1
|
Panicker AJ, Prokop LJ, Hacke K, Jaramillo A, Griffiths LG. Outcome-based Risk Assessment of Non-HLA Antibodies in Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024; 43:1450-1467. [PMID: 38796046 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current monitoring after heart transplantation (HT) employs repeated invasive endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Although positive EMB confirms rejection, EMB fails to predict impending, subclinical, or EMB-negative rejection events. While non-human leukocyte antigen (non-HLA) antibodies have emerged as important risk factors for antibody-mediated rejection after HT, their use in clinical risk stratification has been limited. A systematic review of the role of non-HLA antibodies in rejection pathologies has the potential to guide efforts to overcome deficiencies of EMB in rejection monitoring. METHODS Databases were searched to include studies on non-HLA antibodies in HT recipients. Data collected included the number of patients, type of rejection, non-HLA antigen studied, association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection, and evidence for synergistic interaction between non-HLA antibodies and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody (HLA-DSA) responses. RESULTS A total of 56 studies met the inclusion criteria. Strength of evidence for each non-HLA antibody was evaluated based on the number of articles and patients in support versus against their role in mediating rejection. Importantly, despite previous intense focus on the role of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene A (MICA) and anti-angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies (AT1R) in HT rejection, evidence for their involvement was equivocal. Conversely, the strength of evidence for other non-HLA antibodies supports that differing rejection pathologies are driven by differing non-HLA antibodies. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review underscores the importance of identifying peri-HT non-HLA antibodies. Current evidence supports the role of non-HLA antibodies in all forms of HT rejection. Further investigations are required to define the mechanisms of action of non-HLA antibodies in HT rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali J Panicker
- Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Larry J Prokop
- Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Katrin Hacke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Andrés Jaramillo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Leigh G Griffiths
- Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Almalki WH. Unraveling the role of Xist RNA in cardiovascular pathogenesis. Pathol Res Pract 2024; 253:154944. [PMID: 38006839 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
Understanding the molecular pathways behind cardiovascular illnesses is crucial due to the enormous worldwide health burden they impose. New insights into the role played by Xist (X-inactive specific transcript) RNA in the onset and progression of cardiovascular diseases have emerged from recent studies. Since its discovery, Xist RNA has been known for its role in X chromosome inactivation during embryogenesis; however, new data suggest that its function extends well beyond the control of sex chromosomes. The regulatory roles of Xist RNA are extensive, encompassing epigenetic changes, gene expression, cellular identity, and sex chromosomal inactivation. There is potential for the involvement of this complex regulatory web in a wide range of illnesses, including cardiovascular problems. Atherosclerosis, hypertrophy, and cardiac fibrosis are all conditions linked to dysregulation of Xist RNA expression. Alterations in DNA methylation and histones are two examples of epigenetic changes that Xist RNA orchestrates, leading to modifications in gene expression patterns in different cardiovascular cells. Additionally, Xist RNA has been shown to contribute to the development of cardiovascular illnesses by modulating endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative stress responses. New treatment approaches may become feasible with a thorough understanding of the complex function of Xist RNA in cardiovascular diseases. By focusing on Xist RNA and the regulatory network with which it interacts, we may be able to slow the progression of atherosclerosis, cardiac hypertrophy, and fibrosis, thereby opening novel therapeutic options for cardiovascular diseases amenable to precision medicine. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge concerning the impact of Xist RNA in cardiovascular disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waleed Hassan Almalki
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Goldberg JF, Truby LK, Agbor-Enoh S, Jackson AM, deFilippi CR, Khush KK, Shah P. Selection and Interpretation of Molecular Diagnostics in Heart Transplantation. Circulation 2023; 148:679-694. [PMID: 37603604 PMCID: PMC10449361 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.062847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
The number of heart transplants performed annually in the United States and worldwide continues to increase, but there has been little change in graft longevity and patient survival over the past 2 decades. The reference standard for diagnosis of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection includes histologic and immunofluorescence evaluation of endomyocardial biopsy samples, despite invasiveness and high interrater variability for grading histologic rejection. Circulating biomarkers and molecular diagnostics have shown substantial predictive value in rejection monitoring, and emerging data support their use in diagnosing other posttransplant complications. The use of genomic (cell-free DNA), transcriptomic (mRNA and microRNA profiling), and proteomic (protein expression quantitation) methodologies in diagnosis of these posttransplant outcomes has been evaluated with varying levels of evidence. In parallel, growing knowledge about the genetically mediated immune response leading to rejection (immunogenetics) has enhanced understanding of antibody-mediated rejection, associated graft dysfunction, and death. Antibodies to donor human leukocyte antigens and the technology available to evaluate these antibodies continues to evolve. This review aims to provide an overview of biomarker and immunologic tests used to diagnose posttransplant complications. This includes a discussion of pediatric heart transplantation and the disparate rates of rejection and death experienced by Black patients receiving a heart transplant. This review describes diagnostic modalities that are available and used after transplant and the landscape of future investigations needed to enhance patient outcomes after heart transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason F Goldberg
- Department of Heart Failure and Transplantation, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (J.F.G., C.R.d., P.S.)
- Department of Pediatrics, Inova L.J. Murphy Children's Hospital, Falls Church, VA (J.F.G.)
| | - Lauren K Truby
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas (L.K.T.)
| | - Sean Agbor-Enoh
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.A.-E.)
