Comparison of Abbott AxSYM and Roche Elecsys 2010 for measurement of BNP and NT-proBNP

The role of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in hypertensive patients with comorbidities: From clinical trials to real-world settings

Background:

Sacubitril/valsartan, the first agent to be approved in a new class of drugs called angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), has been shown to reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity compared to enalapril in outpatient subjects with chronic heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, there is little real-world evidence about the efficacy of ARNIs in elderly hypertensive patients with HFrEF and comorbidities.

Methods:

In this prospective open-label study, 108 subjects, 54 of them (mean age 78.6 ± 8.2 years, 75.0 % male), with HFrEF (29.8 ± 4.3 %) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III symptoms were assigned to receive ARNIs twice daily, according to the recommended dosage of 24/26, 49/51, 97/103 mg. Patients were gender- and age-matched with a control arm of patients with HFrEF receiving the optimal standard therapy for HF. The clinic blood pressure (BP), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), uric acid (UA), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and NYHA class were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 12 months. During the follow-up, the clinical outcomes, including mortality and re-hospitalization for HF, were collected.

Results:

NYHA class significantly improved in the ARNI arm compared to the control (24.9 vs. 6.4 %, shifting from class III to II, and 55.4 vs. 25.2 %, from class II to I, p < 0.05 for all). A significant improvement in LVEF and eGFR levels was found in the ARNI arm compared to controls (42.4 vs. 34.2 %, 73.8 vs. 61.2 mL/min, respectively; p < 0.001 for all). NT-proBNP, clinic systolic and diastolic BP, blood glucose, HbA1c and UA values were reduced in both treatment arms, but they were lower in the ARNI arm compared controls (3107 vs. 4552 pg/mL, 112.2 vs. 120.4 and 68.8 vs. 75.6 mmHg, 108.4 vs. 112.6 mg/dL, 5.4 vs. 5.9 % and 5.9 vs. 6.4 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.05). Mortality and re-hospitalization for HF was lower in the ARNI arm than controls (20.1 vs. 33.6 % and 27.7 vs. 46.3 % respectively; p < 0.05 for all). Gender differences were not found in either arm. No patients refused to continue the study, and no side effects to the ARNI treatment were observed.

Conclusions:

In elderly patients with HFrEF and comorbidities, ARNI treatment seems effective and safe. The improvement in LVEF and cardiac remodeling, BP, eGFR, serum glucose, UA and HbA1c could be the mechanisms by which ARNIs play their beneficial role on clinical outcomes. However, these results need to be confirmed in studies involving a greater number of subjects, and with a longer follow-up.

State of the art of immunoassay methods for B-type natriuretic peptides: An update

The aim of this review article is to give an update on the state of the art of the immunoassay methods for the measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its related peptides. Using chromatographic procedures, several studies reported an increasing number of circulating peptides related to BNP in human plasma of patients with heart failure. These peptides may have reduced or even no biological activity. Furthermore, other studies have suggested that, using immunoassays that are considered specific for BNP, the precursor of the peptide hormone, proBNP, constitutes a major portion of the peptide measured in plasma of patients with heart failure. Because BNP immunoassay methods show large (up to 50%) systematic differences in values, the use of identical decision values for all immunoassay methods, as suggested by the most recent international guidelines, seems unreasonable. Since proBNP significantly cross-reacts with all commercial immunoassay methods considered specific for BNP, manufacturers should test and clearly declare the degree of cross-reactivity of glycosylated and non-glycosylated proBNP in their BNP immunoassay methods. Clinicians should take into account that there are large systematic differences between methods when they compare results from different laboratories that use different BNP immunoassays. On the other hand, clinical laboratories should take part in external quality assessment (EQA) programs to evaluate the bias of their method in comparison to other BNP methods. Finally, the authors believe that the development of more specific methods for the active peptide, BNP1-32, should reduce the systematic differences between methods and result in better harmonization of results.

Do laboratories follow heart failure recommendations and guidelines and did we improve? The CARdiac MArker Guideline Uptake in Europe (CARMAGUE)

BACKGROUND

Natriuretic peptides (NP) are well-established markers of heart failure (HF). During the past 5 years, analytical and clinical recommendations for measurement of these biomarkers have been published in guidelines. The aim of this follow-up survey was to investigate how well these guidelines for measurement of NP have been implemented in laboratory practice in Europe.

METHODS

Member societies of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine were invited in 2009 to participate in a web-based audit questionnaire. The questionnaire requested information on type of tests performed, decision limits for HF, turn-around time and frequency of testing.

