Roles of mismatch repair proteins hMSH2 and hMLH1 in the development of sporadic breast cancer

Establishment of patient-derived organoids for guiding personalized therapies in breast cancer patients

Breast cancer has become the most commonly diagnosed cancer. The intra- and interpatient heterogeneity induced a considerable variation in treatment efficacy. There is an urgent requirement for preclinical models to anticipate the effectiveness of individualized drug responses. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) can accurately recapitulate the architecture and biological characteristics of the origin tumor, making them a promising model that can overtake many limitations of cell lines and PDXs. However, it is still unclear whether PDOs-based drug testing can benefit breast cancer patients, particularly those with tumor recurrence or treatment resistance. Fresh tumor samples were surgically resected for organoid culture. Primary tumor samples and PDOs were subsequently subjected to H&E staining, immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) to make comparisons. Drug sensitivity tests were performed to evaluate the feasibility of this model for predicting patient drug response in clinical practice. We established 75 patient-derived breast cancer organoid models. The results of H&E staining, IHC, and WES revealed that PDOs inherited the histologic and genetic characteristics of their parental tumor tissues. The PDOs successfully predicted the patient's drug response, and most cases exhibited consistency between PDOs' drug susceptibility test results and the clinical response of the matched patient. We conclude that the breast cancer organoids platform can be a potential preclinical tool used for the selection of effective drugs and guided personalized therapies for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Theranostic Interpolation of Genomic Instability in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is a diverse disease caused by mutations in multiple genes accompanying epigenetic aberrations of hazardous genes and protein pathways, which distress tumor-suppressor genes and the expression of oncogenes. Alteration in any of the several physiological mechanisms such as cell cycle checkpoints, DNA repair machinery, mitotic checkpoints, and telomere maintenance results in genomic instability. Theranostic has the potential to foretell and estimate therapy response, contributing a valuable opportunity to modify the ongoing treatments and has developed new treatment strategies in a personalized manner. “Omics” technologies play a key role while studying genomic instability in breast cancer, and broadly include various aspects of proteomics, genomics, metabolomics, and tumor grading. Certain computational techniques have been designed to facilitate the early diagnosis of cancer and predict disease-specific therapies, which can produce many effective results. Several diverse tools are used to investigate genomic instability and underlying mechanisms. The current review aimed to explore the genomic landscape, tumor heterogeneity, and possible mechanisms of genomic instability involved in initiating breast cancer. We also discuss the implications of computational biology regarding mutational and pathway analyses, identification of prognostic markers, and the development of strategies for precision medicine. We also review different technologies required for the investigation of genomic instability in breast cancer cells, including recent therapeutic and preventive advances in breast cancer.

A biomarker study in Peruvian males with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) frequency in males is extremely low and tumor features vary from its female counterpart. Breast cancer clinical and pathological features differ by race in women. Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels, mismatch repair (MMR) protein loss, androgen receptor (AR) expression, and PIK3CA gene mutations are predictive biomarkers of response to biological therapy in female BC. There is limited information about clinical and pathological features as well as predictive biomarkers in males of non-Caucasian races with BC.

AIM

To investigate clinicopathological features and biomarkers of BC tumors in males and their prognostic value in Peruvian population.

METHODS

This study looked at a single-institution series of 54 Peruvian males with invasive BC who were diagnosed from Jan 2004 to June 2018. Standard pathological features, TIL levels, MMR proteins, AR immunohistochemistry staining, and PIK3CA gene mutations were prospectively evaluated in cases with available paraffin material. Percentage of AR and estrogen receptor (ER) positive cells was additionally calculated by software after slide scanning. Statistical analyses included association tests, intraclass correlation test and Kaplan Meier overall survival curves.

RESULTS

The median age was 63 years and most cases were ER-positive (85.7%), HER2 negative (87.2%), Luminal-A phenotype (60%) and clinical stage II (41.5%) among our male breast tumors. Median TIL was 10% and higher levels tended to be associated with Luminal-B phenotype and higher grade. AR-positive was found in 85.3% and was correlated with ER (intraclass index of 0.835, P < 0.001). Loss of MMR proteins was found in 15.4% and PIK3CA mutation (H1047R) in 14.3% (belonged to the Luminal-A phenotype). Loss of MMR proteins was associated with AR-negative (P = 0.018) but not with ER (P = 0.43) or TIL (P = 0.84). Early stages (P < 0.001) and lower grade (P = 0.006) were associated with longer overall survival. ER status, phenotype, AR status, TIL level, MMR protein loss nor PIK3CA mutation was not associated with survival (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Male BC is usually ER and AR positive, and Luminal-A. MMR loss and PIK3CA mutations are infrequent. Stage and grade predicted overall survival in our South American country population.

DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Variants in Sporadic Solid Cancers

The phenotypic effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the development of sporadic solid cancers are still scarce. The aim of this review was to summarise and analyse published data on the associations between SNPs in mismatch repair genes and various cancers. The mismatch repair system plays a unique role in the control of the genetic integrity and it is often inactivated (germline and somatic mutations and hypermethylation) in cancer patients. Here, we focused on germline variants in mismatch repair genes and found the outcomes rather controversial: some SNPs are sometimes ascribed as protective, while other studies reported their pathological effects. Regarding the complexity of cancer as one disease, we attempted to ascertain if particular polymorphisms exert the effect in the same direction in the development and treatment of different malignancies, although it is still not straightforward to conclude whether polymorphisms always play a clear positive role or a negative one. Most recent and robust genome-wide studies suggest that risk of cancer is modulated by variants in mismatch repair genes, for example in colorectal cancer. Our study shows that rs1800734 in MLH1 or rs2303428 in MSH2 may influence the development of different malignancies. The lack of functional studies on many DNA mismatch repair SNPs as well as their interactions are not explored yet. Notably, the concerted action of more variants in one individual may be protective or harmful. Further, complex interactions of DNA mismatch repair variations with both the environment and microenvironment in the cancer pathogenesis will deserve further attention.

