Cardiac substructures exposure in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy: Is the mean heart dose a reliable predictor of cardiac toxicity?

Treatment of unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer for patients who are under-represented in clinical trials

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by one year of consolidation durvalumab is the current standard-of-care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), of good functional status. However, cCRT and consolidation durvalumab may be challenging to administer for selected patient populations underrepresented or even excluded in clinical trials: older and/or frail patients; those with cardiovascular or respiratory comorbidities in which treatment-related adverse events may be higher, and patients with pre-existing autoimmune disorders for whom immunotherapy use is controversial. In this narrative review, we discuss the current evidence, challenges, ongoing clinical trials and potential future treatment scenarios in relevant subgroups of patients with locally advanced NSCLC, who are underrepresented in clinical trials.

Evaluation of helical tomotherapy as an alternative for left-sided breast cancer patients not compliant with deep inspiration breath hold

Purpose

The aim of this study is to investigate, from a dosimetric perspective, whether helical Tomotherapy (HT) during free breathing (FB) can serve as an alternative technique for treating left-sided breast cancer patients who are unable to comply with the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique.

Material and Methods

For this purpose, the CT images of 20 left breast-only cancer patients acquired in both FB and DIBH phases were utilized. The left breast was contoured as the target volume, while the heart, LAD, ipsilateral and contralateral lungs, and contralateral breast were contoured as organs at risk on the CT images obtained in both DIBH and FB. Planning with the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique was performed on the CT scans obtained in the DIBH (VMAT-DIBH), while planning with the HT technique was carried out on the CT scans obtained in the FB (HT-FB). Subsequently, dosimetric comparison of the plans were done in terms of target coverage and preservation of normal tissues.

Results

Both techniques achieved the desired target coverage; however, in terms of D2, Vpres values, Conformity Number (CN), and Homogeneity Index (HI), the HT-FB technique was found to be superior. While the mean doses to the heart were similar for both techniques, doses to the LAD and left lung were found to be superior in plans generated with the HT-FB technique. When compared in terms of contralateral breast and right lung protection, VMAT-DIBH technique was found to be significantly superior.

Conclusion

The treatment of left breast-only patients with the HT-FB technique has been observed to provide similar heart protection and better LAD and ipsilateral lung protection compared to the VMAT-DIBH technique without compromising target coverage. However, when the HT-FB technique is used, doses to the contralateral lung and contralateral breast should be carefully evaluated.

Selection criteria and method for deep inspiration breath-hold in patients with left breast cancer undergoing PMRT/IMRT

Purpose

This study explored whether a free-breathing mean heart dose (FB-MHD) of 4 Gy is a reliable dose threshold for selecting left breast cancer patients after modified radical mastectomy suitable for deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and developed anatomical indicators to predict FB-MHD for rapid selection.

Materials and methods

Twenty-three patients with left breast cancer treated with DIBH were included to compare FB and DIBH plans. The patients were divided into the high-risk (FB-MHD ≥ 4 Gy) and low-risk (FB-MHD < 4 Gy) groups to compare dose difference, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and the DIBH benefits. Another 30 patients with FB only were included to analyze the capacity of distinguishing high-risk heart doses patients according to anatomical metrics, such as cardiac-to-chest Euclidean distance (CCED), cardiac-to-chest gap (CCG), and cardiac-to-chest combination (CCC).

Results

All heart doses were significantly lower in patients with DIBH plans than in those with FB plans. Based on FB-MHD of 4 Gy cutoff, the heart dose, NTCP for cardiac death, and benefits from DIBH were significantly higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. The CCED was a valid anatomical indicator with the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 and maintained 95 % sensitivity and 70 % specificity at the optimal cutoff value of 2.5 mm.

Conclusions

An FB-MHD of 4 Gy could be used as an efficient dose threshold for selecting patients suitable for DIBH. The CCED may allow a reliable prediction of FB-MHD in left breast cancer patients at CT simulation.

