Blood transfusions in severe burn patients: Epidemiology and predictive factors

Ultra-restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in extensively burned patients

In recent years, due to the shortage of blood products, some extensive burn patients were forced to adopt an "ultra-restrictive" transfusion strategy, in which the hemoglobin levels of RBC transfusion thresholds were < 7 g/dl or even < 6 g/dl. This study investigated the prognostic impacts of ultra-restrictive RBC transfusion in extensive burn patients. This retrospective multicenter cohort study recruited extensive burns (total body surface area ≥ 50%) from three hospitals in Eastern China between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2022. Patients were divided into an ultra-restrictive transfusion group and a restrictive transfusion group depending on whether they received timely RBC transfusion at a hemoglobin level < 7 g/dl. 1:1 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance selection bias. Modified Poisson regression and linear regression were conducted for sensitive analysis. Subsequently, according to whether they received timely RBC transfusion at a hemoglobin level < 6 g/dl, patients in the ultra-restrictive transfusion group were divided into < 6 g/dl group and 6-7 g/dl group to further compare the prognostic outcomes. 271 eligible patients with extensive burns were included, of whom 107 patients were in the ultra-restrictive transfusion group and 164 patients were in the restrictive transfusion group. The ultra-restrictive transfusion group had a significantly lower RBC transfusion volume than the restrictive transfusion group (11.5 [5.5, 21.5] vs 17.3 [9.0, 32.5] units, p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of in-hospital mortality, risk of infection, hospital length of stay, and wound healing time after PSM or multivariate adjustment (p > 0.05). Among the ultra-restrictive transfusion group, patients with RBC transfusion threshold < 6 g/dl had a significantly higher hospital mortality than 6-7 g/dl (53.1% vs 21.3%, p = 0.001). For extensive burn patients, no significant adverse effects of ultra-restrictive RBC transfusion were found in this study. When the blood supply is tight, it is acceptable to adopt an RBC transfusion threshold of < 7 g/dL but not < 6 g/dL.

Blood transfusions in non-major burns patients

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusions are essential to treating anaemia of burn injuries. It has recently been observed that patients with non-major burns < 20%TBSA may also develop anaemia requiring transfusion of blood products. Due to the morbidity and mortality rate associated with blood transfusions better understanding of risk factors may guide clinical practices to improve patient care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine risk factors for transfusion of blood products in patients with non-major burn injuries and assess transfusion practices to establish impact on patient outcome.

METHOD

Our study included 182 adult patients with non-major burn injuries, < 20%TBSA admitted over a 3-year period at the Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Unit of the Emergency County Hospital Cluj-Napoca. We analysed patient and injury characteristics: age, gender, %TBSA burn, %FT burn, burn site, mechanism of injury, inhalation injury, Hb lab determinations throughout admission and surgical management. Charlson comorbidities index has been determined based on cardiovascular, neurological, gastrointestinal and renal comorbidities as well as diabetes mellitus. We selected blood transfusions, wound infections and length of hospital stay as outcome for our analysis.

RESULTS

37.9% of patients included in our study developed anaemia throughout admission and 7.7% underwent blood transfusions. Mean Hb levels triggering blood transfusions have been recorded at 7.4 (IQR=8.8-9.9) g/dL. Patients who received transfusions were older, presented with higher %TBSA and associated a higher comorbidity index. They also tended to develop coagulopathy and underwent more surgical procedures to achieve wound closure. In transfused patients who associate comorbidities we observed a higher rate of wound infections and longer hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient related comorbidities correlate with higher transfusion rates in non-major burn injuries. Due to the risk associated with the use of blood products decision to transfuse should adhere to current guideline practices and be tailored to specific patient requirements.

Changes in coagulation and temperature management in burn patients - A survey of burn centers in Switzerland, Austria and Germany

BACKGROUND

Severely burned patients suffer from both coagulopathy and hypothermia, with a lack of international consensus and appropriate treatment guidelines. This study examines recent developments and trends in coagulation and temperature management in European burn centers.

METHODS

A survey was sent to burn centers in Switzerland, Austria and Germany in 2016 and again in 2021. The analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, with categorical data reported in absolute numbers (n) and percentages (%) and numerical data reported as mean and standard deviation.