DNA Repair Deficiency in Breast Cancer: Opportunities for Immunotherapy

Historically the development of anticancer treatments has been focused on their effect on tumor cells alone. However, newer treatments have shifted attention to targets on immune cells, resulting in dramatic responses. The effect of DNA repair deficiency on the microenvironment remains an area of key interest. Moreover, established therapies such as DNA damaging treatments such as chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors further modify the tumor microenvironment. Here we describe DNA repair pathways in breast cancer and activation of innate immune pathways in DNA repair deficiency, in particular, the STING (STimulator of INterferon Genes) pathway. Breast tumors with DNA repair deficiency are associated with upregulation of immune checkpoints including PD-L1 (Programmed Death Ligand-1) and may represent a target population for single agent or combination immunotherapy treatment.

The crosstalk between trace elements with DNA damage response, repair, and oxidative stress in cancer

DNA damage response (DDR) is a regulatory system responsible for maintaining genome integrity and stability, which can sense and transduce DNA damage signals. The severity of damage appears to determine DDRs, which can include damage repair, cell-cycle arrest, and apoptosis. Furthermore, defective components in DNA damage and repair machinery are an underlying cause for the development and progression of various types of cancers. Increasing evidence indicates that there is an association between trace elements and DDR/repair mechanisms. In fact, trace elements seem to affect mediators of DDR. Besides, it has been revealed that oxidative stress (OS) and trace elements are associated with cancer development. In this review, we discuss the role of some critical trace elements in the risk of cancer. In addition, we provide a brief introduction on DDR and OS in cancer. Finally, we will further review the interactions between some important trace elements including selenium, zinc, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic, and DDR, and OS in cancer.

Hypomethylation of mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 is associated with chemotolerance of breast carcinoma: Clinical significance

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to understand the importance of mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 in chemotolerance and prognosis of breast carcinoma (BC).

METHODS

First, the alterations (deletion/methylation/expression) of MLH1 and MSH2 were analyzed in 45 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)-treated and 133 pretherapeutic BC samples. The chemotolerant BC cells were characterized by treating two BC cell lines MCF-7 and MDA MB 231 with two anthracycline antitumor antibiotics, doxorubicin and nogalamycin.

RESULTS

The deletion frequencies were 32% to 38% in MLH1/MSH2 genes and promoter methylation frequencies were 49% to 62% in MLH1 and 41% to 51% in MSH2 in both NACT-treated and pretherapeutic samples. The overall alteration of MLH1 and MSH2 was 58% to 71% in the samples. Reduced messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression were found in both the genes and it showed concordance with the molecular alterations. NACT-treated patients showed better prognosis. The chemotherapeutic drug induced increased mRNA/protein expression of the genes in BC cell lines was due to their promoter hypomethylation, as analyzed by quantitative methylation assay. This phenomenon was also evident in NACT-treated BC samples.

CONCLUSION

MLH1/MSH2 genes play a critical role in the development of BC. Hypomethylation of MLH1/MSH2 genes might be important in chemotolerance of the disease.

Functional Interaction Between BRCA1 and DNA Repair in Yeast May Uncover a Role of RAD50, RAD51, MRE11A, and MSH6 Somatic Variants in Cancer Development

In this study, we determined if BRCA1 partners involved in DNA double-strand break (DSB) and mismatch repair (MMR) may contribute to breast and ovarian cancer development. Taking advantage the functional conservation of DNA repair pathways between yeast and human, we expressed several BRCA1 missense variants in DNA repair yeast mutants to identify functional interaction between BRCA1 and DNA repair in BRCA1-induced genome instability. The pathogenic p.C61G, pA1708E, p.M775R, and p.I1766S, and the neutral pS1512I BRCA1 variants increased intra-chromosomal recombination in the DNA-repair proficient strain RSY6. In the mre11, rad50, rad51, and msh6 deletion strains, the BRCA1 variants p.C61G, pA1708E, p.M775R, p.I1766S, and pS1215I did not increase intra-chromosomal recombination suggesting that a functional DNA repair pathway is necessary for BRCA1 variants to determine genome instability. The pathogenic p.C61G and p.I1766S and the neutral p.N132K, p.Y179C, and p.N550H variants induced a significant increase of reversion in the msh2Δ strain; the neutral p.Y179C and the pathogenic p.I1766S variant induced gene reversion also, in the msh6Δ strain. These results imply a functional interaction between MMR and BRCA1 in modulating genome instability. We also performed a somatic mutational screening of MSH6, RAD50, MRE11A, and RAD51 genes in tumor samples from 34 patients and identified eight pathogenic or predicted pathogenic rare missense variants: four in MSH6, one in RAD50, one in MRE11A, and two in RAD51. Although we found no correlation between BRCA1 status and these somatic DNA repair variants, this study suggests that somatic missense variants in DNA repair genes may contribute to breast and ovarian tumor development.

Expressional analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Mismatch repair proteins are ubiquitous keys in diverse cellular functions and protects the genome by correcting mismatch as post replication error correction machinery. Mismatch repair deficiency was associated with tumor development and progression therefore, current study was aimed to investigate MLH1 and MSH2 expression in breast cancer and correlate patients' clinicopathological factors with status of mismatch repair genes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Breast cancer tissues with adjacent normal tissue along with clinical details were collected during surgery from 80 cases. Immunohistochemistry was performed with primary and secondary antibodies for expressional analysis. Results were analyzed using SPSS version 24.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that both MLH1 and MSH2 were crucial in maintaining DNA repair system and loss of these 2 mismatch repair proteins may lead to adverse outcomes in breast cancer. Statistically significant association was found between loss of MLH1 (P = 0.0004; odds ratio 13.8; 95% confidence interval 4.6-41.1), MSH2 (P = 0.0002; odds ratio 14.0; 95% confidence interval 4.7-42.2) and breast cancer. Statistical analysis demonstrated that MLH1 and MSH2 deficiency may lead breast cancer progression to advanced stage, correlated with tumor focality (MLH1 P = 0.001; MSH2 P = 0.002) and chemotherapy (MLH1 P = 0.01; MSH2 P = 0.04). Presence of CK7, GATA 3, and E cadherin tends to increase in mismatch repair deficient breast cancer. Whereas, no association of mismatch repair deficiency was observed with age, tumor grade, positive lymph nodes, menopause, and ER and/or PR status.