Inter-institutional variability of knowledge-based plan prediction of left whole breast irradiation

PURPOSE

Within a multi-institutional project, we aimed to assess the transferability of knowledge-based (KB) plan prediction models in the case of whole breast irradiation (WBI) for left-side breast irradiation with tangential fields (TF).

METHODS

Eight institutions set KB models, following previously shared common criteria. Plan prediction performance was tested on 16 new patients (2 pts per centre) extracting dose-volume-histogram (DVH) prediction bands of heart, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung and breast. The inter-institutional variability was quantified by the standard deviations (SDint) of predicted DVHs and mean-dose (Dmean). The transferability of models, for the heart and the ipsilateral lung, was evaluated by the range of geometric Principal Component (PC1) applicability of a model to test patients of the other 7 institutions.

RESULTS

SDint of the DVH was 1.8 % and 1.6 % for the ipsilateral lung and the heart, respectively (20 %-80 % dose range); concerning Dmean, SDint was 0.9 Gy and 0.6 Gy for the ipsilateral lung and the heart, respectively (<0.2 Gy for contralateral organs). Mean predicted doses ranged between 4.3 and 5.9 Gy for the ipsilateral lung and 1.1-2.3 Gy for the heart. PC1 analysis suggested no relevant differences among models, except for one centre showing a systematic larger sparing of the heart, concomitant to a worse PTV coverage, due to high priority in sparing the left anterior descending coronary artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed high transferability among models and low inter-institutional variability of 2% for plan prediction. These findings encourage the building of benchmark models in the case of TF-WBI.

Cardiac segments dosimetric benefit from deep inspiration breath hold technique for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy

Background

The objective was to compare dosimetry in left-sided breast cancer (LSBC) patients receiving deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy (RT) with free-breathing (FB) treatment plans.

Materials and methods

Voluntary DIBH with a spirometer-based video-assisted system and CT-simulation were performed under FB and DIBH conditions on 40 LSBC patients, segmented according Duane's atlas. IMRT plans kept the same dosimetric goals on FB and DIBH conditions. Target, lungs and heart volumes were measured. Planning target volume (PTV) dose distribution, organs at risk (OARs) dose/volume parameters, including cardiac substructures, were calculated.

Results

Lungs and left-lung volumes increased in DIBH conditions (ΔV = 1637.8 ml ± 555.3 and 783.5 ml ± 286.4, respectively). Heart volume slightly decreased in apnea (p = 0.04), but target volumes, CTV and PTV were similar in FB or DIBH plans. PTV dose coverage was similar irrespective of respiratory conditions (median D50% = 41.1 Gy vs 41.0 Gy, p = 0.665; V95% = 96.9% vs. 97%). Mean dose for the whole heart (MHD), left ventricle (LV), and LV segments were significantly reduced in DIBH plans. V20 values for heart subvolumes were significantly different only for those that received considerable doses (apical and anterior). DIBH plans provided significantly smaller doses (Dmax, D2%, and V20) to the LAD artery.

Conclusion

Important dosimetric improvements can be achieved with DIBH technique for LSBC patients, reducing the dose to the LAD artery and heart, particularly to the segments closer to the chest wall. Apical/anterior LV segments, should be considered as separate organ at risk in breast RT.

Radiation therapy in the thoracic region: Radio-induced cardiovascular disease, cardiac delineation and sparing, cardiac dose constraints, and cardiac implantable electronic devices

Radiation therapy in the thoracic region may deliver incidental ionizing radiation to the surrounding healthy structures, including the heart. Radio-induced heart toxicity has long been a concern in breast cancer and Hodgkin's lymphoma and was deemed a long-term event. However, recent data highlight the need to limit the dose to the heart in less favorable thoracic cancers too, such as lung and esophageal cancers in which incidental irradiation led to increased mortality. This article will summarize available cardiac dose constraints in various clinical settings and the types of radio-induced cardiovascular diseases encountered as well as delineation of cardiac subheadings and management of cardiac devices. Although still not completely deciphered, heart dose constraints remain intensively investigated and the mean dose to the heart is no longer the only dosimetric parameter to consider since the left anterior descending artery as well as the left ventricle should also be part of dosimetry constraints.

