Transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in Japan: Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN) Japanese multicenter registry

Performance and outcomes of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA transcatheter heart valve in the OCEAN-TAVI registry

BACKGROUND

Data on the performance of the latest-generation SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA (S3UR) valve in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are scarce.

AIMS

We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes, including valve performance, of the S3UR.

METHODS

Registry data of 618 consecutive patients with S3UR and of a historical pooled cohort of 8,750 patients who had a SAPIEN 3 (S3) valve and underwent TAVR were collected. The clinical outcomes and haemodynamics, including patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM), were compared between the 2 groups and in a propensity-matched cohort.

RESULTS

The incidence of in-hospital death, vascular complications, and new pacemaker implantation was similar between the S3UR and the S3 groups (allp>0.05). However, both groups showed significant differences in the degrees of paravalvular leakage (PVL) (none-trivial: 87.0% vs 78.5%, mild: 12.5% vs 20.5%, ≥moderate: 0.5% vs 1.1%; p<0.001) and the incidence of PPM (none: 94.3% vs 85.1%, moderate: 5.2% vs 12.8%, severe: 0.5% vs 2.0%; p<0.001). The prevalence of a mean pressure gradient ≥20 mmHg was significantly lower in the S3UR group (1.6% vs 6.2%; p<0.001). Better haemodynamics were observed with the smaller 20 mm and 23 mm S3UR valves. The results were consistent in a matched cohort of patients with S3UR and with S3 (n=618 patients/group).

CONCLUSIONS

The S3UR has equivalent procedural complications to the S3 but with lower rates of PVL and significantly better valve performance. The better valve performance of the S3UR, particularly in smaller valve sizes, overcomes the remaining issue of balloon-expandable valves after TAVR.

Safety and feasibility of zero-contrast transcatheter aortic valve implantation using balloon-expandable valves in patients with aortic stenosis and severe renal impairment: A single-center study

BACKGROUND

Aortic stenosis (AS) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) can coexist. Repeat exposure to contrast media in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has latent mortality risks and increased risk for acute kidney injury. We aimed to assess our "zero-contrast TAVI" protocol for patients with advanced CKD.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI at a single center registry were enrolled. Zero-contrast TAVI group included patients who underwent TAVI without contrast and who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conventional TAVI group included patients who underwent the regular TAVI procedure. Patients using balloon-expandable valves via transfemoral approach were analyzed. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between two groups. The primary outcome was early safety as defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium Criteria. Secondary outcomes included the presence of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch, moderate or greater perivalvular leakage, and requirement for new dialysis (within 3 months).

RESULTS

A total of 520 patients were analyzed. Among these, 32 (6 %) underwent zero-contrast TAVI and 488 (94 %) conventional TAVI. In the zero-contrast TAVI group, 12 patients (37.5 %) had to use 20.7 (11.0-31.2) mL of contrast media. There were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes between zero-contrast TAVI and conventional TAVI groups (78.1 % vs. 86.8 %, P = 0.184 and 9.4 % vs. 8.1 %, P = 0.738 for the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Zero-contrast TAVI is feasible, safe, and effective in patients with AS and stage 4 CKD.

Rationale and design of Non-antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (NAPT) Trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the wide implementation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the optimal antithrombotic therapy after TAVI has not been established yet. Owing to the accumulating evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) over dual antiplatelet therapy, the latest guideline recommends life-long SAPT. However, there is scarce evidence supporting SAPT compared with non-antithrombotic therapy. Given the vulnerability of patients undergoing TAVI in terms of high bleeding risk, the benefit of SAPT may be canceled out by its potential increased bleeding risk.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES

Non-antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (NAPT) Trial is a prospective, randomized controlled, open-label blinded endpoint multicenter trial conducted in Japan, testing the non-inferiority of non-antithrombotic therapy compared with aspirin monotherapy in patients who underwent TAVI and had no indications for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Patients who successfully underwent trans-femoral TAVI for severe aortic stenosis with either balloon-expandable or self-expandable valves are eligible for inclusion. Key exclusion criteria are (i) occurrence of perioperative complications (ii) indications of taking antithrombotic drugs for other reasons; (iii) eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. A total of 360 patients will be randomized (1:1) to aspirin monotherapy vs. non-antithrombotic therapy. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding. All bleeding events based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 are included as a component of the primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

The NAPT trial will determine the non-inferiority of a non-antithrombotic therapy compared with aspirin monotherapy after TAVI.

Appropriate Use Criteria for the Management of Aortic Stenosis: Insight From the Japanese Expert Panel

Background

The indication for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) significantly varies among physicians and institutions.

Objectives

This study aims to develop a set of appropriate use criteria for AS management to assist physicians in decision-making.

Methods

The RAND-modified Delphi panel method was used. A total of >250 common clinical scenarios were identified in terms of whether to perform the intervention for AS and the mode of intervention (surgical aortic valve replacement vs TAVR). Eleven nationally representative expert panelists independently rated the clinical scenario appropriateness on a scale of 1-9, as "appropriate" (7-9), "may be appropriate" (4-6), or "rarely appropriate" (1-3); the median score of the 11 experts was then assigned to an appropriate-use category.