CONCLUSION

Loss of mismatch repair proteins in breast cancer highlights its potential role in DNA repair mechanisms and helps tumor cells to become resistant against chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, mismatch repair deficiency may contribute to breast cancer progression.

Causes of genome instability: the effect of low dose chemical exposures in modern society

Genome instability is a prerequisite for the development of cancer. It occurs when genome maintenance systems fail to safeguard the genome's integrity, whether as a consequence of inherited defects or induced via exposure to environmental agents (chemicals, biological agents and radiation). Thus, genome instability can be defined as an enhanced tendency for the genome to acquire mutations; ranging from changes to the nucleotide sequence to chromosomal gain, rearrangements or loss. This review raises the hypothesis that in addition to known human carcinogens, exposure to low dose of other chemicals present in our modern society could contribute to carcinogenesis by indirectly affecting genome stability. The selected chemicals with their mechanisms of action proposed to indirectly contribute to genome instability are: heavy metals (DNA repair, epigenetic modification, DNA damage signaling, telomere length), acrylamide (DNA repair, chromosome segregation), bisphenol A (epigenetic modification, DNA damage signaling, mitochondrial function, chromosome segregation), benomyl (chromosome segregation), quinones (epigenetic modification) and nano-sized particles (epigenetic pathways, mitochondrial function, chromosome segregation, telomere length). The purpose of this review is to describe the crucial aspects of genome instability, to outline the ways in which environmental chemicals can affect this cancer hallmark and to identify candidate chemicals for further study. The overall aim is to make scientists aware of the increasing need to unravel the underlying mechanisms via which chemicals at low doses can induce genome instability and thus promote carcinogenesis.

DNA methylome profiling beyond promoters - taking an epigenetic snapshot of the breast tumor microenvironment

Breast cancer, one of the most common and deadliest malignancies in developed countries, is a remarkably heterogeneous disease, which is clinically reflected by patients who display similar pathological features but respond differently to treatments. In the search for mediators of responsiveness, the tumor microenvironment (TME), in particular tumor-associated immune cells, has been pushed into the spotlight as it has become clear that the TME is an active component of breast cancer disease that affects clinical outcomes. Thus, the characterization of the TME in terms of cell identities and their frequencies has generated a great deal of interest. The common methods currently used for this purpose are either limited in accuracy or application, and DNA methylation has recently been proposed as an alternative approach. The aim of this review is to discuss DNA methylation profiling beyond promoters as a potential clinical tool for TME characterization and cell typing within tumors. With respect to this, we review the role of DNA methylation in breast cancer and cell-lineage specification, as well as inform about the composition and clinical relevance of the TME.

Expanding the genetic basis of copy number variation in familial breast cancer

Introduction

Familial breast cancer (fBC) is generally associated with an early age of diagnosis and a higher frequency of disease among family members. Over the past two decades a number of genes have been identified that are unequivocally associated with breast cancer (BC) risk but there remain a significant proportion of families that cannot be accounted for by these genes. Copy number variants (CNVs) are a form of genetic variation yet to be fully explored for their contribution to fBC. CNVs exert their effects by either being associated with whole or partial gene deletions or duplications and by interrupting epigenetic patterning thereby contributing to disease development. CNV analysis can also be used to identify new genes and loci which may be associated with disease risk.

Methods

The Affymetrix Cytogenetic Whole Genome 2.7 M (Cyto2.7 M) arrays were used to detect regions of genomic re-arrangement in a cohort of 129 fBC BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation negative patients with a young age of diagnosis (<50 years) compared to 40 unaffected healthy controls (>55 years of age).

Results

CNV analysis revealed the presence of 275 unique rearrangements that were not present in the control population suggestive of their involvement in BC risk. Several CNVs were found that have been previously reported as BC susceptibility genes. This included CNVs in RPA3, NBN (NBS1), MRE11A and CYP19A1 in five unrelated fBC patients suggesting that these genes are involved in BC initiation and/or progression. Of special interest was the identification of WWOX and FHIT rearrangements in three unrelated fBC patients.

Conclusions

This study has identified a number of CNVs that potentially contribute to BC initiation and/or progression. The identification of CNVs that are associated with known tumour suppressor genes is of special interest that warrants further larger studies to understand their precise role in fBC.

Promoter methylation status of MGMT, hMSH2, and hMLH1 and its relationship to corresponding protein expression and TP53 mutations in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

To determine the relevance of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), human mutS homolog 2 (hMSH2), and human mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1) in TP53 mutations in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, we employed methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting technology and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to analyze promoter hypermethylation of MGMT, hMSH2, and hMLH1, respectively, in 51 paired tumors and their adjacent normal tissues. The protein expression of the three proteins was also evaluated by Western blot analysis, and the PCR products of TP53, from exon 5 to exon 8, were directly sequenced to measure the mutation spectrum. Esophageal tumor tissues embraced statistically higher MGMT and hMSH2 promoter methylation level than normal tissue. The promoter methylation status of MGMT and hMSH2 corresponds positively with the protein expression level of MGMT and hMSH2. However, such relevance was not found for hMLH1. Furthermore, TP53 mutation status was well associated with MGMT and hMSH2 promoter methylation status, indicating that silencing of the two genes could lead to TP53 mutation in ESCC.

Protein expression and methylation of DNA repair genes hMLH1, hMSH2, MGMT and BRCA1 and their correlation with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in basal-like breast cancer

AIMS

Basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) is characterized by aggressive behaviour; its genesis is the perturbation of DNA repair as a consequence of BRCA1 methylation or mutation. We comparatively evaluated alterations of DNA repair proteins and p53 between BLBC and non-BLBC cases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Tumour sections from 104 BLBC and 89 non-BLBC patients were immunostained for hMLH1, hMSH2, MGMT, BRCA1 and p53. Methylation status of DNA repair genes was analysed by methylation-specific PCR, and p53 mutation was examined by direct sequencing. Immunoreactive levels of hMLH1 and MGMT were lower in BLBC, whereas the levels of hMSH2 and p53 were higher, compared to non-BLBC (P ≤ 0.014). Reduced expression of hMLH1 [hazard ratio (HR) 5.26, P = 0.001] and preserved expression of MGMT (HR 2.58, P = 0.039) proved to be independent predictors of poor survival in BLBC patients. DNA repair genes were methylated in approximately 20-40% of BLBCs without a significant relationship between their methylation and p53 mutation. BRCA1 methylation was associated with the loss of its protein expression (P = 0.004). MGMT methylation was linked to larger tumour size (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Perturbations of the DNA repair system might be different between BLBC and non-BLBC. Alterations of hMLH1 and MGMT appear important for tumour progression and survival in BLBC patients.

