Dynamic Assessment of Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index Provides Incremental Risk Assessment for Early Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device

Right Ventricular Assist Device Placement During Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Is Associated With Improved Survival

Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a significant cause of mortality in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Although right ventricular assist devices (RVADs) can treat RVF in the perioperative LVAD period, liberal employment before RVF is not well established. We therefore compared the survival outcomes between proactive RVAD placement at the time of LVAD implantation with a bailout strategy in patients with RVF. Retrospectively, 75 adult patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation at our institution and had an RVAD placed proactively before LVAD implantation or as a bailout strategy postoperatively due to hemodynamically unstable RVF were evaluated. Patients treated with a proactive RVAD strategy had lower Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) and a higher proportion of these required temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) preoperatively. Preoperative hemodynamic profiling showed a low pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) score of 1.8 ± 1.4 and 1.6 ± 0.94 ( p = 0.42) in the bailout RVAD and proactive RVAD groups, respectively. Survival at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LVAD implantation was statistically significantly higher in patients who received a proactive RVAD. Thus, proactive RVAD implantation is associated with short- and medium-term survival benefits compared to a bailout strategy in RVF patients undergoing LVAD placement.

Right heart failure with left ventricular assist devices: Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative management strategies. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC

Right heart failure (RHF) following implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a common and potentially serious condition with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations with an unfavourable effect on patient outcomes. Clinical scores that predict the occurrence of right ventricular (RV) failure have included multiple clinical, biochemical, imaging and haemodynamic parameters. However, unless the right ventricle is overtly dysfunctional with end-organ involvement, prediction of RHF post-LVAD implantation is, in most cases, difficult and inaccurate. For these reasons optimization of RV function in every patient is a reasonable practice aiming at preparing the right ventricle for a new and challenging haemodynamic environment after LVAD implantation. To this end, the institution of diuretics, inotropes and even temporary mechanical circulatory support may improve RV function, thereby preparing it for a better adaptation post-LVAD implantation. Furthermore, meticulous management of patients during the perioperative and immediate postoperative period should facilitate identification of RV failure refractory to medication. When RHF occurs late during chronic LVAD support, this is associated with worse long-term outcomes. Careful monitoring of RV function and characterization of the origination deficit should therefore continue throughout the patient's entire follow-up. Despite the useful information provided by the echocardiogram with respect to RV function, right heart catheterization frequently offers additional support for the assessment and optimization of RV function in LVAD-supported patients. In any patient candidate for LVAD therapy, evaluation and treatment of RV function and failure should be assessed in a multidimensional and multidisciplinary manner.

Status 2 upgrade indication impacts posttransplant mortality in patients bridged with intraaortic balloon pump in the new heart allocation system

To evaluate outcomes of patients undergoing heart transplants (HTs) using an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) under exception status. Adult patients supported by an IABP who underwent HT between November 18, 2018, and December 31, 2020, as documented in the United Network for Organ Sharing, were included. Patients were stratified according to requests for exception status. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to look for differences in survival between groups. A total of 1284 patients were included; 492 (38.3%) were transplanted with an IABP under exception status. Exception status patients had higher body mass index, were more likely to be Black, and had longer waitlist times. Exception status patients received organs from younger donors, had a shorter ischemic time, and had a higher frequency of sex mismatch. The 1-year posttransplant survival was 93% for the nonexception and 88% for the exception IABP patients (hazard ratio: 1.85 [95% confidence interval: 1.12-2.86, P = .006]). The most common reason for requesting an exception status was inability to meet blood pressure criteria for extension (37% of patients). The most common reason for an extension request for an exception status was right ventricular dysfunction (24%). IABP patients transplanted under exception status have an increased 1-year mortality rate posttransplant compared with those without exception status.

Advanced hemodynamics for prognostication in heart failure: the pursuit of the patient-specific tipping point

Background

Objective tools to define the optimal time for referral for advanced therapies and to help guide escalation and de-escalation of support can improve management decisions and outcomes for patients with advanced heart failure. The current parameters have variable prognostic potential depending on the patient population being studied and often have arbitrary thresholds.