Results

The panel identified 3 factors that were associated with a rarely appropriate rating in terms of performing the intervention: 1) limited life expectancy; 2) frailty; and 3) pseudo-severe AS on dobutamine stress echocardiography. Clinical scenarios that were deemed rarely appropriate for TAVR were also identified: 1) patients with low surgical risk and high TAVR procedural risk; 2) patients with coexistent severe primary mitral regurgitation or rheumatic mitral stenosis; and 3) bicuspid aortic valve that was not suitable for TAVR. Importantly, any TAVRs for patients who were older than 75 years of age were not rated as rarely appropriate.

Conclusions

These appropriate use criteria provide a practical guide for physicians regarding clinical situations commonly encountered in daily practice and elucidates scenarios deemed rarely appropriate that are clinical challenges for TAVR.

Postprocedural ascending aortic dissection after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a case report

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been established as an effective and safe treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). It is reported that vascular complications, especially aortic dissection, are rare. However, aortic dissection may be a serious consequence if it occurs. We experienced a case of delayed onset of ascending aortic dissection after TAVI.

Case summary

An 82-year-old woman presented with dyspnoea and general fatigue. Echocardiography revealed severe AS and she was diagnosed with heart failure associated with AS. She had difficulty controlling heart failure and required the intervention of the aortic valve. We evaluated the aortic valve and access routes with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), which showed marked dilatation of the ascending aorta. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed and the procedure was completed without major complications. Transoesophageal echocardiography during the procedure did not detect any obvious arterial injury. However, on the second postoperative day, the patient suddenly became unconscious and a CT indicated an ascending aortic dissection. Unfortunately, she passed away. An autopsy revealed the fragility of the ascending aorta.

Conclusion

Patients with AS and aortic root dilatation may develop delayed onset of ascending aortic dissection after TAVI.

The search for optimal antithrombotic therapy in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: facts and uncertainties

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive procedure, which is used frequently in patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis. Most patients undergoing TAVI are over 80 years of age with a high bleeding as well as thrombotic risk. Despite the increasing safety of the procedure, thromboembolic events [stroke, (subclinical) valve thrombosis] remain prevalent. As a consequence, antithrombotic prophylaxis is routinely used and only recently new data on the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic drugs has become available. On the other hand, these antithrombotic drugs increase bleeding in a population with unique aortic stenosis-related bleeding characteristics (such as acquired von Willebrand factor defect and angiodysplasia). In this review, we discuss the impact of thromboembolic and bleeding events, the current optimal antithrombotic therapy based on registries and recent randomized controlled trials, as well as try to give a practical guide how to treat these high-risk patients. Finally, we discuss knowledge gaps and future research needed to fill these gaps.

Economics of Minimalist Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the 3M-TAVR Economic Study

BACKGROUND

The 3M-TAVR trial (3M-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement) demonstrated the feasibility and safety of next-day hospital discharge after transfemoral TAVR with implementation of a minimalist pathway. However, the economic impact of this approach is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated costs for patients undergoing minimalist TAVR compared with conventional TAVR.

METHODS

We used propensity matching to compare resource utilization and costs (from a US health care system perspective) for patients in the 3M-TAVR trial with those for transfemoral TAVR patients enrolled in the contemporaneous S3i trial (PARTNER SAPIEN-3 Intermediate Risk). Procedural costs were estimated using measured resource utilization for both groups. For the S3i group, all other costs through 30-day follow-up were assessed by linkage with Medicare claims; for 3M, these costs were assessed using regression models derived from S3i cost and resource utilization data.

RESULTS

After 1:1 propensity matching, 351 pairs were included in our study (mean age 82, mean Society of Thoracic Surgery risk score 5.3%). There were no differences in death, stroke, or rehospitalization between the 3M-TAVR and S3i groups through 30-day follow-up. Index hospitalization costs were $10 843/patient lower in the 3M-TAVR cohort, driven by reductions in procedure duration, anesthesia costs, and length of stay. Between discharge and 30 days, costs were similar for the 2 groups such that cumulative 30-day costs were $11 305/patient lower in the 3M-TAVR cohort compared with the S3i cohort ($49 425 versus $60 729, 95% CI for difference $9378 to $13 138; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional transfemoral TAVR, use of a minimalist pathway in intermediate-risk patients was associated with similar clinical outcomes and substantial in-hospital cost savings, which were sustained through 30 days.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02287662.

A Risk Model for 1-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement From the J-TVT Registry

Background

Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has demonstrated favorable outcomes in randomized studies, there remains a sizable group of patients in whom TAVR may be futile. Characterizing the survival rate in a wide array of patients undergoing TAVR can help develop effective strategies for improving the allocation of medial resources.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to develop a risk model to estimate 1-year mortality after TAVR from a representative nationwide registry in Japan.

