Comparative prognostic value of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and C-reactive protein in patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and chronic statin therapy

Impact of C-Reactive Protein on Long-Term Cardiac Events in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

AIM

Chronic inflammation is associated with atherosclerosis development. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events and is associated with chronic inflammation. We aimed to investigate the influence of C-reactive protein (CRP), an important marker of inflammation, on the clinical outcomes of patients with CKD and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Among patients with stable CAD and CKD who underwent PCI, 516 patients whose CRP levels were available before the PCI procedure were identified. The patients were divided into two groups according to the CRP levels: those with CRP ≥ 2.0 mg/L (high-CRP group) and those with CRP ＜2.0 mg/L (low-CRP group). The primary endpoint of this study was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean age of the patients was 72.5±9.7 years, and 20.7% were female. The median CRP level was 1.43 mg/L (0.6-4.9 mg/L). The median follow-up period was 3.6 years. The occurrence of MACE was significantly higher in the high-CRP group than in the low-CRP group (log-rank p＜0.001). Notably, the incidence rate of cardiac death was significantly higher in the high-CRP group (log-rank p＜0.001). According to the multivariable analysis, CRP level ≥ 2.0 mg/L was found to be a significant predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-2.28, p=0.003), as well as estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, p＜0.01).

CONCLUSION

High-CRP levels adversely affect long-term cardiac events in patients with stable CAD and CKD.

Comparison of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein vs C-reactive Protein for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Chronic Cardiac Disease

Background

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is a biomarker used for risk prediction for cardiovascular disease by assessing low concentration of inflammation. Measurements of regular CRP have become very sensitive with a lower detection limit of 0.3 mg/L. This study aimed to compare and explore the association between CRP and hs-CRP.

Methods

Data from 607 consecutive patients referred for cardiovascular risk assessment with hs-CRP were reviewed retrospectively. In total, 570 patients were included in the analysis and classified into 3 (low-, medium-, and high-risk) groups (hs-CRP cutoff: <1, 1–3, >3 mg/L). Correlation between hs-CRP and CRP was assessed with the kappa statistic and visualized with a Bland–Altman plot. The association between hs-CRP and occurrence of the composite outcome (acute myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary intervention [percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery], or death) was determined with Cox regression analysis and visualized with Kaplan–Meier curves.

Results

A total number reclassification occurred in 8.6% of the cases for CRP risk groups, which demonstrates an agreement of 91.4% (kappa 0.87; P < 0.001). The correlation between CRP and hs-CRP was significant (P < 0.001), Spearman regression R2 = 0.98. A Bland–Altman plot displayed an average difference of 0.19 mg/L (95%CI, 0.17 to 0.23) between the CRP and hs-CRP. Cardiovascular events were more likely to occur in patients who were older, with hs-CRP or CRP >3 mg/L and a history of coronary artery disease.

Conclusions

The usual laboratory tests for CRP values in the lower range highly correlate with the hs-CRP tests and can therefore replace the costlier hs-CRP measurements.

Prognostic value of urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 for mortality: A cohort study of stable coronary artery disease patients treated with aspirin

AIM

There is a variable cardiovascular risk reduction attributable to aspirin because of individual differences in the suppression of thromboxane A₂ and its downstream metabolite 11-dehydro-thromboxane B₂ (11dhTxB₂ ). The aim of this study is to evaluate the optimal cut point of urinary 11dhTxB₂ for the risk of mortality in aspirin-treated coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prospective cohort study including stable CAD patients who visited the Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital in Dallas or the Texas Heart Hospital Baylor Plano, TX between 2010 and 2013. The outcome of all-cause mortality was ascertained from chart review and automated sources. The 449 patients included in this analysis had a mean age of 66.1 ± 10.1 years. 67 (14.9%) patients died within 5 years; 56 (87.5%) of the 64 patients with known cause of death suffered a cardiovascular related mortality. Baseline ln(urinary 11dhTxB₂ /creatinine) ranged between 5.8 and 11.1 (median = 7.2) with the higher concentrations among those who died (median: 7.6) than those who survived (median = 7.2, P < 0.001). Using baseline ln(11dhTxB₂ ) to predict all-cause mortality, the area under the curve was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64-0.76). The optimal cut point was found to be ln(7.38) = 1597.8 pg/mg, which had the following decision statistics: sensitivity = 0.67, specificity = 0.62, positive predictive value = 0.24, negative predictive value = 0.92, and accuracy = 0.63.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate the optimal cut point for urine 11dhTxB2 is 1597.8 (pg/mg) for the risk prediction of mortality over five years in stable patients with CAD patients treated with aspirin.

