Potential role of metronomic chemotherapy in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer

A phase II study of a doublet metronomic chemotherapy regimen consisting of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine in Chinese women with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This single-arm prospective phase II trial was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of the dual oral metronomic vinorelbine and capecitabine (mNC) regimen in women with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in China.

METHODS

The mNC regimen was administered to the enrolled cases, including oral vinorelbine (VNR) 40 mg three times weekly (on days 1, 3 and 5 every week) and capecitabine (CAP) 500 mg three times a day, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Stratified factors included treatment lines and hormone receptor (HR) status.

RESULTS

Between June 2018 and March 2023, 29 patients were enrolled into the study. The median follow-up time was 25.4 months (range, 2.0-53.8). In the entire group, the 1-year PFS rate was 54.1%. ORR, DCR and CBR were 31.0%, 96.6% and 62.1%, respectively. The mPFS was 12.5 months (range, 1.1-28.1). Subgroup analysis revealed that ORRs were 29.4% and 33.3% in first- and ≥second-line chemotherapy, respectively. ORRs were 29.2% (7/24) and 40.0% (2/5) for HR-positive MBC and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), respectively. Grade 3/4 TRAEs were neutropenia (10.3%) and nausea/vomiting (6.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The dual oral mNC regimen showed very good safety features and improved compliance without loss of efficacy in both first- and second-line treatments. The regimen also reached an excellent ORR in the mTNBC subgroup.

Nanoformulations-Based Metronomic Chemotherapy: Mechanism, Challenges, Recent Advances, and Future Perspectives

Cancer-related death is a significant health and economic burden worldwide, and some conventional chemotherapy is associated with limited effectiveness in completely curing various cancers, severe adverse effects, and destruction of healthy cells. To overcome the complications associated with conventional treatment, metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is extensively suggested. In this review, we aim to highlight the importance of MCT over conventional chemotherapeutic approach with emphasis on nanoformulations-based MCT, their mechanism, challenges, recent advances, and future perspectives. Nanoformulations-based MCT revealed remarkable antitumor activity in both preclinical and clinical settings. For example, the metronomic scheduling of oxaliplatin-loaded nanoemulsion and polyethylene glycol-coated stealth nanoparticles incorporating paclitaxel were proven very effective in tumor-bearing mice and rats, respectively. Additionally, several clinical studies have demonstrated the benefit of MCT with acceptable tolerance. Moreover, metronomic might be a promising treatment strategy for improving cancer care in low- and middle-income nations. However, an appropriate alternative to a metronomic regimen for an individual ailment, suitable combinational delivery and scheduling, and predictive biomarkers are certain parts that remain unanswered. Further clinical-based comparative research studies are mandatory to be performed before entailing this treatment modality in clinical practice as alternative maintenance therapy or in place of transferring to therapeutic management.

Oral metronomic chemotherapy after definitive chemoradiation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Improving outcomes in locally advanced esophageal/GEJ squamous cell cancer (SCC) is an unmet need. We investigated the addition of oral metronomic chemotherapy (OMC) following definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a randomized open-label integrated phase II/III study in patients with SCC of esophagus/GEJ following definitive CRT who had no radiologic evidence of progression, and no endoscopically detected disease. Randomization was 1:1 to OMC (celecoxib 200 mg twice daily and methotrexate 15 mg/m² weekly) for 12 months or observation. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and toxicity. P ≤ 0.2 for PFS was required to proceed to phase III.

RESULTS

Between Jan 2016 and Dec 2019, we enrolled 151 patients for the phase II portion, 75 to OMC and 76 to observation. The tumor originated in the upper thoracic esophagus in 79% patients. Concurrent CRT consisted of median 63 Gy in a median of 35 fractions; concurrent chemotherapy was weekly paclitaxel + carboplatin in 91%. OMC was started at a median of 2.6 months (IQR 2.3-2.8) from CRT completion. Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred in 18 patients (24%) in the OMC arm and 9 (12%) in the observation arm; P = 0.071. Median PFS was 25 months (95% CI, 17-58) in the OMC arm and was not attained [NA] (95% CI, 25-NA) in the observation arm; HR, 1.51, 95% CI, 1-2; P = 0.073. Median OS was 36 months (95% CI, 23-NA) in the OMC arm, and not attained (95% CI, NA-NA) in the observation arm; HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1-2.9; P = 0.023.

CONCLUSION

Oral metronomic methotrexate and celecoxib in patients who have not progressed radiologically and have no endoscopic evidence of disease following radical CRT for locally advanced esophageal/GEJ SCC does not improve outcomes and may lower survival. [Funded by the TMC-Research Administration Council (TRAC); CHROME study (CHemoRadiotherapy followed by Oral Metronomic therapy in Esophageal cancer); ctri.nic.in number: CTRI/2015/09/006204].

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CTRI/2015/09/006204.