Ixabepilone administered weekly or every three weeks in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients; a randomized non-comparative phase II trial

To explore the activity and safety of two schedules of ixabepilone, as first line chemotherapy, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, a randomized non-comparative phase II study was conducted. From November 2008 until December 2010, 64 patients were treated with either ixabepilone 40 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (Group A, 32 patients) or ixabepilone 20 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks (Group B, 32 patients). Overall response rate (the primary end point) was 47% in Group A and 50% in Group B. The most frequent severe adverse events were neutropenia (32% vs. 23%), metabolic disturbances (29% vs. 27%) and sensory neuropathy (12% vs. 27%). Two patients in Group A and 3 in Group B developed febrile neutropenia. After a median follow-up of 22.7 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9 months in Group A and 12 months in Group B. Median survival was 26 months in Group A, whereas it was not reached in Group B. Multiple genetic and molecular markers were examined in tumor and peripheral blood DNA, but none of them was associated with ORR or drug toxicity. Favorable prognostic markers included: the T-variants of ABCB1 SNPs c.2677G/A/T, c.1236C/T and c.3435C/T, as well as high MAPT mRNA and Tau protein expression, which were all associated with the ER/PgR-positive phenotype; absence of TopoIIa; and, an interaction between low TUBB3 mRNA expression and Group B. Upon multivariate analysis, tumor ER-positivity was a favorable (p = 0.0092) and TopoIIa an unfavorable (p = 0.002) prognostic factor for PFS; PgR-positivity was favorable (p = 0.028) for survival. In conclusion, ixabepilone had a manageable safety profile in both the 3-weekly and weekly schedules. A number of markers identified in the present trial appear to deserve further evaluation for their prognostic and/or predictive value in larger multi-arm studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00790894.

Predictive value of MGMT, hMLH1, hMSH2 and BRCA1 protein expression for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in basal-like breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the importance of biological markers to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced basal-like breast cancers (BLBCs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two BLBC patients receiving NACT with an anthracycline-based regimen plus taxane were included in this study. The immunoreactivities of MGMT, MLH1, MSH2 and BRCA1 before and after NACT were evaluated.

RESULTS

A pCR was obtained in 10 of 32 cases (31%). Cancer-related (P = 0.013) and disease-free (P = 0.023) survival rates were significantly higher in the pCR group than in the non-pCR group. In biopsy samples before NACT, attenuated expression of MGMT, MLH1, MSH2 and BRCA1 was observed in 12/32 (38%), 0/32 (0%), 5/32 (16%) and 28/32 (88%) cases, respectively. On evaluation of pCR, patients' characteristics (patients' age, menopausal status, or clinical and pathological stages) and immunohistochemical patterns, attenuated expression of MGMT was only found to be significantly predictive of a pCR (P = 0.018). Paired biopsy sample before NACT and a surgical tumor material after NACT were available for 19 cases of non-pCR. In these cases, decrease in expression during NACT were more frequently observed for MGMT as compared to MLH1, MSH2 or BRCA1 (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

MGMT status is a predictive factor for pCR with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based plus taxane combination chemotherapy, which may be helpful in the selection of appropriate NACT for Japanese patients with BLBC.

DNA demethylation by 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine treatment abrogates 17 beta-estradiol-induced cell growth and restores expression of DNA repair genes in human breast cancer cells

Prolonged exposure to elevated levels of estrogen is a risk factor for breast cancer. Though increased cell growth and loss of DNA repair capacity is one of the proposed mechanisms for estrogen-induced cancers, the mechanism through which estrogen induces cell growth and decreases DNA repair capacity is not clear. DNA hypermethylation is known to inactivate DNA repair genes and apoptotic response in cancer cells. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the role of DNA hypermethylation in estrogen-induced cell growth and regulation of DNA repair genes expression in breast cancer cells. To achieve this objective, the estrogen-responsive MCF-7 cells either pretreated with 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) or untreated (as control) were exposed to 17 beta-estradiol (E2), and its effect on cell growth and expression of DNA repair genes were measured. The result revealed that 5-aza-dC abrogates the E2-induced growth in MCF-7 cells. An increased expression of OGG1, MSH4, and MLH1 by 5-aza-dC treatment alone, suggest the DNA hypermethylation as a potential cause for decreased expression of these genes in MCF-7 cells. The decreased expression of ERCC1, XPC, OGG1, and MLH1 by E2 alone and its restoration by co-treatment with 5-aza-dC further suggest that E2 reduces the expression of these DNA repair genes potentially through promoter hypermethylation. Reactivation of mismatch repair (MMR) gene MLH1 and abrogation of E2-induced cell growth by 5-aza-dC treatment suggest that estrogen causes increased growth in breast cancer cells potentially through the inhibition of MMR-mediated apoptotic response. In summary, this study suggests that estrogen increases cell growth and decreases the DNA repair capacity in breast cancer cells, at least in part, through epigenetic mechanism.

Genotyping of BRCA1, BRCA2, p53, CDKN2A, MLH1 and MSH2 genes in a male patient with secondary breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Some tumour suppressor genes (BRCA2) and mismatch repair genes (MSH2, MLH1) are correlated with an increased risk for male breast cancer.

CASE REPORT

Our patient developed secondary breast cancer after the treatment for Hodgkin's disease in childhood. DNA was isolated from the patients' blood and screened for mutations, polymorphisms and variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, p53, CDKN2A, MLH1 and MSH2 genes. We found no mutations but common polymorphisms, and three variants in mismatch repair genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Nucleotide variants c.2006-6T>C and p.G322D in MSH2 might be correlated with male breast cancer.