Different meaning of the mean heart dose between 3D-CRT and IMRT for breast cancer radiotherapy

Background

Previous studies in 2D and in 3D conformal radiotherapy concludes that the maximal heart distance and the mean heart dose (MHD) are considered predictive of late cardiac toxicities. As the use of inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is increasing worldwide, we hypothesized that this 3D MHD might not be representative of heart exposure after IMRT for breast cancer (BC).

Methods

Patients with left-sided BC and unfavorable cardiac anatomy received IMRT. Their treatment plan was compared to a virtual treatment plan for 3D conformal radiotherapy with similar target volume coverage (study A). Then, a second 3D conformal treatment plan was generated to achieve equivalent individual MHD obtained by IMRT. Then the heart and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery exposures were analyzed (study B). Last, the relationship between MHD and the heart volume or LAD coronary artery volume receiving at least 30Gy, 40Gy and 45Gy in function of each additional 1Gy to the MHD was assessed (study C).

Results

A significant decrease of heart and LAD coronary artery exposure to high dose was observed with the IMRT compared with the 3D conformal radiotherapy plans that both ensured adequate target coverage (study A). The results of study B and C showed that 3D MHD was not representative of similar heart substructure exposure with IMRT, especially in the case of high dose exposure.

Conclusions

The mean heart dose is not a representative dosimetric parameter to assess heart exposure following IMRT. Equivalent MHD values following IMRT and 3DRT BC treatment do not represent the same dose distribution leading to extreme caution when using this parameter for IMRT plan validation.

CArdiac and REspiratory adaptive Computed Tomography (CARE-CT): a proof-of-concept digital phantom study

Current respiratory 4DCT imaging for high-dose rate thoracic radiotherapy treatments are negatively affected by the complex interaction of cardiac and respiratory motion. We propose an imaging method to reduce artifacts caused by thoracic motion, CArdiac and REspiratory adaptive CT (CARE-CT), that monitors respiratory motion and ECG signals in real-time, triggering CT acquisition during combined cardiac and respiratory bins. Using a digital phantom, conventional 4DCT and CARE-CT acquisitions for nineteen patient-measured physiological traces were simulated. Ten respiratory bins were acquired for conventional 4DCT scans and ten respiratory bins during cardiac diastole were acquired for CARE-CT scans. Image artifacts were quantified for 10 common thoracic organs at risk (OAR) substructures using the differential normalized cross correlation between axial slices (ΔNCC), mean squared error (MSE) and sensitivity. For all images, on average, CARE-CT improved the ΔNCC for 18/19 and the MSE and sensitivity for all patient traces. The ΔNCC was reduced for all cardiac OARs (mean reduction 21%). The MSE was reduced for all OARs (mean reduction 36%). In the digital phantom study, the average scan time was increased from 1.8 ± 0.4 min to 7.5 ± 2.2 min with a reduction in average beam on time from 98 ± 28 s to 45 s using CARE-CT compared to conventional 4DCT. The proof-of-concept study indicates the potential for CARE-CT to image the thorax in real-time during the cardiac and respiratory cycle simultaneously, to reduce image artifacts for common thoracic OARs.

Cost-effectiveness of using protons for breast irradiation aiming at minimizing cardiotoxicity: A risk-stratification analysis

Background

Incidental exposure of the heart to ionizing irradiation is associated with an increased risk of ischemic heart disease and subsequent fatality in patients with breast cancer after radiotherapy. Proton beam therapy can limit the heart dose in breast irradiation to a negligible level. However, compared with conventional photon modality, proton breast irradiation is more expensive. In this study, we performed cost-effectiveness analyses to identify the type of patients who would be more suitable for protons.