Methods

The J-TVT (Japan Transcatheter Valve Therapies) registry contains complete data, including 1-year outcomes, on patients undergoing TAVR in Japan. A total of 17,655 patients underwent TAVR between 2013 and 2018. They were randomly divided into 2 groups in a 7:3 ratio to form a derivation cohort of 12,316 patients and a validation cohort of 5,339 patients. A risk model was constructed for 1-year mortality in the derivation cohort, and its discrimination and calibration were assessed in the validation cohort.

Results

The mean age of all registered patients was 84.4 years, and 68.8% were women. The mean body size area was 1.43 m², and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 7.3%. The estimated 1-year survival was 91.8%; 202 and 1,316 deaths were observed at 30 days and 1 year, respectively; The estimated C index for the developed model was 0.733 (95% CI: 0.709-0.757) in the validation cohort, with good calibration.

Conclusions

A prediction model for 1-year survival following TAVR derived from a national clinical database performed well and should aid physicians managing TAVR patients.

Incidence, Timing, and Causes of Late Bleeding After TAVR in an Asian Cohort

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the incidence, predictive factors, and clinical outcomes of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) bleeding is limited in the Asian cohort.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the predictors and prognostic impact of post-TAVR late bleeding.

METHODS

This study used the Japanese multicenter registry data to analyze 2,518 patients (mean age: 84.3 ± 5.2 years) who underwent TAVR. Late bleeding was defined as any postdischarge bleeding events after TAVR. Baseline characteristics, predictive factors, and clinical outcomes including death and rehospitalization were assessed in patients with and without late bleeding events.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence rate of all and major late bleeding and ischemic stroke were 7.4%, 5.2%, and 3.4%, respectively, 3 years after TAVR. The independent predictive factors of late bleeding were low platelet count, high score (≥4) on the clinical frailty scale, and a New York Heart Association functional class III/IV. The cumulative mortality rates up to 3 years were significantly higher in patients with late bleeding than in those without bleeding (P < 0.001). The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that late bleeding, included as a time-varying covariate in the model, was associated with an increased risk of mortality following TAVR (HR: 5.63; 95% CI: 4.28-7.41; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Late bleeding after TAVR was not a rare complication, and it significantly increased long-term mortality. It should be carefully managed, especially when it is predictable in the high-risk cohort, and efforts should be taken to reduce bleeding complications even after a successful procedure.

The Usefulness of the Modified Essential Frailty Toolset to Predict Late Bleeding Events after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Frailty is strongly associated with poor short- and long-term prognoses in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, limited data are available regarding the association between frailty and late bleeding events after TAVI. Of the 2,518 patients in the Japanese multicenter TAVI registry, 1371 patients with complete data on frailty parameters were analyzed. We developed a modified Essential Frailty Toolset (EFT) using 4 frailty parameters-gait speed, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), anemia, and hypoalbuminemia-that are significant predictors of late bleeding events in this cohort. The predictive value of the modified EFT for late bleeding after TAVI was assessed in comparison with other clinical variables. Late bleeding events after TAVI occurred in 80 patients (5.8%). Gait speed, MMSE, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia were significantly associated with late bleeding. A modified EFT was developed to include these parameters, which were scored from 0 to 5 points comprising the following 4 items: gait speed (0: >1.5 m/s, 1: 1.5 to 0.75 m/s, 2: <0.75 m/s), cognition (1: MMSE <18), anemia (1: hemoglobin <13 g/100 ml in men or <12 g/100 ml in women), and malnutrition (1: albumin <3.5 g/100 ml). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the modified EFT was an independent predictor of late bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19 to 1.92, p <0.001) In conclusion, the modified EFT was found to be a significant predictive factor for late bleeding events after TAVI. Assessment of frailty is important to predict patients with high bleeding risk after TAVI.

Revisiting the Aortic Valve Calcium Score in Evaluating the Severity of Aortic Stenosis in Japanese Patients - A Single-Center Study

Background: In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), measurement of aortic valve calcification (AVC) using computed tomography (CT) is recommended in cases where echocardiographic measurements are inconclusive. However, sex-specific AVC thresholds proposed in the guidelines for predicting severe AS (women: 1,200 arbitrary units [AU]; men: 2,000 AU) are based on studies from Western countries. Methods and Results: We retrospectively included 512 Japanese patients with at least moderate AS who underwent transthoracic echocardiography and CT. AVC was quantified using the Agatston method. AVC was positively correlated with peak aortic jet velocity and mean transvalvular gradient (mPG), and negatively correlated with aortic valve area (AVA) and the AVA index (AVAi). In 257 patients with concordant AS grading (152 severe AS [AVAi ≤0.6 cm2/m2, mPG ≥40 mmHg], 105 moderate AS [AVAi >0.6 cm2/m2, mPG <40 mmHg]), receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of AVC predicting severe AS yielded an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.95; P<0.001) in women and 0.86 (95% CI 0.75-0.98; P<0.001) in men. The optimal thresholds (women: 1,379 AU; men: 1,802 AU) were close to those proposed in the guidelines. The diagnostic accuracy of the thresholds in the guidelines was similar to that of the optimal thresholds. Conclusions: The sex-specific AVC thresholds proposed in international guidelines can be applied to Japanese AS patients, yielding similar diagnostic accuracy as the optimal cut-off derived from the study patients.

