1
|
Sattar Y, Faisaluddin M, Almas T, Alhajri N, Shah R, Zghouzi M, Zafrullah F, Sengodon PM, Zia Khan M, Ullah W, Alam M, Balla S, Lakkis N, Kawsara A, Daggubati R, Chadi Alraies M. Cardiovascular outcomes of transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in End-Stage renal Disease: A Regression-Based comparison. IJC HEART & VASCULATURE 2022; 43:101110. [PMID: 36051245 PMCID: PMC9424587 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Limited data is available on the comparison of outcomes of transradial (TR) and transfemoral (TF) access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with end-stage stage renal disease (ESRD). Methods Online databases were queried to compare cardiovascular outcomes among TR. and TF in ESRD patients. The outcomes assessed included differences in mortality, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI), bleeding, transfusion, and periprocedural cardiogenic shock (CS). Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random-effect effect model. Results A total of 6 studies including 7,607 patients (TR-PCI = 1,288; TF-PCI = 6,319) were included. The overall mean age was 67.7 years, while the mean age for TR-PCI and TF-PCI was 69.7 years and 67.9 years, respectively. TR-PCI was associated with lower incidence of mortality (OR 0.46 95 % CI 0.30–0.70, p < 0.05, I2 0.00 %), bleeding (OR 0.45 95 % CI 0.29, 0.68, p < 0.05, I2 3.48 %), and transfusion requirement (OR 0.52 95 % CI 0.40, 0.67, p < 0.05, I2 0.00 %) (Fig. 1). There were no differences among TR-PCI and TF-PCI for periprocedural MI, periprocedural CS, and CVA outcomes. Conclusion TR access was associated with lower mortality, bleeding, and transfusion requirement as compared to TF access in patients with ESRD undergoing PCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Talal Almas
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Corresponding authors at: RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland (T. Almas) and Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA (M. Chadi Alraies).
| | - Noora Alhajri
- College of Medicine and Health Science, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Waqas Ullah
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - M. Chadi Alraies
- Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
- Corresponding authors at: RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland (T. Almas) and Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA (M. Chadi Alraies).
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Latif A, Ahsan MJ, Mirza MM, Aurit S, Siller-Matula J, Mamas MA, Parikh M, Brilakis ES, Abbott JD, Bhatt DL, Velagapudi P. Meta-Analysis of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. Am J Cardiol 2021; 157:8-14. [PMID: 34389155 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Data comparing outcomes of transradial (TR) versus transfemoral (TF) access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) including patients with eGFR< 30 ml/min/1.73m2 and patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis (ESRD) are lacking. This meta-analysis compares the outcomes of TR versus TF approach for PCI in patients with CKD. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar were searched for studies including adults with CKD undergoing PCI via a TR versus TF approach from January 1, 2000, until January 15, 2021. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes included major bleeding, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), blood transfusion, contrast volume, and fluoroscopy time. The analysis was performed using a random-effects-model using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Five observational studies met inclusion criteria, including 1,156 and 6,156 patients in the TR and TF arms, respectively. The mean age of included patients was 70.5 years, 66% were male and 90% had ESRD. In patients with CKD, TR access for PCI was associated with lower all-cause mortality (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.73), major bleeding (RR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.73), blood transfusion (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.68) and contrast volume (SMD -0.34 [-0.60 to -0.08]) with no difference in stroke, MI, or fluoroscopy time compared with TF access. In conclusion, in patients with CKD undergoing PCI, the TR approach was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality, post-procedural bleeding, and blood transfusion compared with TF access.
Collapse
|