RESULTS

There was a moderate increase (12%) of laboratories measuring NP compared to the initial survey in 2006. The most frequently used HF decision limits for B-type NP (BNP) and N-terminal BNP (NT-proBNP) were, respectively, 100 ng/L and 125 ng/L, derived from the package inserts in 55%. Fifty laboratories used a second decision limit. Age or gender dependent decision limits were applied in 10% (8.5% in 2006). The vast majority of laboratories (80%) did not have any criteria regarding frequency of testing, compared to 33% in 2006.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of NP measurement for HF management was a slow process between 2006 and 2009 at a time when guidelines had just been established. The decision limits were derived from package insert information and literature. There was great uncertainty concerning frequency of testing which may reflect the debate about the biological variability which was not published for most of the assays in 2009.

Time course of NT-proBNP levels after acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) can be a biomarker of cardioembolic stroke. However, the best time to measure it after stroke is unknown. We studied the time course of NT-proBNP in patients with ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients were admitted over 10 months to a Stroke Unit. Stroke type was classified according to TOAST. Blood samples were drawn within 24, 48, and 72 hours after stroke. Friedman test was used to compare NT-proBNP values across the 3 times in all, cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic stroke patients. Post hoc analysis with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests was conducted with a Bonferroni correction. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare median values of NT-proBNP between cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic stroke patients. ROC curves were drawn to determine NT-proBNP accuracy to diagnose cardioembolic stroke at 24, 48, and 72 hours after stroke onset.

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients were included (29 cardioembolic) with a mean age of 64.5±12.3 years. NT-proBNP values for cardioembolic stroke were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than for non-cardioembolic stroke in the 3 time points. NT-proBNP was highest in the first 24-48 h after ischemic stroke and decreased significantly 72 h after stroke onset. The area under the curve for the three time points was similar.

CONCLUSION

NT-proBNP levels were highest in the first 2 days after ischemic stroke and declined significantly thereafter. However, the area under the curve for the three time points was similar. The first 72 hours after ischemic stroke have a similar diagnostic accuracy to diagnose cardioembolic stroke.

N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Shows Diagnostic Accuracy for Detecting Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients

Background

Diagnosing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with stroke can be difficult. We aimed to determine if N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide can help identify paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke.

Methods and results

Among 264 ischemic stroke patients, serum levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide were measured within 72 h of stroke onset. In cryptogenic stroke patients, 24-h Holter monitoring was used to look for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation within the first week and also three-and six-months after admission. First, patients with a defined etiology were used to construct a receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. From this curve, the sensitivity and specificity of preestablished cutoff points for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation were calculated. A logistic regression was performed to assess the independent relationship of the logarithm of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels with atrial fibrillation. The cutoff points were then evaluated in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Results

One hundred eighty-four patients had a specific stroke etiology. Fifty-five patients had atrial fibrillation. Using multivariate analysis, the logarithm of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels was independently associated with atrial fibrillation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation was 0·91 (95% confidence interval 0·87–0·95). The cutoff point of 265·5 pg/ml had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 70·5% for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. The cutoff point of 912 pg/ml had a sensitivity of 81·8% and a specificity of 87·5%. Eighty patients had a cryptogenic stroke. In 17, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was found during follow-up. In these patients, the area under the curve for the diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was 0·83. The cutoff point of 265·5 had a sensitivity of 88·2% and a specificity of 61·9%. The cutoff point of 912 pg/ml had a sensitivity of 47·1% and a specificity of 88·9%.

Conclusion

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide has good accuracy in predicting the presence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke and can help to identify these patients.

Comparison of performance of serum and plasma in panbio dengue and Japanese encephalitis virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays

We examined the comparative performance of serum and plasma (in dipotassium EDTA) in Panbio Dengue enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for detection of non-structural protein 1 (NS1), IgM, and IgG, and a dengue/Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) combination IgM ELISA in a prospective series of 201 patients with suspected dengue in Laos. Paired comparisons of medians from serum and plasma samples were not significantly different for Dengue IgM, and NS1 which had the highest number of discordant pairs (both 2%; P = 0.13 and P = 0.25, respectively). Comparison of qualitative final diagnostic interpretations for serum and plasma samples were not significantly different: only 1.5% (3 of 201 for Dengue/JEV IgM and Dengue IgG) and 2.0% (4 of 201; IgM and NS1) showed discordant pairs. These results demonstrate that plasma containing EDTA is suitable for use in these ELISAs.

