Randomized comparison of early inflammatory response after sirolimus-eluting stent vs bare metal stent implantation in native coronary lesions

Perioperative inflammatory status predicts mid-term outcomes in patients undergoing femoropopliteal paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of perioperative inflammatory status, as determined using the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level, with the efficacy of femoropopliteal paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty.

METHODS

The data of 122 patients (138 limbs) were retrospectively analyzed (median follow-up time, 21 months). The pre- and postoperative NLRs and hs-CRP levels were evaluated to determine their predictive value for mid-term primary patency and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) during follow-up. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to investigate the predictive value of the inflammatory parameters and clinical risk factors.

RESULTS

The study population had a median age of 67.2±9.2 years, and 85.2±3% were men. Approximately 18.0±3% of the cases were classified under Rutherford grade II; 52.5±4%, grade III; 24.6±3%, grade IV; 4.1±1%, grade V; and 0.8±0.7%, grade VI. The 12- and 24-month cumulative patency rates were 81.2±27.0% and 60.4±30.1%, respectively, and the freedom from CD-TLR rates were 90.8±19.1% and 82.5±28.3%, respectively. Severe lesion calcification was identified as an independent risk factor for CD-TLR (hazard ratio [HR]=1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.05-3.01), while hypertension was found as a protective factor for primary patency (HR=0.54, 95% CI=0.30-0.93). The patients with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C/D lesions had more than a 2-fold increased adjusted risk of both primary patency loss and CD-TLR compared with those with TASC A/B lesions (HR=2.44 for primary patency loss; HR=2.51 for CD-TLR). The perioperative NLRs and hs-CRP levels were stratified into three grades. The patients with a higher preoperative hs-CRP level (>9.2 vs. 0.6-9.2 vs. <0.6 mg/L by each tertile) had a 2.4-fold increased adjusted risk of primary patency loss compared with those with a lower preoperative hs-CRP level. The patients with a higher hs-CRP level on the first postoperative day (>13.0 vs. 7.7-13.0 vs. <7.7 mg/L by each tertile) had a 1.8-fold increased adjusted risk of primary patency loss compared with those with a lower hs-CRP level. In contrast, the patients with a higher NLR at 4-6 hours postoperatively (>3.6 vs. 2.5-3.6 vs. <2.5 by each tertile) showed better primary patency (adjusted HR=0.57) than did those with a lower NLR. A higher hs-CRP level on the first postoperative day was the only inflammatory marker associated with a high risk of CD-TLR (adjusted HR=2.37).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative inflammatory status serves as a valuable prognostic parameter for assessing the potential risk stratification of outcomes after PCB angioplasty.

Red cell distribution width in coronary heart disease: prediction of restenosis and its relationship with inflammatory markers and lipids

BACKGROUND

Red cell distribution width (RDW) is associated with a poor prognosis and adverse events in cardiovascular diseases. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between serum RDW levels and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and to identify potential novel laboratory markers for evaluating the risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) with stable angina pectoris.

METHODS

A total of 261 patients with coronary heart disease from Dongfeng General Hospital implanted with a coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) were enrolled in the study. We retrospectively analysed the role and prognosis values of serum parameters that were measured before angiography at the first admission. According to the results of the second angiogram, the patients were divided into two groups as follows: the non-ISR group (n=143) and the ISR group (n=118). The clinical characteristics and all laboratory data were considered for univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The white cell count, RDW, neutrophil count, C-reactive protein (CRP), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), blood urea nitrogen and uric acid levels were higher in the ISR group than in the non-ISR group. There were no differences in the rates of hypertension, fasting plasma glucose, red cell count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet count, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and creatinine levels. In the univariate regression analysis, age, diabetes, white cell count, neutrophil count, RDW, CRP, total cholesterol, LDL-C, blood urea nitrogen, Gensini score and number of stents were predictors of ISR. According to the multiple logistic regression analysis, age, RDW and number of stents were independent predictors of ISR.

