Confronting the challenge: individualized immune monitoring after organ transplantation using the cellular immune function assay

A semi-quantitative visual lateral flow immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection for the follow-up of immune response to vaccination or recovery

The lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) technique is largely employed for the point-of-care detection of antibodies especially for revealing the immune response in serum. Visual LFIAs usually provide the qualitative yes/no detection of antibodies, while quantification requires some equipment, making the assay more expensive and complicated. To achieve visual semi-quantification, the alignment of several lines (made of the same antigen) along a LFIA strip has been proposed. The numbering of the reacting lines has been used to correlate with the quantity of some biomarkers in serum. Here, we designed the first semiquantitative LFIA for detecting antibodies and applied it to classify the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 raised by vaccination or natural infection. We used a recombinant spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) as the specific capture reagent to draw two test lines. The detection reagent was selected among three possible ligands that are able to bind to anti-spike human antibodies: the same RBD, staphylococcal protein A, and anti-human immunoglobulin G antibodies. The most convenient detector, adsorbed on gold nanoparticles, was chosen based on the highest correlation with an antibody titre of 171 human sera, measured by a reference serological method, and was the RBD (Spearman's rho = 0.84). Incorporated into the semiquantitative LFIA, it confirmed the ability to discriminate high- and low-titre samples and to classify them into two classes (Dunn's test, P < 0.05). The proposed approach enabled the semiquantification of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 by the unaided eye observation, thus overcoming the requirement of costly and complicated equipment, and represents a general strategy for the development of semiquantitative serological LFIAs.

Noninvasive biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare disease of unclear etiology characterized by loss of self-tolerance that can lead to liver injury, cirrhosis, and acute liver failure. First-line treatment consists of systemic corticosteroids, or budesonide, and azathioprine, to which most patients are initially responsive, although predictors of response are lacking. Relapses are very common, correlate with histological activity despite normal serum transaminases, and increase hepatic fibrosis. Furthermore, current regimens lead to adverse effects and reduced quality of life, whereas medication titration is imprecise. Biomarkers that can predict the clinical course of disease, identify patients at elevated risk for relapse, and improve monitoring and medication dosing beyond current practice would have high clinical value. Herein, we review novel candidate biomarkers in adult and pediatric AIH based on prespecified criteria, including gene expression profiles, proteins, metabolites, and immune cell phenotypes in different stages of AIH. We also discuss biomarkers relevant to AIH from other immune diseases. We conclude with proposed future directions in which biomarker implementation into clinical practice could lead to advances in personalized therapeutic management of AIH.

Liver Graft MicroRNAs Expression in Different Etiology of Acute Jaundice after Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Background: Acute jaundice remains a critical problem following liver transplantation. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in regulating gene expression related to various disease phenotypes and statuses. Aims: To differentiate acute jaundice etiology after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), we examined the hepatic miRNA expression patterns in several liver graft pathologies. Methods: Eighty liver transplant recipients undergoing post-LDLT graft biopsy for the evaluation of acute jaundice were enrolled in this 1-year prospective study. Using a real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction profiling assay, we identified hepatic miRNA (miRNA-122, miRNA-301, miRNA-133a, and miRNA-21) signatures in various allografts pathologies. Results: Pathologic findings of the 80 recipients were as follows: acute cholangitis (AC), 37 (46%); acute rejection (AR), 20 (25%); recurrent hepatitis (RH), 12 (15%); non-specific pathological change, 6 (8%); and fatty change (FC), 5 (6%). None of these identified hepatic miRNAs expression pattern was significantly correlated with serum parameters, including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. In AC, hepatic miRNA-122, miRNA-301, miRNA-133a, and miRNA-21 expression was significantly downregulated (p < 0.05). MicroRNA-122 expression was elevated in cases of AR and RH (p < 0.05); miRNA-301 and miRNA-21 expression was higher in RH than in AC (p < 0.05); and miRNA-133a expression was higher in FC than in AR (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study suggests that specific hepatic miRNA expression patterns as a checklist may be useful for differential diagnosis of acute jaundice following liver transplantation.