N-Terminal Probrain Natriuretic Peptide as a Biomarker of Cardioembolic Stroke

Background and purpose

N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, which is mainly produced by the heart, is increased in acute stroke. We aimed to determine if N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide could be a biomarker for ischemic stroke with a cardioembolic cause.

Methods

Consecutive sample of acute stroke patients admitted to a Stroke Unit. Ischemic stroke subtype was classified using the TOAST classification. Blood samples were drawn within 72 h after stroke onset. Serum N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide concentration was measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Mean values of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide were compared between patients with hemorrhagic stroke vs. ischemic stroke, cardioembolic stroke vs. noncardioembolic stroke, cardioembolic stroke with atrial fibrillation vs. noncardioembolic stroke using t-test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to test the ability of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide values to identify cardioembolic stroke and cardioembolic stroke with atrial fibrillation.

Results

Ninety-two patients were included (66 with ischemic stroke) with a mean age of 58·6 years. Twenty-eight (42·4%) ischemic strokes had a cardioembolic cause. Mean N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide values for cardioembolic stroke were significantly higher ( P < 0·001) (491·6; 95% confidence interval 283·7–852·0 pg/ml) than for noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (124·7; 86·3–180·2 pg/ml). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide in cardioembolic stroke was 0·77. The cut-off point with the highest sensitivity and specificity was set at 265·5 pg/ml (71·4% and 73·7% respectively). The area under the curve of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide for cardioembolic stroke related to atrial fibrillation was 0·92, cut-off was set at 265·5 pg/ml (sensitivity 94·4%, specificity 72·9%).

Conclusion

N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide is a biomarker with a good accuracy to predict ischemic stroke of cardioembolic cause, namely associated with atrial fibrillation.

Comparison of the cardiac markers B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide

B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide have emerged as powerful biomarkers for heart failure and other cardiovascular conditions. B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide are synthesized on the basis of myocardial stress and hypertrophy and are detectable in serum by several commercially available assays. Although both markers display wide similarities in their predictive values for acute and chronic heart failure, important differences exist regarding cutoff values and influence of noncardiac variables. The similarities and differences between B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide will be reviewed and illustrated in detail regarding preanalytics and analytics, predictive properties for acute and chronic heart failure and prognosis as well as the influence of noncardiac parameters.

A pilot survey of the use and implementation of cardiac markers in acute coronary syndrome and heart failure across Europe. The CARdiac MArker Guideline Uptake in Europe (CARMAGUE) study

BACKGROUND

Guidelines on preferred cardiac marker strategies for investigation of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are available from the laboratory medicine and cardiology communities. Therefore, implementation of these guidelines into daily clinical practice should be a joint effort of laboratory specialists and clinicians. This was investigated in this survey.

METHODS

A pilot study was performed sponsored by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. A link to an online questionnaire was e-mailed to 990 laboratories from eight European countries in May 2006. The requested information included tests performed, clinical protocol development, and reference limits.

RESULTS

We obtained a total of 220 responses. Out of these, 208 responses (95%) were from hospitals that provide 24-h admission of patients. The suggested turn-around-time (<60 min) was apparently met by >88% for cardiac troponin T/I and for CK-MB mass. The majority of the laboratories derive their decision limits from kit inserts provided by the manufacturers. The results revealed a worrying fact that external quality assessments are not used in all testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey demonstrated that cardiac troponin is the preferred biomarker for the diagnosis of ACS. Half of the participants had written protocols, mostly as a result of collaboration between laboratorians and clinicians.

B type natriuretic peptide--a diagnostic breakthrough in peri-operative cardiac risk assessment?

The B-type natriuretic peptides; B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, are increasing being used as biomarkers for the diagnosis, management and prognostication of cardiac failure, but their application in the peri-operative period is unclear. This review examines the current understanding of the role of B-type natriuretic peptides in both the operative and non-operative settings. Normal values, diagnostic thresholds, monitoring targets and significant prognostic levels are identified. Using this as a background, the role of B-type natriuretic peptides in the prediction of peri-operative mortality and morbidity is examined and potential confounders, such as renal failure and body mass index, which may impact significantly on the utility of the biomarkers, are discussed. Clinical recommendations with regard to its use are made and a research agenda is proposed for future peri-operative studies.