Methods

Here, a mathematical and physiological framework to define the patient-specific tipping point of myocardial energetics is defined. A novel hemodynamic parameter known as the myocardial performance score (MPS), a marker of power and efficiency, is introduced that allows for the objective assessment of the physiological tipping point. The performance of the MPS and other advanced hemodynamic parameters including aortic pulsatility index (API) and cardiac power output (CPO) in predicting myocardial energetics and the overall myocardial performance was evaluated using a validated computer simulation model of heart failure (Harvi) as well as a proof-of-concept clinical validation using a cohort of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Stage C cardiogenic shock patients.

Results

Approximately 1010 discrete heart failure scenarios were modeled. API strongly correlated with the left ventricular coupling ratio (R2 = 0.81) and the strength of association became even stronger under loaded conditions where pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was >20 mmHg (R2 = 0.94). Under loaded conditions, there is a strong logarithmic relationship between MPS and mechanical efficiency (R2 = 0.93) with a precipitous rise in potential energy (PE) and drop in mechanical efficiency with an MPS <0.5. An MPS <0.5 was able to predict a CPO <0.6 W and coupling ratio of <0.7 with sensitivity (Sn) of 87%, specificity (Sp) of 91%, positive predictive value of 81%, and negative predictive value of 94%. In a cohort of 224 patients with SCAI Stage C shock requiring milrinone initiation, a baseline MPS score of <0.5 was associated with a 35% event rate of the composite endpoint of death, left ventricular assist device, or transplant at 30 days compared with 3% for those with an MPS >1 (p < 0.001). Patients who were able to augment their MPS to >1 after milrinone infusion had a lower event rate than those with insufficient reserve (40% vs. 16%, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

The MPS, which defines the patient-specific power-to-efficiency ratio and is inversely proportional to PE, represents an objective assessment of the myocardial energetic state of a patient and can be used to define the physiological tipping point for patients with advanced heart failure.

Right Heart Reserve Function Assessed With Fluid Loading Predicts Late Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND

A left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an effective therapeutic option for advanced heart failure. Late right heart failure (LRHF) is a complication after LVAD implantation that is associated with increasing morbidity and mortality; however, the assessment of right heart function, including right heart reserve function after LVAD implantation, has not been established. We focused on a fluid-loading test with right heart catheterization to evaluate right heart preload reserve function and investigate its impact on LRHF.

METHODS

Patients aged > 18 years who received a continuous-flow LVAD between November 2007 and December 2022 at our institution, and underwent right heart catheterization with saline loading (10 mL/kg for 15 minutes) 1 month after LVAD implantation, were included.

RESULTS

Overall, 31 cases of LRHF or death (right heart failure [RHF] group) occurred in 149 patients. In the RHF vs the non-RHF groups, the pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) at rest (1.8 ± 0.89 vs 2.5 ± 1.4, P = 0.02) and the right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWi) change ratio with saline loading (0.96 ± 0.32 vs 1.1 ± 0.20, P = 0.03) were significantly different. The PAPi at rest and the RVSWi change ratio with saline loading were identified as postoperative risks for LRHF and death. The cohort was divided into 3 groups based on whether the PAPi at rest and the RVSWi change ratio were low. The event-free curve differed significantly among the 3 groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemodynamic assessment with saline loading can evaluate the right ventricular preload reserve function of patients with an LVAD. A low RVSWi change with saline loading was a risk factor for LRHF following LVAD implantation.

PERSUADE Survey-PERioperative AnestheSia and Intensive Care Management of Left VentricUlar Assist DevicE Implantation in Europe and the United States

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively assess relevant institutional variations in anesthesia and intensive care management during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

DESIGN

The authors used a prospective data analysis.

SETTING

This was an online survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were from LVAD centers in Europe and the US.