RESULTS

The rate of completed questionnaires was 84 % (16 of 19 questionnaires) in 2016 and 91 % (21 of 22 questionnaires) in 2021. The number of global coagulation tests performed has decreased over the observation period in favor of single factor determination and bed-side point-of-care coagulation tests. This has also led to increased administration of single factor concentrates in therapy. Although many centers had a defined treatment protocol for hypothermia in 2016, coverage increased such that in 2021 all centers surveyed had such a protocol. The body temperature was measured more consistently in 2021; thus, hypothermia was more actively sought, detected and treated.

CONCLUSION

A point-of-care guided, factor-based coagulation management and the maintenance of normothermia have gained importance in the care of burn patients in recent years.

Reducing Blood Loss in a Burn Care Unit: A Review of Its Key Determinants

Patients with a major burn injury differ considerably from the typical critical ill and trauma population. Very often, burn patients suffer from anemia throughout their hospital stay. This is caused both by combination of persistent blood loss with decreased erythropoiesis. Therefore, burn patients do have major transfusion requirements. However, transfusion is not devoid of risks or costs. We hereby review the best surgical techniques and medical approaches, aiming to reduce blood loss in a burn patient and optimize red cell production, so that we can reduce the need of RBC transfusion. The implementation of a combination of surgical techniques aiming to reduce blood loss and medical care approaches to prevent anemia, rather than single attitudes, should be adopted in burn care. There is an urgent need for clear guidelines that can easily be accepted, applied, and spread across different burn units to methodically implement measures to reduce blood loss and transfusion needs, and ultimately improve burn patients' outcome and the health care financial status.

Predicting blood loss in burn excisional surgery

BACKGROUND

Blood loss during burn excisional surgery remains an important factor as it is associated with significant comorbidity, mortality and longer length of stay. Blood loss is, among others, influenced by length of surgery, burn size, excision size and age. Most literature available is aimed at large burns and little research is available for small burns. Therefore, the goal of this study is to investigate blood loss and develop a prediction model to identify patient at risk for blood loss during burn excisional surgery ≤ 10% body surface area.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective study included adult patients who underwent burn excisional surgery of ≤ 10% body surface area in the period 2013-2018. Duplicates, patients with missing data and delayed surgeries were excluded. Primary outcome was blood loss. A prediction model for per-operative blood loss (>250 ml) was built using a multivariable logistic regression analysis with stepwise backward elimination. Discriminative ability was assessed by the area under the ROC-curve in conjunction with optimism and calibration.

RESULTS

In total 269 patients were included for analysis. Median blood loss was 50 ml (0-150) / % body surface area (BSA) excised and 0.28 (0-0.81) ml / cm². Median burn size was 4% BSA and median excision size was 2% BSA. Blood loss of> 250 ml was present in 39% of patients. The model can predict blood loss> 250 ml based on %BSA excised, length of surgery and ASA-score with an AUC of 0.922 (95% CI 0.883 - 0.949) and an AUC after optimism correction of 0.915. The calibration curve showed an intercept of 0.0 (95% CI -0.36 to 0.36) with a slope of 1.0 (95% CI 0.78-1.22).

CONCLUSION

Median blood loss during burn excisional surgery of ≤ 10% BSA is 50 ml / % BSA excised and 0.28 ml / cm² excised. However, a substantial part of patients is at risk for higher blood loss. The prediction model can predict P(blood loss>250 ml) with an AUC of 0.922, based on expected length of surgery, ASA-score and size of excision. The model can be used to identify patients at risk for significant blood loss (>250 ml).

Clinical characteristics and predictors of burn complicated with smoke inhalation injury: A retrospective analysis