The role of the DNA hypermethylating agent Budesonide in the decatenating activity of DNA topoisomerase II

Catenations between sister chromatids result from DNA replication and must be resolved to ensure proper chromatid segregation in mitosis. Functionally active Topoisomerase II (Topo II), through its mechanism of concerted breaking and rejoining of double stranded DNA, is required to carry out this fundamental process. In previous studies we have shown that modifications in DNA sequence by halogenated pyrimidines and by the demethylating agent 5-azacytidine leads to malfunction of Topo II that results in an increased yield of endorreduplicated cells as a result of segregation failure. In the present work we have evaluated the possible influence of the methylating agent Budesonide to modify the frequency of endoreduplicated cells in AA8 Chinese hamster cell population. Our results seem to indicate that when Budesonide was administered for two consecutive cell cycles did induce an increase in the yield of endoreduplicated cells, as previously observed for the hypomethylating agent 5-azaC. We have also examined the possible relationship between extensive hypermethylation induced by Budesonide in DNA and stabilization of cleavable complexes by m-AMSA. Taken as a whole, our results show that the degree of methylation in DNA correlates with the effectiveness of m-AMSA to stabilize the Topo II-DNA complexes and to induce DNA cleavage. These findings evidence for the first time the functional importance of DNA hyper- and hypomethylation changes as epigenetic factors able to modulate Topo II activity for proper chromosome segregation.

Emergence of rationally designed therapeutic strategies for breast cancer targeting DNA repair mechanisms

Accumulating evidence suggests that many cancers, including BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancers, are deficient in DNA repair processes. Both hereditary and sporadic breast cancers have been found to have significant downregulation of repair factors. This has provided opportunities to exploit DNA repair deficiencies, whether acquired or inherited. Here, we review efforts to exploit DNA repair deficiencies in tumors, with a focus on breast cancer. A variety of agents, including PARP (poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase) inhibitors, are currently under investigation in clinical trials and available results will be reviewed.

DNA mismatch repair and the transition to hormone independence in breast and prostate cancer

The molecular basis for the progression of breast and prostate cancer from hormone dependent to hormone independent disease remains a critical issue in the management of these two cancers. The DNA mismatch repair system is integral to the maintenance of genomic stability and suppression of tumorigenesis. No firm consensus exists regarding the implications of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies in the development of breast or prostate cancer. However, recent studies have reported an association between mismatch repair deficiency and loss of specific hormone receptors, inferring a potential role for mismatch repair deficiency in this transition. An updated review of the experimental data supporting or contradicting the involvement of MMR defects in the development and progression of breast and prostate cancer will be provided with particular emphasis on their implications in the transition to hormone independence.

Clinical significance of epigenetic inactivation of hMLH1 and BRCA1 in Tunisian patients with invasive breast carcinoma

Aberrant hypermethylation of gene promoter regions is one of the mechanisms for inactivation of tumour suppressor genes in many human cancers including breast carcinoma. In the current study, we aimed to assess by MSP, the methylation pattern of two cancer-related genes involved in DNA repair: hMLH1 (mutL homolog 1, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 2 (E. coli) and BRCA1 (breast cancer 1, early onset) in 78 primary breast cancers from Tunisian patients. The methylation frequencies were 24.36% for hMLH1 and 46% for BRCA1. BRCA1 methylation correlated with age at diagnosis (P = .015) and 5-years disease free survival (P = .016) while hMLH1 methylation was more frequent in larger tumors (P = .002) and in presence of distant metastasis (P = .004). Furthermore, methylation of hMLH1 significantly correlated with high level of P53 expression (P = .006) and with overall survival (P = .015) suggesting that silencing of hMLH1 through aberrant promoter methylation could be used as a poor prognosis indicator in breast cancer.

Expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins in pleomorphic adenoma of minor salivary glands: relationship with clinical and histologic findings

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to examine the relationship between clinicopathological features and immunoexpression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins in pleomorphic adenoma (PA) of minor salivary glands.

STUDY DESIGN

Paraffin-embedded samples of typically benign PA lesions (n = 35) were prepared for histologic and immunohistochemical assessment. Based on the clinicopathologic features, the samples were categorized into low- and high-risk subtypes for their estimated potential for malignant transformation.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical analysis revealed strong correlations regarding the expression estimation and staining-intensity distribution (SID) scores between the two proteins. Although there was no relationship between marker immunoexpression and SID scores regarding clinical parameters, statistically significant variations for these parameters were evident regarding some histologic criteria or for risk stratification subtypes.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study could suggest the relationship of a DNA mismatch repair deficiency with high-risk subtypes of PA and the implication of its role in the origin and progression of these subtypes.

Expression and promoter methylation status of mismatch repair gene hMLH1 and hMSH2 in epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between methylation and loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression in ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We examined the methylation status of hMLH1 and hMSH2 promoter region by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) in 56 primary ovarian cancer tissues and 20 normal ovarian tissues, the relationship between the methylation status of these two genes and clinicopathological characteristics were analysed. We then treated SKOV3 and 3AO ovarian cancer cell lines with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dc). The hMLH1 and hMSH2 methylation was further assessed by MSP, and their mRNA expression was compared by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) before and after 5-aza-dc treatment in these two cell lines.

RESULTS

The methylation frequency of hMLH1 and hMSH2 was 30.4% (17 of 56) and 51.7% (29 of 56) in ovarian cancers, respectively, while no methylation was detected in normal ovarian tissues (P=0.015). There is a significant correlation between hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation and histological grade (P=0.028) as well as lymphatic metastasis (P=0.003). Methylation of hMSH2 correlated with histological grade (P=0.035) and lymphatic metastasis (P=0.015). Besides, the methylation rates of hMSH2 were significantly higher in endometrioid adenocarcinoma tissues than in other pathological types of ovarian cancer. After 5-aza-dc treatment, the expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 was reversed in two cell lines.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that promoter hypermethylation is an important mechanism for loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression in human ovarian cancer and may be a potential prognostic factor in ovarian cancer.