- Applied Precision Genomics, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD (S.A.-E.)
| | - Annette M Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (A.M.J.)
| | - Christopher R deFilippi
- Department of Heart Failure and Transplantation, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (J.F.G., C.R.d., P.S.)
| | - Kiran K Khush
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (K.K.K.)
| | - Palak Shah
- Department of Heart Failure and Transplantation, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (J.F.G., C.R.d., P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tambur AR, Bestard O, Campbell P, Chong AS, Barrio MC, Ford ML, Gebel HM, Heidt S, Hickey M, Jackson A, Kosmoliaptsis V, Lefaucheur C, Louis K, Mannon RB, Mengel M, Morris A, Pinelli DF, Reed EF, Schinstock C, Taupin JL, Valenzuela N, Wiebe C, Nickerson P. Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:133-149. [PMID: 36695615 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat R Tambur
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Campbell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anita S Chong
- Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Martha Crespo Barrio
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar & Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mandy L Ford
- Department of Surgery and Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Howard M Gebel
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
| | - Michelle Hickey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Annette Jackson
- Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Louis
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anna Morris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David F Pinelli
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Department of Immunology, Saint Louis Hospital and University Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nicole Valenzuela
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jethwani P, Rao A, Bow L, Menon MC. Donor–Recipient Non-HLA Variants, Mismatches and Renal Allograft Outcomes: Evolving Paradigms. Front Immunol 2022; 13:822353. [PMID: 35432337 PMCID: PMC9012490 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.822353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite significant improvement in the rates of acute allograft rejection, proportionate improvements in kidney allograft longevity have not been realized, and are a source of intense research efforts. Emerging translational data and natural history studies suggest a role for anti-donor immune mechanisms in a majority of cases of allograft loss without patient death, even when overt evidence of acute rejection is not identified. At the level of the donor and recipient genome, differences in highly polymorphic HLA genes are routinely evaluated between donor and recipient pairs as part of organ allocation process, and utilized for patient-tailored induction and maintenance immunosuppression. However, a growing body of data have characterized specific variants in donor and recipient genes, outside of HLA loci, that induce phenotypic changes in donor organs or the recipient immune system, impacting transplant outcomes. Newer mechanisms for “mismatches” in these non-HLA loci have also been proposed during donor–recipient genome interactions with transplantation. Here, we review important recent data evaluating the role of non-HLA genetic loci and genome-wide donor-recipient mismatches in kidney allograft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Jethwani
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Arundati Rao
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Laurine Bow
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Madhav C. Menon
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- *Correspondence: Madhav C. Menon,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moreno JD, Verma AK, Kopecky BJ, Dehner C, Kostelecky N, Vader JM, Lin CY, Schilling JD. Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibody-mediated Rejection Following Orthotopic Heart Transplant: A Single-center Experience. Transplantation 2022; 106:373-380. [PMID: 33988339 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) following orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) causes significant morbidity and mortality. There are limited data on antibodies to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) causing rejection following OHT. METHODS This is a retrospective, single-center study that presents our 2-y experience with a series of 11 patients with evidence of nonspecific graft dysfunction and pathologic levels of AT1R-Ab. The clinical outcomes and treatments were compared to a group of 10 patients, also with evidence of nonspecific graft dysfunction, but who had nonsignificant AT1R-Ab titers. RESULTS The mean age of the AT1R-Ab cohort was 52% and 73% were bridged to transplant with an left ventricular assist device. The average left ventricular ejection fraction at presentation was 45%, and most were not on an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Endomyocardial biopsies in those with elevated AT1R-Ab levels frequently showed reactive endothelium/endocardium without C4d or intravascular CD68 staining. Ten patients (91%) were started on an ARB. Other therapies included plasmapheresis and IVIg (64%), with 4 patients also receiving rituximab. Most patients had symptom improvement, but minimal change in graft function at an average 6 mo of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The role of AT1R-Ab-mediated rejection in OHT recipients remains poorly understood. More than half of patients at our center who presented with graft dysfunction in the absence of acute cellular rejection or AMR were found to have elevated AT1R-Ab titers. Empiric AMR treatment in conjunction with ARB therapy may improve patient outcomes. Future studies are needed to better define the optimal treatment modalities for ATR1-Ab-mediated AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D Moreno
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Amanda K Verma
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Benjamin J Kopecky
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Carina Dehner
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Nicolas Kostelecky
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Justin M Vader
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Chieh-Yu Lin
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Joel D Schilling
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Habal MV. Current Desensitization Strategies in Heart Transplantation. Front Immunol 2021; 12:702186. [PMID: 34504489 PMCID: PMC8423343 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.702186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Heart transplant candidates sensitized to HLA antigens wait longer for transplant, are at increased risk of dying while waiting, and may not be listed at all. The increasing prevalence of HLA sensitization and limitations of current desensitization strategies underscore the urgent need for a more effective approach. In addition to pregnancy, prior transplant, and transfusions, patients with end-stage heart failure are burdened with unique factors placing them at risk for HLA sensitization. These include homograft material used for congenital heart disease repair and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Moreover, these risks are often stacked, forming a seemingly insurmountable barrier in some cases. While desensitization protocols are typically implemented uniformly, irrespective of the mode of sensitization, the heterogeneity in success and post-transplant outcomes argues for a more tailored approach. Achieving this will require progress in our understanding of the immunobiology underlying the innate and adaptive immune response to these varied allosensitizing exposures. Further attention to B cell activation, memory, and plasma cell differentiation is required to establish methods that durably abrogate the anti-HLA antibody response before and after transplant. The contribution of non-HLA antibodies to the net state of sensitization and the potential implications for graft longevity also remain to be comprehensively defined. The aim of this review is to first bring forth select issues unique to the sensitized heart transplant candidate. The current literature on desensitization in heart transplantation will then be summarized providing context within the immune response. Building on this, newer approaches with therapeutic potential will be discussed emphasizing the importance of not only addressing the short-term pathogenic consequences of circulating HLA antibodies, but also the need to modulate alloimmune memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlena V. Habal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|