Measures of economic advantage associated with HPV-positive head and neck cancers among non-Hispanic black and white males identified through the National Cancer Database

Association Between Social Determinants of Health, Distance from Treatment Center, and Treatment Type with Outcomes in Human Papillomavirus Associated Oropharyngeal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Social determinants of health (SDOH) can influence access to cancer care, clinical trials, and oncologic outcomes. We investigated the association between SDOH, distance from treatment center, and treatment type with outcomes in human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [HPV(+)OPSCC] patients treated at a tertiary care center.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

HPV(+)OPSCC patients treated surgically from 2006 to 2021 were selected from our departmental Oropharyngeal Cancer RedCap database. Demographic data, treatment, and oncologic outcomes were extracted. Distance was calculated in miles between the centroid of each patient zip code and our hospital zip code (zipdistance).

RESULTS

874 patients (89 % male; mean age: 58 years) were identified. Most patients (96 %) reported Non-Hispanic White as their primary race. 204 patients (23 %) had a high-school degree or less, 217 patients (25 %) reported some college education or a 2-year degree, 153 patients (18 %) completed a four-year college degree, and 155 patients (18 %) had post-graduate degrees. Relative to those with a high-school degree, patients with higher levels of education were more likely to live further away from our institution (p < 0.0001). Patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy elsewhere lived, on average, 104 miles further away than patients receiving radiation at our institution (Estimate 104.3, 95 % CI 14.2-194.4, p-value = 0.02). In univariable Cox PH models, oncologic outcomes did not significantly differ by zipdistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Education level-and access to resources-varied proportionally to a patient's distance from our center. Patients travelling further distances for surgical management of OPSCC were more likely to pursue adjuvant radiation therapy at an outside institution. Distance traveled was not associated with oncologic outcomes. Breaking down barriers to currently excluded populations may improve access to clinical trials and improve oncologic outcomes for diverse patient populations.

Factors Related to Human Papillomavirus Positivity among Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancers from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program Data

BACKGROUND

As human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) oral cavity and pharynx cancer (OCPC) incidence increases significantly, our objective was to determine whether selected sociodemographic and clinical factors were associated with HPV+ OCPCs overall and by oropharyngeal and non-oropharyngeal sites.

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program data were used in this study. Specifically, univariate and logistic regression models were used to examine the relationships between HPV+ and HPV- OCPC cases and age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, factors of neighborhood socioeconomic status (i.e., nSES/Yost index) and rurality/urbanity, first malignancy status, histology, reporting source, stage at diagnosis, and OCPC anatomic site. The same approach was used to identify risk factors for HPV positivity for oropharyngeal and non-oropharyngeal OCPCs separately.

RESULTS

In all OCPCs, cases that were male, <80 years old, lived in the four highest nSES categories, diagnosed with a non-"gum and other mouth" OCPC (ref = hypopharynx), not locally staged at diagnosis, and a first malignancy had higher odds of being HPV+. Cases that were American Indian/Alaska Native and Asian or Pacific Islander (ref = White), Spanish-Hispanic-Latino ethnicity, non-married/partnered, and not reported by a hospital/clinic had lower odds of being HPV+. Associations were maintained in oropharyngeal OCPCs and only age and race remained significant for non-oropharyngeal OCPCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Sociodemographic and clinical differences in HPV+ and HPV- OCPC, overall and for (non)oropharyngeal, cases exist.

IMPACT

Identification of OCPC and (non)oropharyngeal risk factors for HPV positivity may assist in discovering high-risk groups that should receive enhanced public health efforts to reduce the U.S. OCPC burden.

Distinct sociodemographic differences in incidence and survival rates for human papillomavirus (HPV)-like, non-HPV-like, and “other”-like oral cavity and pharynx cancers: An analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program data

Purpose

Oral cavity and pharynx cancer (OCPC) cases are traditionally dichotomized into human papillomavirus (HPV) and non-HPV types. Using a proxy for HPV status, the objective was to evaluate differences in incidence and survival rates of OCPC anatomic sub-sites identified as: 1) HPV-like; 2) non-HPV-like (i.e., tobacco/alcohol-related); and 3) “other”-like (i.e., not predominantly HPV-like nor tobacco/alcohol-like) OCPCs.

