1
|
Mills M, Mollenkopf D, Wittum T, Sullivan MP, Lee J. One Health Threat of Treated Wastewater Discharge in Urban Ohio Rivers: Implications for Surface Water and Fish Gut Microbiome and Resistome. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024. [PMID: 39014939 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c09070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are thought to be a major disseminating source of antibiotic resistance (AR) to the environment, establishing a crucial connection between human and environmental resistome. The objectives of this study were to determine how wastewater effluents impact microbiome and resistome of freshwater and fish, and identify potential AR-carrying clinically relevant pathogens in these matrices. We analyzed wastewater influent and effluent from four WWTPs in three metropolitan areas of Ohio, USA via shotgun metagenomic sequencing. We also sequenced river water and fish guts from three reaches (upstream, at the WWTP outfall, and downstream). Notably, we observed a decline in microbiome diversity and AR gene abundance from wastewater to the receiving river. We also found significant differences by reach and trophic level (diet) in beta-diversity of the fish gut microbiomes. SourceTracker revealed that 0.443 and 0.248 more of the of the fish gut microbiome was sourced from wastewater effluent in fish from the outfall and downstream locations, respectively, compared to upstream fish. Additionally, AR bacteria of public health concern were annotated in effluent and river water samples, indicating potential concern for human exposure. In summary, our findings show the continued role of wastewater as a significant AR reservoir and underscores the considerable impact of wastewater discharge on aquatic wildlife, which highlights the One Health nature of this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Mills
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
| | - Dixie Mollenkopf
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
| | - Thomas Wittum
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
- Infectious Diseases Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
| | - Mažeika Patricio Sullivan
- Baruch Institute of Coastal Ecology & Forest Science, Clemson University, Georgetown, South Carolina 29442, United States
| | - Jiyoung Lee
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
- Infectious Diseases Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
- Department of Food Science & Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laue HE, Gilmour AJ, Tirado VM, Romano ME. Conceptualizing the Role of the Microbiome as a Mediator and Modifier in Environmental Health Studies: A Scoping Review of Studies of Triclosan and the Microbiome. Curr Environ Health Rep 2024; 11:30-38. [PMID: 38217674 PMCID: PMC10922364 DOI: 10.1007/s40572-024-00428-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Triclosan is an endocrine-disrupting antimicrobial additive that is suspected of contributing to antibiotic resistance and altering the microbiome. In this scoping review, we summarize what is known about the association between triclosan exposure and the microbiome using evidence from in vivo and epidemiologic studies. RECENT FINDINGS Our review includes 11 rodent studies, seven fish studies, and five human studies. Evidence from animal studies suggests that triclosan decreases the diversity of the microbiome, although only one epidemiologic study agreed. Most studies suggest that triclosan alters the microbial community beta diversity, but disagree on which taxa contributed to compositional differences. Taxa in the Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria may be more influenced by triclosan than those in other phyla. Studies on triclosan and the microbiome were scarce and were inconclusive as to the effects of triclosan on the microbiome. Additional research is needed to clarify windows of heightened susceptibility of the microbiome to triclosan. We recommend guidelines for future microbiome research in environmental health to increase comparability across studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah E Laue
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Dr, WTRB 700 HB 7927, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Aislinn J Gilmour
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | | | - Megan E Romano
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Turko AJ, Firth BL, Craig PM, Eliason EJ, Raby GD, Borowiec BG. Physiological differences between wild and captive animals: a century-old dilemma. J Exp Biol 2023; 226:jeb246037. [PMID: 38031957 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.246037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Laboratory-based research dominates the fields of comparative physiology and biomechanics. The power of lab work has long been recognized by experimental biologists. For example, in 1932, Georgy Gause published an influential paper in Journal of Experimental Biology describing a series of clever lab experiments that provided the first empirical test of competitive exclusion theory, laying the foundation for a field that remains active today. At the time, Gause wrestled with the dilemma of conducting experiments in the lab or the field, ultimately deciding that progress could be best achieved by taking advantage of the high level of control offered by lab experiments. However, physiological experiments often yield different, and even contradictory, results when conducted in lab versus field settings. This is especially concerning in the Anthropocene, as standard laboratory techniques are increasingly relied upon to predict how wild animals will respond to environmental disturbances to inform decisions in conservation and management. In this Commentary, we discuss several hypothesized mechanisms that could explain disparities between experimental biology in the lab and in the field. We propose strategies for understanding why these differences occur and how we can use these results to improve our understanding of the physiology of wild animals. Nearly a century beyond Gause's work, we still know remarkably little about what makes captive animals different from wild ones. Discovering these mechanisms should be an important goal for experimental biologists in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy J Turko
- Department of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3C5
| | - Britney L Firth
- Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1
| | - Paul M Craig
- Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1
| | - Erika J Eliason
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Goleta, CA 93117, USA
| | - Graham D Raby
- Department of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada, K9L 0G2
| | - Brittney G Borowiec
- Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Romero J, Díaz O, Miranda CD, Rojas R. Red Cusk-Eel ( Genypterus chilensis) Gut Microbiota Description of Wild and Aquaculture Specimens. Microorganisms 2022; 10:microorganisms10010105. [PMID: 35056554 PMCID: PMC8779451 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10010105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Chile has promoted the diversification of aquaculture and red cusk-eel (Genypterus chilensis) is one of the prioritized species. However, many aspects of the biology of the species are unknown or have little information available. These include intestinal microbiota, an element that may play an important role in the nutrition and defense of cultured animals for meat production. This study compares the microbiota composition of the intestinal contents of wild and aquaculture fish to explore the microbial communities present and their potential contribution to the host. DNA was extracted from the intestinal content samples and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using the Ion Torrent platform. After the examination of the sequences, strong differences were found in the composition at the level of phylum, being Firmicutes and Tenericutes the most abundant in aquaculture and wild condition, respectively. At the genus level, the Vagococcus (54%) and Mycoplasma (97%) were the most prevalent in the microbial community of aquaculture and wild condition, respectively. The evaluation of predicted metabolic pathways in these metagenomes showed that in wild condition there is an important presence of lipid metabolism belonging to the unsaturated fatty acid synthesis. In the aquaculture condition, the metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides were relevant. To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize and compare the intestinal microbiota of red cusk-eel (Genypterus chilensis) of wild and aquaculture origin using high-throughput sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Romero
- Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos (INTA), Universidad de Chile, El Líbano 5524, Macul, Santiago 783090, Chile;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +56-2-29781524
| | - Osmán Díaz
- Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos (INTA), Universidad de Chile, El Líbano 5524, Macul, Santiago 783090, Chile;
| | - Claudio D. Miranda
- Laboratorio de Patobiología Acuática, Departamento de Acuicultura, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo 1780000, Chile; (C.D.M.); (R.R.)
| | - Rodrigo Rojas
- Laboratorio de Patobiología Acuática, Departamento de Acuicultura, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo 1780000, Chile; (C.D.M.); (R.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bisesi JH, Adamovsky O, Martyniuk CJ. Recent insights from comparative animal microbiomics. COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY D-GENOMICS & PROTEOMICS 2021; 40:100880. [PMID: 34304147 DOI: 10.1016/j.cbd.2021.100880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph H Bisesi
- Department of Environmental and Global Health and Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ondrej Adamovsky
- Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Christopher J Martyniuk
- Department of Physiological Sciences and Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology, UF Genetics Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|