BNP or NTproBNP? A clinician's perspective

Existing literature on two natriuretic peptides--B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP)--is overwhelming. Both peptides are acknowledged markers for cardiac dysfunction. Most of the sources present data on either BNP or NTproBNP making the comparison difficult. This paper focuses on reviewing studies directly comparing two peptides in the setting of chronic and acute heart failure (HF) and coronary artery disease. Many concomitant diseases influence these two peptides to varying extent. These characteristics should be taken into consideration when interpreting results. For most practical purposes, BNP and NTproBNP are interchangeable, and can be used based on local preferences and availability. NTproBNP seems to be more advantageous for diagnosing mild HF or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction.

Brain natriuretic peptide is a good predictor for outcome in cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The heart secretes brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in response to myocardial stretch. The aim of this study was to determine whether adverse effects after cardiac surgery were associated with higher serum BNP levels pre-operatively.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-five patients undergoing various cardiac procedures were included in the study, and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-pro-BNP) was measured pre-operatively. Post-operative complications were defined as follows: (i) a post-operative length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) exceeding 48 h; (ii) mortality at 28 days; (iii) the need for inotropic agents and/or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP); and (iv) renal failure. Serum NT-pro-BNP values were compared for patients with and without complications. The serum NT-pro-BNP level was also correlated with the euroSCORE and ejection fraction (EF).

RESULTS

Pre-operative serum NT-pro-BNP levels were significantly higher in patients with an ICU length of stay of more than 2 days or death prior to post-operative day 28 (3118 ng/l vs. 705 ng/l; P < 0.001). Pre-operative serum NT-pro-BNP levels were also significantly higher in patients needing inotropic agents (2628 ng/l vs. 548 ng/l; P < 0.001) or IABP insertion (3705 ng/l vs. 935 ng/l; P = 0.001) or developing renal failure (2857 ng/l vs. 945 ng/l; P < 0.001) post-operatively. The correlation between the serum NT-pro-BNP level and euroSCORE was good (r = 0.658; P < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the ability of serum NT-pro-BNP, euroSCORE and EF to predict outcome after cardiac surgery. This revealed an area under the ROC curve for the length of stay in the ICU or mortality at 28 days of 0.829 for serum NT-pro-BNP, 0.814 for euroSCORE and 0.328 for EF assessed by transesophageal echocardiography, indicating that the pre-operative serum NT-pro-BNP level is a good prognostic indicator for outcome after cardiac surgery.

CONCLUSION

Serum NT-pro-BNP is a good predictor for complications after cardiac surgery, and is as good as euroSCORE and better than EF.

Analytical and clinical performance of three natriuretic peptide tests in the emergency room

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate the analytical and diagnostic utility of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the N-terminus of this prohormone, N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-pro-BNP) testing in the emergency department to identify acute congestive heart failure (CHF).

METHODS

A blood sample taken from patients presenting to the emergency department with acute dyspnoea (n=80) was analyzed for natriuretic peptides using three different assays [Triage BNP (Biosite), Centaur BNP (Bayer) and Elecsys NT-pro-BNP (Roche)]. A cardiologist and a pulmonologist, blinded to the actual natriuretic peptide levels, reviewed all test results (including echocardiography, etc.) retrospectively and made a diagnosis of dyspnoea due to CHF or not.

RESULTS

Analytical testing showed good correlation and coefficients of variation of less than 10% for all three assays. Cardiac-related dyspnoea was found in 40 patients (50%). NT-proBNP and BNP values were significantly elevated in these patients. For identifying patients with CHF, BNP and NT-proBNP scored equally well (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78, 0.77 and 0.78 for the Biosite, Roche and Bayer assays, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In general, the different assays tested for BNP and NT-pro-BNP correlate very well in patients with suspected CHF and may aid in the risk stratification process in emergency departments. However, the value must always be interpreted in conjunction with other clinical information. It should also be considered that renal impairment can affect the results.

Miniaturized monolithic disks for immunoadsorption of cardiac biomarkers from serum

Immunoadsorbers based on 2.0 x 6.0 mm i.d., epoxy-bearing, methacrylate-based monolithic disks were developed in order to target myoglobin and N-terminal pro-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), two biomarkers involved in cardiovascular disease. In both cases, antibodies were successfully coupled to the polymeric disk material. The developed immunoadsorbers permitted the selective isolation of myoglobin and NT-proBNP from human serum. Myoglobin was successfully isolated and detected from serum samples at concentrations down to 250 fmol microL(-1). However, the affinity of the antibodies was not sufficient for the analysis of low-concentration clinical samples. Frontal analysis of anti-NT-proBNP disks revealed the ability of the immunoadsorber to bind up to 250 pmol NT-proBNP, which is more than sufficient for the analysis of clinical samples. Anti-NT-proBNP disks showed good stability over more than 18 months and excellent batch-to-batch reproducibility. Moreover, anti-NT-proBNP disks permitted the isolation of NT-proBNP at concentrations down to 750 amol microL(-1) in serum, corresponding to concentrations of strongly diseased patients. Using reversed-phase trapping columns, the detection of NT-proBNP eluted from immunoadsorbers by mass spectrometry was achieved for concentrations down to 7.8 fmol microL(-1).