Methods

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program were used to examine incidence and survival rates for OCPC categories over time and according to age, sex, race, ethnicity, stage at diagnosis, neighborhood socioeconomic status (i.e., nSES or Yost Index), and rurality/urbanity (i.e., Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes). Although HPV status was unavailable in this dataset, OCPC anatomies and histologies were classified into three sub-categories, based on potential risk factors. Frequencies, average annual, age-adjusted incidence rates, five-year relative survival rates, and 95% confidence intervals were examined across and within OCPC categories.

Results

HPV-like OCPC incidence rates sharply increased from 1975 through 2015 while non-HPV-like and “other”-like OCPC rates decreased, all converging to similar rates from 2016 through 2018. Increasing over time for both categories, survival was highest for HPV-like and lowest for non-HPV-like OCPCs; survival for “other”-like OCPCs remained stable. Generally, across OCPC categories, incidence and survival rates were significantly higher among males vs. females, Whites vs. African Americans, and non-Hispanics vs. Hispanics. “Other”-like OCPC incidence decreased with increasing nSES tertiles, while no nSES differences were observed for HPV-like and non-HPV-like OCPCs. Incidence rates were significantly lower among urban (vs. rural) residents. For all OCPC categories, survival rates were significantly higher with increasing nSES and variable across RUCA categories.

Conclusion/Impact

HPV-like and non-HPV-like OCPC cases had distinct sociodemographic differences; “other”-like OCPC cases were a sociodemographic blend of HPV-like and non-HPV-like OCPC cases, resembling more of the sociodemographic makeup of non-HPV-like OCPC cases. To prevent new OCPCs, additional studies are needed to epidemiologically and clinically differentiate between OCPC categories so that high-risk groups can be better targeted in future public health interventions.

Socioeconomic status, access to care, risk factor patterns, and stage at diagnosis for head and neck cancer among black and white patients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how factors combine to influence progression of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). We aimed to evaluate multidimensional influences of factors associated with HNSCC stage by race.

METHODS

Using retrospective data, patients with similar socioeconomic status (SES), access to care (travel time/distance), and behavioral risk factors (tobacco/alcohol use and dental care) were grouped by latent class analysis. Relative frequency differences (RFD) were calculated to evaluate latent classes by stage, race, and p16 status.

RESULTS

We identified three latent classes. Advanced T-stage was higher for black (RFD = +20.2%; 95% CI: -4.6 to 44.9) than white patients (RFD = +10.7%; 95% CI: 2.1-19.3) in the low-SES/high-access/high-behavioral risk class and higher for both black (RFD = +29.6%; 95% CI: 4.7-54.5) and white patients (RFD = +23.9%; 95% CI: 15.2-32.6) in the low-SES/low-access/high-behavioral risk class.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that SES, access to care, and behavioral risk factors combine to underly the association with advanced T-stage. Additionally, differences by race warrant further investigation.

A Systematic Review of Head and Neck Cancer Health Disparities: A Call for Innovative Research

OBJECTIVE

(1) Describe the existing head and neck cancer health disparities literature. (2) Contextualize these studies by using the NIMHD research framework (National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities). (3) Explore innovative ideas for further study and intervention.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.

REVIEW METHODS

Databases were systematically searched from inception to April 20, 2020. The PRISMA checklist was followed (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). Two authors reviewed all articles for inclusion. Extracted data included health disparity population and outcomes, study details, and main findings and recommendations. Articles were also classified per the NIMHD research framework.

RESULTS

There were 148 articles included for final review. The majority (n = 104) focused on health disparities related to at least race/ethnicity. Greater than two-thirds of studies (n = 105) identified health disparities specific to health behaviors or clinical outcomes. Interaction between the individual domain of influence and the health system level of influence was most discussed (n = 99, 66.9%). Less than half of studies (n = 61) offered specific recommendations or interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been extensive study of health disparities for head and neck cancer, largely focusing on individual patient factors or health care access and quality. This review identifies gaps in this research, with large numbers of retrospective database studies and little discussion of potential contributors and explanations for these disparities. We recommend shifting research on disparities upstream toward a focus on community and societal factors, rather than individual, and an evaluation of interventions to promote health equity.

The impact of socioeconomic and geographic factors on access to transoral robotic/endoscopic surgery for early stage oropharyngeal malignancy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of social and geographic factors on the likelihood of receiving transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or non-robotic transoral endoscopic surgery treatment in early stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried to form a cohort of patients with T1-T2 N0-N1 M0 OPSCC (AJCC v.7) who underwent treatment from 2010 to 2016. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment type, social, and geographic factors were all collected. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were then performed.