Rosuvastatin Improves Vaspin Serum Levels in Obese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Adipose tissue-derived serine protease inhibitor (vaspin), which has endocrine and local roles in atherosclerosis growth, is also synthesized by adipose tissue; it was found that vaspin was negatively correlated with blood pressure in obese patients, while vaspin levels were decreased in endothelial dysfunction. The aim of the present study was to determine rosuvastatin modulation effects on serum vaspin levels in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with class I obesity. A total number of seventy patients with acute coronary syndrome previously and currently treated with rosuvastatin was compared to 40 patients with IHD not treated by rosuvastatin as a control. Vaspin serum levels were higher in rosuvastatin-treated patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to the patients with acute coronary syndrome not treated by rosuvastatin, p < 0.01. Additionally, in the rosuvastatin-treated group, patients with STEMI showed higher vaspin serum levels compared to NSTEMI p < 0.01. Conclusion: Rosuvastatin significantly increases vaspin serum levels in acute coronary syndrome.

Cumulative Exposure to High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Predicts the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND

One measurement of hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The objective of this study was to characterize the association of cumulative exposure to increased hs-CRP with incident cardiovascular events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 53 065 participants with hs-CRP measured at 3 examinations in 2006, 2008, and 2010. Cumulative exposure to hs-CRP was calculated as the weighted sum of the average hs-CRP level for each time interval (level×time). Participants were classified into nonexposed group (hs-CRP<3.0 mg/L in all 3 examinations), 1-exposed group (hs-CRP≥3.0 mg/L in 1 of the 3 examinations), 2-exposed group (hs-CRP≥3.0 mg/L in 2 of the 3 examinations), and 3-exposed group (hs-CRP≥3.0 mg/L in 3 examinations). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of cumulative hs-CRP with incident CVD. The study showed a dose-response pattern with risk of CVD and myocardial infarction as the number of years of exposure to hs-CRP increases. Participants in the 3-exposed group had significantly increased CVD risk with hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.38 (1.11-1.72), in comparison with 1.28 (1.07-1.52) for participants in the 2-exposed group and 1.13 (0.97-1.31) for those in the 1-exposed group (P<0.05); meanwhile, the similar and significant associations were also observed for myocardial infarction with respective hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 2.13 (1.42-3.18), 1.60 (1.12-2.27), and 1.57 (1.17-2.10). The associations between stroke and cumulative hs-CRP were not statistically significant (P=0.360).

CONCLUSIONS

Cumulative exposure to hs-CRP was dose dependently associated with a subsequent increased risk of CVD and myocardial infarction.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: ChiCTR-TNC-11001489.

Preprocedural C-Reactive Protein Predicts Outcomes after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction a systematic meta-analysis

Risk assessment in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is critical in order to provide adequate treatment. We performed a systematic meta-analysis to assess the predictive role of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We included 7 studies, out of 1,033 studies, with a total of 6,993 patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI, which were divided in the high or low CRP group, according to the validated cut-off values provided by the corresponding CRP assay. High CRP values were associated with increased in-hospital and follow-up all-cause mortality, in-hospital and follow-up major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI). The pre-procedural CRP predicted in-hospital target vessel revascularization (TVR), but was not associated with acute/subacute and follow-up in-stent restenosis (ISR), and follow-up TVR. Thus, pre-procedural serum CRP could be a valuable predictor of global cardiovascular risk, rather than a predictor of stent-related complications in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI. This biomarker might have the potential to improve the management of these high-risk patients.

State of the Art: Blood Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Multiple circulating biomarkers have been associated with the incidence of cardiovascular events and proposed as potential tools for risk stratification in stable ischemic heart disease (IHD), yet current guidelines do not make any firm recommendations concerning the use of biomarkers for risk stratification in this setting. This state-of-the-art review provides an overview of biomarkers for risk stratification in stable IHD.

CONTENT

Circulating biomarkers associated with the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with stable IHD reflect different pathophysiological processes, including myocardial injury, myocardial stress and remodeling, metabolic status, vascular inflammation, and oxidative stress. Compared to the primary prevention setting, biomarkers reflecting end-organ damage and future risk of heart failure development and cardiovascular death may play more important roles in the stable IHD setting. Accordingly, biomarkers that reflect chronic, low-grade myocardial injury, and stress, i.e., high-sensitivity cardiac troponins and natriuretic peptides, provide graded and incremental prognostic information to conventional risk markers. In contrast, in stable IHD patients the prognostic value of traditional metabolic biomarkers, including serum lipids, is limited. Among several novel biomarkers, growth-differentiation factor-15 may provide the most robust prognostic information, whereas most inflammatory markers provide limited incremental prognostic information to risk factor models that include conventional risk factors, natriuretic peptides, and high-sensitivity troponins.

SUMMARY

Circulating biomarkers hold promise as useful tools for risk stratification in stable IHD, but their future incorporation into clinically useful risk scores will depend on prospective, rigorously performed clinical trials that document enhanced risk prediction.