Fire smoke enters the human lungs through the respiratory tract. The damage to the respiratory tract and lung tissue is known as smoke inhalation injury (SII). Fire smoke can irritate airway epithelium cells, weaken endothelial cell adhesion and lyse alveolar type II epithelia cells, leading to emphysema, decreased lung function, pneumonia and risk of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of the present study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with SII and the risk factors affecting their prognosis. A total of 103 patients with SII admitted between January 2016 to December 2021 to the Burns Unit of the Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force and 983 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army were selected for the present study. The demographics and clinical features between different severities of SII were analyzed. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the potential predictors for severity, ARDS and mortality of patients with SII. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to screen independent risk factors and identify their prediction accuracy. It was concluded that total body surface area (TBSA), III burn area (of total %TBSA), cases of respiratory infections, ARDS morbidity, mortality, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, lung injury prediction score, lactic acid, white blood cells (WBC), alanine transaminase, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine and uric acid were indicators that were raised with increasing severity of SII. However red blood cells, hemoglobin, platelet count, total protein, albumin, and albumin/globulin were decreased with the increasing severity of SII (P<0.05). WBC >20.91 (10⁹/l) was a reliable indicator for severe SII. Lactic acid >9.60 (mmol/l) demonstrated a high degree of accuracy in predicting ARDS development in patients with SII. Hemoglobin <83.00 (g/l) showed a high degree of accuracy in predicting mortality. In summary, the highlighted assessment parameters could be used to contribute to devising improved treatment plans to preempt worsening conditions (such as shock, ARDS, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and death).

Pre-operative Blood Loss Prediction Formulas in Burn Surgeries: A Review

Extensive burn surgeries lead to a considerable amount of blood loss. Predicting pre-operative blood loss is essential for blood ordering and crossmatching. Accurate amount of ordered blood units ensures patients' safety and minimizes cost. However, blood loss estimation is complicated due to a variety of factors influencing blood loss, including patient and operative-related variables. Currently, no standard method to predict blood loss exists prior to surgery. Our goal is to review factors influencing blood loss and formulas that can predict blood loss. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and MEDLINE databases for studies investigating blood loss in burn surgeries with a clear quantitative outcome. Fifteen studies were included, comprising 1613 subjects. All studies calculated blood loss and assessed possible related factors, and four studies proposed preoperative blood loss prediction formulas. Larger areas of tissue excised and grafted, younger age, and delayed surgery were correlated with increased blood loss. Varying decrease in blood loss was observed with tumescent usage and other bleeding control methods. Other variables produced inconsistent results. From four prediction formulas, only one formula, Dye's Formula, had been applied and proven effective in reducing unused blood units clinically by up to 40% of cross-matched blood. Various confounding factors and dissimilarities between studies make reliable prediction method construction challenging. With consideration of diverse patient characteristics, some study develops formulas to achieve optimal patient care and avoid unnecessary hospital expenditure. Further research with consistent variables should be done to construct a standardized blood loss estimation formula.

Determining transfusion use in major burn patients: A retrospective review and analysis from 2009 to 2019

Blood transfusion is an important treatment for patients with major burns. Understanding the predictive factors of blood product usage in major burns can improve effective transfusion therapy. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the Burn Center, First Affiliated Hospital of the Chinese Naval Military Medical University, from August 2009 to July 2019 and enrolled all patients with major burns treated in that decade. Basic information, condition, and blood-transfusion details of the patients were analyzed to identify predictive factors for blood use and prognosis. Despite a yearly decreasing trend, the frequency of use of blood-product usage in major burns was high at 57.72%, with 5.39 times and 28.76 units of blood usage per person. Burn area was the most important predictive factor for blood transfusion at different stages. Burn depth, combined with injury, age, and other factors, affected blood use. Blood use or volume correlated with prognosis; especially, platelet and cryoprecipitate use was significantly associated with increased mortality. Blood product usage in major burns patients is related not only to the clinical condition, but also to doctors' experience, which can predict prognosis. Blood use is associated with increased mortality, although we found no evidence of a causal association.

Temporal trends, predictors of blood transfusion and in-hospital outcomes among patients with severe burn injury in the United States-A national database-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Severe burn can be accompanied by life-threatening bleeding on some occasions, thus, blood transfusion is often required in these patients during their hospitalization. Therefore, we aimed to examine temporal trends, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of blood transfusion in these patients in the United States.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample was used to identify severe burn patients between January 2010 and September 2017 in the United States. Trends in the utilization of blood transfusion were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Moreover, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed, and then in-hospital outcomes were compared between these two groups in the matched cohort. Multivariable logistic regressions were further used to validate the results of PSM.