Lymphocyte function based on IFN-γ secretion assay may be a promising indicator for assessing different immune status in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Immunological monitoring plays a crucial role in organ recipients for allowing tailoring of immunosuppression. However, there is still a paucity of promising indicators for detecting immune status in recipients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study to characterize the immune status by detecting dynamically lymphocyte subsets and function (represented by the abilities to secrete IFN-γ) in the first 6 months posttransplant in renal recipients. Participants were classified into an immune stable group, infected group, and rejected group.

RESULTS

In the stable group, our study suggested that the counts and function of CD4+ T, CD8+ T, and NK lymphocytes decreased to their nadir at week 2, and thereafter these indicators were gradually restored. The counts exceeded pre-operative levels, whereas function did not reach the pre-transplant levels by 6 months. We demonstrated that function of lymphocytes was considerably decreased in infected recipients compared with the stable group when infection occurred. By contrast, the function of lymphocytes was obviously increased at the point of rejection. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in the combination of subsets and function of lymphocytes presented a superior clinical value with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.903 in the diagnosis of infected receivers, and IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells% is the highest indicator with the auROC curve of 0.862. Another ROC analysis confirmed that IFN-γ+CD4  T cells% presented a preferable diagnostic value with an area of 0.887 for rejected recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the ability of lymphocyte subsets secreting IFN-γ may provide a promising assessment of immune status in recipients and allow timely modifying immunosuppression.

Advances in Rejection Management: Prevention and Treatment

Extended survival of liver transplant recipients has brought rejection management to the forefront of liver transplant research. This article discusses T-cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and chronic rejection. We focus on the prevention and then discuss treatment options. Future directions of rejection management include biomarkers of rejection, which may allow for monitoring of patients who are considered high risk for rejection and detection of rejection before there is any clinical evidence to improve graft and patient survival. With improved graft life and survival of liver transplant recipients, the new frontier of rejection management focuses on immunosuppression minimization, withdrawal, and personalization.

Pharmacodynamic Monitoring of mTOR Inhibitors

Pharmacodynamic (PD) monitoring may complement routine pharmacokinetic monitoring of mTOR inhibitors (mTORis) in an attempt to better guide individualized sirolimus (SRL) or everolimus (EVR) treatment after organ transplantation. This review focuses on current knowledge about PD biomarkers for personalized mTORi therapies. Different strategies have already been used in the evaluation of the pharmacodynamics of SRL and EVR as a proxy for their effects on the immune response after transplantation. These include measuring p70S6K (70 kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase) activity, p70S6K phosphorylation (P-p70S6K), or P-S6 protein expression. Compared with Western blot and ELISA, phosphoflow cytometry can detect phosphorylated proteins and differentiate activation-induced changes of signaling molecules inside the cell from unstimulated populations of identical cells in the same sample. Alternatively, in patients receiving a combined therapy, the other PD approach is to consider biomarkers such as NFAT residual expression for calcineurin inhibitors or to evaluate nonspecific effects of the drugs such as lymphocyte proliferation, interleukin synthesis, specific peripheral blood T regulatory subsets, or lymphocyte surface antigens, which have the advantage to reflect the overall immunosuppressive status achieved. Although limited, the available data on mTOR pathway biomarkers seem promising. Before clinical implementation, the analytical methodologies must be standardized and cross-validated, and the selected biomarkers will have to demonstrate their clinical utility for SRL or EVR dose individualization in multicenter clinical trials.

