Declining hysterectomy prevalence and the estimated impact on uterine cancer incidence in Scotland

Prevalence of hysterectomy and its determinants in northern Iran: enrollment results of the Tabari cohort study

BACKGROUND

To the best of our knowledge, no population-based studies have provided insights into the prevalence of hysterectomy and its risk factors among northern Iranian females. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of hysterectomy in a large cohort of northern Iranian females.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included data from the enrollment phase of the Tabari cohort study (TCS). The TCS consists of 10,255 adults (4,149 males and 6,106 females) aged 35-70 years who reside in Sari, Mazandaran, Iran, of which 6103 females were included in the study. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to search for hysterectomy determinants.

RESULTS

Our results revealed that the prevalence of hysterectomy among northern Iranian females was 9.7% (595/6103). Additionally, 50-59 (OR: 4.63, 95% CI: 3.57-6.01) and 60-70 (OR: 5.83, 95% CI: 4.28-7.95) age groups, higher socioeconomic levels (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.13-2.42), a history of tubectomy (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05-1.53), and more gravida (OR: 5.35, 95% CI: 1.62-17.63) were found to increase the odds of hysterectomy, whereas living in mountainous areas (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-2.75) and having a job (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45-0.86) were found to decrease the odds of hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

Older age groups, living in urban areas, higher socioeconomic levels, not having a job, a history of tubectomy, and more gravida were found to increase the odds of hysterectomy.

LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy (LAVA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

There is uncertainty about the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy, particularly the relative rate of complications of the two procedures. While uptake of laparoscopic hysterectomy has been slow, the situation is changing with greater familiarity, better training, better equipment and increased proficiency in the technique. Thus, a large, robust, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to compare contemporary laparoscopic hysterectomy with abdominal hysterectomy to determine the safest and most cost-effective technique.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A parallel, open, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised controlled, expertise-based surgery trial with integrated health economic evaluation and an internal pilot with an embedded qualitative process evaluation. A within trial-based economic evaluation will explore the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with open abdominal hysterectomy. We will aim to recruit 3250 women requiring a hysterectomy for a benign gynaecological condition and who were suitable for either laparoscopic or open techniques. The primary outcome is major complications up to six completed weeks postsurgery and the key secondary outcome is time from surgery to resumption of usual activities using the personalised Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function questionnaire. The principal outcome for the economic evaluation is to be cost per QALY at 12 months' postsurgery. A secondary analysis is to be undertaken to generate costs per major surgical complication avoided and costs per return to normal activities.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the West Midlands-Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee, 18 February 2021 (Ethics ref: 21/WM/0019). REC approval for the protocol version 2.0 dated 2 February 2021 was issued on 18 February 2021.We will present the findings in national and international conferences. We will also aim to publish the findings in high impact peer-reviewed journals. We will disseminate the completed paper to the Department of Health, the Scientific Advisory Committees of the RCOG, the Royal College of Nurses (RCN) and the BSGE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN14566195.

Sex and Gender Multidimensionality in Epidemiologic Research

Along with age and race, sex has historically been a core stratification and control variable in epidemiologic research. While in recent decades research guidelines and institutionalized requirements have incorporated an approach differentiating biological sex from social gender, neither sex nor gender is itself a unidimensional construct. The conflation of dimensions within and between sex and gender presents a validity issue wherein proxy measures are used for dimensions of interest, often without explicit acknowledgement or evaluation. Here, individual-level dimensions of sex and gender are outlined as a guide for epidemiologists, and 2 case studies are presented. The first case study demonstrates how unacknowledged use of a sex/gender proxy for a sexed dimension of interest (uterine status) resulted in decades of cancer research misestimating risks, racial disparities, and age trends. The second illustrates how a multidimensional sex and gender framework may be applied to strengthen research on coronavirus disease 2019 incidence, diagnosis, morbidity, and mortality. Considerations are outlined, including: 1) addressing the match between measures and theory, and explicitly acknowledging and evaluating proxy use; 2) improving measurement across dimensions and social ecological levels; 3) incorporating multidimensionality into research objectives; and 4) interpreting sex, gender, and their effects as biopsychosocial.

Uterine Factor Infertility, a Systematic Review

Uterine factor infertility (UFI) is defined as a condition resulting from either a complete lack of a uterus or a non-functioning uterus due to many causes. The exact prevalence of UFI is currently unknown, while treatments to achieve pregnancy are very limited. To evaluate the prevalence of this condition within its different causes, we carried out a worldwide systematic review on UFI. We performed research on the prevalence of UFI and its various causes throughout the world, according to the PRISMA criteria. A total of 188 studies were included in qualitative synthesis. UFI accounted for 2.1 to 16.7% of the causes of female infertility. We tried to evaluate the proportion of the different causes of UFI: uterine agenesia, hysterectomies, uterine malformations, uterine irradiation, adenomyosis, synechiae and Asherman syndrome, uterine myomas and uterine polyps. However, the data available in countries and studies were highly heterogenous. This present systematic review underlines the lack of a consensual definition of UFI. A national register of patients with UFI based on a consensual definition of Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility and Non-Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility would be helpful for women, whose desire for pregnancy has reached a dead end.

Trends in Hysterectomy Incidence Rates During 2000-2015 in Denmark: Shifting from Abdominal to Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Background

Hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) is a common surgical procedure in gynecology. Although minimally invasive surgical procedures have been introduced, hysterectomy is still associated with risk of short- and long-term complications. Given that hysterectomized women are no longer at risk of either hysterectomy or being diagnosed with endometrial or cervical cancer, it is important to describe trends in hysterectomy rates.

Objective

To describe trends in hysterectomy incidence rates overall and stratified by age, indication, and procedure.

Methods

Nationwide population-based cohort study using Danish national registries, 2000–2015, was conducted. We calculated the overall hysterectomy-corrected and age-standardized incidence rates of hysterectomy among women ≥20 years old. Incidence rates were stratified by age group, indication, and surgical procedure. We performed trend analyses using Joinpoint regression, thereby estimating the average annual percentage change (AAPC).

Results

A total of 98,484 women had a hysterectomy during the study period, corresponding to an overall age-standardized, hysterectomy-corrected hysterectomy incidence rate (SIR) of 351.1 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 348.9;353.3). SIR of hysterectomy declined over time (AAPC −1.4; 95% CI −1.9;-1.0), which was driven by a decline in rates of benign hysterectomy (AAPC −2.1; 95% CI −2.7;-1.6). Irrespective of indication, rates of abdominal hysterectomy declined substantially during the study period and were surpassed by rates of minimally invasive procedures (ie, laparoscopy and robot-assisted laparoscopy) in 2013.

Conclusion

Hysterectomy-corrected incidence rates of benign hysterectomy declined over time. Irrespective of indication, we observed a shift in surgical procedure over time, from abdominal hysterectomy to minimally invasive surgical procedures.

Interventions to improve insulin resistance for the prevention of endometrial cancer

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To determine the safety and effectiveness of interventions to improve insulin resistance for the prevention of atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial cancer, or both.