INTERVENTIONS

After investigating initial interest, 91 of 202 European and 93 of 195 US centers received a link to the survey targeting institutional organization and experience, perioperative hemodynamic monitoring, medical management, and postoperative intensive care aspects.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The survey was completed by 73 (36.1%) European and 60 (30.8%) US centers. Although most LVAD implantations were performed in university hospitals (>5 years of experience), significant differences were observed in the composition of the preoperative multidisciplinary team and provision of intraoperative care. No significant differences in monitoring or induction agents were observed. Propofol was used more often for maintenance in Europe (p < 0.001). The choice for inotropes changed significantly from preoperatively (more levosimendan in Europe) to intraoperatively (more use of epinephrine in both Europe and the US). The use of quantitative methods for defining right ventricular (RV) function was reported more often from European centers than from US centers (p < 0.05). Temporary mechanical circulatory support for the treatment of RV failure was more often used in Europe. Nitric oxide appeared to play a major role only intraoperatively. There were no significant differences in early postoperative complications reported from European versus US centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the perioperative practice of care for patients undergoing LVAD implantation differs in several aspects between Europe and the US, there were no perceived differences in early postoperative complications.

Standardization of the Right Heart Catheterization and the Emerging Role of Advanced Hemodynamics in Heart Failure

The accurate assessment of hemodynamics is paramount to providing timely and efficacious care for patients presenting in cardiogenic shock. Recently, the regular use of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiogenic shock has had a resurgence with emerging data indicating improved survival in the modern era. Optimal multidisciplinary management of advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock relies on our ability to effectively communicate and understand the complete hemodynamic assessment. Standardization of data acquisition and a renewed focus on the physiological processes, and thresholds driving disease progression, including the coupling ratio and myocardial reserve, are needed to fully understand and interpret the hemodynamic assessment. This State-of-the-Art review discusses best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory as well as emerging data on the prognostic role of emerging advanced hemodynamic parameters.

Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a persistent problem

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an option for bridge-to-transplant or destination therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure. Right heart failure (RHF) remains a complication after LVAD implantation that portends high morbidity and mortality, despite advances in LVAD technology. Definitions of RHF vary, but generally include the need for inotropic or pulmonary vasodilator support, or potential right ventricular (RV) mechanical circulatory support. This review covers the complex pathophysiology of RHF related to underlying myocardial dysfunction, interventricular dependence, and RV afterload, as well as treatment strategies to curtail this challenging problem.

Hemodynamic reserve predicts early right heart failure after LVAD implantation

BACKGROUND

Early right heart failure (RHF) remains a major source of morbidity and mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, yet efforts to predict early RHF have proven only modestly successful. Pharmacologic unloading of the left ventricle may be a risk stratification approach allowing for assessment of right ventricular and hemodynamic reserve.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone continuous-flow LVAD implantation from October 2011 to April 2020. Only those who underwent vasodilator testing with nitroprusside during their preimplant right heart catheterization were included (n = 70). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of early RHF as defined by Mechanical Circulatory Support-Academic Research Consortium.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients experienced post-LVAD early RHF (39%). Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between patients with and without RHF. Patients without RHF, however, achieved higher peak stroke volume index (SVI) (30.1 ± 8.8 vs 21.7 ± 7.4 mL/m2; p < 0.001; AUC: 0.78; optimal cut-point: 22.1 mL/m2) during nitroprusside administration. Multivariable analysis revealed that peak SVI was significantly associated with early RHF, demonstrating a 16% increase in risk of early RHF per 1 ml/m2 decrease in SVI. A follow up cohort of 10 consecutive patients from July 2020 to October 2021 resulted in all patients being categorized appropriately in regards to early RHF versus no RHF according to peak SVI.

CONCLUSION

Peak SVI with nitroprusside administration was independently associated with post-LVAD early RHF while resting hemodynamics were not. Vasodilator testing may prove to be a strong risk stratification tool when assessing LVAD candidacy though additional prospective validation is needed.

