Hidden clues in prostate cancer - Lessons learned from clinical and pre-clinical approaches on diagnosis and risk stratification

A three-stage eccDNA based molecular profiling significantly improves the identification, prognosis assessment and recurrence prediction accuracy in patients with glioma

Glioblastoma (GBM) progression is influenced by intratumoral heterogeneity. Emerging evidence has emphasized the pivotal role of extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) in accelerating tumor heterogeneity, particularly in GBM. However, the eccDNA landscape of GBM has not yet been elucidated. In this study, we first identified the eccDNA profiles in GBM and adjacent tissues using circle- and RNA-sequencing data from the same samples. A three-stage model was established based on eccDNA-carried genes that exhibited consistent upregulation and downregulation trends at the mRNA level. Combinations of machine learning algorithms and stacked ensemble models were used to improve the performance and robustness of the three-stage model. In stage 1, a total of 113 combinations of machine learning algorithms were constructed and validated in multiple external cohorts to accurately distinguish between low-grade glioma (LGG) and GBM in patients with glioma. The model with the highest area under the curve (AUC) across all cohorts was selected for interpretability analysis. In stage 2, a total of 101 combinations of machine learning algorithms were established and validated for prognostic prediction in patients with glioma. This prognostic model performed well in multiple glioma cohorts. Recurrent GBM is invariably associated with aggressive and refractory disease. Therefore, accurate prediction of recurrence risk is crucial for developing individualized treatment strategies, monitoring patient status, and improving clinical management. In stage 3, a large-scale GBM cohort (including primary and recurrent GBM samples) was used to fit the GBM recurrence prediction model. Multiple machine learning and stacked ensemble models were fitted to select the model with the best performance. Finally, a web tool was developed to facilitate the clinical application of the three-stage model.

Exploring prostate cancer in the post-genomic era

In the Special Issue on Prostate Cancer, we have invited 25 researchers or clinicians from prostate cancer community to review the cutting-edge topics in this field. In particular, the mini-reviews have covered various basic science and clinical aspects in prostate cancer, including prostate epithelial stem cells or progenitors, androgen and androgen receptor pathways, tumor modeling, genomics, different cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms as well as various clinical issues encompassing diagnosis, risk stratification and treatments.

Classification of pyroptosis patterns and construction of a novel prognostic model for prostate cancer based on bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests an important role for pyroptosis in tumorigenesis and recurrence, but it remains to be elucidated in prostate cancer (PCa). Considering the low accuracy of common clinical predictors of PCa recurrence, we aimed to develop a novel pyroptosis-related signature to predict the prognosis of PCa patients based on integrative analyses of bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) profiling.

METHODS

The RNA-seq data of PCa patients was downloaded from several online databases. PCa patients were stratified into two Classes by unsupervised clustering. A novel signature was constructed by Cox and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. The Kaplan-Meier curve was employed to evaluate the prognostic value of this signature and the single sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) algorithm was used to analysis tumor-infiltrating immune cells. At single-cell level, we also classified the malignant cells into two Classes and constructed cell developmental trajectories and cell-cell interaction networks. Furthermore, RT-qPCR and immunofluorescence were used to validate the expression of core pyroptosis-related genes.

RESULTS

Twelve prognostic pyroptosis-related genes were identified and used to classify PCa patients into two prognostic Classes. We constructed a signature that identified PCa patients with different risks of recurrence and the risk score was proven to be an independent predictor of the recurrence free survival (RFS). Patients in the high-risk group had a significantly lower RFS (P<0.001). The expression of various immune cells differed between the two Classes. At the single-cell level, we classified the malignant cells into two Classes and described the heterogeneity. In addition, we observed that malignant cells may shift from Class1 to Class2 and thus have a worse prognosis.

CONCLUSION

We have constructed a robust pyroptosis-related signature to predict the RFS of PCa patients and described the heterogeneity of prostate cancer cells in terms of pyroptosis.