after a workplace electrical accident, neurosensory testing confirmed the existence of an underlying impairment of the nervous system.

Electrical injury: Chronic pain, somatosensory dysfunction, post traumatic stress and movement disorders

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

We aimed in this case series to identify shortcomings in assessment of long-term painful and psychosocial consequences of EI and to demonstrate the value of biopsychosocial assessment and the commonalities in outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 15 cases from 2004 to 2019 of adult claimants assessed in a medico-legal practice for complex chronic pain disorders secondary to EI. Extensive biopsychosocial information, including 165 data items on pre- and post-injury observations, were collected on each. Cutaneous and deep pressure somatosensory examination was performed and questionnaires for psychological evaluation and restless legs syndrome completed. A comprehensive literature review and descriptive analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Pre-injury, most claimants worked (12/15), did not receive government benefits (14/15) and had no primary pain disorder (9/15). EIs were severe (14/15), where chronic post-traumatic pain, typically high impact with nociplastic features, was regional in 5 and widespread in 10. Somatosensory signs in wide distribution in all cases implied central sensitization. Movement disorders included digital dyskinesia (5/15), involuntary muscle contractions (7/15) and restless legs syndrome in 7. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criteria were met in 12/15, and 14/15 experienced depression and impaired sleep. Severe social impacts, notably including loss of employment resulting in financial stresses, were common.

CONCLUSIONS

Biological, psychological and social consequences of EI revealed extensive similarities. Disability was generally severe, moreso than indicated in clinical records, influenced by relative paucity of primary pathology, inadequate pain-orientated somatosensory testing and insufficient application of biopsychosocial assessment and management.

Cognition and mental wellbeing after electrical accidents: a survey and a clinical study among Swedish male electricians

PURPOSE

The purpose was to examine long-term consequences of exposure to electrical current passing through the body. We investigated (1) whether electricians after having experienced an electrical accident report more cognitive problems and lower mental wellbeing and (2) have objectively verifiable reduced cognitive function; and (3) which circumstances at the time of the accident affect long-term subjective cognitive function and mental wellbeing?

METHODS

A survey of male electricians who had experienced electrical accidents (n = 510) and a clinical study in a subsample (n = 23) who reported residual health problems was carried out. Both groups were examined regarding subjective cognitive function (Euroquest-9) and mental wellbeing (Symptom Checklist-90 subscales). The clinical study included neuropsychological tests of memory, attention, spatial function, and premorbid intellectual capacity. A matched control group was retrieved from reference data.

RESULTS

The survey participants reported more cognitive problems and lower mental wellbeing than referents. Of the examined circumstances, having experienced mortal fear at the time of the accident and health complaints, especially mental symptoms, for > 1 week after the accident were the most significant risk factors for later subjective cognitive problems and lower mental wellbeing. The only statistically significant difference in neuropsychological tests was better performance in part of the memory tests by the clinical study group compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The participants reported more cognitive problems and lower mental wellbeing than referents, but no long-term objective cognitive dysfunction was detected. Emotional response at the time of the accident and health complaints in the aftermath of the accident may constitute important indications for medical and psychological follow-ups.

Life-changing or trivial: Electricians' views about electrical accidents

BACKGROUND:

It is well known that electrical accidents can cause physical injury. Less well known is that long-term consequences may include emotional and cognitive problems.

OBJECTIVE:

To explore electricians’ experiences and perceptions of work-related electrical accidents, with focus on psychological short- and long-term consequences, including how contacts with health care services and the workplace were perceived.

METHODS:

Semi-structured interviews with 23 Swedish male electricians, aged 25– 68, who had experienced at least one electrical accident and reported residual sensory, musculoskeletal, cognitive or emotional symptoms. Data was analyzed by means of qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS:

Immediate emotional reactions included surprise, confusion, fear, anxiety, and anger; also long-term consequences were seen. Experiencing a no-let-go situation was particularly stressful. The cause of the accident, and questions about guilt and blame were central in the aftermath. Lack of knowledge and routine among health care professionals concerning electrical injury was reported, as well as lack of medical and psychological follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS:

For some informants, the accident had been a life-changing event, while for others it was an event of little importance. Adequate handling at the workplace, and from health care personnel, including follow-up, could facilitate rehabilitation and return to work.