Optimal, Early Postoperative Management of Cardiac Transplant and Durable Left Ventricular Assist Recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Summarize developments in the early postoperative care of patients undergoing cardiac transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation. Provide a practical approach with personal insights to highly complex patients at risk for prolonged hospitalization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advancements in technology allow for percutaneous mechanical circulatory support of both the right and left ventricles either isolated or combined via subclavian and neck vessels. Since the adult heart allocation system has been changed to reduce waitlist mortality, the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support has increased. This has influenced preoperative optimization by enabling ambulation and majorly changed postoperative strategy. New doors have been opened for a multidisciplinary approach to facilitate rapid weaning of inotropic medications, limitation of sedation, early liberation from mechanical ventilation, and mobilization. Individualized percutaneous mechanical circulatory support offers new possibilities for the early postoperative management of highly complex patients undergoing cardiac transplantation or durable left ventricular assist device implantation.

Prediction, prevention, and management of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: A comprehensive review

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly common across the heart failure population. Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a feared complication that can occur in the early post-operative phase or during the outpatient follow-up. Multiple tools are available to the clinician to carefully estimate the individual risk of developing RVF after LVAD implantation. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of available tools for RVF prognostication, including patient-specific and right ventricle (RV)-specific echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters, to provide guidance in patient selection during LVAD candidacy. We also offer a multidisciplinary approach to the management of early RVF, including indications and management of right ventricular assist devices in this setting to provide tools that help managing the failing RV.

Impact of Pre-Operative Right Ventricular Response to Hemodynamic Optimization on Outcomes in Patients with LVADs

Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) continues to affect patients supported with durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and results in increased morbidity and mortality. Information regarding the impact of right ventricular response to pre-operative optimization on outcomes is scarce. Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent first continuous flow LVAD implantation between 2006 and 2020. Patients with bi-ventricular support before LVAD or without hemodynamic data were excluded. Invasive hemodynamics at baseline and after pre-operative medical and/or temporary circulatory support were recorded. Patients were grouped in the following categories: A: No Hemodynamic RV dysfunction (RVD) at baseline; B: RVD with achievement of RV hemodynamic optimization goals; C: RVD without achievement of RV optimization goals. The main outcomes were right ventricular failure defined as inotropes >14 days after implantation, or postoperative right ventricular mechanical support, and all-cause mortality. Results: Overall, 128 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 58 ±12.5 years, 74.2% were males and, 68.7% had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Hemodynamic RVD was present in 70 (54.7%) of the patients at baseline. RV hemodynamic goals were achieved in 46 (79.31%) patients with RVD and in all the patients without RVD at baseline. Failure to achieve hemodynamic optimization goals was associated with a significantly higher risk of RVF after LVAD implantation (adjusted OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.14−16.76, p = 0.031) compared with no RVD at baseline and increased 1-year mortality compared with no RVD (adjusted HR 4.1, 95% CI 1.24−13.2, p = 0.02) and optimized RVD (adjusted HR 6.4, 95% CI 1.6−25.2, p = 0.008).Conclusion: Among patients with RVD, the inability to achieve hemodynamic optimization goals was associated with higher rates of RV failure and increased 1-year all-cause mortality post LVAD implantation.

Prediction of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: role of vasodilator challenge

AIMS

Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is an indicator of right ventricular (RV) function and an independent predictor of right ventricular failure (RVF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Administration of vasodilator challenge during right heart catheterization (RHC) could reduce RV workload allowing a better assessment of its functional reserve.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing LVAD implantation at our Institution between May 2013 and August 2021 were enrolled. Only patients who had undergone RHC and vasodilator challenge with sodium nitroprusside were analyzed. We collected all available clinical, instrumental, and haemodynamic parameters, at baseline and after nitroprusside infusion and evaluated potential associations with post-LVAD RVF. Of the 54 patients analyzed, 19 (35%) developed RVF after LVAD implantation. Fractional area change (FAC) (OR: 0.647, CI: 0.481-0.871; P = 0.004), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (OR: 0.856, CI: 0.761-0.964; P = 0.010), and post-sodium nitroprusside (NTP) PAPi (OR: 0.218, CI: 0.073-0.653; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of post-LVAD RVF. The model combining FAC, PASP, and post-NTP PAPi demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 90.7%. Addition of post-NTP PAPi significantly increased the predictive accuracy of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support right-sided heart failure risk score [79.4 vs. 70.4%; area under the curve (AUC): 0.841 vs. 0.724, P = 0.022] and the CRITT score (79.6% vs. 74%; AUC: 0.861 vs. 0.767 P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Post-NTP PAPi has observed to be an independent predictor of RVF following LVAD implantation. Dynamic assessment of PAPi using a vasodilator challenge may represent a method of testing RV functional reserve in candidates for LVAD implantation. Larger and prospective studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