Methods

A Markov decision model was designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of protons vs. photons in reducing the risk of irradiation-related ischemic heart disease. A baseline evaluation was performed on a 50-year-old woman patient without the preexisting cardiac risk factor. Furthermore, risk-stratification analyses for photon mean heart dose and preexisting cardiac risk were conducted on 40-, 50-, and 60-year-old women patients under different proton cost and willingness-to-pay (WTP) settings.

Results

Using the baseline settings, the incremental effectiveness (protons vs. photons) increased from 0.043 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) to 0.964 QALY when preexisting cardiac risk increased to 10 times its baseline level. At a proton cost of 50,000 US dollars ($), protons could be cost-effective for ≤ 60-year-old patients with diabetes and ≤50-year-old patients with grade II–III hypertension at the WTP of China ($37,653/QALY); for ≤ 60-year-old patients with diabetes and ≤ 50-year-old patients with grade II–III hypertension or ≥ 2 major cardiac risk factors at a WTP of $50,000/QALY; and for ≤ 60-year-old patients with diabetes, grade II–III hypertension or ≥ 2 major cardiac risk factors and ≤ 50-year-old patients with total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dL at a WTP of $100,000/QALY.

Conclusion

Patients' preexisting cardiac risk status was a key factor affecting the cardiac benefits gained from protons and should therefore be a major consideration for the clinical decision of using protons; cost-effective scenarios of protons exist in those patients with high risk of developing cardiac diseases.

Oncological Benefit versus Cardiovascular Risk in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Modern Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) is an essential part of breast cancer (BC) treatments. Unfortunately, heart exposure to radiation can also impair the long-term survival of patients. Our study aimed to quantify the oncological benefit and the cardiovascular (CV) risk associated with modern RT in a real-world cohort of BC patients. Our descriptive study enrolled BC patients who received adjuvant RT. Ten-year overall survival (OS) was estimated using Predict^® version 2.1 (National Health Service, London, UK). The basal risk of CV events was estimated using the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) CV score. Treatment volumes and mean cardiac doses were obtained from RT treatment plan records. The increased risk of CV events due to RT was estimated using a model proposed by Darby. The risk of acute myocardial infarction or stroke mortality was estimated using HeartScore^® (European Society of Cardiology, Brussels, Belgium). A total of 256 BC patients were included in the study. The average age of patients was 57 years old (range: 25–91); 49.6% had left BC. The mean cardiac dose was 166 cGy (interquartile range (IQR) 94–273); the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for CV disease was HR 1.12 (confidence interval (CI) 1.04–1.24). The estimated baseline 10-year CV risk was 5.6% (0.2 to 51.2); CV risk increased by 0.9% (range 0.02–35.47%) after RT. The absolute risk of 10-year mortality from CV disease was 2.5% (0.1–9); RT was associated with an estimated 4.9% survival benefit (3.73–6.07) against BC death and a 0.23% (0.17–0.29) estimated increase in CV mortality. Modern RT decreased 10-year BC mortality by 4% but increased CV mortality by 0.2% in this cohort. Our findings encourage the implementation of personalized adjuvant RT treatments that balance risks and benefits to improve long-term BC patient survival.