Chronic kidney disease and transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Patients with aortic stenosis have a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD is generally associated with an increased risk of mortality, cardiovascular events, and readmission for heart failure; this supports the concept of a cardio-renal syndrome (CRS). CRS encompasses a spectrum of disorders of the heart and kidneys, wherein dysfunction in one organ may cause dysfunction in the other. TAVI treatment is expected to break this malignant cycle of CRS and improve cardio-renal function after the procedure. However, several reports demonstrate that patients with CKD have been associated with poor outcomes after the procedure. In addition, TAVI treatments for patients with advanced CKD and those with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis are considered more challenging. Adequate management to preserve cardio-renal function in patients undergoing TAVI may reduce the risk of cardio-renal adverse events and improve the long-term prognosis. The current comprehensive review article aims to assess the prognostic impact of CKD after TAVI and seek optimal care in patients with CKD even after successful TAVI.

Prosthetic cardiac valves: history and review of cardiac prostheses clinically available in Japan

Recently developed prosthetic valves are reliable and essential for the treatment of valvular heart disease. The mechanical valve evolved remarkably following the introduction of pyrolite carbon material, which enabled the creation of a bileaflet form incorporated with a pivot mechanism. The improved durability of the biological valve is attributed mainly to the development of a tissue fixation process and anti-calcification treatments. However, optimal antithrombogenicity and durability have not yet been achieved for either prosthetic valve type. To select the most suitable prosthetic valve for each individual patient from among the many clinically available prosthetic valves, it is necessary to have a thorough understanding of the characteristics of each valve.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Asia: Present Status and Future Perspectives

Over the last decade, based on evidence from multiple randomized clinical trials, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the established treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Despite the overwhelming expansion of TAVR in Western countries, the initial uptake and widespread adoption of this procedure have been relatively delayed in Asian countries, owing to the high cost of devices; limited local health and reimbursement policies; and lack of specific training/proctoring program, specialized heart team, or dedicated infrastructure. Furthermore, it has not yet been determined whether there are substantial interracial and ethnic differences in the clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and anatomic features, as well as procedural and long-term outcomes, in patients receiving TAVR. In this review, we provide not only a comprehensive look at the current status and outcomes of TAVR in Asian populations compared with those of Western populations but also a perspective on the future of TAVR in Asia.

Predictors and clinical outcomes of poor symptomatic improvement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Objective

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) improves clinical symptoms in most patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, some patients do not benefit from the symptom-reducing effects of TAVR. We assessed the predictors and clinical outcomes of poor symptomatic improvement (SI) after TAVR.

Methods

A total of 1749 patients with severe symptomatic AS undergoing transfemoral TAVR were evaluated using the Japanese multicentre TAVR registry. Poor SI was defined as readmission for heart failure (HF) within 1 year after TAVR or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥3 after 1 year. A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of poor SI. One-year landmark analysis after TAVR was used to evaluate the association between poor SI and clinical outcomes.

Results

Among the overall population (mean age, 84.5 years; female, 71.3%; mean STS score, 6.3%), 6.6% were categorised as having poor SI. Atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4, chronic kidney disease and moderate to severe mitral regurgitation were independent predictors of poor SI. One-year landmark analysis demonstrated that poor SI had a higher incidence of all-cause death and readmission for HF compared with SI (p<0.001). Poor SI with preprocedural NYHA class 2 had a worse outcome than SI with preprocedural NYHA class ≥3.

Conclusions

Poor SI was associated with worse outcomes 1 year after the procedure. It had a greater impact on clinical outcomes than baseline symptoms. TAVR may be challenging for patients with many predictors of poor SI.

Trial registration number

This registry, associated with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, was accepted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (UMIN-ID: 000020423).

Prognostic Value of Ventricular-Arterial Coupling After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Midterm Clinical Outcomes

Background

Ventricular‐arterial coupling predicts outcomes in patients with heart failure. The arterial elastance to end‐systolic elastance ratio (Ea/Ees) is a noninvasively assessed index that reflects ventricular‐arterial coupling. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of ventricular‐arterial coupling assessed through Ea/Ees after transcatheter aortic valve replacement to predict clinical events.

Methods and Results

We retrieved data on 1378 patients (70% women) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement between October 2013 and May 2017 from the OCEAN‐TAVI (Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention) Japanese multicenter registry. We determined the association between Ea/Ees and the composite end point of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death by classifying the patients into quartiles based on Ea/Ees values (group 1: <0.326; group 2: 0.326–0.453; group 3: 0.453–0.666; and group 4: >0.666) during the midterm follow‐up after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. During a median follow‐up period of 736 days (interquartile range, 414–956), there were 247 (17.9%) all‐cause deaths, 89 (6.5%) cardiovascular deaths, 130 (9.4%) hospitalizations for heart failure, and 199 (14.4%) composite events of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death. The incidence of the composite end point was significantly higher in group 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.08–2.87 [P=0.024]), group 3 (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.53–3.86 [P<0.001]), and group 4 (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.83–4.57 [P<0.001]) than that in group 1. On adjusted multivariable Cox analysis, Ea/Ees was significantly associated with composite events (HR, 1.47 per 1‐unit increase; 95% CI, 1.08–2.01 [P=0.015]).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that a higher Ea/Ees at discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with adverse clinical outcomes during midterm follow‐up.