CONCLUSIONS

Preprocedural blood parameters can independently predict ISR. Our study results demonstrated that a high preprocedural RDW is an independent predictor of DES restenosis.

Novel Multifunctional Nanomatrix Reduces Inflammation in Dynamic Conditions in Vitro and Dilates Arteries ex Vivo

Inflammatory responses play a critical role in tissue-implant interactions, often limiting current implant utility. This is particularly true for cardiovascular devices. Existing stent technology does little to avoid or mitigate inflammation or to influence the vasomotion of the artery after implantation. We have developed a novel endothelium-mimicking nanomatrix composed of peptide amphiphiles that enhances endothelialization while decreasing both smooth muscle cell proliferation and platelet adhesion. Here, we evaluated whether the nanomatrix could prevent inflammatory responses under static and physiological flow conditions. We found that the nanomatrix reduced monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells and expression of monocyte inflammatory genes (TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-1β, and IL-6). Furthermore, the nitric-oxide releasing nanomatrix dramatically attenuated TNF-α-stimulated inflammatory responses as demonstrated by significantly reduced monocyte adhesion and inflammatory gene expression in both static and physiological flow conditions. These effects were abolished by addition of a nitric oxide scavenger. Finally, the nanomatrix stimulated vasodilation in intact rat mesenteric arterioles after constriction with phenylephrine, demonstrating the bioavailability and bioactivity of the nanomatrix, as well as exhibiting highly desired release kinetics. These results demonstrate the clinical potential of this nanomatrix by both preventing inflammatory responses and promoting vasodilation, critical improvements in stent and cardiovascular device technology.

Macromolecular approaches to prevent thrombosis and intimal hyperplasia following percutaneous coronary intervention

Cardiovascular disease remains one of the largest contributors to death worldwide. Improvements in cardiovascular technology leading to the current generation of drug-eluting stents, bioresorbable stents, and drug-eluting balloons, coupled with advances in antirestenotic therapeutics developed by pharmaceutical community, have had a profound impact on quality of life and longevity. However, these procedures and devices contribute to both short- and long-term complications. Thus, room for improvement and development of new, alternative strategies exists. Two major approaches have been investigated to improve outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention including perivascular delivery and luminal paving. For both approaches, polymers play a major role as controlled research vehicles, carriers for cells, and antithrombotic coatings. With improvements in catheter delivery devices and increases in our understanding of the biology of healthy and diseased vessels, the time is ripe for development of novel macromolecular coatings that can protect the vessel lumen following balloon angioplasty and promote healthy vascular healing.

Antirestenotic mechanisms of everolimus on human coronary artery smooth muscle cells: inhibition of human coronary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation, but not migration

Everolimus, a pharmaceutical component of drug-eluting stents, inhibits coronary vessel restenosis, but the antirestenotic mechanisms of action remain unclear. Here, we describe the effects of everolimus on key contributors to vessel restenosis, smooth muscle cell proliferation, and migration. In a dose-dependent fashion, everolimus reduced human coronary artery smooth muscle cell (HCASMC) proliferation without toxicity in a bimodal fashion, with accentuated potency occurring at 10 μM. Everolimus arrested the majority of HCASMCs in G1-phase, whereas it reduced the fraction of cells in S-phase at doses that inhibited DNA synthesis (bromodeoxyuridine incorporation). Consistent with this, Western blotting demonstrated that everolimus reduced activation and expression of G1-phase cell cycle progression factors, including p70S6K and cyclin D, respectively, decreased levels of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and attenuated growth factor/serum-induced phosphorylation of the cell cycle phase transition intermediate, retinoblastoma protein. Everolimus did not, however, affect HCASMC migration. These observations suggest that everolimus acts as an antiproliferative, but not antimigratory, compound to account for at least some of the clinical efficacy exhibited by this drug as an antirestenotic agent. Moreover, everolimus-induced inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 and regulation of cyclin-mediated cell cycle progression actions likely account for the antiproliferative effects of this compound on HCASMCs.

