Exposure to glucocorticoids prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with reduced incidence of high-degree AV block and pacemaker

Intraoperative Corticosteroids and Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic stenosis. However, conduction disturbances leading to pacemaker implantation remain a common complication, increasing morbidity and mortality in these patients. Hence, measures to lower its incidence should be taken, and corticosteroid therapy could be effective by reducing inflammation caused by direct mechanical trauma to the conduction system.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, analyzing the medical records of patients with native severe aortic stenosis who underwent transfemoral TAVR in 2022. The Chi-square test was used to compare the rate of pacemaker implantation in patients who received corticosteroids with patients who didn't. The statistical significance was considered for a p-value <0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 341 patients were included in this study. Monitored anesthesia care was the preferred anesthetic technique (99.1%). Sixty-three point three percent (63.3%) of patients received corticosteroids at the beginning of the procedure. Corticosteroid administration did not significantly affect the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation (p=0.277), vascular complications on the access site (p=0.765), or in-hospital mortality (p=0.909). Male gender, 1st-degree atrioventricular block, and right branch block were the only identified predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transfemoral TAVR (p=0.041 <0.001 and <0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroid administration at the beginning of TAVR doesn't seem to influence the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation, which can suggest that other factors play a more important role in the development of conduction disturbances leading to pacemaker implantation.

Effect of acute CORticosteroids on conduction defects after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: the CORTAVI study

AIMS

Conduction abnormalities, requiring a permanent pacemaker (PPM), are the most common electrical complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The exact mechanism for conduction system defects is not yet clear. The local inflammatory process and edema are thought to play a role in the development of electrical disorders. Corticosteroids are effective anti-inflammatory and antiedematous agents. We aim to investigate the potential protective effect of corticosteroids on conduction defects after TAVI.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of a single center. We analyzed 96 patients treated with TAVI. Thirty-two patients received oral prednisone 50 mg for 5 days after the procedure. This population was compared with the control group. All patients were followed up after 2 years.

RESULTS

Of the 96 patients included, 32 (34%) were exposed to glucocorticoids after TAVI. No differences in age, preexisting right bundle branch block or left bundle branch block, or valve type were seen among patients exposed to glucocorticoids versus those who were unexposed. We observed no significant differences between the two groups in the overall frequency of new PPM implantations during hospitalization (12% vs. 17%, P  = 0.76). The incidence of atrioventricular block (AVB) (STx 9% vs. non-STx 9%, P  = 0.89), right bundle branch block (STx 6% vs. non-STx 11%, P  = 0.71), and left bundle branch block (STx 34% vs. non-STx 31%, P  = 0.9) was not significantly different between the STx and non-STx groups. At 2 years after TAVI, none of the patients had implanted PPM or had severe arrhythmias documented by 24-h Holter ECG or cardiac examination.

CONCLUSION

Oral prednisone treatment does not appear to significantly reduce the incidence of AVB requiring acute PPM implantation after TAVI.

The conjunction conundrum in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

A continuous discussion regarding the predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is ongoing, especially in the era of low and medium risk patients. The aim of this article is to review the data so far regarding the pathophysiology, risk factors, and the indications for permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI. The factors that contribute to rhythm abnormalities post TAVI can be divided into pre-existing conduction abnormalities, patient-related anatomical factors, and peri-procedural technical factors. The latter components are potentially modifiable, and this is where attention should be directed, particularly now that in an era of TAVI expansion towards lower-risk patients.

Systemic corticosteroid exposure and atrioventricular conductance delays after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular conduction delays (AVCD) are common after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and frequently require implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM). Autopsy studies demonstrated the role of ischemia, inflammation, and oedema in the pathogenesis of AVCD. Corticosteroids (CS) reduce inflammation and oedema and hence might lead to a lower rate of AVCD.

METHODS

Based on a prospective single-center registry, we performed a propensity score (PS) matched analysis of subjects treated with or without systemic CS (>2.5 mg prednisolone-equivalent per day) at the time of TAVI. The primary endpoint was a composite of PPM-implantation and new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) within 30 days after TAVI.

RESULTS

Among 2213 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI (51.5% female, mean age 82.1 ± 6.1 years) 89 patients were treated with systemic CS, of which 87 were included in the PS matched analysis. At 30 days, rates of the composite of PPM and LBBB were comparable between patients with versus without CS both in the overall cohort (33.7% versus 33.0%, p = 0.89) and the PS matched cohort (34.5% versus 40.2%, p = 0.443). There were no differences in a composite of major or minor vascular complications and major or life-threatening bleeding events between patients with versus without CS in the overall cohort (34.8% versus 26.6%, p = 0.088) or the PS matched cohort (33.3% versus 33.3%, p ≥ 0.999).

CONCLUSION

In this exploratory study, intake of systemic CS among patients undergoing TAVI was not associated with differences in rates of AVCD, vascular complications, or bleeding events after TAVI.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients Receiving Chronic Systemic Corticosteroid Treatment

The aim of this study was to describe the effects of chronic systemic corticosteroid treatment (SCT) on early and late outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). From October 2006 to November 2018, 1,299 patients underwent TAVI in our institution. Among them, 48 (3.7%) received chronic SCT at the time of procedure (SCT group). They were more frequently women (p = 0.08) and needed more often dialysis (p = 0.002). All other baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. At 30 days, there was no difference on mortality. However, after adjustment, the SCT group had more major vascular complications: 16.7% versus 7.4%, hazard ratio (HR) 2.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 5.9, p = 0.023), major or life-threatening bleedings: 22.9% versus 12.4%, HR 2.02 (95% CI 1.00 to 4.08, p = 0.05), and tamponades: 8.3% versus 2.4%, HR 4.05 (95% CI 1.35 to 12.15, p <0.001) than the non-SCT group. One-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the SCT than in the non-SCT group (37.5% vs 12.5%, p <0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that SCT use was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.50, p = 0.017). In conclusion, chronic use of SCT significantly increases the rates of early vascular complications, major or life-threatening bleedings and tamponade and is an independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality after TAVI.

Advances in transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Evidence in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has accumulated rapidly over the last few years and its application to clinical decision making are becoming more important. In this review, we discuss the advances in TAVR for patient selection, expanding indications, complications, and emerging technologies.