Frequent alterations of hMLH1 and RBSP3/HYA22 at chromosomal 3p22.3 region in early and late-onset breast carcinoma: clinical and prognostic significance

Young age can be an independent prognostic factor for adverse prognosis in women with breast carcinoma (BC). In younger women, BC exhibited more aggressive pathological features than older women, indicating differences in biology. Frequent alterations in chromosomal (chr.) 3p22.3 in different malignancies indicated the existence of multiple candidate tumor suppressor genes (TSG) in this region, yet its association with BC remains unclear. In an effort to understand the differences in molecular pathogenesis in two age groups of BC, detailed analysis of alterations at chr.3p22.3 region was carried out in 47 early onset (group-A: < or =40 years) and 59 late-onset (group-A: >40 years) BC samples. Deletion mapping of the four candidate TSG, hMLH1, APRG1, ITGA9 and RBSP3/HYA22, located within 1 Mb of chr.3p22.3 showed high deletion in hMLH1 and RBSP3/HYA22 genes. Frequent methylation was also observed in these genes and significantly associated with their deletion. Quantitative messenger RNA (mRNA) expression and immunohistochemical analysis showed down-regulation of these genes. Alterations (deletion/methylation) of hMLH1 were significantly associated with RBSP3/HYA22 in group-A (P = 0.02). Significant poor survival in group-A patients with alterations in hMLH1 and RBSP3/HYA22 and the same in group-B patients with hMLH1 alterations indicated their importance as prognostic markers. Differential association of alterations of these genes with higher histological grades, more advanced stages and positive lymph node involvement were also seen. Thus, the present study suggests hMLH1 and RBSP3/HYA22 to be candidate TSG associated with development of both early and late-onset BC undergoing frequent genetic and epigenetic alteration and having significant prognostic implications.

Epigenetic mapping and functional analysis in a breast cancer metastasis model using whole-genome promoter tiling microarrays

Introduction

Breast cancer metastasis is a complex, multi-step biological process. Genetic mutations along with epigenetic alterations in the form of DNA methylation patterns and histone modifications contribute to metastasis-related gene expression changes and genomic instability. So far, these epigenetic contributions to breast cancer metastasis have not been well characterized, and there is only a limited understanding of the functional mechanisms affected by such epigenetic alterations. Furthermore, no genome-wide assessments have been undertaken to identify altered DNA methylation patterns in the context of metastasis and their effects on specific functional pathways or gene networks.

Methods

We have used a human gene promoter tiling microarray platform to analyze a cell line model of metastasis to lymph nodes composed of a poorly metastatic MDA-MB-468GFP human breast adenocarcinoma cell line and its highly metastatic variant (468LN). Gene networks and pathways associated with metastasis were identified, and target genes associated with epithelial–mesenchymal transition were validated with respect to DNA methylation effects on gene expression.

Results

We integrated data from the tiling microarrays with targets identified by Ingenuity Pathways Analysis software and observed epigenetic variations in genes implicated in epithelial–mesenchymal transition and with tumor cell migration. We identified widespread genomic hypermethylation and hypomethylation events in these cells and we confirmed functional associations between methylation status and expression of the CDH1, CST6, EGFR, SNAI2 and ZEB2 genes by quantitative real-time PCR. Our data also suggest that the complex genomic reorganization present in cancer cells may be superimposed over promoter-specific methylation events that are responsible for gene-specific expression changes.

Conclusion

This is the first whole-genome approach to identify genome-wide and gene-specific epigenetic alterations, and the functional consequences of these changes, in the context of breast cancer metastasis to lymph nodes. This approach allows the development of epigenetic signatures of metastasis to be used concurrently with genomic signatures to improve mapping of the evolving molecular landscape of metastasis and to permit translational approaches to target epigenetically regulated molecular pathways related to metastatic progression.

Hypermethylation and aberrant expression of DNA mismatch repair gene in pancreatic cancer

AIM: To determine the methylation and expression status of mismatch repair genes hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMLH3 and explore the role of mismatch repair defect in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS: Methylation status of hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMLH3 was detected by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP), and the expression of hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMLH3 were determined by reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR).

RESULTS: The frequencies of methylation for hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMSH3 were 28.6%, 46.4% and 39.3%, respectively in pancreatic cancer tissues, and 3.6%, 10.7% and 12.5% in cancer-adjacent normal tissues, and there were significant differences between cancer and normal tissues (hMLH1: χ² = 12.97, P < 0.01; hMSH2: χ² = 17.50, P < 0.01; hMLH3: χ² = 10.47, P < 0.01). The frequencies of expression loss for hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMSH3 were 25.0%, 50.0% and 33.9%, respectively in pancreatic cancer tissues, and 7.1%, 8.9% and 16.1% in cancer-adjacent normal tissues, and there were also marked differences between cancer and normal tissues (hMLH1: χ² = 6.62, P < 0.05; hMSH2: χ² = 22.73, P < 0.01; hMLH3: χ² = 4.76, P < 0.05). Methylations of hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMLH3 were found in PANC-1, PC-3 and CFPAC-1 cell lines, while expression loss of hMLH1 was observed in PANC-1 and CFPAC-1 cell lines, that of hMSH2 in PC-3 cell line and hMLH3 was observed in PC-3 and PANC-1 cell lines.

CONCLUSION: Mismatch repair defect is common in pancreatic cancer and plays a role in pancreatic carcinogenesis.

Epigenetic contributions to cancer metastasis

The molecular basis of cancer encompasses both genetic and epigenetic alterations. These epigenetic changes primarily involve global DNA methylation changes in the form of widespread loss of methylation along with concurrent hypermethylation events in gene regulatory regions that can repress tissue-specific gene expression. Increasingly, the importance of these epigenetic changes to the metastatic process is being realized. Cells may acquire an epi-genotype that permits their dissemination from the primary tumour mass or the ability to survive and proliferate at a secondary tissue site. These epigenetic changes may be cancer-type specific, or in some cases may involve a common target gene providing a selective advantage to multiple metastatic cell types. In this review, I examine the growing volume of literature related to the epigenetic contributions to cancer metastasis. I discuss the functional importance of these epigenetic phenomena and how new epigenetic biomarkers may permit the identification of diagnostic signatures of metastasis and the development of new cancer therapies.