Ultra-Hypofractionated vs. Moderate Fractionated Whole Breast Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background and Objectives: Reducing time of treatment during COVID-19 outbreaks has been recommended by the leading Radiation Oncology societies. Still minimizing radiation induced tissue toxicity is one of the most important issues in breast cancer patients. The study aimed to investigate compliance, clinical and dosimetry normal tissue toxicity, and cosmetic results between moderated and ultra-fractionated regimes for breast cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: This pilot prospective randomized study included 60 patients with early breast cancer after preserving surgery, 27 patients advocated to ultra-hypofractionated whole-breast three dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy of 26 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week and 33 patients with moderate fractionated breast 3D conformal radiotherapy patients between March 2020 and July 2020, during the COVID pandemic outbreak. The compliance to treatment, dosimetric parameters, acute and late skin toxicity, subcutaneous tissue toxicity, cosmetic results and clinical follow up for 18 months for the two regimes were analyzed and compared. Results: When two regimes were compared 5 fraction group had significantly lower prevalence of newly infected cases of SARS-CoV-2 and thus delayed/interrupted treatment (p = 0.05), comparable grade 1 CTCAE v5, acute skin toxicity (p = 0.18), Grade 1 Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme (RESS) subcutaneous tissue toxicity (p = 0.18), Grade 1 RESS late skin toxicity (p = 0.88) and cosmetic results (p = 0.46). Dosimetric results reveled that patients in 5 fraction group received significantly lower median ipsilateral lung doses (p < 0.01) in addition to left breast cancer patients that received significantly lower median heart dose (p < 0.01) and median left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer is comparable to moderate hypofractionation regimen regarding grade 1 acute skin toxicity, grade 1 subcutaneous tissue toxicity, late skin toxicity and cosmetic results. Application of ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy with significantly lower radiation doses for lung and heart could be crucial in reducing the risk of acute/late pulmonary and heart radiation-induced toxicity.

Dosimetric Evaluation of Incidental Irradiation to the Internal Mammary Chain After Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients

Background and Purpose

The low rate of internal mammary node (IMN) recurrence was attributed to systemic therapy and internal mammary chain (IMC) coverage by the tangential fields of irradiation. This study aimed to evaluate the incidental irradiation dose to the IMC in breast cancer patients after surgery and to estimate the clinical predictive parameters affecting the magnitude of the IMC.

Materials and Methods

A total of 138 patients treated with postmastectomy radiotherapy and 210 patients undergoing radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The mean dose (Dmean) to the IMC and the first to third intercostal spaces of IMC levels (ICS1–3) were evaluated. We evaluated the IMC coverage according to the type of surgery and whether the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa (SCF) was included in the irradiation field.

Results

The incidental radiation dose to the IMC was 29.69 Gy, and the dose delivered to the IMC, ICS1, and ICS2 showed a greater coverage in the modified radical mastectomy (MRM) group when compared with the BCS group (32.85 vs. 27.1 Gy, 26.6 vs. 12.5 Gy, 34.63 vs. 30.42 Gy). The dose delivered to ICS3 showed no difference between the MRM and BCS groups (37.41 vs. 36.24 Gy). Furthermore, 131 patients (37.64%) received radiotherapy to the chest wall and ipsilateral SCF. In the univariate analysis, both surgery type and SCF irradiation were parameters affecting the Dmean of incidental radiation to the IMC (r = −0.179, P = 0.001; r = −0.175, P = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, surgery type was the only correlative factor that affected incidental radiation dose to the IMC (r = –3.534, P = 0.000).

Conclusion

The real influencing factor of incidental dose to the IMC was the surgery form rather than the accession of SCF irradiation.

The cardiac toxicity of radiotherapy - a review of characteristics, mechanisms, diagnosis, and prevention

PURPOSE

Radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD) is one of the most serious complications of radiotherapy. The purpose of this paper is to review recent researches about cardiac toxicity of radiotherapy in clinical characteristics, mechanisms, diagnosis, and prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Powered by the rapid development of medicine, the overall survival (OS) of cancer has been improved significantly. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (RT) are three critical ways in the comprehensive treatments of cancer. There is a consensus that early diagnosis and interventions for the prevention of RIHD are crucial. This review concludes recent clinical and experimental studies on RIHD. RIHD, a heterogeneous and serious disease, is a spectrum of heart disease including myocardial disease, pericarditis, coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, and conduction system dysfunction. Mean heart dose, biomarkers, and detecting techniques are important components in detecting heart injury. Improvements in radiotherapy regimens remain the primary goal of prevention. Further investigation is needed beyond the observation period of most of these studies.