Registration

URL: https://www.upload.umin.ac.jp/. Unique identifier: UMIN000020423.

Impact of New York Heart Association functional class on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

In the current guidelines, indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are expanded to include several subgroups of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), and there is a paucity of data on the prognostic impact of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

Among 2588 patients enrolled in the OCEAN-TAVI registry, patients were divided into 4 groups according to baseline NYHA class (class I in 95 patients, class II in 1172 patients, class III in 1126 patients, and class IV in 195 patients).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 729 days. The cumulative 2-year incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in patients with NYHA class IV and III than in those with NYHA class II and I. (30.0%, 21.3%, 13.4%, and 11.2%, respectively, P < 0.001). After adjusting confounders, NYHA class IV and III, but not NYHA class II were independently associated with higher mortality compared with NYHA class I (reference) (adjusted HR: 3.43, 95%CI: 1.83-7.15, P < 0.001; adjusted HR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.15-4.19, P = 0.013; and adjusted HR: 1.50, 95%CI: 0.83-3.04, P = 0.19, respectively). With increasing NYHA class, there was an incremental increase of heart failure hospitalization in the effect size relative to the reference (NYHA class I).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term outcomes of patients with NYHA class I were better than those with NYHA class IV or III in some selected patients undergoing TAVI.

Patients' characteristics and mortality in urgent/emergent/salvage transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insight from the OCEAN-TAVI registry

Objectives

Patients’ backgrounds and clinical outcomes in urgent/emergent/salvage transcatheter aortic valve replacement (Em-TAVR) remain unclear. We investigated patient characteristics and the mortality in Em-TAVR and the predictors for the need for Em-TAVR.

Methods

We consecutively enrolled 1613 patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis between October 2013 and July 2016 from the Optimised transCathEter vAlvular interventioN (OCEAN)-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) registry. The urgency was based on the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II. Urgent, emergent or salvage were included with the Em-TAVR group and elective with the El-TAVR group.

Results

Em-TAVR was observed in 87 (5.4%) patients. A higher Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), peripheral artery disease (PAD), hypoalbuminaemia, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and preoperative at least moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) predicted the need for the Em-TAVR by the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The Em-TAVR group had the higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score (13.7 (IQR 8.2–21.0) vs 6.5 (IQR 4.6–9.2); p<0.001) and higher 30-day mortality (9.2% vs 1.3%; p<0.001) than the El-TAVR group. Accordingly, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative mortality was higher in the Em-TAVR group than that in the El-TAVR group (log-rank; p<0.001). However, Em-TAVR did not predict mortality in the multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Conclusions

Em-TAVR was performed in 5.4% of patients. Higher CFS, PAD, hypoalbuminaemia, reduced LVEF and preprocedural MR predicted the need for Em-TAVR. Em-TAVR was not a predictor for mortality in the multivariate analysis, suggesting that it is a reasonable treatment option.

Creatinine Score Can Predict Persistent Renal Dysfunction Following Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is often accompanied by renal dysfunction, which portends a poor prognosis. Trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an accepted therapy for patients with severe AS, whereas the prediction of persistent renal dysfunction following TAVR remains challenging. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the pre-procedural score to assess the reversibility of renal dysfunction following TAVR. A total of 2,588 patients with severe AS who received TAVR and were enrolled in the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN-TAVI) multicenter registry (UMIN000020423) were retrospectively investigated and those with serum creatinine (Cre) data at baseline and one year following TAVR were included. The Cre score was calculated using the formula: 0.2 × (age [years]) + 3.6 × (baseline serum Cre [mg/dL]). This score was evaluated to assess the risk of persistent renal dysfunction defined as serum Cre level > 1.5 mg/dL at one year following TAVR. Of the 1705 patients (84.3 ± 5.0 years old) included, 246 (14%) had persistent renal dysfunction following TAVR. The Cre score predicted the incidence of persistent renal dysfunction with an adjusted incidence rate ratio of 1.48 (95% confidence interval 1.42-1.56) with a cutoff of 21.4 (43% versus 5%, P < 0.001). The Cre score also predicted 4-year survival following TAVR (70% versus 52%, P < 0.001) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.75 (95% confidence interval 1.29-2.37). In conclusion, the Cre score identified those with a high risk of one-year persistent renal dysfunction following TAVR. The implication of Cre score-guided therapeutic strategy is the next concern.