Aberrant gene promoter methylation in plasma cell dyscrasias

The aberrant methylation of promoter CpG island is known to be a major inactivation mechanism of tumour-related genes. To determine the clinicopathological significance of gene promoter methylation in monoclonal gammopathies, we analysed the methylation status of 6 tumour suppressor genes and their association with loss of gene function. Methylation status of the genes p14, p15, p16, hMLH1, MGMT, and DAPK was determined by methylation-specific PCR in 52 cases: 30 MM, 13 MGUS, and 9 plasmacytomas, comparing them with their protein expression by immunohistochemistry, and association between methylation status, protein expression, and clinical characteristics was assessed. The methylation frequencies were 50% for p16, 17% for p15, 10% for hMLH1, 23% for MGMT and 30% for DAPK in MM samples, and 38%, 15%, 8%, and 15% for p16, p15, MGMT and DAPK respectively in MGUS samples. In plasmacytomas samples we found methylation of p16 in 55%, p15 in 22%, MGMT in 67% and DAPK in 44%. hMLH1 was unmethylated in all cases of MGUS and plasmacytomas. Immunohistochemistry showed that gene methylation was closely associated with a loss of protein expression. Our study demonstrates that methylation-mediated silencing is a frequent event in monoclonal gammopathies: 83% of MM, 46% of MGUS and 77% of plasmacytomas have at least one gene methylated, affecting different molecular pathways involved in cell cycle, DNA repair and apoptosis. This high prevalence of aberrant promoter hypermethylation suggests that monoclonal gammopathies carry a CpG island methylator phenotype, therefore the development of new DNA demethylation agents may be a potential therapeutic use in this disease.

Evaluation of tumor microsatellite instability in laryngeal cancer using five quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats and pentaplex PCR

PURPOSE

To determine microsatellite instability (MSI) in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was performed in a group of 30 male patients, aged 42-47 years. All patients underwent total laryngectomy with lymph nodectomy. Histologically all tumors were squamous cell carcinomas. Detection of MSI was based on comparison of allelic profiles generated from amplification of matching normal and tumor DNA.

RESULTS

The appearance of novel alleles in the tumor DNA indicated microsatellite instability. MSI analysis showed a microsatellite stable phenotype in 23 cases (77%).

CONCLUSIONS

MSI may not contribute to the development of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx.

Mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 may not play an essential role in breast carcinogenesis

Breast carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies in women, and its carcinogenesis is still unknown. The role of microsatellite instability (MSI) in breast carcinogenesis has been inconsistent in the literature. Here we studied the expression of 2 mismatch repair genes, hMLH1 and hMSH2, in 211 cases of intraductal (DCIS; 90 cases) and invasive ductal carcinoma (121 cases) of the breast by immunohistochemical analysis; and evaluated its relationship with cytokeratin (CK) subtypes, along with expression of ER-alpha (138 cases positive, 73 cases negative); PR (118 cases positive, 93 cases negative), and HER-2/neu (47 cases positive, 164 cases negative); and clinical features such as patient age (157 cases>50 years, 54 cases<50 years), tumor size (31 cases of IDC>2 cm, 90 cases of IDC<2 cm), tumor grade (87 cases high nuclear grade, 124 case non-high grade), and lymph node metastasis (38 cases of IDC positive, 74 cases of IDC negative, 9 cases of IDC with no available data on lymph node status). For CK subtypes, 167 cases were classified as luminal subtype (expressing CK8 and/or CK18, negative for CK5/6, CK14, and CK17) and 44 cases were classified as nonluminal (most of them belonged to basal/stem subtype, expressing CK5/6, and/or CK14, and/or CK17). No typical or atypical medullary carcinoma was included in this study. Our results showed that no loss of nuclear expression of either hMLH1 or hMSH2 was identified in any of the 211 cases of DCIS or IDC regardless of the various pathological and clinical factors, suggesting that hMLH1 or hMSH2 may not play an essential role in the majority of cases of the breast carcinoma.

The expression of mismatched repair genes and their correlation with clinicopathological parameters and response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway is an important post-replicative repair process. It is involved in the maintenance of genomic stability and MMR genes have therefore been named the proofreaders of replicating DNA. These genes repair the replicative errors of DNA and are thus imperative for genomic stability. The MMR genes have been found to be involved in promoting cytotoxicity, apoptosis, p53 phosphorylation and cell cycle arrest following exposure to exogenous DNA damaging agents. Loss of MMR function prevents the correction of replicative errors leading to instability of the genome, and can be detected by polymorphisms in micro satellites (1-6 nucleotide repeat sequences scattered in whole of the genome). This phenomenon, known as micro satellite instability (MSI), is a hallmark of MMR dysfunction and can be used as a marker of MMR dysfunction in colorectal and other malignancies. An alternative method for detection of MMR dysfunction is to test the expression of protein products of the MMR genes by immunohistochemistry (IHC), as mutations in these genes lead to reduced or absent expression of their gene products. Correlation between loss of MMR function and clinical, histopathological, behavioral parameters of the tumor and its response to chemotherapy in breast cancers may be of value in predicting tumor behavior and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an integral part of multimodal therapy for locally advanced breast cancer and predicting response may help in tailoring regimens in patients for optimum response.

MATERIALS

After approval by the IRB (Institutional Review Board) and ethical committee of the hospital, 31 cases of locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC) were studied to assess the correlation between MMR dysfunction, clinicopathological parameters and objective clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using immunohistochemistry. The immunohistochemical analysis for four MMR protein products--MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 was done in the pre NACT trucut biopsy specimen and after three cycles of NACT with C AF (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil) regimen, in the modified radical mastectomy specimen.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

There was no significant correlation observed between expression of MMR proteins and age, family history, tumor size or histological type. However there was a statistically significant negative correlation between MLH1, MSH2 expression and histological grade. There was also a negative correlation observed between PMS2 expression after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and clinical response. Cases with high post NACT expression of PMS2 were poor responders to chemotherapy. MSH6 was the most frequently altered MMR gene, with a negativity rate of 48% and the patients with high expression responded poorly to NACT. The study highlights the possible role of MMR expression in predicting aggressive tumor behavior (histological grade) and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with LABC.