RESULTS

Among 9267 identified patients, 1774 (19.1%) received transoral robotic surgery (TORS), 1191 (12.9%) received transoral endoscopic surgery, and 6302 (68%) received radiation therapy. We found that lower cancer stage, lower comorbidity burden and HPV- positive status predicted a statistically significant increased likelihood of receiving surgery. Patients who reside in suburban or small urban areas (>1 million population), were low-to- middle income, or rely on Medicaid were less likely to receive surgery. Patients that reside in Medicaid-expansion states were more likely to receive TORS (p > .0001). Patients that reside in states that expanded Medicaid January 2014 and after were more likely to receive non-robotic transoral endoscopic surgery (p > .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Poorer baseline health, lower socioeconomic status and residence in small urban areas may act as barriers to accessing minimally invasive transoral surgery while residence in a Medicaid-expansion state may improve access. Barriers to accessing robotic surgery may be greater than accessing non-robotic surgery.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas among males of the three largest Asian diasporas in the US, 2004-2013

BACKGROUND

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) have not been fully examined in the Asian diasporas in the US, despite certain Asian countries having the highest incidence of specific HNSCCs.

METHODS

National Cancer Database was used to compare 1046 Chinese, 887 South Asian (Indian/Pakistani), and 499 Filipino males to 156,927 Non-Hispanic White (NHW) males diagnosed with HNSCC between 2004-2013. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the association of race/ethnicity with two outcomes - site group and late-stage diagnosis. Temporal trends were explored for site groups and subsites.

RESULTS

South Asians had a greater proportion of oral cavity cancer [OCC] compared to NHWs (59 % vs. 25 %; OR_adj =7.3 (95 % CI: 5.9-9.0)). In contrast, Chinese (64 % vs. 9%; OR_adj =34.0 (95 % CI: 26.5-43.6)) and Filipinos (47 % vs. 9%; OR_adj =10.0 (95 % CI: 7.8-12.9)) had a greater proportion of non-oropharyngeal cancer compared to NHWs. All three Asian subgroups had a higher likelihood of being diagnosed by age 40 (14 % Chinese, 10 % South Asian and 8% Filipino compared to 3% in NHW; p < 0.001). Chinese males had lower odds of late-stage diagnosis, compared to NHWs. South Asian cases doubled from 2004 to 2013 largely due to an increase in OCC cases (34 cases in 2004 to 86 in 2013).

CONCLUSION

Asian diasporas are at a higher likelihood of specific HNSCCs. Risk factors, screening and survival need to be studied further, and policy changes are needed to promote screening and to discourage high-risk habits in these Asian subgroups.

Race, not socioeconomic disparities, correlates with survival in human papillomavirus-negative oropharyngeal cancer: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

Investigate the impact of black versus white race, socioeconomic status (SES), and comorbidity burden on oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed between 1991 and 2012 at an urban tertiary care center with a high volume of head and neck cancer referrals. Data gathered included demographics, human papilloma virus (HPV) status, follow-up time, comorbidities, smoking history, and overall survival. SES was extrapolated from the 2000 and 2010 censuses. Analysis of variance, chi-square tests, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, Cox proportional hazards regression, Kaplan Meier curves and the log-rank test were utilized.

RESULTS

Of 208 charts reviewed, 192 patients met inclusion criteria. Black patients had significantly (p < 0.001) poorer survival at 1, 2, and 5 years than white patients (5-year survival: 32% vs 64%); this discrepancy persisted in only HPV-negative disease (20% vs 50%). In the HPV-negative subgroup, there was no racial difference in treatment modality received, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and proportion receiving inadequate, noncurative or no treatment. Univariate analysis identified significant differences in median household income, education level, and stage at presentation between black and white subgroups. Multivariate analysis identified white race and HPV-positive status as independent predictors of overall survival, but SES and stage at presentation were not.

CONCLUSION

SES did not explain the greater survival in HPV-negative white versus black patients. This indicates that race is an independent predictor of survival; future studies should examine more accurate indicators of SES and genetic differences in tumors of black and white patients.

Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors Associated With Metastases at Presentation in HPV-Related Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: An NCDB Analysis

PURPOSE

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHNs) tend to have a distinct prognosis. Socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with metastatic disease at presentation and diagnosis in patients with HPV-related SCCHN tumors were examined.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to assess patients with HPV-related oropharyngeal carcinomas (HPVOPCAs) and HPV-related nonoropharyngeal carcinomas (HPVNOPCAs) diagnosed between 2010 and 2014. Rate of metastases at presentation was analyzed using clinical M stage. Multivariable analysis was performed evaluating race, ethnicity, sex, age, facility location, facility type, insurance status, income, education, and tumor and nodal stage using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 12,857 patients with HPVOPCA and 952 patients with HPVNOPCA were included. Private insurance was carried by 64% and 47% of patients with HPVOPCA and HPVNOPCA, respectively. HPVOPCA was located in the tonsil in 56% of patients. For both HPVOPCA and HPVNOPCA, there was no meaningful difference in distant metastasis at presentation based on facility type or location, sex, race, Hispanic ethnicity, or urban or rural location. For HPVOPCA, there were significantly lower odds of metastasis in privately insured patients compared with uninsured patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.64; P < .001) and higher odds of metastasis for patients living in census tracts with the lowest rates of high school graduates compared with the highest rates (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.02 to 3.19; P = .041) and for patients with higher tumor stage (OR, 3.67, 95% CI, 2.25 to 5.99; P < .001) and nodal stage (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.11 to 5.29; P < .001). For HPVNOPCA, neither higher T or N stage nor any demographic features were found to be associated with metastasis at presentation.

CONCLUSION

This large retrospective analysis identifies likely modifiable risk factors for metastatic presentation in HPVOPCA. Educational interventions may result in modifications of these patterns.

JAK3 Variant, Immune Signatures, DNA Methylation, and Social Determinants Linked to Survival Racial Disparities in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

To inform novel personalized medicine approaches for race and socioeconomic disparities in head and neck cancer, we examined germline and somatic mutations, immune signatures, and epigenetic alterations linked to neighborhood determinants of health in Black and non-Latino White (NLW) patients with head and neck cancer. Cox proportional hazards revealed that Black patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC) with PAX5 (P = 0.06) and PAX1 (P = 0.017) promoter methylation had worse survival than NLW patients, after controlling for education, zipcode, and tumor-node-metastasis stage (n = 118). We also found that promoter methylation of PAX1 and PAX5 (n = 78), was correlated with neighborhood characteristics at the zip-code level (P < 0.05). Analyses also showed differences in the frequency of TP53 mutations (n = 32) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) counts (n = 24), and the presence of a specific C → A germline mutation in JAK3, chr19:17954215 (protein P132T), in Black patients with HNSCC (n = 73; P < 0.05), when compared with NLW (n = 37) patients. TIL counts are associated (P = 0.035) with long-term (>5 years), when compared with short-term survival (<2 years). We show bio-social determinants of health associated with survival in Black patients with HNSCC, which together with racial differences shown in germline mutations, somatic mutations, and TIL counts, suggests that contextual factors may significantly inform precision oncology services for diverse populations.

TGFβ1 Genetic Variants Predict Clinical Outcomes of HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients after Definitive Radiotherapy

Purpose: TGFβ1 plays a critical role in inflammation and immune responses and treatment response and survival. TGFβ1 variants may affect its expression level or functional efficiency, thus modifying tumor status and survival in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (SCCOP).Experimental Design: We determined tumor HPV16 status and genotyped three TGFβ1 polymorphisms in 564 incident SCCOP patients treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Univariate and multivariable Cox models were used to evaluate the associations between the three polymorphisms and survival.Results: Overall, 85% of patients (482 of 564) had HPV16-positive SCCOP. We found that TGFβ1 rs1982073 had statistically significant associations with survival, whereas TGFβ1 rs1800469 and TGFβ1 rs1800471 did not. Patients with TGFβ1 rs1982073 CT/CC variant genotypes had significantly better overall, disease-specific, and disease-free survival compared with those with the corresponding common homozygous TT genotype (all log-rank: P < 0.001). Furthermore, these genotypes were significantly associated with an approximately 5 times reduced risk of overall death, death owing to disease, and recurrence after multivariable adjustment. Moreover, the stratified analyses by tumor HPV status indicated that the significant effects of TGFβ1 rs1982073 polymorphism on survival were found among HPV16-positive SCCOP patients only. Finally, the functional relevance of these variants was further characterized.Conclusions: Our findings support that the TGFβ1 rs1982073 polymorphism plays a significant role in the prognosis of SCCOP, especially in HPV16-positive SCCOP patients treated with chemoradiation. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings. Clin Cancer Res; 24(9); 2225-33. ©2018 AACR.