Late kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Information on early to late-phase kidney damage in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is scarce. We aimed to identify the predictive factors for late kidney injury (LKI) at 1-year and patient prognosis beyond 1-year after TAVR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1,705 patients' data from the Japanese TAVR multicenter registry. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and LKI, defined as an increase of at least 0.3 mg/dL in creatinine level, a relative 50% decrease in kidney function from baseline to 48 hours and 1-year, were evaluated. The patients were categorized into the 4 groups as AKI-/LKI- (n = 1.362), AKI+/LKI- (n = 95), AKI-/LKI+ (n = 199), and AKI+/LKI+ (n = 46).

RESULTS

The cumulative 3-year mortality rates were significantly increased across the four groups (12.5%, 15.8%, 24.6%, 25.8%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, periprocedural AKI, and heart failure-related re-admission within 1-year were significantly associated with LKI. The Cox regression analysis revealed that AKI-/LKI+ and AKI+/LKI+ were independent predictors of increased late mortality beyond 1-year after TAVR (P = .001 and P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

LKI was influenced by adverse cardio-renal events and was associated with increased risks of late mortality beyond 1-year after TAVR.

A Real-World Comparison of 1-Year Survival and Expenditures for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacements: SAPIEN 3 Versus CoreValve Versus Evolut R

OBJECTIVES

New versions of balloon-expandable and self-expandable valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have been developed, but few studies have examined the outcomes associated with these devices using national-level data. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical and economic outcomes of TAVR for aortic stenosis in Japan through an analysis of real-world data.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed using data from patients with aortic stenosis who had undergone transfemoral TAVR with Edwards SAPIEN 3, Medtronic CoreValve, or Medtronic Evolut R valves throughout Japan from April 2016 to March 2018. Pacemaker implantation, mortality, and health expenditure were examined for each valve type during hospitalization and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Generalized linear regression models and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the associations between the valve types and outcomes.

RESULTS

We analyzed 7244 TAVR cases (SAPIEN 3: 5276, CoreValve: 418, and Evolut R: 1550) across 145 hospitals. The adjusted 1-year expenditures for SAPIEN 3, CoreValve, and Evolut R were $79 402, $76 125, and $75 527, respectively; SAPIEN 3 was significantly more expensive than the other valves (P < .05). The pacemaker implantation hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for CoreValve and Evolut R were significantly higher (P < .001) than SAPIEN 3 at 2.61 (2.07-3.27) and 1.80 (1.53-2.12), respectively. The mortality hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for CoreValve and Evolut R were not significant at 1.11 (0.84-1.46) and 1.22 (0.97-1.54), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SAPIEN 3 users had generally lower pacemaker implantation and mortality but higher expenditures than CoreValve and Evolut R users.

Cost analysis of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: analysis from a single Japanese center

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the prognosis of intermediate- or high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, particularly among older adults. However, in possible candidates for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), the implantation of expensive prostheses may be questionable in an era when healthcare costs are becoming a major concern. In this retrospective analysis of a single Japanese center, we focused on patients aged over 80 years; the objectives of this study were: (1) to compare TAVR and SAVR in terms of total hospitalization costs and (2) to describe the itemized cost of TAVR and SAVR to identify patients aged over 80 years in whom TAVR or SAVR would be cost-effective. A total of 146 patients aged over 80 years who underwent TAVR or SAVR for severe aortic stenosis were included. These patients were divided into a high-risk group (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] mortality score > 8%; 36: TAVR and 12: SAVR) with 48 patients and a non-high-risk group (STS mortality score < 8%; 45: TAVR and 53 SAVR) with 98 patients. No 30-day mortality was observed in either group. In both groups, postoperative intensive care unit stay and hospital stay were longer with SAVR than with TAVR. In the non-high-risk group, the total cost was comparable for TAVR and SAVR; however, in the high-risk group, the total cost was significantly higher with SAVR than that with TAVR. A breakdown analysis of the total cost in the high-risk group showed both pre- and postoperative costs to be significantly higher with SAVR than with TAVR; however, operative costs were higher with TAVR. Up to 3 years, the overall survival in both groups did not significantly differ between TAVR and SAVR. Our findings suggest that from the perspective of total medical costs, TAVR is more suitable than SAVR for high-risk older adults.

Calculated plasma volume status and outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Aims

This study investigated the prognostic value of plasma volume status (PVS) in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Methods and results