RESULTS

Among 27,260 severe burn patients identified during the study period, 2120 patients (7.18%) received blood transfusion. Blood transfusion rates decreased significantly from 9.52% in 2010 to 5.02% in 2017 (p for trend <.001). In the propensity-matched cohort (2120 pairs with and without transfusion), patients transfused were at increased risk of in-hospital mortality (13.3% vs 8.77%, p < .001), overall postoperative complications (88.3% vs 72.59%, p < .001), longer hospital stays (defined as > median hospital stays = 5 d) (73.8% vs 50.6%, p < .001) and increased overall cost (defined as > median overall costs = 30,746) (81.6% vs 57.3%, p < .001). This was also the case for the multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood transfusion following severe burn injury may be associated with worse clinical outcomes. The utility for blood transfusion in burn patients warrants further prospective exploration.

Treatment of Anaemia in Patients with Acute Burn Injury: A Study of Blood Transfusion Practices

Objective: To determine blood transfusion practices, risk factors, and outcomes associated with the use of blood products in the setting of the acute management of burn patients at the Victorian Adult Burn Service. Background: Patients with burn injuries have variable transfusion requirements, based on a multitude of factors. We reviewed all acute admissions to the Victorian Adult Burns Service (VABS) between 2011 and 2017: 1636 patients in total, of whom 948 had surgery and were the focus of our analysis. Method and results: Patient demographics, surgical management, transfusion details, and outcome parameters were collected and analyzed. A total of 175 patients out of the 948 who had surgery also had a blood transfusion, while 52% of transfusions occurred in the perioperative period. The median trigger haemoglobin in perioperative was 80mg/dL (IQR = 76–84.9 mg/dL), and in the non-perioperative setting was 77 mg/dL (IQR = 71.61–80.84 mg/dL). Age, gender, % total body surface area (TBSA) burn, number of surgeries, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were associated with transfusion. Conclusions: The use of blood transfusions is an essential component of the surgical management of major burns. As observed in our study, half of these transfusions are related to surgical procedures and may be influenced by the employment of blood conserving strategies. Furthermore, transfusion trigger levels in stable patients may be amenable to review and reduction. Risk adjusted analysis can support the implementation of blood transfusion as a useful quality indicator in burn care.

Inhalation Injury Does Not Influence the Amount of Blood Transfused to Major Burn Patients: A Secondary Analysis from the Transfusion Requirement in Burn Care Evaluation Study

Patients with major burn injuries typically require numerous blood transfusions. It is not known if an inhalation injury (INHI) directly influences the need for blood transfusion. The purpose of this study was to determine whether INHI increases the amount of blood transfused to major burn patients. A secondary analysis from the Transfusion Requirement in Burn Care Evaluation (TRIBE) study was conducted. Patients with INHI were compared with patients without INHI. The number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions per day (RBC per day) between INHI and No INHI was analyzed with a multivariable regression. Patients with INHI (n = 78) had significantly larger burns (P = .0004), larger full-thickness burns (P = .0007), greater admission APACHE score (P < .0001), higher admission multiple organ dysfunction scores (P < .0001), and were transfused more RBC per day (P = .009) than No INHI patients (n = 267). In the multivariable regression analysis, RBC per day was significantly associated with the %TBSA burn (P < .0001), age of the patient (P = .004), the need for more than 1 day of mechanical ventilation (P < .0001), the occurrence of at least one blood stream infection (BSI; P = .044), and being assigned to the liberal transfusion arm of TRIBE (P < .001) but not the presence of INHI (P = .056). The null hypothesis that INHI exerts no influence on the amount of blood transfused could not be rejected. Larger burn size, advanced patient age, mechanical ventilation, and BSIs are important determinants of the blood transfusion rate in major burn patients.

RBC Transfusion Strategies in the ICU: A Concise Review

OBJECTIVES

To critically assess available high-level clinical studies regarding RBC transfusion strategies, with a focus on hemoglobin transfusion thresholds in the ICU.

DATA SOURCES

Source data were obtained from a PubMed literature review.

STUDY SELECTION

English language studies addressing RBC transfusions in the ICU with a focus on the most recent relevant studies.

DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant studies were reviewed and the following aspects of each study were identified, abstracted, and analyzed: study design, methods, results, and implications for critical care practice.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Approximately 30-50% of ICU patients receive a transfusion during their hospitalization with anemia being the indication for 75% of transfusions. A significant body of clinical research evidence supports using a restrictive transfusion strategy (e.g., hemoglobin threshold < 7 g/dL) compared with a more liberal approach (e.g., hemoglobin threshold < 10 g/dL). A restrictive strategy (hemoglobin < 7 g/dL) is recommended in patients with sepsis and gastrointestinal bleeds. A slightly higher restrictive threshold is recommended in cardiac surgery (hemoglobin < 7.5 g/dL) and stable cardiovascular disease (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL). Although restrictive strategies are generally supported in hematologic malignancies, acute neurologic injury, and burns, more definitive studies are needed, including acute coronary syndrome. Massive transfusion protocols are the mainstay of treatment for hemorrhagic shock; however, the exact RBC to fresh frozen plasma ratio is still unclear. There are also emerging complimentary practices including nontransfusion strategies to avoid and treat anemia and the reemergence of whole blood transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature supports the use of restrictive transfusion strategies in the majority of critically ill populations. Continued studies of optimal transfusion strategies in various patient populations, coupled with the integration of novel complementary ICU practices, will continue to enhance our ability to treat critically ill patients.

Blood transfusions in mass casualty events: recent trends

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The US AABB disaster task force recommends estimating 3 RBC units per admission (UPA) for mass casualty events (MCEs). In a previous analysis, median MCE UPA were 2·7 RBCs, 1·2 plasmas and 0·27 platelet doses (Vox Sang 2017; 112:648). Additional recent data were sought from the current era of balanced massive transfusion protocols (bMTPs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Publications in English from 1980 to 2020 were reviewed for MCEs using ≥50 RBCs/event and with numbers of admissions available. MCE reports were stratified by era and event-wide or trauma-centre source. The bMTP era included all MCEs since 2010 plus a 2008 bMTP military report.

STATISTICS

Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Thirty-two MCEs met analysis criteria. Event-wide reports used medians [interquartile ranges] of 1·8 [1·2-3·9] RBC, 0·6 [0·3-0·9] plasma and 0·14 [0·06-0·26] platelet-dose UPA. Trauma centres transfused 3·4 [2·7-6·3] RBC, 2·4 [1·3-4·1] plasma and 0·41 [0·34-0·50] platelet-dose UPA, all P < 0·05 vs event-wide. Same-event median post-day-1 transfusions were 50% of day-1 use for RBC, 28% for plasma and 16% for platelets. Compared to prior years, the median plasma/RBC transfusion ratio rose from 0·28 to 0·67 in the bMTP era (P < 0·01). In recent mass shootings, trauma centres transfused up to 42 platelets (range 0·45-0·57 UPA) on day 1.

CONCLUSION

Based on available mass casualty data, we recommend planning for 3 RBC, 1 plasma and one-fourth platelet-dose units per admission for blood centres (event-wide), and 6, 4 and one-half UPA, respectively, for trauma centres, which have seen rising plasma usage and large mass-shooting platelet needs.

The Impact of Blood Type O on Major Outcomes in Patients With Severe Burns

ABO blood type has been reported to be a predictor of poor prognosis in critically ill patients. Here, we aim to correlate different blood types with clinical outcomes in patients with severe burns. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study by enrolling patients with severe burn injuries (≥40% TBSA) between January 2012 and December 2017. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between disparate ABO blood types (type O vs non-O type). Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to identify an association between ABO blood type and clinical outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, the development of acute kidney injury (AKI), and hospital or ICU length of stay. A total of 141 patients were finally enrolled in the current study. Mortality was significantly higher in patients with type O blood compared with those of other blood types. The development of AKI was significantly higher in patients with blood type O vs non-O blood type (P = .001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that blood type O was independently associated with in-hospital mortality and AKI occurrence after adjusting for other potential confounders. Our findings indicated the blood type O was an independent risk factor of both increased mortality and the development of AKI postburn. More prudent and specific treatments are required in treating these patients to avoid poor prognosis.

Increased risk of blood transfusion in patients with diabetes mellitus sustaining non-major burn injury

BACKGROUND

Due to the increased mortality and morbidity associated with blood transfusion, identifying modifiable predictors of transfusion are vital to prevent or minimise blood use. We hypothesised that burn patients with diabetes mellitus were more likely to be prescribed a transfusion. These patients tend to have increased age, number of comorbidities, infection risk and need for surgery which are all factors reported previously to be associated with blood use.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients with diabetes mellitus who have sustained a burn ≤20% total body surface area (TBSA) are at higher risk of receiving red blood cell transfusion compared to those without diabetes mellitus.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study including patients admitted to the major Burns Unit in Western Australia for management of a burn injury. Only the first hospital admission between May 2008 to February 2017 were included.