HOXA5 regulates hMLH1 expression in breast cancer cells

Homeobox protein HOXA5 functions as a transcriptional factor for genes that are not only involved in segmentation identity but also in cell differentiation. Although HOXA5 has been shown to regulate the expression of the tumor-suppressor protein p53, its role in breast tumorigenesis is not well understood. Using yeast as a model system, we now demonstrate that overexpression of HOXA5 in yeast can be used to identify downstream target genes that are homologous in humans. One such identified gene was that of the mismatch repair pathway component MutL homolog 1. Analysis of the promoter region of the gene for human MutL homolog 1 (hMLH1) displayed several putative HOXA5-binding sites. In transient transfection experiments, the overexpression of HOXA5 transactivated the hMLH1 promoter-reporter construct. In addition, chromatin immunoprecipitation assay using a human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 demonstrated that HOXA5 binds to the hMLH1 promoter in vivo. Furthermore, we demonstrate that, in the presence of HOXA5, there is an increase in in vivo repair activity in MCF-7 cells. Taken together, our results indicate that HOXA5 is a transcriptional regulator of hMLH1 in breast cancer cells.

Increasing oxidative damage and loss of mismatch repair enzymes during breast carcinogenesis

This study examined the expression of oxidative damage markers 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) and nitrotyrosine using immunohistochemical techniques. In addition, DNA topoisomerase II binding protein 1 (TopBP1) and mismatch repair proteins 2 and 6 (MSH2 and MSH6) were immunostained in a series of 80 stage I invasive breast tumours, 26 in situ breast carcinomas and 12 benign breast hyperplasias. 8-OHdG, HNE and nitrotyrosine expression were considerably weaker in hyperplasias than in in situ lesions, which, in turn, showed less oxidative damage than T1N0 tumours. Hyperplasias and in situ tumours were all, at least moderately, positive for MSH2, and nearly all were positive for MSH6. Nitrotyrosine expression was associated with HNE (P<0.0005) and 8-OHdG (P=0.041) in the T1N0 cohort. To conclude, there is increasing oxidative stress during the early steps of breast carcinogenesis. On the other hand, a significant reduction in expression of mismatch repair proteins occurs during the progression of in situ lesions to invasive tumours.

Computational exploration of the activated pathways associated with DNA damage response in breast cancer

Molecular signaling events regulate cellular activity. Cancer stimulating signals trigger cellular responses that evade the regulatory control of cell development. To understand the mechanism of signaling regulation in cancer, it is necessary to identify the activated pathways in cancer. We have developed RepairPATH, a computational algorithm that explores the activated signaling pathways in cancer. The RepairPATH integrates RepairNET, an assembled protein interaction network associated with DNA damage response, with the gene expression profiles derived from the microarray data. Based on the observation that cofunctional proteins often exhibit correlated gene expression profiles, it identifies the activated signaling pathways in cancer by systematically searching the RepairNET for proteins with significantly correlated gene expression profiles. Analyzing the gene expression profiles of breast cancer, we found distinct similarities and differences in the activated signaling pathways between the samples from the patients who developed metastases and the samples from the patients who were disease free within 5 years. The cellular pathways associated with the various DNA repair mechanisms and the cell-cycle checkpoint controls are found to be activated in both sample groups. One of the most intriguing findings is that the pathways associated with different cellular processes are functionally coordinated through BRCA1 in the disease-free sample group, whereas such functional coordination is absent in the samples from patients who developed metastases. Our analysis revealed the potential cellular pathways that regulate the signaling events in breast cancer.

hMLH1 and MGMT inactivation as a mechanism of tumorigenesis in monoclonal gammopathies

Monoclonal gammopathies are a group of disorders characterized by clonal proliferation and accumulation of immunoglobulin-producing plasma cells. Multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance are the most common monoclonal gammopathies; the two comprise a spectrum of disorders, ranging from a relatively benign disease, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, to a malignant disease, multiple myeloma. Aberrant promoter methylation represents a primary mechanism of gene silencing during tumorigenesis. DNA repair systems act to maintain genome integrity in the presence of replication errors, environmental insults, and the cumulative effects of aging. The methylation patterns of two genes implicated in DNA repair, O6 methylguanine DNA methyl-transferase (MGMT) and human mutL homologue1 (hMLH1) have been detected in various solid tumours. With the purpose of studying the gene silencing of MGMT and hMLH1 in plasma cell disorders, we investigated the methylation status and expression of both genes in: 29 cases of multiple myeloma; one case of plasma cell leukaemia; 13 cases of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; and two cases of polyclonal plasmacytosis, using methylation-specific polymerase-chain reaction and immunohistochemical techniques. Methylation frequencies for MGMT were 23% in multiple myeloma and 8% in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. It was 10% for hMLH1 in multiple myeloma. None of the patients diagnosed with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance had hMLH1 hypermethylated. In addition, 50% of myeloma cases had a loss of hMLH1 expression, whereas silencing of MGMT was observed in 43% of myeloma and 36% of samples with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. This study indicates that repair pathway defects play a role in the pathogenesis and evolution of monoclonal gammopathies, and suggests that inactivation of hMLH1 could be implicated in multiple myeloma tumorigenesis.

Microsatellite instability and methylation of the DNA mismatch repair genes in head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Methylation in the promoter region of the DNA mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 and microsatellite instability at three loci were analyzed in the tumor tissue from patients with head and neck cancer.

METHODS

Microsatellite instability and promoter methylation were investigated by PCR, denaturing-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and digestion with methylation-specific restriction enzymes.

RESULTS

Microsatellite instability was observed in 41% of the patients. hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes were methylated in 47% and 30% of the patients, respectively. BAT25 and BAT26 instability were associated with age and histopathology, respectively. Methylation frequency of the hMLH1 gene promoter was significantly higher in patients displaying a high level of microsatellite instability. Instability at the BAT 26 and D2S123 loci were associated with the MSI-high status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that microsatellite instability and modifications in the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes are implicated in a significant proportion of the patients with head and neck cancer.