Plasma volume status was calculated in 2588 patients who underwent TAVR using data from the Japanese multicentre registry. All‐cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) within 2 years of TAVR were compared among the PVS quartiles (Q1, PVS < 5.5%; Q2, PVS 5.5–13.5%; Q3, PVS 13.5–21.0%; and Q4, PVS ≥ 21.0%). Subgroups were stratified by the PVS cut‐off value combined with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class as follows: low PVS with NYHA I/II (n = 959), low PVS with NYHA III/IV (n = 845), high PVS with NYHA I/II (n = 308), and high PVS with NYHA III/IV (n = 476). The cumulative all‐cause mortality and HFH within 2 years of TAVR significantly increased with increasing PVS quartiles [8.5%, 16.8%, 19.2%, and 27.0% (P < 0.001) and 5.8%, 8.7%, 10.3%, and 12.9% (P < 0.001), respectively]. The high‐PVS group regardless of the NYHA class had a higher all‐cause mortality and HFH [9.6%, 18.2%, 24.5%, and 30.4% (P < 0.001) and 6.1%, 10.4%, 14.1%, and 11.3% (P < 0.001)]. In a Cox regression multivariate analysis, the PVS values of Q3 and Q4 had independently increased all‐cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 1.50 and 1.64 (P = 0.017 and P = 0.008), respectively], and Q4 had independently increased HFH (HR, 1.98, P = 0.005). The low PVS with NYHA III/IV, high PVS with NYHA I/II, and high PVS with NYHA III/IV also had significantly increased all‐cause mortality [HR, 1.45, 1.73, and 1.86 (P = 0.006, P = 0.002, and P < 0.001), respectively] and HFH [HR, 1.52, 2.21, and 1.70 (P = 0.049, P = 0.002, and P = 0.031), respectively].

Conclusions

Plasma volume status is useful for predicting all‐cause mortality and HFH after TAVR.

Late Adverse Cardiorenal Events of Catheter Procedure-Related Acute Kidney Injury After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Data regarding the longitudinal effect of catheter procedure-related acute kidney injury (AKI) on clinical outcomes are limited. This study aimed to assess the late adverse cardiorenal events of AKI following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A total of 2,518 patients who underwent TAVI, excluding in-hospital deaths, were enrolled from the Japanese multicenter registry. The definition of AKI was determined using the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. The incidence, predictors, major adverse renal and cardiac events (MARCE), and all-cause mortality of AKI were evaluated. MARCE included readmission for renal and heart failure (HF), hemodialysis requirement, and cardiovascular-renal death during the follow-up period. The incidence of AKI was 9.7% in the entire cohort. The significant predictive factors of AKI were men, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, low albumin, overdose of contrast media, nontransfemoral approach, transfusion, vascular complications, and new pacemaker implantation. The rates of HF readmission and future hemodialysis were significantly higher in patients with AKI than in those without AKI (19.7% vs 9.0%, p <0.001, 3.3% vs 0.4%, p <0.001, respectively). Cox regression multivariate analysis showed that AKI occurrence was an independent predictive factor for the incremental risk of both MARCE and late mortality up to 4 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 1.20, p <0.001, HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.79; p <0.001, respectively). In conclusion, AKI occurrence was significantly associated with late adverse cardiorenal events after TAVI. Adequate clinical management can be expected to reduce AKI-related late phase cardiorenal damage even after successful TAVI.

Sex-Related Differences in Cardiac Remodeling and Reverse Remodeling After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Japanese Population

Left ventricular (LV) remodeling with aortic stenosis (AS) appears to differ according to sex, but reverse remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has not been elucidated in a Japanese population. This study aims to determine whether any sex-related differences in LV or reverse remodeling after TAVI exist in the context of severe AS.Of 208 patients who received TAVI for severe AS in our institution, 100 (men, 42; mean age, 83.0 ± 4.9 years) underwent transthoracic echocardiography before and 3 months after TAVI. Despite similar valvular gradients, women with severe AS had lower indexed LV mass (LVMi) than did men (152.3 ± 35.4 versus 173.2 ± 44.6 g/m², P = 0.005), with smaller indexed LV end-diastolic (LVEDVi) (50.2 ± 13.3 versus 61.4 ± 20.7 mL/m², P = 0.001) and end-systolic (LVESVi; 17.9 ± 8.7 versus 24.3 ± 13.8 mL/m², P = 0.006) volumes. After TAVI, women (-6.0% ± 14.4%) had higher reduction in the rate of change of relative wall thickness (RWT) than did men (4.4% ± 19.0%, P = 0.003). Men (-8.9% ± 3.9%) had higher reduction in the rate of change of LVEDVi than did women (1.5% ± 3.3%, P = 0.045). Incidence of LV reverse remodeling defined as a reduction in LVESV of >15% was significantly higher in men (50%) than in women (26%, P = 0.013).In addition to sex differences in the pattern of LV remodeling with AS, reverse LV remodeling after TAVI also differed between sexes.

Short-term dual anti-platelet therapy decreases long-term cardiovascular mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

No data are available on extended dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) duration which may influence long-term prognosis (later than 1 year) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Therefore, this study is aimed to evaluate whether discontinuing DAPT within 1 year had an impact on adverse events after TAVR. Using data from the OCEAN-TAVI registry, we assessed 1008 patients who survived the first year after TAVR with DAPT since discharge. Patients were divided into 'DAPT group' (n = 462), comprising patients who took DAPT at both discharge and 1 year, and 'stop-DAPT group' (n = 546), comprising patients who took DAPT at discharge and single anti-platelet therapy (SAPT) at 1 year. We compared the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) death, major and minor bleeding, and ischemic stroke later than 1 year after TAVR between the two groups. A total of 28 CV deaths were observed later than 1 year after TAVR. The stop-DAPT group had a significantly lower incidence of CV death than the DAPT group (1.8% vs. 4.9%, log-rank P = 0.029). Stop DAPT was associated with lower CV death later than 1 year of TAVR in Cox regression analysis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.99), and in analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting method using propensity score (adjusted HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20-0.98). Our study demonstrated that switching from DAPT to SAPT within 1 year of TAVR was significantly associated with a lower CV death later than 1 year after TAVR.