RESULTS

Among 2101 patients with burn injuries ≤20% TBSA, 48 (2.3%) received packed red blood cells and 169 (8.0%) had diabetes. There were 13 (7.7%) diabetic patients that were transfused versus 35 (1.8%) non-diabetic patients. Patients with diabetes were 5.2 (p = 0.034) times more likely to receive packed red blood cells after adjusting for percentage TBSA, haemoglobin at admission or prior to transfusion, number of surgeries, total comorbid burden and incidence of infection. As percentage TBSA increases, the probability of packed red blood cell transfusion increases at a higher rate in DM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that diabetic patients with burn injuries ≤20% TBSA have a higher probability of receiving packed red blood cell transfusion compared to patients without diabetes. This effect was compounded in burns with higher percentage TBSA.

Diagnostic blood loss from phlebotomy and hospital acquired anemia in patients with severe burns

PURPOSE

The study was performed to estimate the diagnostic blood loss (DBL) volume during hospitalization and investigate its relationship with the development of moderate to severe hospital acquired anemia (HAA) and increased number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion following extensive burns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult burned patients with total body surface area (TBSA) burn larger than 40%, who were admitted to burn center of Changhai hospital between January 2005 and December 2017.

RESULTS

We included a final number of 157 patients in the present study. Moderate to severe HAA within the fourth week postburn was developed in 46 of 121 patients who stayed over 28-day hospitalization. Patients with moderate to severe HAA had both significantly higher total DBL volume [245 (IQR: 183.75, 325.25) mL vs 168 (119, 163) mL ; P = 0.001] and DBL volume per day [10.22 (IQR: 8.57, 12.38) mL vs 6.63 (5.22, 10.42) mL/day; P = 0.005]. Logistic regression analysis revealed that both DBL volume per day and TBSA burn were independent risk factors for the development of moderate to severe HAA.

CONCLUSIONS

Severely burned patients appear to be prone to develop HAA during hospitalization. The DBL volume contribute to the occurrence of moderate to severe HAA, which might be a modifiable target for preventing HAA.

Restrictive Transfusion Strategy Is More Effective in Massive Burns: Results of the TRIBE Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

Studies suggest that a restrictive transfusion strategy is safe in burns, yet the efficacy of a restrictive transfusion policy in massive burn injury is uncertain. Our objective: compare outcomes between massive burn (≥60% total body surface area (TBSA) burn) and major (20-59% TBSA) burn using a restrictive or a liberal blood transfusion strategy.

METHODS

Patients with burns ≥20% were block randomized by age and TBSA to a restrictive (transfuse hemoglobin <7 g/dL) or liberal (transfuse hemoglobin <10 g/dL) strategy throughout hospitalization. Data collected included demographics, infections, transfusions, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Three hundred and forty-five patients received 7,054 units blood, 2,886 in massive and 4,168 in restrictive. Patients were similar in age, TBSA, and inhalation injury. The restrictive group received less blood (45.57 ± 47.63 vs. 77.16 ± 55.0, p < 0.03 massive; 11.0 ± 16.70 vs. 16.78 ± 17.39, p < 0.001) major). In massive burn, the restrictive group had fewer ventilator days (p < 0.05). Median ICU days and LOS were lower in the restrictive group; wound healing, mortality, and infection did not differ. No significant outcome differences occurred in the major (20-59%) group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A restrictive transfusion strategy may be beneficial in massive burns in reducing ventilator days, ICU days and blood utilization, but does not decrease infection, mortality, hospital LOS or wound healing.

Acute kidney injury after burn surgery: Preoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a predictive factor

BACKGROUND

Severe inflammation and acute kidney injury (AKI) are serious adverse events after burn injuries. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of inflammation. We evaluated the independent risk factors for postoperative AKI, including NLR, in burn-injured patients.

METHODS

The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables of 473 burn-injured patients were collected. The risk factors for AKI after burn surgery were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of preoperative NLR was performed. The 3-month mortality after surgery was also compared between AKI and non-AKI groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test.