Percutaneous coronary interventions affect concentrations of interleukin 6 and its soluble receptors in coronary sinus blood in patients with stable angina

Coronary stenting may create local inflammatory reaction. Interleukin 6 effects depend on the presence of soluble receptors (sIL-6R and sgp130) that facilitate or impede interleukin 6 signal transduction. Concentrations of interleukin 6 and its soluble receptors were assessed in aorta and coronary sinus after stenting in optimally treated stable angina patients scheduled for elective stenting. Baseline levels of interleukin 6 and its soluble receptors in patients did not differ from healthy controls. Initial levels of sIL-6R in aorta were significantly higher than in coronary sinus but this difference disappeared after intervention. Stenting caused interleukin 6 concentration increase to a similar extent both in coronary sinus and in aorta. Moreover, there was significantly higher sgp130 concentration in coronary sinus than in aorta. Coronary intervention increases concentration of interleukin 6 in patients with stable angina. It affects the cardiac level of interleukin 6 soluble receptors what may influence the local inflammatory reaction.

Safety and efficacy of antihypertensive therapy with add-on angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker after successful coronary stent implantation

This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of additional antihypertensive therapy with angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB; olmesartan or valsartan) after successful stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Fifty patients with CAD after successful stent implantation were included in this study. They were divided into an ARB group, which initially received olmesartan (n=20, 14+/-8 mg day(-1)) or valsartan (n=20, 60+/-23 mg day(-1)) immediately after stent implantation, and a non-ARB group (n=10) according to their blood pressure (BP). Follow-up coronary angiography, measurement of BP and blood sampling were performed before (at baseline) and 6-8 months after stent implantation (at follow-up). There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the groups, except for BP. Although there were no changes in % diameter restenosis between the groups, the BP level in the ARB group at follow-up showed a significant reduction (125+/-12/69+/-9 mm Hg) and reached the target BP. There were no critical adverse effects in the ARB group throughout the study period. In addition, serum high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and pentraxin 3 were significantly decreased in the ARB group but not in the non-ARB group. Although olmesartan and valsartan induced similar BP-lowering effects, olmesartan but not valsartan induced a significant decrease in hs-CRP, but did not increase serum uric acid. In conclusion, antihypertensive therapy with add-on low-dose ARB after stent implantation was safe and achieved the target BP. In particular, olmesartan had an anti-inflammatory effect.

Comparison of changes in early inflammatory markers between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation after coronary intervention identifies patients at increased risk of subsequent cardiac events. Cardiac events, especially in-stent restenosis, are less frequent after use of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) compared with paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). However, the underlying mechanism for this disparity is not well investigated. We hypothesize that an attenuated inflammatory response after SES implantation may be a contributor.

PURPOSE

In the present study, we sought to determine the early inflammatory response after SES implantation in patients with single-vessel disease compared with PES implantation, and evaluate the relationship between inflammatory response and late clinical outcomes in a randomized design.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with stable angina were randomly enrolled into the two groups, SES or PSE group (n = 16 respectively). Peripheral blood samples were taken before PCI, 24 and 72 h after stenting. The plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed at 8 months after stenting.

RESULTS

The data showed that there was no significant difference in clinical and angiographic baseline characteristics between the two groups. The plasma CRP and IL-6 levels at 24 h after stenting were significant higher in both groups compared with baseline (p < 0.01 respectively). Likewise, the CRP levels at 72 h after stenting were also significant higher compared with baseline in both groups (p < 0.01 respectively). However, the plasma levels of IL-6 at 24 h and CRP at 72 h after stenting were higher in PES group compared with SES group (p < 0.05). At 8 months follow-up, the rates of major adverse cardiac events, target lesion revascularization, in-stent and in-segment restenosis were similar in both groups. However, the late loss in both in-stent and in-segment was significantly higher in the PES group than in SES group (p < 0.001 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that a drug-eluting stent implantation could trigger a systemic inflammatory response as previously demonstrated. However, SES implantation results in a lower inflammatory response compared with PES implantation, which seems to be associated with greater late of in-stent and in-segment loss at 8-month follow-up with PES.