Development of a new risk model for a prognostic prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) recommend that TAVR should be performed in patients with a life expectancy > 1 year. However, it is challenging to estimate the patients' life expectancy because it is related to various factors, including frailty and nutritional status.

HYPOTHESIS

A new risk model can estimate the prognosis of patients after TAVR.

METHODS

We randomly divided 388 patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVR from October 2009 to August 2016 into two groups (2:1 ratio; training cohort, 259; validation cohort, 129). Using 94 baseline factors in the training cohort, we developed possible scoring models by the Cox proportional hazard regression model with the overall survival as the endpoint. Then, cross-validated 5-year C-statistics were calculated to assess the accuracy of the model.

RESULTS

Of 94 baseline factors, 12 factors were finally identified (5-year C-statistics in the training cohort: 0.709)-age, gender, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, % vital capacity, forced expiratory volume 1.0 (s) %, albumin, hemoglobin, creatine, platelet, creatine kinase, and prothrombin time-international normalized ratio. The cross-validated 1-, 3-, and 5-year C-statistics in the validation cohort were 0.792, 0.758, and 0.778, respectively. Furthermore, calibration plots in the validation cohort revealed that 5-year survival is well predicted (r = 0.962).

CONCLUSIONS

The new survival prediction model after TAVR could provide appropriate guidance during decision making regarding the TAVR implementation.

Appropriateness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background:

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is widely used; however, its appropriateness is unknown. We sought to investigate the appropriateness of TAVR.

Methods and Results:

We assigned appropriateness ratings to patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis between October 2013 and May 2017 at 14 Japanese hospitals participating in the optimized transcatheter valvular intervention-transcatheter aortic valve implantation registry according to the US appropriate use criteria for treating severe aortic stenosis. To account for the influence of uncaptured variables on appropriate use criteria ratings, we initially assigned them to a best-case scenario where they were assumed to classify a case to the most appropriate clinical scenario and then to a worst-case scenario where assumed least appropriate. Overall proportion of TAVRs classified as appropriate, maybe appropriate, or rarely appropriate was assessed. In addition, extent of hospital-level variation in rarely appropriate procedures was evaluated. Of 2036 TAVRs (median age [25th, 75th]: 85.0 years [81.0–88.0]; 70.5% female the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score: 6.2% [4.4–8.9]), in the best-case scenario, 177 (8.7%) were not successfully mapped, and 1580 (77.6%) were classified as appropriate, 180 (8.8%) as maybe appropriate, 99 (4.9%) as rarely appropriate, respectively. In the worst-case scenario, the rate of rarely appropriate increased to 6.8%. The majority of rarely appropriate TAVRs was performed in patients with moderate to severe dementia (defined as mini-mental status examination of ≤17), bicuspid aortic valve, or anticipated life expectancy <1 year. There was substantial variation in the proportion of rarely appropriate TAVR across hospitals (median rate of rarely appropriate: 4.9% [3.8–6.6] in the best-case scenario, P <0.001; 6.5% [5.6–8.6] in the worst-case scenario, P <0.001).

Conclusions:

In clinical practice, the proportion of rarely appropriate TAVRs ranged from 4.9% to 6.8% with substantial institutional variation. Our study elucidates common clinical scenarios deemed rarely appropriate and clarifies the potential targets of quality improvement.

Registration:

URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm . Unique identifier: UMIN000020423.

Preoperative Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Predicts Survival After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Background: This aim of this study was to clarify prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and to identify baseline factors associated with mortality.

Methods and Results: We prospectively enrolled 257 consecutive elderly persons with AS who were referred to Keio University Hospital and who underwent assessment of cardiac, physical (walking speed), cognitive, and renal functions, nutritional status, activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL (IADL) assessed with the Frenchay activities index (FAI), and comorbidities. The primary outcome was postoperative death. Differences in basic characteristics were compared between a group that survived for a median of 661 days (IQR, 0–1,289 days) after TAVI and a group that did not. Multivariate hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for independent factors selected in Cox proportional hazard models. Thirty-one individuals died during follow-up. Walking speed was significantly faster (0.87±0.25 vs. 0.70±0.24 m/s, P<0.001) and FAI was significantly higher (21.2±8.0 vs. 15.7±8.0, P=0.026) in the survival group compared with those who died. Multivariate HR for mortality according to walking speed was 0.05 (95% CI: 0.028–0.091) in model 1 and 0.04 (95% CI: 0.020–0.081) in model 2, and those for FAI were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.95) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.92), respectively.

Conclusions: Preoperative walking speed and IADL are crucial factors associated with prognosis after TAVI even after adjustment.