Analytical Aspects of the Implementation of Biomarkers in Clinical Transplantation

In response to the urgent need for new reliable biomarkers to complement the guidance of the immunosuppressive therapy, a huge number of biomarker candidates to be implemented in clinical practice have been introduced to the transplant community. This includes a diverse range of molecules with very different molecular weights, chemical and physical properties, ex vivo stabilities, in vivo kinetic behaviors, and levels of similarity to other molecules, etc. In addition, a large body of different analytical techniques and assay protocols can be used to measure biomarkers. Sometimes, a complex software-based data evaluation is a prerequisite for appropriate interpretation of the results and for their reporting. Although some analytical procedures are of great value for research purposes, they may be too complex for implementation in a clinical setting. Whereas the proof of "fitness for purpose" is appropriate for validation of biomarker assays used in exploratory drug development studies, a higher level of analytical validation must be achieved and eventually advanced analytical performance might be necessary before diagnostic application in transplantation medicine. A high level of consistency of results between laboratories and between methods (if applicable) should be obtained and maintained to make biomarkers effective instruments in support of therapeutic decisions. This overview focuses on preanalytical and analytical aspects to be considered for the implementation of new biomarkers for adjusting immunosuppression in a clinical setting and highlights critical points to be addressed on the way to make them suitable as diagnostic tools. These include but are not limited to appropriate method validation, standardization, education, automation, and commercialization.

Immune monitoring post liver transplant

Many of the causes of short and late morbidity following liver transplantation are associated with immunosuppression or immunosuppressive medications. Current care often involves close monitoring of liver biochemistry as well as therapeutic drug levels. However, the postoperative course following liver transplantation can often be associated with significant complications including infection and rejection, suggesting an inadequacy in current immune function monitoring. Many assays have been tested in the research setting to identify possible biomarkers that may be used to predict clinical events such as acute cellular rejection, and therefore allow modification of a patient’s immunosuppressive regimen prior to a clinical event. However, these generally require significant laboratory processing and have had difficulty becoming established in common clinical use outside the research setting. One assay, Cylex ImmuKnow has been food and drug administration approved but has had variable results. In this review we discuss the assays that have been used to assess monitoring of immune function after liver transplantation and consider possible future directions.

Cellular immune function monitoring after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: evaluation of a new assay

Managing the patient's immune system after haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a challenge, mainly in the unstable period immediately after the transplant. Currently there is no standardized non-invasive diagnostic tool for the evaluation of immunological complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and for managing the cellular immune function of the transplant recipient. The ImmuKnow assay for cellular immune function monitoring has been incorporated successfully into the clinical follow-up routine of solid organ transplant recipients. This study aims to explore the relevance and potential contribution of immune monitoring using the assay in the setting of HCT. We found that ImmuKnow-level measurement can distinguish between states of immune function quiescence and between events of acute GVHD. ImmuKnow levels were significantly higher in patients going through GVHD than the levels measured for the same patients during immunological stability. Moreover, we demonstrate a patient case where longitudinal monitoring using the ImmuKnow assay provided a trustworthy depiction of the patient's cellular immune function post-HCT. In conclusion, we provide evidence for the potential contribution of the ImmuKnow assay for longitudinal individualized cellular immune function monitoring of patients following HCT. Further studies are necessary in order to establish the optimal practice for utilizing the assay for this purpose.

Concise review: immunologic lessons from solid organ transplantation for stem cell-based therapies

Clinical organ transplantation became possible only after powerful immunosuppressive drugs became available to suppress the alloimmune response. After decades of solid organ transplantation, organ rejection is still a major challenge. However, significant insight into allorecognition has emerged from this vast experience and should be used to inform future stem cell-based therapies. For this reason, we review the current understanding of selected topics in transplant immunology that have not been prominent in the stem cell literature, including immune responses to ischemia/reperfusion injuries, natural killer cells, the adaptive immune response, some unresolved issues in T-cell allorecognition, costimulatory molecules, and the anticipated role of regulatory T cells in graft tolerance.

Cylex ImmuKnow Cell Function Assay

The use of immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Monitoring trough immunosuppression levels alone in transplant recipients is insufficient to gauge the suppression of immune responses. The ImmuKnow Immune Cell Function Assay (Cylex, Inc., Columbia, MD, USA) has been developed to measure the activity of CD4+ T cells as a marker of global immune-competence. The changes in T cell activation were correlated with the relative risk of rejection and infection. However, the most significant utility of the ImmuKnow test, in combination with other clinical parameters, is to identify immune-compromised patients and to help to tailor individualized immunosuppression regimens.