Prognostic Value of B-Type Natriuretic Peptides in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the association between B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and the incidence of specific cardiovascular events in low-risk patients with stable coronary disease, the incremental prognostic information obtained from these two biomarkers compared with traditional risk factors, and their ability to identify patients who may benefit from angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition.

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of BNPs in low-risk patients with stable coronary artery disease remains unclear.

METHODS

Baseline plasma BNP and NT-proBNP concentrations were measured in 3,761 patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular function participating in the PEACE (Prevention of Events With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition) study, a placebo-controlled trial of trandolapril. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the association between natriuretic peptide concentrations and the incidence of cardiovascular mortality, fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke.

RESULTS

The BNP and NT-proBNP levels were strongly related to the incidence of cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, and stroke but not to myocardial infarction. In multivariable models, BNP remained associated with increased risk of heart failure, whereas NT-proBNP remained associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, and stroke. By C-statistic calculations, BNP and NT-proBNP significantly improved the predictive accuracy of the best available model for incident heart failure, and NT-proBNP also improved the model for cardiovascular death. The magnitude of effect of ACE inhibition on the likelihood of experiencing cardiovascular end points was similar, regardless of either BNP or NT-proBNP baseline concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

In low-risk patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved ventricular function, BNPs provide strong and incremental prognostic information to traditional risk factors.

Comparison of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino-terminal ProBNP for early diagnosis of heart failure

BACKGROUND

We compared the diagnostic accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) for diagnosis of preclinical and mild heart failure (HF).

METHODS

We assayed plasma NT-proBNP and BNP in 182 healthy controls and in a prospective cohort of 820 HF patients divided according to the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology classification. These included 86 patients in stage A [mean (SE) ejection fraction 61% (1%); mean (SE) age 47 (2) years], 255 in stage B [65% (2%); 62 (1) years], 420 patients in stage C [35% (1%); 68 (1) years] and 59 in stage D [25% (1%); 74 (1) years]. Diagnostic accuracies of BNP and NT-proBNP were evaluated by ROC analysis, and a multivariate linear regression model was applied to predict HF staging.

RESULTS

Median BNP and NT-proBNP concentrations increased from stage A to D 57-fold and 107-fold, respectively. Both assays were accurate (P <0.001) in separating stage B from controls or stage A, and stage C from controls or stage A or B. NT-proBNP was more accurate (P <0.001) than BNP in differentiating stage C from stages A and B patients and controls and was a better predictor of HF classification in a model including age, sex, and renal function (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring BNP or NT-proBNP enabled identification of asymptomatic patients at risk for the development of HF. NT-proBNP showed better accuracy than BNP for identifying mild HF.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and the N-Terminal Part of the Propeptide of BNP Immunoassays in Chronic and Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review

Background: We used evidence-based laboratory medicine principles to compare the diagnostic accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the N-terminal part of the propeptide of BNP (NT-proBNP) assays for the diagnosis of heart failure.

Methods: In May 2006, we performed a computerized literature search of the online National Library of Medicine to select studies specifically designed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of BNP and NT-proBNP assays. The comparison took into account the area under the curve and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) derived from ROC analysis of original studies.

Results: Both BNP and NT-proBNP assays were found to be clinically useful for the diagnosis of heart failure. Metaanalysis of these data was difficult because of the heterogeneity of data regarding patient population, diagnostic criteria, end-points, and immunoassay methods for both BNP and NT-proBNP. Separate metaanalyses were performed for acute and chronic heart failure. In chronic heart failure, the diagnostic DOR for BNP (8.44, 95% CI 4.66–15.30) was not significantly different from that of NT-proBNP (23.36, 95% CI 9.38–58.19). In patients with acute heart failure, the mean DOR for BNP (16.46, 95% CI 10.65–25.43) was not significantly different from that of NT-proBNP (18.61, 95% CI 12.99–26.65).

Conclusion: Our results indicate that both BNP and NT-proBNP assays have a high degree of diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance for both acute and chronic heart failure.