RESULTS

Postoperative AKI occurred in 71 of 473 (15.0%) burn patients. The total body surface area burned (odds ratio (OR), 1.013; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.001-1.026; P = 0.037), inhalation injury (OR, 1.821; 95% CI, 1.008-3.292; P = 0.047), and preoperative NLR (OR, 1.094; 95% CI, 1.064-1.125; P < 0.001) were risk factors for AKI after surgery. The area under the ROC curve was 0.767, with an optimal cut-off value of 11.7. Moreover, the 3-month mortality after surgery was significantly higher in the AKI group than in the non-AKI group (49.3% vs 14.9%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Total body surface area burned, inhalation injury, and preoperative NLR are risk factors for AKI after burn surgery, which is associated with early postoperative mortality. Preoperative NLR can provide useful information for the early detection of postoperative AKI and subsequent mortality in burn-injured patients.

Transfusion Requirement in Burn Care Evaluation (TRIBE): A Multicenter Randomized Prospective Trial of Blood Transfusion in Major Burn Injury

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare outcomes of a restrictive to a liberal red cell transfusion strategy in 20% or more total body surface area (TBSA) burn patients. We hypothesized that the restrictive group would have less blood stream infection (BSI), organ dysfunction, and mortality.

BACKGROUND

Patients with major burns have major (>1 blood volume) transfusion requirements. Studies suggest that a restrictive blood transfusion strategy is equivalent to a liberal strategy. However, major burn injury is precluded from these studies. The optimal transfusion strategy in major burn injury is thus needed but remains unknown.

METHODS

This prospective randomized multicenter trial block randomized patients to a restrictive (hemoglobin 7-8 g/dL) or liberal (hemoglobin 10-11 g/dL) transfusion strategy throughout hospitalization. Data collected included demographics, infections, transfusions, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighteen burn centers enrolled 345 patients with 20% or more TBSA burn similar in age, TBSA burn, and inhalation injury. A total of 7054 units blood were transfused. The restrictive group received fewer blood transfusions: mean 20.3 ± 32.7 units, median = 8 (interquartile range: 3, 24) versus mean 31.8 ± 44.3 units, median = 16 (interquartile range: 7, 40) in the liberal group (P < 0.0001, Wilcoxon rank sum). BSI incidence, organ dysfunction, ventilator days, and time to wound healing (P > 0.05) were similar. In addition, there was no 30-day mortality difference: 9.5% restrictive versus 8.5% liberal (P = 0.892, χ test).

CONCLUSIONS

A restrictive transfusion strategy halved blood product utilization. Although the restrictive strategy did not decrease BSI, mortality, or organ dysfunction in major burn injury, these outcomes were no worse than the liberal strategy (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01079247).

Measuring coagulation in burns: an evidence-based systematic review

Introduction

Dynamic monitoring of coagulation is important to predict both haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications and to guide blood product administration. Reducing blood loss and tailoring blood product administration may improve patient outcome and reduce mortality associated with transfusion. The current literature lacks a systematic, critical appraisal of current best evidence on which clinical decisions may be based.

Objectives

Establishing the role of different coagulation markers in burn patients, diagnosing coagulopathy, tailoring blood product administration and indicating prognosis.

Methods

Literature during 2004-2017 from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Medline and Embase was reviewed. Eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, multi-/single-centre study and meta-analyses. Keywords searched were 'burns', 'blood coagulation disorders', 'rotem', 'blood coagulation' and 'thromboelastography'. The PRISMA flow system was used for stratification and the CASP framework for appraisal of the studies retrieved.

Results

In total, 13 articles were included after inclusion/exclusion criteria had been applied to the initial 79 studies retrieved. Hypercoagulation increases in proportion to the severity of thermal injury. Whole blood testing, using thrombelastography (TEG) and rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM), was superior to standard plasma based tests, including prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) at detecting burn-related coagulopathies.

Conclusions

Routine laboratory markers such as PT/APTT are poor indicators of coagulation status in burns patients. Viscoelastic tests, such as TEG and ROTEM, are efficient, fast and have a potential use in the management of burn patients; however, strong evidence is lacking. This review highlights the need for more randomised controlled trials, to guide future practice.