The metabolism and molecular toxicology of chloroprene

Atmospheric Chemistry of Chloroprene Initiated by OH Radicals: Combined Ab Initio/DFT Calculations and Kinetics Analysis

Chloroprene (CP; CH2═C(Cl)-CH═CH2) is a significant toxic airborne pollutant, often originating from anthropogenic activities. However, the environmental fate of CP is incompletely understood. High level CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ//M06-2X/aug-cc-pVTZ calculations combined with kinetic modeling were employed here to glean new insight into the reaction mechanism, energies, and kinetics of the reaction of CP with OH radical (•OH). We report the energies of four different addition pathways and six different abstraction pathways. The •OH attack on the terminal C1 atom of the =CH2 group (which is directly attached to the =CCl moiety), leading to the formation of HOCH2-•C(Cl)-CH═CH2, was found to be a major path. The barrier height for the formation of the corresponding transition state was found to be -1.9 kcal mol-1 below that of the starting CP + •OH reactants. Rate coefficients were calculated for addition and abstraction pathways involving the CP + •OH reaction under pre-equilibrium approximation conditions, employing a combination of canonical variational transition state theory and small curvature tunneling. The overall rate coefficient for the reaction of CP + •OH at 298 K was found to be 1.4 × 10-10 cm3 molecule-1 s-1. The thermochemistry of the possible channels and atmospheric implications are provided. In addition, the fate of HOCH2-•C(Cl)-CH═CH2 in the presence of 3O2 was investigated. We found the reaction of the CP-derived peroxy radical adduct with HO2 and NO to make contributions to the formation of products such as formaldehyde, HO2 radical, Cl atom, HOCH2C(OOH)(Cl)CH═CH2, HOCH2C(O)Cl, ClC(O)CH═CH2, HOCH2C(O)CH═CH2, and HC(O) radical.

Using available in vitro metabolite identification and time course kinetics for β-chloroprene and its metabolite, (1-chloroethenyl) oxirane, to include reactive oxidative metabolites and glutathione depletion in a PBPK model for β-chloroprene

Introduction: ß-chloroprene (2-chloro-1,3-butadiene; CP) causes lung tumors after inhalation exposures in rats and mice. Mice develop these tumors at lower exposures than rats. In rats CP exposures cause depletion of lung glutathione (GSH). Methods: PBPK models developed to relate the appearance of mouse lung tumors with rates of CP metabolism to reactive metabolites or total amounts metabolized during exposures have been expanded to include production of reactive metabolites from CP. The extended PBPK model describes both the unstable oxirane metabolite, 2-CEO, and metabolism of the more stable oxirane, 1-CEO, to reactive metabolites via microsomal oxidation to a diepoxide, and linked production of these metabolites to a PK model predicting GSH depletion with increasing CP exposure. Key information required to develop the model were available from literature studies identifying: 1) microsomal metabolites of CP, and 2) in vitro rates of clearance of CP and 1-CEO from active microsomal preparations from mice, rats, hamsters and humans. Results: Model simulation of concentration dependence of disproportionate increases in reactive metabolite concentrations as exposures increases and decreases in tissue GSH are consistent with the dose-dependence of tumor formation. At the middle bioassay concentrations with a lung tumor incidence, the predicted tissue GSH is less than 50% background. These simulations of reduction in GSH are also consistent with the gene expression results showing the most sensitive pathways are Nrf2-regulation of oxidative stress and GSH metabolism. Discussion: The PBPK model is used to correlate predicted tissue exposure to reactive metabolites with toxicity and carcinogenicity of CP.

DNA interstrand cross-linking activity of (1-Chloroethenyl)oxirane, a metabolite of beta-chloroprene

With the goal of elucidating the molecular and cellular mechanisms of chloroprene toxicity, we examined the potential DNA cross-linking of the bifunctional chloroprene metabolite, (1-chloroethenyl)oxirane (CEO). We used denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to monitor the possible formation of interstrand cross-links by CEO within synthetic DNA duplexes. Our data suggest interstrand cross-linking at deoxyguanosine residues within 5'-GC and 5'-GGC sites, with the rate of cross-linking depending on pH (pH 5.0 > pH 6.0 > pH 7.0). A comparison of the cross-linking efficiencies of CEO and the structurally similar cross-linkers diepoxybutane (DEB) and epichlorohydrin (ECH) revealed that DEB > CEO > or = ECH. Furthermore, we found that cytotoxicity correlates with cross-linking efficiency, supporting a role for interstrand cross-links in the genotoxicology of chloroprene.

Identification and degradation characterization of hexachlorobutadiene degrading strain Serratia marcescens HL1

A bacterium (strain HL1) capable of growing with hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD) as sole carbon and energy sources was isolated from a mixture of soil contaminated with HCBD and activated sludge obtained from petrochemical plant wastewater treatment plant by using enrichment culture. Biochemical characteristics and phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rDNA sequence indicate that strain HL1 clearly belongs to Serratia marcescens sp. Resting cells of strain HL1 were found to remove HCBD from culture fluids with the concomitant release of chloride ion under aerobic conditions. The ranges of pH value and temperature for satisfactory growth of strain HL1 cells were from 7.0 to 8.0 and 25 to 30 degrees C, respectively. Capability of resting cells to degrade HCBD was induced by HCBD in the culture fluids. HCBD (20mg/l) was removed from culture fluids by resting cells in 4 d without lag phase, but for 50mg/l and 80mg/l HCBD 7 days were needed with lag phase. Growth of strain HL1 cells was inhibited by HCBD at the concentration up to 160mg/l. First order kinetics could be fitted to the biodegradation of HCBD by HL1 cells after lag phase at initial concentrations of 20, 50, and 80mg/l. Strain HL1 also showed strong capacity to degrade chloroprene, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, and vinyl chloride at solely initial concentration of 50mg/l. Results could offer useful information for the application of strain HL1 in bioremediation or control of HCBD-polluted environment.

International Symposium on the Evaluation of Butadiene and Chloroprene Health Risks

These proceedings represent nearly all the platform and poster presentations given during the International Symposium on Evaluation of Butadiene and Chloroprene Health Risks, held in Charleston, South Carolina, USA, on September 20-22, 2005. The Symposium was attended by 78 participants representing private industry (37), academia (21), government (11), not-for-profit organizations (5), and consulting (4). The program followed the format of previous symposia on butadiene, chloroprene, and isoprene in London UK (2000) and butadiene and isoprene in Blaine, Washington USA (1995). This format enabled the exchange of significant new scientific results and discussion of future research needs. Isoprene was not evaluated during the 2005 Symposium because of lack of new data. For background information, the reader is referred to the proceedings of the London 2000 meeting for a thorough historical perspective and overview of scientific and regulatory issues concerning butadiene, chloroprene, and isoprene [Chem.-Biol. Interact. (2001) 135-136:1-7]. The Symposium consisted of seven sessions: (1) Introduction and Opening Remarks, (2) Butadiene/styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR)--Process Overview, Exposure and Health Effects/Human Studies; (3) Chloroprene--Process Overview, Exposure and Health Effects/Human Studies; (4) Mode of Action/Key Events; (5) Risk Assessment; (6) Poster Presentations; and (7) Panel Discussion and Future Directions. The Symposium concluded with a discussion by all participants of issues that arose throughout the course of the Symposium. The Proceedings of the Symposium published in this Special Issue are organized according to the Sessions outlined above. The purpose of this foreword is to summarize the presentations and their key findings and recommend future research directions for each chemical.