A Novel Hemodynamic Index of Post-operative Right Heart Dysfunction Predicts Mortality in Cardiac Surgical Patients

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate whether mortality following cardiac surgery was associated with the pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi): pulmonary artery pulse pressure divided by central venous pressure (CVP), and a novel index: mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) minus CVP.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis investigated all cardiac surgery patients in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons registry at a single academic medical center from January 2017 through March 2020 (n = 1510). The primary and secondary outcomes were mortality at 1 year and serum creatinine increase during index surgical admission, respectively. CVP, mPAP, PAPi, mPAP-CVP gradient, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cardiac index (CI) were sampled continually from invasive hemodynamic monitors post-operatively. Associations with mortality were tested with univariate and multivariate analyses. The relationship with serum creatinine was investigated with Pearson's correlation at alpha = .05.

RESULTS

One-year mortality was observed in 44/1200 patients (3.7%). On univariate analysis, mortality was associated with minimums for mPAP, MAP, and CI and maximums for CVP, mPAP, PAPi, mPAP-CVP gradient, and CI (all P < .10). Model selection revealed that the only independently predictive parameters were minimum MAP (AOR = .880 [.819-.944]), maximum mPAP-CVP gradient (AOR = 1.082 [1.031-1.133]), and maximum CI (AOR = 1.421 [.928-2.068]), with model c-statistic = .770. A maximum mPAP-CVP gradient >20.5 predicted mortality with 54.5% sensitivity and 79.30% specificity, maintaining significance on survival analysis (P < .001). Peak increase in serum creatinine from baseline demonstrated a weak association with all parameters (max |r| = .33).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality was not predicted by the post-operative PAPi; rather, it was independently predicted by the mPAP-CVP gradient, MAP, and CI.

Trends and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: JACC Focus Seminar

As the prevalence of advanced heart failure continues to rise, treatment strategies for select patients include heart transplantation or durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, both of which improve quality of life and extend survival. Recently, the HeartMate 3 has been incorporated into clinical practice, the United Network for Organ Sharing donor heart allocation system was revised, and the management of LVAD-related complications has evolved. Contemporary LVAD recipients have greater preoperative illness severity, but survival is higher and adverse event rates are lower compared with prior eras. This is driven by advances in device design, patient selection, surgical techniques, and long-term management. However, bleeding, infection, neurologic events, and right ventricular failure continue to limit broader implementation of LVAD support. Ongoing efforts to optimize management of patients implanted with current devices and parallel development of next-generation devices are likely to further improve outcomes for patients with advanced heart failure.

Invasive Haemodynamic Assessment Before and After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Guide to Current Practice

Mechanical circulatory support for the management of advanced heart failure is a rapidly evolving field. The number of durable long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantations increases each year, either as a bridge to heart transplantation or as a stand-alone ‘destination therapy’ to improve quantity and quality of life for people with end-stage heart failure. Advances in cardiac imaging and non-invasive assessment of cardiac function have resulted in a diminished role for right heart catheterisation (RHC) in general cardiology practice; however, it remains an essential tool in the evaluation of potential LVAD recipients, and in their long-term management. In this review, the authors discuss practical aspects of performing RHC and potential complications. They describe the haemodynamic markers associated with a poor prognosis in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and evaluate the measures of right ventricular (RV) function that predict risk of RV failure following LVAD implantation. They also discuss the value of RHC in the perioperative period; when monitoring for longer term complications; and in the assessment of potential left ventricular recovery.